Papers

University students experience disproportionately high rates of common mental health conditions, such as depression, which can impair learning, social functioning, and overall well-being. Although lifestyle interventions such as mindfulness and physical activity can reduce the symptoms, many do not achieve symptomatic remission. Developing new approaches to identify students with poor outcomes could enable earlier and more targeted intervention. Machine learning (ML) methods have increasingly been used to predict remission in depressive patients. However, these ML models often suffer from class imbalance, where there may be an unequal proportion of people in the remitted group relative to the non-remitted group. This imbalance can reduce model accuracy and bias predictions. To address this, studies commonly employ the popular oversampling strategy SMOTE. However, SMOTE has a notable limitation: it may generate invalid synthetic minority samples. In a clinical context, these false positives can lead to incorrect risk stratification, potentially delaying necessary escalated care for patients unlikely to remit. In this paper, we introduce a novel and effective oversampling method that addresses this shortcoming. Our approach leverages the variance function of a Gaussian process to estimate the uncertainty of generated minority samples to reduce false positives. We validate our method on a depression dataset collected from university students and demonstrate that it is better than existing oversampling approaches in predicting remission (i.e., treatment outcome). By improving the reliable identification of non-responders, our method provides a robust computational tool to help clinicians rapidly pivot to adjunctive therapies, thereby personalizing and optimizing mental health care pathways.

Australian universities regulate students' use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) through overlapping policies, procedures, guidance, and assessment instructions, but these environments may classify identical conduct differently. We applied 15 standardized student-use vignettes to the public policy environments of 20 Australian universities and produced 300 university-case classifications. We analyzed binding instruments (Layer A) separately from the full official environment (Layer B), then classified each combination as clearly permitted, permitted with conditions, potential policy breach, clearly prohibited, or indeterminate. We measured cross-university divergence with normalized Shannon entropy. We classified 120 combinations (40.0%) as clearly prohibited, 97 (32.3%) as potential policy breaches, 27 (9.0%) as permitted with conditions, and 56 (18.7%) as indeterminate; none met the strict threshold for clearly permitted. Disclosed language rewriting and a disclosed AI-drafted paragraph produced the highest divergence, whereas an explicit assessment prohibition produced unanimity. Binding instruments remained silent on GenAI in 100 combinations, and guidance clarified 88. The primary researcher led the coding with AI assistance and manually reviewed all 201 queued rows. An independent human second coder, who used no AI assistance, coded a blind 75-row sample. Overall agreement reached 57.3% (unweighted Cohen's kappa = 0.395; bootstrap 95% CI [0.244, 0.539]). The findings distinguish permission-gated from disclosure-based architectures and show that written policies regulate the retention of AI-generated text more clearly than process-only assistance does. Comparative policy-vignette testing evaluates whether written governance supports defensible classifications; it does not predict misconduct or enforcement decisions.

Automated driving systems (ADSs) are increasingly operating on public roads, raising safety concerns, yet reliable prediction of crash injury severity remains difficult because crash reports are limited, severe outcomes are rare, and injury classes are highly imbalanced. Existing augmentation methods mainly increase minority-class sample size but rarely assess whether generated samples are credible for safety-critical prediction. This study proposes Expert-Committee Audit Screening (ECAS), a credibility-aware sample acceptance framework for ADS crash injury severity prediction under data imbalance. Using 1,477 incident-level ADS crashes from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Standing General Order records, ECAS audits generated minority samples through a real-data-only expert committee based on label support, boundary separation, committee agreement, and local plausibility. Within-class percentile normalization and Pareto non-dominated sorting select accepted samples without manually assigned evidence weights. With a fixed backbone combining normalizing flow augmentation and a Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN) classifier, the best ECAS configuration achieved the highest balanced accuracy, macro-F1, and minor-injury recall among all evidence configurations. Local neighborhood analysis showed that ECAS-accepted samples were better supported by nearby real minority crashes than unscreened retained samples. Shapley additive explanations and partial dependence plots further indicated that lower injury severity classes were mainly associated with crash counterpart and pre-crash movement, whereas moderate-plus injuries were more sensitive to posted speed limit and operating context. These findings support a shift from quantity-oriented augmentation to credibility-aware sample acceptance for ADS safety prediction and risk governance.

External human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) are evolving from predefined displays toward adaptive communication strategies that respond to changing traffic and road-user states. This transition requires experimental infrastructure that supports human-in-the-loop (HIL) interaction, software-in-the-loop (SIL) algorithm execution, reusable experiment orchestration, and synchronized multimodal human-factors evaluation. This paper presents TransCAVE-E, a distributed virtual-reality testbed for developing and validating adaptive and intelligent eHMIs. The platform integrates three coupled modules: a Scenario Design Center for configurable traffic environments and experimental conditions; an eHMI Algorithm Module for bidirectional real-time coupling between simulation and external algorithms; and a Data Management System that synchronizes trajectories, eye-tracking, physiological, system-log, and subjective data. A distributed multi-agent architecture supports synchronous interaction among pedestrians, human drivers, automated vehicles, and other traffic entities. Two use cases demonstrate the platform. In an AV-pedestrian experiment, an intent-recognition-based eHMI improved decision efficiency by 12.8% and 13.0% in yielding and non-yielding scenarios, reduced gaze distraction by 17.1% in the yielding scenario, and reduced unnecessary prompts by 40% in the non-yielding scenario while maintaining interaction safety. An HV-AV study further demonstrated real-time SIL validation of a game-theoretic information-disclosure strategy under active driver interaction. TransCAVE-E provides an extensible and reproducible infrastructure for closed-loop evaluation and iterative refinement of intelligent human-vehicle communication strategies.

Named Entity Recognition (NER) is a core NLP task, but transformer-based sentence-level models struggle with long documents because of fixed input-length limits: truncation drops content, and non-overlapping chunking fragments entities at segment boundaries. We introduce an inference-only pipeline that extends a frozen NER model, MahaNER-BERT, fine-tuned on the MahaNER corpus, to document-level prediction via overlapping sliding windows that are merged into a single annotation, without any retraining or architectural change. We evaluate the pipeline on six document-level corpora built from the MahaNER test set using two strategies: Normal Repeat, which duplicates sentence sequences to extend length while preserving contextual continuity, and Random Repeat, which concatenates distinct sequences to produce longer, heterogeneous inputs, each instantiated at three length levels, across several sliding-window configurations. The model retains a macro F1-score of up to 0.8902, with variation staying below one percentage point regardless of document length or construction strategy. Compared with the conventional non-windowed approach, the sliding-window pipeline avoids the boundary-fragmentation errors introduced by non-overlapping segmentation, yielding consistently higher and more stable document-level F1-scores.

SPEC CPU has long provided a common foundation for comparing processor, compiler, memory-system, and platform performance. Its multi-copy SPECrate mode measures homogeneous throughput by running many copies of the same benchmark at once. That mode remains valuable, but modern cloud and server systems commonly run heterogeneous collections of jobs whose interactions are shaped by shared caches, memory bandwidth, power management, operating-system scheduling, and noisy neighbors. SPEC CPU 2026 introduces Rolling Round-Robin Rate (RRR), an exhibition run style that uses the existing rate suites to generate deterministic heterogeneous multiprogrammed workloads. This paper describes RRR as a benchmark methodology and proposes a SPEC-like scoring model for future RRR reporting: compute per-benchmark average throughput and coefficient of variation from per-copy ratios, compute a SPEC-style geometric mean for each copy across the suite, and average that population of copy geomeans to form a suite score with its own coefficient of variation. RRR therefore preserves the familiar SPEC throughput tradition while exposing richer information about variability, interference, and heterogeneous-system behavior.

Automatic Post-Editing (APE) for low-resource languages (LRLs) often fails to improve Machine Translation (MT), and the score alone cannot say why: whether more training would help, or whether the training data is too inconsistent to learn from. We introduce a black-box, inference-time diagnostic that tells these two cases apart without retraining or annotation. It varies an edit-distance penalty $\lambda$ that drives the model from free editing towards copying the MT, and reads two signals: (1) the shape of the Translation Edit Rate (TER)-vs-$\lambda$ curve, U-shaped if edits from the model reduce error and monotonically decreasing if none does; and (2) the ordering of constraint variants that trust model confidence to increasing degrees, which shows whether confidence tracks edit quality. Across decoder-only and encoder-decoder models on English-Sinhala, the diagnostic exposes two failure modes consistent with a heterogeneous post-edit signal as the underlying cause: Binary Collapse, where the model copies the MT or makes off-target edits, and Confident Miscalibration, where the confidence signals we test do not separate useful edits from unnecessary ones. The pattern holds on English-Marathi and English-Tamil, with the failure modes tracking the post-edit distribution rather than MT quality or language family. Beyond diagnosis, the curve shape prescribes a concrete next step for practitioners; in the favorable case, a static constraint yields a free inference-time accuracy gain. We release the first English-Sinhala (~66k) and a new English-Tamil (~39k) APE datasets with all code.

Semi-supervised fine-grained visual recognition is highly vulnerable to overconfident pseudo-label errors: visually similar categories frequently produce high-confidence yet incorrect predictions, and consistency regularization then reinforces these errors throughout training. Existing semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods estimate pseudo-label reliability almost entirely from the visual classifier itself—maximum probability, adaptive thresholds, or entropy—signals that remain blind to whether a predicted class is semantically compatible with the visual representation. We propose ReCalMatch, a reliability-calibrated semantic framework for semi-supervised fine-grained recognition. Rather than treating textual semantics as auxiliary supervision, ReCalMatch uses multi-aspect semantic prototypes as calibration evidence for pseudo-label learning. We construct class-conditioned semantic prototypes from class names and domain-specific semantic aspects, and measure a visual–semantic agreement score between each unlabeled embedding and its pseudo-label prototype. This agreement is combined with prediction confidence and entropy into a single reliability weight that down-weights pseudo-labels that are visually confident but semantically inconsistent. A semantic consistency term and a semantic margin regularizer further sharpen prototype separability under limited labels. Extensive experiments on CUB-200-2011, Stanford Dogs, NABirds, and iNaturalist18 show that ReCalMatch consistently improves strong SSL baselines, with the largest gains in low-label regimes where pseudo-label noise is most severe.

Sequential task updates are fundamental to continual learning, but their recency bias can impose a lasting performance cost. We study this cost in an overparameterized linear-regression model with i.i.d. task sampling. We prove that distribution-level forgetting and population loss converge to the same stationary limit. We quantify the additional loss incurred by sequential exact fitting, or the sequential price. In more homogeneous task geometries, it equals the intrinsic loss asymptotically attained by joint training, making the total loss twice as large. We further analyze fixed-strength elastic weight consolidation (EWC) under general task curvatures and characterize its stationary sequential price at every regularization strength. Under strong regularization, the price decays inversely with EWC strength while the mean-square coupling horizon grows proportionally. Experiments on Jester and Rotated MNIST support the predicted sequential price and its reduction by EWC, with quantitative agreement on real-world tasks satisfying the theory's assumptions and qualitative agreement under nonlinear finite-step training.

In practical machine learning tasks, data are often contaminated with noise, outliers, and class imbalance, which can degrade the performance of conventional models. While random vector functional link (RVFL) networks offer fast training and strong generalization, they do not explicitly handle uncertainty or exploit local data structure. To address these limitations, we propose a fuzzy granular-ball random vector functional link (GBFRVFL) framework that leverages granular-ball computing to abstract raw samples into adaptive granular balls. Within this framework, we introduce two membership assignment schemes: (i) F-GBRVFL, which incorporates fuzzy membership to quantify the reliability of each granular ball, and (ii) SDAP-GBRVFL, which we propose, incorporates a novel statistical density-adaptive pythagorean membership (SDAPM) scheme that dynamically adjusts membership and non-membership values based on class variance, local sparsity, and granular-ball compactness. These schemes enhance robustness to noise, outliers, class imbalance, and uncertainty in granular-ball distributions, while retaining the computational efficiency of RVFL networks. Extensive experiments on 37 benchmark UCI and KEEL datasets under both clean and noisy conditions demonstrate that the proposed models consistently outperform baseline models, achieving superior accuracy and stability. The results validate the effectiveness of integrating granular-ball computing with adaptive membership schemes for reliable, scalable, and noise-tolerant learning.

Robot learning now advances along two tracks that rarely meet. On one side, direct Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies map observations to actions and are scored by closed-loop task success. On the other, predictive and generative world models forecast future observations and are scored by open-loop prediction or generation quality. A natural question sits between them: does world modelling earn a measurable, closed-loop advantage over a direct policy, and for which robotic capabilities? We argue that the field cannot yet answer this question, and that the reason is a gap in how it is measured, not in the models themselves. World-model benchmarks score prediction without ever executing it, while task-success suites host a single policy and never build a world-model versus VLA contrast. This survey maps the evaluation landscape around that gap. We catalogue 160 web-verified benchmarks spanning 2017 to 2026 and organise them by evaluation mode, robotic capability, and model family into four lanes: policy suites, embodied agents, world model evaluation, and prediction-to-action bridges. Across the corpus, 138 of 160 benchmarks are model-agnostic and only 11 (7%) build an explicit VLA-versus-world-model contrast; counterfactual capability is almost entirely unmeasured, and only four benchmarks turn prediction into executed action. We contribute an operational taxonomy, a coverage comparison against the eight closest surveys (ours is the only one to cross capability with model family), an evaluation loop that isolates the advantage of prediction, and an actionable protocol of four advantage-aware metrics anchored on named testbeds. The organising claim is not that world models help or do not help, but that answering the question requires benchmarks built to ask it.

Large language model agents increasingly automate data workflows, but end-to-end cloud data engineering and analytical execution require reliable coordination across code, data, infrastructure, and runtime environments. We present two zero-trust frameworks. Zero-Trust Agentic Data Engineering generates, deploys, and verifies complete cloud data-engineering solutions from natural-language tasks, with completion conditioned on repository, deployment, runtime, and policy evidence. Zero-Trust Agentic OLAP combines governed Data Preparation with verified Online Analytical Processing (OLAP), permitting production promotion only after validation and evidence-bound approval, and releasing analytical answers only after Same-Snapshot Execution, Exact Result Equivalence, deterministic grounding, and reflection. Both frameworks share three abstractions: graph engineering for evidence-gated workflow structure, loop engineering for bounded recovery, and agent-harness engineering for zero-trust execution. We evaluate both frameworks under nominal execution, controlled failures, bounded recovery, and policy-constrained conditions, measuring verified completion, recovery, authorization enforcement, production promotion, and verified OLAP execution.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven effective in enhancing the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs), particularly in complex mathematical and programming tasks. However, this capability comes with systematic length misallocation, in which models devote excessive reasoning to simple questions while terminating prematurely on harder ones, degrading inference efficiency with negligible accuracy improvement. Many length-adaptive methods mitigate this issue by allocating token budgets according to question difficulty, under the implicit assumption that harder questions benefit monotonically from extended reasoning. In contrast, we find that the effect of reasoning length on accuracy is concentrated on partially solvable questions. Our further analysis reveals that explicit length rewards can produce unintended training dynamics. Motivated by these findings, we propose CARE—Contrastive Accuracy Reward Estimation—which compares the beneficial length adjustment per question from online sampled responses and applies adaptive length rewards within Group Relative Policy Optimization, with no extra hyperparameters or additional inference cost. Experiments across multiple reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method improves Pass@1 by up to \(4\%\) while simultaneously reducing reasoning length by \(37\%\), achieving higher token efficiency. Code will be available upon the acceptance of this paper.

White blood cells (WBCs) present on every Giemsa-stained thick blood smear share visual properties with early-stage Plasmodium falciparum ring-form trophozoites: small size, round morphology, and intense purple staining. They are a plausible but untested source of false positives in parasite-only detectors. We trained two YOLOv12s models on the Lacuna Malaria Detection dataset (8,000 images from Uganda and Ghana): Model A with parasite labels only, and Model B with both parasite and WBC labels. Seven independent spatial and statistical analyses tested whether false positive (FP) predictions cluster near WBC locations. All seven refute the hypothesis. In both models, 95% of FPs are pure background detections (IoU below 0.10 against any ground-truth box); zero are WBC class confusions. Ripley's Cross-K analysis shows spatial repulsion between FP centroids and WBC positions at every radius tested. Model B outperforms Model A overall (mAP50 0.859 vs. 0.755), and the advantage is uniform across all WBC-proximity bands, pointing to multi-task representation learning rather than WBC suppression as the cause. False positives arise from Giemsa stain debris and preparation artifacts. Effective mitigation requires staining artifact augmentation and annotation of unannotated early-stage ring forms rather than WBC labeling alone.

Multimodal fake news detection (FND) increasingly demands verdicts that are not only accurate but traceable, revealing how cross-modal evidence is combined, yet two coupled difficulties remain. First, text-image relations are heterogeneous: uniqueness, redundancy, and synergy coexist and vary from post to post, so a single global fusion rule is brittle and opaque. Second, the dominant modality shifts across instances, which static encoders and a fixed fusion pathway handle poorly. We present IMEX-FND, an interaction-aware mixture-of-experts framework that couples adaptive routing with explicit interaction decomposition. A Multi-Modal Expert Gateway (MMEG) performs instance-wise, within-modality routing over specialized and shared experts and builds a CLIP-grounded cross-modal stream, yielding three refined, interaction-ready representations that adapt to the dominant modality of each post. An Interaction-aware Multi-Modal Expert Fusion (IMEF) module then decomposes the interactions among these streams into uniqueness, redundancy, and synergy, producing transparent, sample-wise weights via a modality-replacement training signal. The two stages form a single route-then-decompose pipeline whose routing and interaction weights are both inspectable, offering instance- and dataset-level traceability for misinformation diagnosis. Extensive experiments on the Weibo, Weibo-21, and Gossip benchmarks show that IMEX-FND achieves state-of-the-art performance, surpassing competitive baselines by 0.4-1.2% while offering superior traceability with fewer parameters.

Modeling the underlying user intent is crucial for recommendation, but existing methods struggle with the inherent uncertainty and the dynamic, hierarchical nature of user interests. Current approaches often rely on clustering or prototype learning to discover a static set of intents. However, they face two critical challenges: (1) they overlook the uncertainty inherent in multimodal features; and (2) they assume a static and flat intent structure, failing to adapt to a user's varying decision certainty. To address these limitations, we propose UHIFlow, an Uncertainty-aware Hierarchical Intent learning framework via Flow matching. First, our Cross-modal Uncertainty Synergistic Modeling (CUSM) module leverages conditional flow matching to quantify uncertainty from visual and textual modalities and synergistically align them. Subsequently, the Uncertainty-guided Hierarchical Intent Generation (UHIG) module uses this quantified uncertainty to dynamically construct a personalized intent hierarchy, generating coarse-grained intents for uncertain users and fine-grained ones for users with clear preferences. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that UHIFlow significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Social virtual reality (VR) creates a paradox. A user's body motion is a high-entropy biometric: head and hand trajectories alone re-identify users among tens of thousands with over $94\%$ accuracy, so anonymizing the rendered avatar is a practical necessity. Yet a user often still wants to prove their identity to a chosen party from inside that anonymity. We present MoSign, which recasts digital watermarking as a challenge-response authentication protocol on the motion channel. MoSign embeds a time-varying keyed message into the style latent of a motion variational autoencoder via keystream-whitened Gaussian-Shading: watermarked motion is provably indistinguishable from watermark-free motion, since any detector's advantage reduces to breaking a pseudorandom function, so the mark composes with anonymization. The message is a keyed MAC over an epoch counter, a session nonce, and a deployment context, making MoSign replay-resistant and bounding forgery by the verifier's measured false-accept rate times the adversary's online query budget. A key-holding verifier decides with a sequential test. We identify render$\rightarrow$record$\rightarrow$re-estimate ("recapture") as the realistic VR attack surface: a generic pose estimator strips the necessarily subtle watermark, but a recapture-robust keyed reader recovers it (up to $0.96$ codeword accuracy on a projected-2D channel, $0.81$ through a full render-to-video loop), while without the key recovery stays at chance. On HumanML3D, MoSign authenticates every legitimate user at a false-accept rate of $10^{-4}$ on clean and most channels and stays undetectable (detection AUC $0.51$, chance $0.5$); on the BOXRR-23 VR dataset it carries the mark through a real anonymizer at $0.99$ codeword accuracy and adds no de-anonymization side channel.

Distributed Volt–VAR control relies on voltage measurements and is therefore vulnerable to false-data injection. Neighbor corroboration can distinguish an isolated corrupted measurement from a physical disturbance, but coordinated agents can falsely corroborate one another. This paper proposes DynaTrust-VVC, a cyber-resilient multi-agent Volt–VAR framework that assigns each incoming neighbor message a directional trust value based on the consistency between its reported voltage increment and a sensitivity-based prediction from active- and reactive-power changes. Trust falls immediately after a physics mismatch and recovers gradually after sustained consistency. DynaTrust-VVC further uses a physics-adaptive evidence threshold and counterfactual safe-voltage recovery-based mitigation. The proposed method was validated using a nonlinear IEEE 123-bus feeder with minute-resolution residential profiles and 27 matched replicates. DynaTrust-VVC identifies a coordinated three-bus attack one minute after onset in all 27 matched replicates, whereas an otherwise identical configuration with fixed neighbor trust identifies none. The composite resilience index also increases from 0.227 to 0.315, with no statistically significant increase in the benign false-alarm rate.

Spectrum governance requires rules to be translated into machine-executable decisions while preserving incumbent protection, regulatory authority, and an auditable record of why a decision was made. We present SPECTRA-GOV, a Tri-Layer Adaptive Governance Architecture (TLAGA) connecting international treaty coordination, national adaptive licensing, and real-time enforcement. The work builds on the original reference implementation preserved at v0.1.0-paper and adds a post-audit evaluation layer rather than replacing it. V2 introduces controlled spectral-contention scenarios, corrected geodesic-distance calculation, per-operator selective authorization, paired baseline counterfactuals, policy perturbation, regulatory-change analysis, and causal provenance. Across 10,000 scenarios in each of seven contention classes, incumbent protection was 100.00% in the no-contention control, 99.92-99.87% in weak-to-dynamic classes, 99.47% under strong overlap, and 90.00% in the adversarial close-proximity class. In a paired S3 baseline experiment, selective authorization achieved 100% incumbent protection and 89.43% access opportunity, while the population-wide dynamic baseline achieved 99.91% protection and 99.53% access. Identical results for the dynamic-SAS and SPECTRA-GOV selective variants mean selective admission alone is not claimed as an exclusive algorithmic novelty. The contribution is the integration of policy representation, computational enforcement, auditability, provenance. Enforcement timing was measured in-process, with mean latency increasing from 0.028 ms for one operator to 1.682 ms for 500 operators; these are software benchmarks, not field measurements. The results establish a reproducible computational governance prototype and identify remaining questions before operational or regulatory claims can be made.

Hybrid quantum-classical neural networks have emerged as a promising approach for leveraging quantum computing in machine learning while mitigating current hardware limitations. This paper presents Sim-HVQC, a hybrid Deep Quantum Neural Network that couples an adaptive, parameter-free SimAM weighting module with classical feature extraction to preserve class-discriminative information prior to encoding into a Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC). Previous studies are restricted to binary classification [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. In contrast, the proposed framework is trained and evaluated on various multi-class datasets(MNIST, KMNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and EMNIST). The framework further demonstrates reproducibility, parameter efficiency, and interpretability through multi-seed evaluation, parameter analysis, and latent/quantum feature inspection. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/Dilli822/ SimAM-HVQC

Quantum-enabled learning is increasingly being explored for future communication and networking applications, including distributed sensing, Internet of Things (IoT), and distributed quantum computing. However, existing approaches often face challenges in scalable inference and efficient information processing. To address these limitations, this paper integrates quantum machine learning (QML) with quantum semantic communication (QSemCom) in an end-to-end learning framework. A classical dataset is first mapped to a low-dimensional feature representation and encoded by a variational quantum transmitter that learns task-relevant semantic features. The resulting features are transmitted through a quantum channel and processed by a receiver to perform a downstream classification task. The proposed framework is evaluated using the MNIST dataset and variational quantum neural networks (QNNs) under ideal and noisy quantum-channel conditions. First, a baseline model is trained over an ideal channel and evaluated under increasing depolarizing noise without retraining. A second set of experiments introduces a trainable receiver QNN and jointly optimizes the transmitter and receiver through end-to-end (E2E) training. The results demonstrate that jointly trained quantum semantic transceivers can adapt the transmitted representation to channel impairments and preserve task-relevant information, highlighting the potential of receiver-aware QML for robust inference in quantum semantic communication.

The rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) creates new opportunities for strategic content generation on online platforms, including potentially harmful forms of manipulation that may undermine platform effectiveness and reshape platform dynamics. However, measuring such activity is difficult because AI-generated content is rarely directly observable. We introduce an empirical approach that leverages discrete LLM supply shocks - abrupt changes in model prices and capabilities, and contrasts verified with non-verified reviews to identify changes in platform activity associated with generative AI supply improvements. We apply this approach to more than 13 million reviews from Trustpilot, one of the leading online platforms for business reviews. A robust finding is that following LLM supply shocks, unverified reviews shift toward greater negativity: more 1-stars, fewer 5-stars, and lower ratings, with effects driven primarily by new model releases and concentrated among firms with the lowest and highest review volumes, suggesting that strategic AI use may reshape platform competition dynamics. We further find that LLM supply shocks trigger short, concentrated bursts of review activity. Together, these findings suggest that generative AI is already reshaping how reputation and competition operate on online platforms.

We study Hierarchical Reasoning Model (HRM), a representative hierarchical Transformer-based latent reasoning model with many variants, on Sudoku, Maze, and ARC-AGI-2. We mechanistically understand how HRM reasons and what information it encodes. Our analyses compare HRM against Transformer baselines with and without recurrent modules, apply causal interventions on recurrent states, and utilize linear probes against random-direction ablations, as well as sparse autoencoders with feature ablations. Our results reveal several key findings: recurrent models outperform one-pass baselines, while single-state recurrent Transformers are comparable to HRM. State interventions further show that the causal contributions of the high- and low-level states vary across task-specific checkpoints and inference stages. Selected task variables are linearly decodable from the recurrent states in HRM, yet ablating probe directions produce effects comparable to random controls. SAE ablations yield larger behavioral changes than probe-direction ablations. However, top-ranked SAE features show no stable advantage over size-matched random subsets at larger ablation sizes or across tasks; the same pattern persists in a Sudoku control with within-step BPTT. Together, we characterize that HRM is essentially implementing constraint-aware iterative refinement on a puzzle-specific solution state, in which the functional contributions of components at different levels vary without relying on a compact, causally important feature set. These results highlight the necessity of studying the different working mechanisms and the importance of developing mechanistic interpretability techniques better suited for latent-space, recursive reasoning models.

We present EvoRank, an open autonomous ranking engineer: an LLM-guided evolutionary loop that discovers complete Learning-to-Rank pipelines (features, models, losses, ensembles) for multi-objective e-commerce search. On the Expedia ICDM 2013 dataset, with relevance, conversion, and revenue as competing objectives, three independent runs each converge within 50 iterations (about ten dollars) on interpretable pipelines that beat an Optuna-tuned LambdaMART on 60k held-out queries, an advantage that persists at full data scale and places in the top 6 percent of the original competition. A first campaign, evolving only training objectives, builds the central design rule: it appeared to work on its selection fold (the small dataset it uses to pick winners) while a transfer audit, re-scoring winners on held-out data, showed the gains were almost entirely fitness noise (the randomness of its own scoring), and neither seeded domain knowledge nor richer diagnostic feedback changed what transferred. The deciding quantity is measurable in advance: search-space headroom relative to fitness noise. We package this as a headroom gate that predicts, before any LLM spend, whether the loop will pay off, and we release the system, the auditing tools, and a catalog of failure modes with their guardrails, so teams can apply the procedure to their own ranking stacks.

Large language models can convincingly adopt personas, recall past dialogues, and weave rich autobiographies. Yet this conversational eloquence conceals a fundamental attribution problem: looking the part does not mean having lived the life. Two individuals can share identical public profiles–the same age, hometown, occupation, and personality traits–while possessing entirely distinct private histories, relationships, and acquired skills. When conditioned solely on that shared profile, an agent lacks the information required to determine which lineage is correct. We introduce the Situated Identity Test (SIT), an architecture-independent framework that evaluates whether an agent's behavior is functionally attributable to a specific developmental lineage. Grounded identity requires both appropriate knowledge of recorded experiences and appropriate ignorance of ungrounded ones, bounded by what the identity has actually acquired rather than what its underlying foundation model knows. We prove that any policy conditioned solely on a compressed profile is bounded by an average situated validity of at most 1/m across m colliding life histories on lineage-discriminative queries (at most 50% for paired lineages). We instantiate this framework in SITBench, an evaluation suite designed for 25 profile-collision pairs (50 distinct lineages) across 10,000 planned probes and nine architectural configurations. Supported by an open-source reference implementation, deterministic test fixtures, and empirical pilot evaluations on frontier foundation models (GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5), we formalize the failure modes of persona prompting under profile collision and provide an assurance harness for evaluating episodic continuity, structured state, and epistemic boundaries.

Neural correlates of spatial cognitive map are well documented, yet exactly how neural circuits perform spatial navigation in complex environments - e.g., reaching a goal while avoiding obstacles - remains largely unclear. Here, we show that a hippocampal network with appropriate recurrent connections can naturally achieve optimal goal-directed navigation via its relaxation dynamics. Specifically, we consider that the recurrent weights between the neurons represent the transition probabilities between spatial locations encoded by neurons; obstacles such as walls and blocked corridors are therefore reflected by the vanishing of connection weights. This connection pattern can be learned in the hippocampus via behavioral-timescale synaptic plasticity (BTSP) while the animal is exploring the environment. When a goal signal is presented, the network dynamics will relax into an activity field representing the goal location. We prove that this field is mathematically equivalent to the desirability field of a Linearly-solvable Markov Decision Process (LMDP), and the local log-gradient of the field indicates the navigation direction. Both theoretical analyses and simulations demonstrate that this recurrent network dynamics-mediated navigation is efficient and robust in environments with complex obstacle layouts. Moreover, only low-rank updates of the network's connection pattern are needed when the environment has local changes. We hope this study offers insight into a general circuit principle for planning in abstract rational maps in the brain beyond spatial navigation.

Option-critic learns options: sub-policies together with a learned rule for when each one hands control back. Its headline result is that performance improves as options are added. We explain that result, with theory and experiment. First, the termination rule option-critic learns by maximising return contributes nothing. When the termination test and the policy that picks options read the same values, the test fires at every step, so the learned rule is identical to always terminating. When that policy explores and the test does not, as in option-critic itself, the rule can block the exploration; there are instances where it suffers $\Omega(T)$ regret while always terminating holds to $O(\log T)$. Forcing termination at every step leaves the option-count curve intact. Second, the policy inside an option barely explores at all, so a state locks onto the first action that looked good and never updates again. We name this policy necrosis, give a state-level test for it, and find three fifths of states necrotic in a typical option. Restoring exploration repairs those states, and one option then solves the task. Third, extra options improve no option; what falls is the chance that all of them fail in the same state, from $59\\%$ to $4\\%$, and performance follows that joint quantity.

With the rapid growth of live-streaming e-commerce and digital marketing, abnormal marketing behaviors have become increasingly concealed and coordinated across heterogeneous modalities, challenging platform governance and early risk identification. We propose MM-FGDNet, a data-driven multimodal framework for detecting abnormal behavior in large-scale live-streaming environments from complementary temporal-evolution and group-structure perspectives. A cross-modal temporal alignment module maps video, text, audio, and user behavior into a unified temporal semantic space. A temporal fraud-pattern module captures the progression from weak early signals to abrupt outbreaks, while a cooperative manipulation module identifies coordinated interactions among organized user groups and automated accounts. Experiments on real-world multi-platform live-streaming e-commerce datasets show that MM-FGDNet outperforms representative baselines, achieving an AUC of 0.927, F1 of 0.847, precision of 0.861, recall of 0.834, and an Early Detection Score of 0.689, while reducing false alarms. Ablation studies validate the contribution of each module, and cross-domain experiments demonstrate stable generalization to new streamers, product categories, and platforms. These results indicate that MM-FGDNet provides an effective and scalable solution for proactive detection of coordinated abnormal behavior in live-streaming systems.

Forecasting a correlation or covariance matrix is common in risk management and portfolio construction, but evaluating such a forecast correctly is not routine: naive matrix-comparison metrics are not proper scoring rules, walk-forward evaluation windows are easy to overlap with the estimation window in ways that silently leak information, and significance testing on serially dependent forecast-error sequences needs machinery few analysts implement from scratch. corrscore is a Python package that provides matrix-aware implementations of two established proper scoring rules for this setting – the energy score and the variogram score – dispatched across a closed-form tractability spectrum (point, discrete-mixture, and isotropic-Gaussian-mixture forecasts are scored exactly; a general Monte Carlo ensemble falls back to sampling), a geometry-aware variant of the variogram score built from the affine-invariant distance on the correlation manifold, a zero-overlap-by-construction walk-forward backtest harness, and a bundled significance-testing suite (circular block bootstrap, the Diebold-Mariano test, and the Model Confidence Set). We describe the package's design, its point of departure from the existing scoringRules and properscoring packages, and walk through a complete worked example.

Prediction error is widely used to evaluate nuisance-function estimators in causal inference, but its relationship with the performance of the resulting causal estimator is not well understood. We studied this question in a partially linear model using Monte Carlo simulations, comparing ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized additive models (GAMs), XGBoost, and Double Machine Learning with XGBoost (DML-XGBoost) with independent and with clustered observations. We evaluated nuisance-function prediction error, bias, RMSE, and 95% confidence interval coverage, and derived the second-order remainder through which errors in the exposure and outcome nuisance functions jointly determine the bias of the residualized estimator. When all methods estimated the causal effect from the same training sample, DML-XGBoost had the lowest RMSE and the highest coverage among the non-oracle methods, although XGBoost fitted to the full training sample had lower out-of-sample prediction error for both nuisance functions. GAMs had the lowest prediction error of all methods but were biased, with coverage of 0.55 with independent observations. The remainder reproduced the average bias of OLS, GAMs, and DML-XGBoost, but only half to three-quarters of the bias of XGBoost, whose residuals were formed on the data used to fit it. A joint-error measure based on the absolute cross-product of the two nuisance errors was only weakly associated with causal bias. Prediction error is useful for assessing nuisance-function estimation, but it should not be treated as a direct measure of the quality of the resulting causal estimator.