Peer Revenue Past citations are no guarantee of future returns

Papers

Fresh from arXiv, typeset properly. Highlighted words trade on the market.

Computer Science Computation and Language

cs.CL Watch Computation and Language

Wednesday 29 July

Computation and Language

Contrastive ESA: Human Evaluation of Multiple Translations at Once

Vilém Zouhar, Roman Grundkiewicz, Sara Rajaee et al. (+6 more)

Current human evaluation of machine translation typically assesses single outputs in isolation, a paradigm that suffers from high annotator noise and cost. We introduce Contrastive Error Span Annotation (cESA), a protocol that presents multiple translations of the source input (text, video, audio, image). In cESA, the annotator sees multiple translations of the same document, marks major and minor error spans, and then assigns a score from 0% to 100% on absolute scale. By allowing annotators to access the shared context across multiple outputs, cESA facilitates more consistent and efficient judgments. We validate cESA using a large-scale human evaluation of English->Japanese translations of 12 models, demonstrating reductions in annotation time and noise compared to standard pointwise evaluation. Unlike existing contrastive ranking methods, cESA yields absolute quality judgments that enable simple, interpretable non-parametric model rankings without the need for post-hoc corrections.
Read the full abstract

All authors Vilém Zouhar, Roman Grundkiewicz, Sara Rajaee, Parker Riley, Martin Popel, Rachel Bawden, Philipp Koehn, Marine Carpuat, Tom Kocmi

Computation and Language

Filesystem-Based Memory for LLM Agents: Organization, Evolution, and Sustainability

Sizhe Zhou, Sheldon Yu, Hui Wei et al. (+8 more)

Deployed LLM agents increasingly keep their long-term memory as a filesystem: a directory tree of markdown files that the agent itself reads, writes, and reorganizes through generic file tools. Yet research has largely passed over this medium: prior systems design bespoke memory representations and study retrieval over them, leaving the default's two working assumptions untested: that an agent can keep a growing store organized as memories accumulate, conflict, and go stale, and that this organization pays. We present the first systematic exploration of filesystem-based memory for LLM agents. We formalize the setting as three roles around one memory filesystem: a management agent integrates and organizes incoming content, a search agent answers queries with cited sources, and an execution agent supplies task trajectories that are distilled into skills, unifying declarative memory and skills in a single store. Across long-conversation benchmarks and embodied tasks, we vary memory shape (agent-organized hierarchy, verbatim dump, chunk retrieval), stream scale, tool harness (sandboxed shell, memory-tool-style functions, varied search tooling), and the strengths of the management and search agents, tracking answer quality, cost, and store health as memory grows. What organization reliably buys is search economy: organized stores roughly halve retrieval cost where material is large. Today's agents, however, fall short of the default's promise: in our growth study, organization erodes for all but the strongest management agent, and no agent we measure converts organization itself into better answers. And the model is not the only lever over a store's shape: changing the tool set alone reshapes the store as strongly as swapping the model. The study turns the filesystem default from an assumption into a design space for agent memory.
Read the full abstract

All authors Sizhe Zhou, Sheldon Yu, Hui Wei, Junda Wu, Siru Ouyang, Yizhu Jiao, Shijia Pan, Julian McAuley, Yu Zhang, Tong Yu, Jiawei Han

Computation and Language

Revisiting Lossy Verification in Speculative Decoding: Mechanisms, Trade-offs, and Failure Modes

Tianyu Wang, Yuxuan Zhou, Heng Li et al. (+4 more)

Speculative Decoding (SD) accelerates large language model inference by allowing a lightweight draft model to propose tokens that are subsequently verified in parallel by a larger target model. Recent approaches introduce lossy verification schemes to further improve efficiency by relaxing strict distributional matching. Yet such relaxation silently rewrites the decoding distribution, and the resulting acceleration can come at the cost of unstable, sometimes severely degraded generation quality. In this work, we present a principled analysis of the distributions induced by lossy verification methods. We show that many seemingly distinct approaches differ only superficially and can be unified into two categories: truncation-based verification and collaborative verification. We further construct a diagnostic evaluation framework across curated benchmarks. For truncation-based methods, we identify a fundamental pitfall-performance can degrade significantly compared to the true truncation sampling baseline due to distributional distortion. For collaborative verification, we reveal that well-designed relaxation principles, namely overshoot suppression and supervision quality, matter far more than the linear interpolation between draft and target. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZhouYuxuanYX/Fast-HSD.
Read the full abstract

All authors Tianyu Wang, Yuxuan Zhou, Heng Li, Wenbin Wang, Zikai Xiao, Chunrui Zheng, Junyuan Shang

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG

FedWeave: Rethinking the Unit of Specialization in Heterogeneous Federated MoE-LoRA

Donghang Duan, Xu Zheng, Lizong Zhang et al. (+2 more)

Federated PEFT enables LLMs to collaboratively adapt to decentralized private data without sharing raw examples. However, task heterogeneity across clients can cause cross-task interference and gradient conflicts during aggregation. Federated MoE-LoRA addresses this challenge through specialized LoRA experts and conditional routing. Yet existing methods typically specialize at client granularity, implicitly assuming task-coherent clients. Our core insight is that experts need purity, namely pattern-coherent updates that preserve specialization, whereas routers need contrast, namely mixed-task observations that support expert comparison. We propose FedWeave, a framework that adopts asymmetric aggregation, separating expert aggregation from router optimization to meet these two requirements. FedWeave uses unsupervised prototype discovery to form local buckets and align them across clients, enabling prototype-level expert aggregation while retaining mixed-task client trajectories for router training. At inference, FedWeave performs sparse inference with one active expert while preserving nearly all soft-routing performance. Our theoretical analysis explains why asymmetric aggregation is advantageous: it controls expert convergence in stationarity through off-pattern contamination, identifies the consensus error induced by fragmented router trajectories, and bounds sparse-inference risk. On a heterogeneous multi-task benchmark with mainstream LLM backbones, FedWeave consistently outperforms strong baselines, while ablations verify the effectiveness of our design.
Read the full abstract

All authors Donghang Duan, Xu Zheng, Lizong Zhang, Chong Mu, Meng Han

Computation and Language

WikiLoop: Jointly Learning to Build and Navigate Agent-Native Wikis with Downstream Feedback

Haoliang Ming, Feifei Li and Wenhui Que

Knowledge-base construction and querying are typically optimized in isolation: retrieval-augmented agents operate over a fixed, externally maintained index, whereas construction receives no signal from downstream use. We present WikiLoop, a feedback-coupled framework that jointly learns to build and navigate an agent-native Wiki, a persistent linked-page knowledge base designed for machine navigation. A role-conditioned shared policy supports two interfaces: a Navigator retrieves evidence from the Wiki to answer queries, and a Builder proposes structured edits evaluated through downstream navigation. The Navigator follows a sufficiency-before-efficiency objective that applies retrieval-cost penalties only after full evidence has been collected. The Builder learns from utility differences: a frozen Navigator scores each candidate edit by its change in downstream performance, while a guard penalty discourages regressions on unrelated queries. Training combines sequential role-specific optimization with a final joint stage over role-homogeneous batches. With Qwen3.5-9B as the common backbone, WikiLoop reaches 62.6 aggregate Answer Correctness on AuthTrace, 6.3 points above LLM-Wiki, base, with the largest gains on multi-document queries. Controlled comparisons support the intended effects of both objectives, and the learned edits remain useful to a held-out Navigator. Paired comparisons indicate that the final shared policy largely retains both role-specific capabilities, improves Navigator and end-to-end Answer Correctness by 0.4 points relative to the corresponding specialist references, and consolidates both interfaces into one model. Without dataset-specific training, WikiLoop also improves over the same-backbone LLM-Wiki, base on HotpotQA and MuSiQue.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.MA

Living-Harness Is an Interactive-Agent Evolver

Yuetian Du, Yucheng Wang, He Xu et al. (+9 more)

Large language model (LLM) agents may recover from a failure within an episode or after a retry, yet the same execution failure can recur in later tasks because post-episode feedback rarely revises the persistent harness that guides future interactions. Static harnesses improve reliability through fixed tools, context, memory, and workflow structures, but remain unchanged after deployment. We propose $\textbf{Living-Harness}$, a self-evolving agent harness that converts each completed trajectory and its evaluator signals into posterior evidence for bounded harness updates. Guided by a domain-level $\textbf{Evolution-SOP}$ ($\textbf{S}$tandard $\textbf{O}$perating $\textbf{P}$rocedure), Living-Harness extracts an episode abstraction and structured update evidence, and writes two complementary forms of procedural knowledge: episodic memory that records trigger conditions, failure patterns, and recovery actions, and a state graph that records state nodes, repair edges, and transition rules. The updated harness state is retrieved to guide future interactions, while tools and base context remain frozen, allowing procedural repairs to accumulate across evolution cycles. On eight interactive environments derived from $\tau^2$-Bench and MultiWOZ-2.4, Living-Harness improves average Pass@1 over the strongest interactive baseline by 10.07 and 9.91 percentage points, respectively, and supports retrieval-only reuse of the evolved harness state across model backbones. Our code will be made publicly available soon at https://github.com/anotherbricki/Living-Harness.
Read the full abstract

All authors Yuetian Du, Yucheng Wang, He Xu, Jiexu Xu, Shanwen Tan, Bing Zhao, Boyu Yang, Zhijie Xu, Ming Kong, Hu Wei, Jie Liu, Qiang Zhu

Computation and Language

Where Detectors Fail: Closing the Tail-Domain Gap with Expert-Guided Mutual Distillation

Xuan Feng, Guihong Liu, Tianlong Gu et al. (+5 more)

Multimodal fake news detectors often generalize poorly across domains because they learn to trust unreliable evidence: domain-specific shortcuts amplified by imbalanced data and semantically inconsistent text-image pairs that make cross-modal evidence unreliable. We propose Expert-Guided Mutual Distillation (EGMD), which learns what evidence to trust across the prediction pipeline. At the input level, input-level calibration encodes pair-level coherence as a shared gain before fusion. At the representation level, an expert-guided teacher aligns domain statistics and encourages domain-specific patterns to concentrate in specialized experts. At the decision level, prototype-anchored domain-specific students use mutual learning and dual-channel distillation to inherit the teacher's feature geometry and calibrated predictions while discouraging local domain priors. We further construct Weibo_Balanced, a domain-balanced benchmark that isolates the effect of imbalance on generalization. Across four datasets in two languages, EGMD achieves state-of-the-art accuracy while reducing domain bias by up to 57.3%.
Read the full abstract

All authors Xuan Feng, Guihong Liu, Tianlong Gu, Shuai Zhao, Xuemin Wang, Chenzhong Bin, Yang Liu, Bo An

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.SD

Prosody-driven Jailbreaks in Audio LLMs: A Controlled Study and Mechanistic Analysis

Jiachen Qian and Junyu Li

Audio-capable foundation models enable end-to-end spoken interaction, but they also introduce safety risks beyond transcript content. It remains unclear how much jailbreak capability can arise from matched-text variation in speech delivery rather than from lexical rewriting or broader style transfer. We study this question by holding transcript content fixed and varying six speech-delivery presets whose acoustic attributes may co-vary. We present PJ-Break, a black-box evaluation protocol with presets targeting arousal, authority, and speaking rate, together with AdvAudio-Prosody, a 600-sample benchmark with acoustically verified attributes. On the exact post-QC Qwen2-Audio panel, the Q=1 Panic (38/95), Anger (35/95), and Fast (32/95) presets are all well above Neutral (4/95). The fixed six-query pool covers 44/95 Qwen2-Audio seeds and 15/95 GPT-4o seeds and exceeds a matched-budget StyleBreak reimplementation (27/95) on Qwen2-Audio. A same-voice pool excluding the confounded Commanding condition still reaches 40/95, and a retained-panel ablation shows emotional-delivery audio alone (44/95) is far more effective than emotional text alone (11/95). Exploratory surrogate diagnostics and pilot mitigation observations are secondary, non-core analyses. Overall, matched-text speech delivery should be treated as a first-class factor in Audio LLM safety evaluation
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI

Evidence-Ledger Adjudication for Claim-Evidence Traceability

Gengyu Chen, Yongjie Yu and Weiling Wang

AI agents can draft claims faster than authors can check whether the cited or retrieved evidence supports them. We study evidence-ledger adjudication: a claim-evidence traceability workflow that pairs each claim with an evidence packet, assigns a support relation, and routes unsupported, contradicted, or mixed-evidence claims back to the author. The empirical core is a 2,335-row blind benchmark built from independent external labels in AVeriTeC, CLIMATE-FEVER, and SciFact. Gold relations and source evidence labels are hidden during prediction and joined only for scoring. On this benchmark, the agent evidence-ledger condition achieves 0.676 relation accuracy and 0.601 macro-F1, compared with 0.383 accuracy and 0.303 macro-F1 for the best non-agent baseline. It also routes 1270/1435 claims whose gold labels indicate contradiction, missing evidence, or mixed evidence, while routing 295/900 supported claims. These results show that evidence-ledger adjudication can turn heterogeneous evidence packets into an auditable traceability layer for AI-assisted writing.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

BM25 Wins at Scale: A Scaling Study of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Paradigms

Pengyu Wang, Benfeng Xu, Shaohan Wang et al. (+5 more)

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) spans lexical and dense retrieval, graph-based indexing, and agentic search, but these paradigms are usually evaluated on different benchmarks at one corpus size, leaving their accuracy-cost scaling unclear. To bridge this gap, we present a controlled study that varies corpus size along 28 strictly nested tiers spanning roughly 450-fold, while holding questions and a fixed bedrock of relevant and adversarial documents unchanged. Under one reader model and one judging protocol, we measure official accuracy, construction and query tokens, and latency. The results reveal a scale-dependent crossover rather than an unconditional winner. File-System Agent leads at the smallest shared tiers, but its sequential exploration costs 39 times more query tokens at the bedrock and becomes less effective as the search space grows. Around 10 million corpus tokens, BM25 overtakes it and leads at every larger shared tier, with a margin approaching 20 points at full scale. BM25 also anchors the low-cost end of the Pareto frontier without LLM-based construction. Dense retrieval remains efficient but less accurate, whereas graph-based RAG encounters construction walls before deployment scale and its scalable variants remain below BM25 at shared tiers. Overall, corpus growth increasingly favors global candidate ranking: lexical retrieval is the strongest scalable default, while agentic reasoning works best after ranked discovery rather than in place of it.
Read the full abstract

All authors Pengyu Wang, Benfeng Xu, Shaohan Wang, Mingxuan Du, Xin Zeng, Huarui Wu, Lei Zhang, Licheng Zhang

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG

Learning Dynamic User Personas from Implicit Interaction Streams via Iterative Refinement

Haifeng Wu

Personalizing large language models (LLMs) to individual users is essential for improving user experience, yet existing approaches typically rely on explicit preference supervision such as pairwise comparisons or demographic attributes, limiting their applicability in natural interaction settings. We propose IRIS, a framework that learns dynamic user personas directly from implicit interaction streams by extracting behavioral signals from everyday conversations and iteratively refining persona representations through a prediction-driven closed loop without requiring explicit feedback. We introduce an evaluation protocol based on behavior prediction, persona stability, and decision prediction. A proof-of-concept study on a synthetic interaction stream derived from public-domain autobiographical text shows that IRIS produces stable personas and distinguishes individual users while revealing limitations of memory-only approaches on recall-oriented metrics. We then validate IRIS on anonymized real-world Reddit r/AmItheAsshole (AITA) data, with personas built solely from each author's historical interactions. Across 100 authors, IRIS achieves the highest decision prediction accuracy among all evaluated methods (61.0%), outperforming static personas, memory-only retrieval, and no-personalization baselines. These results suggest that implicit behavioral modeling provides a scalable alternative to explicit preference learning for personalized LLMs and offers a practical foundation for adaptive conversational systems and embodied agents that require continuously evolving models of their users.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

CMT-RAG: Complementary Memory Traces for Multi-turn Multi-hop RAG

Lang Zhou, Yingjian Chen, Shuxuan Li et al. (+2 more)

Multi-turn information-seeking conversations require both multi-hop reasoning and long-range dependency tracking across turns. However, existing RAG systems typically represent conversational memory as raw dialogue history, rewritten queries, or unstructured summaries, making it difficult to recover the specific prior reasoning steps and evidence required for follow-up queries. Our key insight is to align conversational memory with retrieval by representing dialogue context as sub-question-level reasoning traces. Building on this insight, we introduce MuMu-QA, a benchmark for multi-turn multi-hop RAG with explicit cross-turn sub-question dependency annotations, and CMT-RAG, a complementary memory framework for this setting. At each turn, CMT-RAG employs a state-space trace generator, whose recurrent state serves as runtime memory, to incorporate recent conversational context and decompose the current query into structured trace drafts containing retrieval-oriented sub-questions and dependencies on earlier traces. It then grounds these drafts with retrieved evidence and stores them as persistent memory traces in a session-level DAG, enabling future turns to efficiently recover relevant prior reasoning and evidence. Experiments on MuMu-QA and corpus-level RAG benchmarks show that CMT-RAG consistently outperforms five categories of RAG baselines in answer accuracy.
Read the full abstract

All authors Lang Zhou, Yingjian Chen, Shuxuan Li, Kun-Yu Lin, Zhilin Zhao

Computation and Language

ForgetBench: Benchmarking Forgetting Dynamics of Long-Term Parametric Memory in Language Models

Ruxi Gu, Zhenliang Zhang, Zilei Wang et al. (+1 more)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in knowledge acquisition and reasoning, yet their ability to retain previously acquired knowledge under repeated updates remains insufficiently understood. Existing evaluation paradigms primarily focus on single-step reasoning or static knowledge editing, which fail to capture the temporal dynamics of knowledge retention and degradation during continual model modification. In this work, we propose ForgetBench, a benchmark for measuring forgetting dynamics in the long-term parametric memory of LLMs under continual knowledge editing. ForgetBench introduces two complementary evaluation paradigms, namely concept-based QA and scenario-based QA, to probe the retention of isolated facts and structured relational knowledge. Building upon a sequential editing framework, we construct temporally ordered knowledge streams and evaluate model behavior across multiple editing stages. To quantify these dynamics, we introduce a unified evaluation framework that indexes memory age by the number of subsequent edits and measures temporal decay, retention strength, and cross-instance stability. Extensive experiments across diverse models and editing methods reveal distinct forgetting trajectories and a recurring tension between long-term retention and generalization quality. Our findings highlight the need for more robust memory mechanisms that can effectively acquire, update, and preserve knowledge over time in future LLMs.
Read the full abstract

All authors Ruxi Gu, Zhenliang Zhang, Zilei Wang, Wei Wang

Computation and Language

Mergeable Model-Side Aggregation States for Long-Context Language Models

Dachuan Song, Junyu Yin, Zechen Hu et al. (+1 more)

A known limitation of long-context language models is their increasingly unreliable performance in non-additive, set-based aggregation as context length grows. Examples include cardinality estimation, set relationships, and grouped statistics, which widely exist in logs, program outputs, tables, and multi-turn conversations. To provide the aggregation state required by these tasks, we introduce a model-side aggregation interface that maintains compact Hash-based HyperLogLog (HLL) sketch states alongside a frozen language model. While the model processes the context, an extractor maps each relevant record to a canonical identity. The identity is then hashed and updates the HLL state. These states can be merged across context segments and/or read out directly for downstream reasoning, avoiding an additional generate-execute-return cycle. We validate the proposed approach by setting the HLL state size as 2 KiB (2,048 registers), which does not increase with context length or set cardinality. In a distinct-count experiment involving one million records, the mean relative error was 1.6%. In a separate merge test, states built from as many as 256 segments produced exactly the same readout as a single pass over the same stream. On 3,969 aggregate-then-reason tasks from 174 source windows, the fixed-budget interface reached 99.2% accuracy on Gemma 4 (31B, BF16), compared with 100.0% under exact aggregation; the paired gap was 0.8 percentage points (95% window-cluster CI: 0.5-1.3 points). On a matched set of 174 items, our method improved over direct full-context reasoning by 63.2 points on Qwen and 56.3 points on Gemma. The corresponding gains over chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning were 60.9 and 63.2 points, respectively. On a fixed 1,200-task Oolong-Synth subset, our method reached 91.1% on Qwen and 99.3% on Gemma. Code is available at https://github.com/songdc98/sketchops.
Read the full abstract

All authors Dachuan Song, Junyu Yin, Zechen Hu, Xuan Wang

Computation and Language

Voice Memory for Agentic Speech Recognition

Chao-Han Huck Yang, Zih-Ching Chen, Piotr Zelasko et al. (+3 more)

We present Voice Memory, a inference-only scheme for agentic speech recognition: at stream time, a frozen corrector reads a single per-domain memory.md and decides per utterance whether to act on the hypothesis or abstain and keep the 1-best. Asynchronously, a score-gated optimizer revises that file through bounded edits, accepting an edit only when it strictly improves a held-out score. Extended from classical ASR-LM framework, we refer this split the listener-thinker architecture; the two roles are coupled only through the memory, so no weights change and the learned skill stays auditable and portable. Restraint turns out to be the operative skill this loop discovers: unconstrained generative error correction (GER) over-corrects, breaking correct tokens on up to 64% of its edits on financial news, and Voice Memory, reduces this rate to 35%. Across ten HyPoradise domains with an open corrector, Voice Memory, lowers weighted word error rate from 8.36% to 7.52% (7.47% with three added in-context examples) without regressing any dataset below its 1-best baseline; gains concentrate where recoverable headroom is largest, including air-travel commands (8.40% to 3.40%) and noisy far-field speech (CHiME-4, 12.69% to 10.46%). The memory transfers across corrector families and adds zero parameters to the inference path. A demo and example code are provided for future studies.
Read the full abstract

All authors Chao-Han Huck Yang, Zih-Ching Chen, Piotr Zelasko, Zhehuai Chen, Jagadeesh Balam, Boris Ginsburg

Computation and Language

Knowledge before Reasoning: EC-Reason-Bench, a Training-Free Diagnostic Benchmark for LLM Enzyme Classification

Linyu Li, Zhi Jin, Yichi Zhang et al. (+6 more)

Enzyme function prediction is a hierarchical, knowledge-intensive form of protein function classification. Existing benchmarks expose an anomaly: general LLMs often get the coarse first level right, yet once asked for a complete EC number their accuracy at levels two through four drops to almost zero, while specialized models and tools stay usable. We propose EC-Reason-Bench, a training-free, diagnostic evaluation protocol built to answer two questions: why general LLMs score close to nothing on EC number prediction, and how much of that loss can be recovered without updating a single weight. We break enzyme classification ability into four orthogonal levers that can each be measured on their own: output structure, external knowledge, reasoning structure, and reasoning robustness. We test each lever with an inference-time method against a shared zero-shot baseline reproducing previously reported near-zero performance. Experiments with several strong reasoning LLMs yield four main findings. First, external knowledge is decisive and must precede reasoning: uniformly low closed-book performance rises sharply with open-book access, narrowing model gaps. Second, in closed-book settings, whether cascading and chain-of-thought help or hurt depends on a model's tendency to abstain. Third, once evidence is available the aggregate score of the best LLM setting is indistinguishable from simply voting the EC numbers of the nearest retrieved neighbors; that tie is an artifact of averaging, and it hides a large gain on adversarial evidence set against an equally large loss on multi-functional enzymes. Reasoning over evidence therefore acts as an arbiter of conflicting neighbors rather than as a source of knowledge, and no single-number leaderboard can see it. Fourth, accuracy obeys a law of homology availability.
Read the full abstract

All authors Linyu Li, Zhi Jin, Yichi Zhang, Dongming Jin, Yuanpeng He, Huanyao Zhang, Xuan Zhang, Gadeng Luosang, Nyima Tashi

Computation and Language

Misalignment Has a Personality: A Big Five Account of Emergent Misalignment

Hasibur Rahman and Smit Desai

Fine-tuning a language model on data containing a narrow flaw, such as insecure code or incorrect mathematical answers, can cause broad misalignment through a mechanism that remains debated. We provide an interpretable account: in the models and corpora we study, misalignment behaves like a shift in personality. Prior work extracts activation directions for character traits from a single binary contrast, which can separate or steer behavior without establishing a calibrated scale. We instead extract personality vectors for the Big Five using a graded, three-level intervention and validate them on two open-weight models. The three levels are linearly ordered, with Cohen's d values of up to 6.2; the vectors transfer zero-shot and trait-specifically to an independent corpus; and their effects are strongest within a middle-layer band. Applied to training data, the vectors reveal that misaligned corpora across eight domains share a common Big Five signature: lower agreeableness and conscientiousness, together with higher extraversion and neuroticism. This signature is recovered by both models with a correlation of r = 0.94. Fine-tuning imprints the same profile, shifting the model's generations along the corresponding signature, with r = 0.83 using activation-based measurements and r = 0.90 using a text-based judge, while also shifting internal activations with r = 0.69. The same vectors characterize sycophancy as high extraversion and low conscientiousness rather than excess agreeableness, a distinction that a single direction cannot capture. Calibrated personality vectors transform an opaque safety phenomenon into a human-legible diagnostic profile.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

(Im)Paired Programming: Coding Agents Improve Productivity but Harm Understanding

Nishant Balepur, Connor Baumler, Valerie Chen et al. (+3 more)

Coding agents (e.g., Cursor) improve developer productivity by optimizing task completion, but shifting users from writing code to prompting and reviewing may harm their understanding, impeding oversight, learning, and communication. To probe this, we have 54 students create a website with one of two AI systems: an agent that edits user code; or a chatbot where users write code alone or adapt generic code snippets. We test understanding via comprehension questions and a task where users extend their code without agents, showing: (1) While agents aid initial task completion, they harm users' code comprehension and thus do not prepare users to extend their code; (2) Low-effort agent interaction types, like copy+paste prompts and auto-accepted edits, are linked with lower comprehension; and (3) Despite self-reported weaker understanding, users still prefer coding agents because they are quick and easy to use. While users stay in the loop for coding workflows, understanding should not be forgotten. Towards this goal, we distill our analyses into future research directions for coding agent developers: dissuading low-effort prompting, creating readable code, and promoting active engagement.
Read the full abstract

All authors Nishant Balepur, Connor Baumler, Valerie Chen, Eunsol Choi, Rachel Rudinger, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber

Computation and Language

Diagnosing Fine-Grained Inconsistency Classification in Financial Disclosure Text

Aman Kumar, Lasitha Vidyaratne, Dipanjan D Ghosh et al. (+2 more)

Financial disclosures may contain numerical, temporal, referential, factual, and policy inconsistencies that require different evidence and reasoning to diagnose. We study fine-grained inconsistency classification: given a passage known to contain a conflict, the goal is to identify its type among 11 categories. Using a fixed snapshot of the synthetic SBID-FD benchmark, we compare frozen and fine-tuned encoders, evidence-augmented classifiers, prompted large language models, and LoRA-adapted generative models under a shared evaluation protocol. Task-specific adaptation yields large improvements over frozen representations, and a fine-tuned 300M encoder performs competitively with substantially larger prompted and adapted models. We further study whether localizing the conflicting claims improves classification through matched predicted-span, reference-span, and distractor-span conditions. The results show that automatically extracted evidence provides additional signal but recovers only part of the benefit obtained from reference spans. Per-class and confusion analyses further reveal that some inconsistency types are especially sensitive to localization quality, whereas others remain difficult even when the relevant evidence is supplied. These findings identify evidence localization and fine-grained type discrimination as distinct challenges and show that compact supervised encoders are strong baselines for this task.
Read the full abstract

All authors Aman Kumar, Lasitha Vidyaratne, Dipanjan D Ghosh, Arnab Chakrabarti, Ahmed K Farahat

Computation and Language

Symphony of Bias: Exploring Gender Associations with Musical Instruments in Multimodal LLMs

Farhan Farsi, Shayan Bali, Mohammad Heydari Rad et al. (+2 more)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday life and widely used for information seeking, raising concerns about their potential to perpetuate social biases and reinforce stereotypes. In this study, we investigate gender bias in LLMs through the lens of their associations with musical instruments. Building on social-science research on the cultural gender-typing of instruments, we introduce Symphony-Bias, a parallel multimodal dataset spanning text, vision, and audio. We evaluate ten multimodal models with diverse architectures and scales across 22 musical instruments, analyzing how they associate each instrument with three gender categories: {male, female, non-binary}, across three modalities: {text, vision, audio}. Our results show that 92% of instrument-level outcomes align with prior social-science findings, with the harp and drums showing particularly consistent gendered associations across all evaluated models and modalities. We further find that alignment with social stereotypes is weakest in audio, stronger in vision, and strongest in text, suggesting that modality-specific representations can differentially amplify gendered associations with musical instruments.\footnote{The Symphony-Bias dataset will be publicly released upon acceptance of the paper.}
Read the full abstract

All authors Farhan Farsi, Shayan Bali, Mohammad Heydari Rad, Negar Heidary, Donya Rooein

Tuesday 28 July

Computation and Language

A Generative Grammar Underlying the Voynich Manuscript, the Pastiche Hypothesis: Evidence from Large Language Models

Nicolas Turenne

Background: The Voynich Manuscript is a fifteenth-century codex written in an unknown script whose content remains undeciphered. Previous studies suggest that its statistical properties resemble those of natural languages, while its illustrations - primarily plants - recall medieval herbals. Methods: We present a multidisciplinary analysis combining probabilistic modeling, phonetic decomposition, rare-event detection, and multimodal image analysis, based on a newly transliterated corpus. Word- and letter-level distributions are modeled using position-dependent probabilistic grammars, while phonetic patterns are compared across Indo-European, Semitic, and Asian languages. Image-text alignment methods based on large language models are applied to identify potential botanical correspondences. Results: The results indicate that Voynich symbols behave as letters rather than syllabic units, while word-length distributions resemble syllabic structures. Phonetic analyses show closer alignment with consonant-heavy languages such as Hebrew or Arabic than with Indo-European languages. Probabilistic modeling reproduces Zipf-like distributions and reveals extremely low probabilities for repeated initial-letter sequences, indicating a structured imitation of natural language. Image analysis suggests strong correspondences between Voynich plant illustrations and those found in Pseudo-Apuleius herbals from the Mediterranean tradition, consistent with an imitation of medieval medicinal books. Perspectives: These findings support the hypothesis that the Voynich Manuscript follows a structured generative system combining linguistic regularities and herbal knowledge, and demonstrate the value of integrating probabilistic and AI-assisted approaches in the analysis of historical manuscripts.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

Lens: Bringing the Right Semantic Perspective into Focus for Training-Free Multimodal Representation Learning

Xinran Liu, Shouqian Shi, Yixian Chen et al. (+3 more)

High-quality representations are essential for a wide range of downstream tasks. Dedicated embedding models are explicitly optimized for representation learning, yet their training data are often more limited in scale and diversity than the massive corpora used to pretrain modern large language models and multimodal large language models. Large-scale pretraining and instruction following enable autoregressive models to select relevant evidence, integrate multimodal information, and infer semantics under different task perspectives, creating a distinctive opportunity for training-free representation learning. However, our analysis reveals that existing semantic-elicitation methods do not reliably orient the extracted states toward the semantic perspective required by the downstream task. Consequently, the resulting representations often remain dominated by salient input content. We characterize this problem as semantic perspective misalignment and propose Lens, a training-free framework that makes representation readout task-directed. Semantic Perspective Anchoring associates the task-required perspective with a task-specific readout phrase, specifying the interpretive role of the positions later used for extraction. Contextualized Phrase Readout places the same phrase after the complete input and aggregates its token states, combining full-context access with the anchored perspective. The resulting representation reflects task-conditioned evidence integration and inference rather than a generic summary of salient content. Without parameter updates, architectural modification, or reranking, Lens achieves an overall Precision@1 of 63.9 across all 36 MMEB datasets, outperforming the closest same-backbone training-free embedding baseline by 10.2 points.
Read the full abstract

All authors Xinran Liu, Shouqian Shi, Yixian Chen, Ruizhi Chen, Xin-Wei Yao, Sheng Zhong

Computation and Language

Before the Warning Comes Too Late: Incremental Phone-Scam Detection from Speech

Khang Nhat Hoang Vo, Anh Trac Duc Dinh, Tai Tien Ta et al. (+1 more)

We study weakly supervised incremental telecom fraud detection from raw telephone audio, where training provides only conversation-level labels and predictions must be updated before a call ends. We introduce StreamFraudNet, which processes incoming audio through overlapping bounded-context windows using a frozen self-supervised speech encoder, recurrent temporal modeling, and learned aggregation of latent window scores. On a controlled English benchmark, StreamFraudNet achieves a ROC–AUC of \(0.9953\), significantly outperforming acoustic and mean-pooling baselines while remaining competitive with strong global temporal models. The model produces its first prediction after 10 seconds of audio, updates every 2 seconds, and operates faster than real time on the evaluated server hardware. Ablations identify recurrent temporal context as the principal contributor to performance. These results demonstrate that fraud risk can be scored incrementally from raw speech without transcripts or temporal annotations, while highlighting the need for latency-aware training to improve early prediction.
Read the full abstract

All authors Khang Nhat Hoang Vo, Anh Trac Duc Dinh, Tai Tien Ta, Tho Quan

Computation and Language

YNU-HPCC at SemEval-2025 Task 11: Bridging the Gap in Text-Based Emotion Using Multiple Prediction Headers

Hao Yang, Jin Wang and Xuejie Zhang

This paper describes the participation of the YNU-HPCC team in subtask A of task 11, Bridging the Gap in Text-Based Emotion at SemEval-2025. Our best-performing system employs the RoBERTa (Robustly Optimized BERT Approach) model, an improved version of BERT that utilizes the Transformer encoder architecture. We enhanced the output head to allow the model to process one emotion simultaneously. We obtained the official ranking score (0.44), including results from all languages. The entire dataset was translated into English using Google Translate to facilitate subsequent processing. Through probabilistic and attention analyses, we found that (I) a single prediction head performs better than six heads predicting six emotions simultaneously, and (II) training on a uniformly translated English dataset yields better results than using the original dataset. The code is available at: https://github.com/BGWH123/Semeval-2025-task11.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

Alignment Is All You Need: Instruction-Free Training for General Audio-Language Models

Xuanru Zhou, Yiwen Shao, Jiahong Li et al. (+1 more)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are typically built through a multi-stage pipeline consisting of cross-modal alignment, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and preference optimization. This pipeline assumes that adapting an LLM to a new modality requires extensive task-specific supervision. However, pretrained LLMs already possess strong reasoning and instruction-following abilities. As LLMs evolve rapidly, an important question remains: can we efficiently transfer these capabilities to a new modality with minimal intervention, and is alignment alone sufficient for building a multimodal model? We introduce an Instruction-Free Alignment-Only large audio-language model (LALM) that keeps both the audio encoder and the LLM fully frozen, learning only a lightweight projector. Borrowing insights from AzeroS [1], we train on (audio, response) pairs from Self-Generated Data Construction, where an LLM expands captions into free-form responses without explicit task instructions. Across MMAU, MMAR, MMSU, and MMAU-Pro, our approach matches or surpasses heavily post-trained baselines using substantially less data. By keeping the LLM frozen, our model preserves its native instruction-following competence and can port seamlessly across model generations. Our results suggest that competitive MLLM can emerge from alignment alone, reducing multimodal extension to a lightweight projector-training problem that generalizes across modalities and adapts rapidly to each new LLM release.
Read the full abstract

All authors Xuanru Zhou, Yiwen Shao, Jiahong Li, Dong Yu

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG

Valid Per-Field Selective Risk Control for Document Extraction: Three Failure Modes, a Validity Ladder, and When Conditioning Pays

Bhaskar Gurram

Per-field accept/review with selective risk at most alpha – accept a field only if the error rate among accepted fields is controlled – is the trust contract document-extraction systems need, and the natural procedure silently violates it on real documents. On 13,859 genuine claude-sonnet-5 fields from 800 CORD receipts (49.0% correct) we diagnose three failure modes: document clustering (design effect 1.84-2.45), score-refit leakage (coverage 0.416 at risk 0.127, violating alpha=0.10 in 95% of splits), and a tie-mass pathology (a degenerate score collapses the threshold grid, 0.030 to 0.001). We organize the fixes as a validity ladder, guarantee form stated per tier. A fit/val split protocol restores expected-selective-risk control for a learned fusion: coverage 0.318 at risk 0.096 at nominal alpha=0.10, no tolerance band (production variant 0.326) – an on-average point whose realized risk exceeds alpha in 47.5% of resplits, not a certificate. Mondrian Learn-then-Test with exact binomial tails yields per-group PAC certificates: field-iid 0.171 at risk 0.068, cluster-corrected 0.140, doc-iid 0.060 – the only tier matching documents, honestly near-vacuous today. Support-bin, the pre-specified provenance taxonomy, wins every rigor tier on the sonnet CORD capture (p<1e-4, Bonferroni-corrected) – a win that does not replicate on the same documents under haiku or qwen – while on higher-accuracy corpora pooled thresholds win: conditioning helps exactly where pooled cannot certify, subsumed by a learned score elsewhere. A frozen-configuration confirmation on selection-untouched claude-haiku-4-5 held at both risk levels, and a blind three-annotator human-gold audit verifies the practical tier's accepted-set risk at 1.3% against its 10% budget (Fleiss' kappa=0.83; labels err one-sidedly pessimistic). Released Apache-2.0 with seed-pinned, regression-gated procedures.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI

How Hard Does It Think? Analyzing Step-Aware Reasoning Energy in LLM Chain-of-Thought Trajectories

Hui Wei, Junda Wu, Sheldon Yu et al. (+8 more)

Understanding how computational effort is allocated across individual chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning steps remains an open challenge: existing interpretability methods rely on output-level signals or collapse processing depth into a single trajectory-level scalar, leaving step-wise effort opaque. We propose Step-Aware Reasoning Energy (SARE), a geometric framework that quantifies effort at the granularity of individual CoT steps via Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) between Gram matrices of token hidden states across adjacent transformer layers, capturing inter-token relational structure without requiring eigenvector alignment or cluster correspondence. SARE further contextualizes this energy within reasoning's semantic progression by modeling CoT trajectories as transitions among latent semantic states. Across six reasoning benchmarks and three open-weight LLMs, we find that reasoning energy is highly non-uniform across step types, exhibiting phase-like transitions invisible to trajectory-level metrics; incorrect trajectories show systematically lower energy at critical reasoning junctions; and SARE-based features match or outperform output-based confidence baselines in most settings, indicating that internal geometric dynamics encode predictive information beyond surface-level signals.
Read the full abstract

All authors Hui Wei, Junda Wu, Sheldon Yu, Sizhe Zhou, Yizhu Jiao, Ming Zhong, Bowen Jin, Tong Yu, Shijia Pan, Jiawei Han, Julian McAuley

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.SD

Dissecting Sensitivity to Training Language in Self-Supervised Speech Learning Using Neural Audio Codec Tokens

Daigo Takizawa, Tomohiko Nakamura, Samuele Cornell et al. (+3 more)

Neural audio codecs (NACs) have become popular for obtaining speech representations as discrete tokens. Beyond compression, discrete tokens can be used to train self-supervised learning (SSL) models. Such models, referred to as codec-based SSL models, reduce data storage and computational cost, enabling scalable SSL pre-training. However, their language sensitivity remains unclear. When the language changes, codec-based SSL models may require retraining, which undermines their efficiency. In this paper, we present a systematic analysis of language sensitivity by varying either the NAC training language or the SSL pre-training language while keeping the other fixed. Experimental results show that downstream performance is insensitive to the NAC training language but strongly dependent on the SSL pre-training language. These findings suggest that a single NAC can be reused across languages, while aligning the SSL pre-training language with the target language is crucial.
Read the full abstract

All authors Daigo Takizawa, Tomohiko Nakamura, Samuele Cornell, William Chen, Satoru Fukayama, Shinji Watanabe

Computation and Language

When Synthetic Users Fail: A Cross-Domain Benchmark of LLM-Simulated Human Survey Responses

Zihan Chen, Di Zhu and Lei Nico Zheng

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as synthetic users, stand-ins for human respondents whose simulated answers feed product, policy, and market decisions. We ask when this substitution is valid and when it fails, and package the answer as an evaluation framework for intelligent synthetic-user systems. A single protocol, run across four models spanning two families and an 8B-to-frontier capability range, is applied to two independent domains of real human-response data: U.S. general social attitudes (General Social Survey) and cross-cultural values (World Values Survey). Every model is benchmarked against a suite of non-LLM baselines fit on held-out human data. Under demographic prompting and the survey-simulation protocols we test, two failures replicate across both domains, all four models, and both families. First, at the individual level no LLM beats even the strongest baseline; on cross-cultural values every model falls well below it, and the gap survives distance-aware and proper scoring. Second, models systematically over-determine demographics, treating identity as far more predictive of attitudes than it is among real people, a distortion present for nearly every question-group combination and robust to a coding-invariant measure. Neither failure is remedied by a larger, more capable model. A decision-impact analysis shows why this matters in practice: on a segment-targeting task the models inflate between-segment gaps two to fourfold, would direct a team to the wrong segment in half of U.S. and most cross-cultural cases, and manufacture segment splits that do not exist in real people. We publicly release the cross-domain benchmark and validation framework, including all code and data, so that teams can determine in advance when synthetic-user evidence is safe for decision support and when it is not.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CY

Aligning LLM-Simulated and Human Examinees for Psychometric Calibration: A Cognitive Diagnostic Profiling Approach

Wenjie Zhou, Yunting Liu, Renjiao Tang et al. (+1 more)

Psychometric calibration for educational tests typically requires costly human response data. Large language models (LLMs) simulated examinees offer a promising route to early calibration, but their responses are too accurate and too uniform. We propose Cognitive Diagnostic Profiling (CDP), a zero-shot framework that prompts LLMs to simulate plausible examinees with diverse cognitive profiles: binary attribute-mastery patterns are rendered as natural-language profiles and sampled under an uninformative or an informative distribution. Using the Tatsuoka fraction-subtraction dataset (536 examinees, 15 items, five attributes), we evaluated eight LLM configurations under no-profile, uninformative-CDP, and informative-CDP conditions, assessing alignment with human examinees at the ability-distribution, mastery-profile, and item-difficulty levels. CDP improved all three levels: distributional overlap rose across configurations; weighted correlations between profile-level scores and human profile expectations reached 0.92 to 0.98; and item-difficulty recovery improved in rank order and absolute alignment, most for reasoning-enabled models; in the strongest case, Gemini 3.0 Flash (Thinking), one-parameter logistic (1PL) difficulty Spearman correlations rose from 0.24 to 0.86 and 0.90 and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) fell from 6.31 to 1.30 and 0.90; the informative condition helped most where profile-level alignment was strong. CDP brings LLM-simulated examinees into closer psychometric alignment with human examinees, making them practical for operational test development.
Read the full abstract

All authors Wenjie Zhou, Yunting Liu, Renjiao Tang, Mark Wilson