Papers

This work introduces quantum-inspired tensor-network circuits as trainable transforms for image inpainting. Among the proposed architectures, the diagonal quantum Fourier transform (QFT) relaxation is invertible with $O(N^2 \log N)$ computational cost for $N\times N$ images, inherently preserving minimum coherence throughout training via its circuit structure and eliminating the need for explicit coherence penalties. Unconstrained gradient-based phase optimization (Riemannian-optimization free) enables efficient learning from randomly sampled training data, allowing the learned transform to generalize to test images observed through fixed sampling masks. Numerical tests show that the learned models outperform fixed transforms and per-image optimization while matching the performance of much larger unitary architectures, yet with far fewer parameters.

Efficient physical resource block (PRB) allocation in 5G networks requires accurate demand forecasting. Conventional methods minimize symmetric error metrics (MAE, RMSE), ignoring the operational cost asymmetry where under-provisioning (service degradation) is far costlier than over-provisioning (wasted capacity). We propose a goal-oriented probabilistic forecasting framework that aligns model training with the operator's decision-making objectives. Specifically, we train DeepAR and Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT) models using the Pinball Loss function and derive the optimal allocation quantile from the operator's cost matrix. Evaluation on a real beam-level 5G traffic dataset shows that the proposed approach reduces operational cost compared to MSE-trained baselines while maintaining calibrated uncertainty estimates. The framework enables dynamic PRB allocation that explicitly balances service reliability against resource efficiency.

Policy learning aims to determine who should be treated based on individual characteristics. In high-stakes settings such as medicine and public policy where safety is a central concern, improving the average outcomes alone may not be sufficient: decision makers may also seek to protect individuals from harm, in line with the Hippocratic principle of “do no harm.” In this paper, we propose conformal policy learning (CPL), a policy learning procedure with a new distribution-free safety guarantee that controls the probability of assigning treatment to an individual who would be harmed relative to control. CPL views each treatment decision as testing a hypothesis of counterfactual harm and assigns treatment by thresholding conformal p-values. These p-values use observable proxies and selective calibration to address the challenge that the potential outcomes under comparison are never simultaneously observed. For randomized experiments, under standard exchangeability conditions, CPL provides finite-sample safety guarantee at a user-specified level, without imposing any outcome modeling assumptions. Moreover, when the outcome model is consistently estimated, CPL achieves asymptotically optimal welfare subject to the safety constraint. In observational studies, CPL with learn-then-balance weights achieves doubly robust safety guarantees. We evaluate CPL through extensive simulations and apply it to an empirical study of AI-powered interventions designed to reduce conspiracy beliefs.

In flow matching (FM), a velocity model $v_{\theta}$ is trained using a predefined path $g_t$ that connects data and noise samples (e.g., $g_t(x_0, x_1) = (1 - t) x_0 + t x_1$). In this work, we study the choice of this path from an optimization perspective by analyzing the variance of stochastic gradients. We consider the class $G(p_t,v^\star_t)$ of paths that induce the same marginal distributions $p_t$ and marginal velocity field $v^\star_t$, and therefore the same FM objective. Our main finding is that the choice of path $g_t$ can fundamentally change the convergence rate of SGD, even when the FM objective remains exactly the same. (i) For a linear velocity model and one-dimensional Gaussian data, we derive a tight bound on the SGD iteration complexity up to logarithmic factors and find an analytically optimal path that minimizes this bound among linear paths inducing the same FM problem. (ii) We then extend the variance analysis to general FM problems and formulate path selection at a fixed $\theta$ as the variance-minimization problem PathOpt$_\theta$, constrained to $g_t\in G(p_t,v^\star_t)$. We show that this constraint is essential: reducing variance without it can lead to slower convergence. (iii) Since the constraint $g_t \in G(p_t,v^\star_t)$ cannot generally be verified directly, we derive an equivalent formulation with constraints that can be estimated from samples, allowing paths to be found numerically. Our theoretical results are supported by experiments with Gaussian data, Gaussian mixture models, and real datasets.

Statistical heterogeneity limits federated learning when a single global classifier cannot represent client-specific label distributions. In this work, we propose Personalized Federated Knowledge Distillation with Head Adaptation (pFedKDH), which aggregates only the shared backbone, keeps persistent client-specific heads, and uses a recalibrated global head as a teacher during local training. Across MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100 under class-wise Dirichlet partitions, pFedKDH obtains the best accuracy in most settings, with accuracy gaps up to 37.67% over the weakest baseline and consistently low standard deviation across repetitions. Component-wise diagnostics and convergence results support the role of persistent heads and distillation-guided local optimization under label-skewed data.

An agent that learns from rewards has to trust whatever reports those rewards. When the reports suddenly change, either the world changed or the reporter broke. From the reports alone these are indistinguishable, and reinforcement learning theory shows that no amount of further experience separates them. The prescribed escape is richer data about the reporter itself. We ask whether a frozen language model, handed exactly that data, uses it. We build a two-option game in which a payout swap and a lying reporter produce byte-identical histories. Then we add one verified record: an independent check of one round's real result, printed beside what the reporter said about that round. That single line settles the case. We ask three large models, from two families, to answer one question with one letter. Is the reporter honest or lying? They catch a lying reporter almost perfectly. At the 70B class that holds in every condition we tried; the 32B model slips in one wording. They clear an honest reporter far less often, and how often depends on things that should not matter. Averaged over rounds, letters, and wordings, a 72B model calls an honest reporter a liar 38% of the time when nothing has changed at all, and 58% of the time when the payouts moved. A 70B model from a second family calls an honest reporter a liar 26% and 48% of the time. The failure is not one of reading, because in the situation where nothing changed the same models score 0.96 to 1.00 with the answer printed in the prompt. Which surface feature drives it differs by family. For the Qwen models it is which round the record names, and for Llama it is which letter stands for "honest." Adding the record to a prompt that already states the answer makes Llama less likely to give that answer. We had registered a prediction for that 58% before the run: 35%. The failure is larger than we expected.

Medical AI models hold immense potential to improve patient outcomes, but they are also known to unintentionally memorise individual records from their training datasets. While such memorisation has been linked to targeted privacy attacks, its consequences for clinical deployment, where patients may be assessed by a model that saw their historical data during training, remain poorly understood. Here we show that predictions on a patient's unseen future data can change significantly if a model observed that same patient's anonymised historical data during training, a phenomenon we term "memorisation bias". We demonstrate that this bias exists across diverse data modalities and model architectures, and over prolonged time spans: in some cases, memorisation bias persists on future records acquired decades after the historical records used for training. Moreover, in simulated prospective deployment, memorisation bias has asymmetric effects on the diagnostic accuracy of returning data contributors. When a patient returned with a de novo condition absent from their historical records in the training dataset, diagnostic sensitivity decreased significantly compared to an otherwise identical model not trained on their historical data. Conversely, when their health state was unchanged, both sensitivity and specificity were significantly inflated. Our findings reveal a previously uncharacterised risk in medical AI that arises when a model is deployed on patients who contributed to its training data. This exposes a shortcoming of current model development practice: the de-identification measures designed to protect patients' privacy make it difficult to identify returning contributors and exclude them from the AI-assisted interpretation of their own future data. Mitigating memorisation risks may thus require changes to current model training and deployment protocols.

Wi-Fi signal data can be used to compromise the privacy of individuals. While many existing approaches rely on Channel State Information (CSI), collecting this data on typical IoT devices often requires elevated operating system permissions and specialized drivers. Consequently, this paper investigates the feasibility of utilizing Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) data to predict human locations. RSSI was selected because it is accessible even on devices with limited user permissions, and therefore is more applicable to a wider array of IoT devices. To bypass the tedious process of obtaining training data needed to train an RSSI-based model, an existing Wi-Fi pose prediction project was used in this research. However, that project assumed CSI data as input. Therefore, we investigate the feasibility of cross-domain inference, i.e., feeding RSSI data into that existing CSI-based model. We collected an RSSI dataset, synchronized with video ground-truth of a person moving within a room, to evaluate the model's performance. This evaluation confirmed that RSSI data can predict locations with approximately 80% confidence when human movement is present. This demonstrates that a model trained on CSI data can be used to evaluate low-granularity RSSI data consisting of decibel-milliwatt (dBm) values to roughly locate people in the collection space. These results imply that a wide range of IoT devices can be used for privacy invasion in Wi-Fi-dense environments.

High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) gesture recognition supports prosthetic control, assistive robotics, and rehabilitation, but electrode re-donning and physiological variability cause distribution shifts that degrade accuracy across sessions and subjects. Generative HD-sEMG models primarily synthesize signals for augmentation; although diffusion models enhance representation learning, prediction still relies on a separate classifier. To tie learned dynamics to the decision rule, we propose MyoFlow, the first discriminative flow-matching framework for HD-sEMG recognition across sessions and subjects. It recasts classification as anchor-tied transport: a domain-conditioned rectified flow moves encoded windows toward gesture anchors that serve as transport targets and define the nearest-anchor decision geometry, enabling zero-shot recognition without an independent head. On the Hyser dataset, MyoFlow improves mean cross-session and cross-subject accuracy over the strongest diffusion-based baseline by 4.24% and 6.37%, respectively, and achieves 91.71% mean zero-shot accuracy and 97.39% mean few-shot accuracy across multiple days on the CEMHSEY dataset.

Looped Transformers achieve strong performance with compact parameter sizes by repeatedly applying a shared stack of Transformer blocks across recurrent depths. However, they incur higher decoding latency than standard Transformer models of comparable parameter size because shared weights are accessed at every recurrent depth. To improve decoding efficiency, self-speculative decoding is particularly well suited to Looped Transformers, as their intermediate recurrent states can directly provide draft predictions without an auxiliary draft model. We therefore propose LoopSpec, a training-free self-speculative decoding framework tailored for Looped Transformers. LoopSpec extracts draft tokens from early recurrent states and operates in a pipelined manner, overlapping draft generation of future tokens with target verification of the current token. To improve draft accuracy without excessive compute overhead, we introduce a selective second proposal from deeper recurrent depth while ensuring lossless decoding under both greedy and sampling regimes. Furthermore, we derive the optimal proposal depths in closed form and show the prediction matches measurement. Across reasoning and coding benchmarks, LoopSpec achieves up to 6.83$\times$ inference speedup across diverse Looped Transformers.

We present IRENE (Italian Radar Ensemble Nowcasting Experiment), a deep learning model for probabilistic short-range precipitation nowcasting over the Italian domain at \SI{1}{km} spatial and 5 min temporal resolution. IRENE adopts an encoder–forecaster architecture built on multi-scale Convolutional Gated Recurrent Units (ConvGRUs), trained on the national radar composite produced by the Italian Civil Protection Department (DPC). An importance-sampling scheme focuses training on precipitation-relevant events, while the almost-fair Continuous Ranked Probability Score (afCRPS) is adopted as the primary probabilistic loss function. Two additional training configurations are proposed: an adversarial (GAN) variant, IRENE-GAN, designed to improve the spatial sharpness of the generated forecasts, and a spectrally constrained variant, IRENE-GAN-RAPSD, in which the adversarial objective is complemented by an explicit penalty on the radially averaged power spectral density. The three configurations are evaluated against the stochastic extrapolation method STEPS and the pre-trained deep learning model DGMR. All IRENE configurations attain a lower Continuous Ranked Probability Score than both benchmarks at every lead time and rank histograms closer to uniformity, indicating better probabilistic skill and ensemble calibration. In terms of ensemble-mean mean absolute error the advantage is confined to the first 90 min, beyond which the strongly damped DGMR fields and, to a lesser extent, STEPS become competitive. Spectral analysis shows that the adversarial training removes the progressive loss of small-scale variance exhibited by IRENE, at the cost of an excess of fine-scale power at long lead times that the spectral penalty only partially controls.

The interpretability of complex machine learning models is of paramount importance, especially in real-world high-stakes domains such as healthcare and finance. However, existing post-hoc interpretability methods suffer from inherent limitations: fragmented analytical processes, inadequate capacity to model nonlinear feature interactions, computational inefficiencies, and over-reliance on specific model architectures. To address these challenges, this paper provides a novel method - Adaptive Derivative-Ordered Random Explanation (ADORE) - that leverages first- and second-order derivatives to accommodate nonlinear model complexities, while enabling effective capture of feature-sample interactions within a unified analytical framework. ADORE integrates global feature importance with local sample contributions, precisely quantifying feature impact by capturing both magnitude and direction, and identifying critical samples influencing model decisions. Furthermore, it achieves computational efficiency through randomized singular value decomposition (SVD) and dynamic sparsity detection, making it scalable to large, high-dimensional datasets. Experiments across three data modalities - tabular, text, and image - demonstrate that ADORE outperforms existing methods such as LIME and SHAP in handling complex interactions and computational efficiency, while providing detailed and reliable explanations. To facilitate adoption and reproducibility, ADORE has been released as an open-source Python package, hosted on GitHub, enabling researchers and practitioners to readily adapt and apply our approach to their specific tasks, models, and datasets.

Machine-learning surrogate models offer a promising alternative to high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations for aerodynamic analysis and design. However, constructing accurate surrogates for realistic aircraft configurations remain challenging due to complex geometries, multiple flow regimes, and limited training data. This work presents the methodology that achieved first place in the ONERA CRM Wall Distribution Regression Challenge, which focuses on predicting pressure and skin-friction coefficient distributions over the NASA Common Research Model wing-body-pylon-nacelle configuration under different operating conditions. The proposed approach formulates the problem as a conditional neural field mapping spatial coordinates, surface normals, and operating conditions to aerodynamic wall quantities. Fourier feature encoding, a relative squared error objective aligned with the challenge metric, ensemble learning, and $k$-fold cross-validation are progressively introduced to improve prediction accuracy and exploit the limited training data. Beyond presenting the final methodology, the paper documents the successive model design choices that led to the winning solution through a comprehensive ablation study and discusses several alternative approaches that were investigated but ultimately discarded. On the hidden competition test set, the proposed methodology achieves an overall score of 8.81, outperforming the strongest organizer-provided baseline, which achieved a score of 8.64, while requiring approximately three orders of magnitude fewer trainable parameters. These results illustrate that carefully designed coordinate-based neural fields constitute an efficient and robust framework for aerodynamic surrogate modeling on complex geometries under limited-data conditions.

Vision Transformers (ViTs) are central to most modern vision models, yet obtaining input attributions that are fine-grained, faithful, and stable remains challenging. Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) has been adapted to transformer attention, but in ViTs it often produces noisy, unfaithful explanations. We show that the missing ingredient is the treatment of residual connections: cancellation effects in residual pathways lead to attribution explosion. Moreover, we find that these cancellations are substantially stronger in ViTs than in language transformers. To address this issue, we introduce Residual-aware Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (ResLRP), a simple extension of LRP whose propagation rules explicitly account for cancellations in residual branches, are exactly conservative, and provably bound relevance explosion. Causal channel-wise interventions confirm that residual cancellation, not a generic regularization effect, drives the instability. ResLRP substantially improves attribution quality across faithfulness and localization, evaluated on ViT architectures spanning supervised, self-supervised, contrastive, hierarchical, and multimodal families, as well as on the ground-truth-controlled FunnyBirds benchmark. The largest gains arise in modern Vision Language Models (VLMs), with +27-29% localization and up to 3.4x faithfulness scores. Beyond benchmarks, ResLRP localizes Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) features in input space, and our residual amplification measure serves as an architecture-level diagnostic predicting where attribution degrades.

Autonomous racing confronts significant challenges in safely overtaking Opponent Vehicles (OVs) that exhibit uncertain trajectories, stemming from unknown driving policies. To address these challenges, this study proposes heterogeneous kernel metrics for Deep Kernel Learning (DKL), designed to robustly capture the diverse driving policies of OVs, and carry out precise trajectory predictions along with the associated uncertainties. A key virtue of the proposed kernel metrics lies in their ability to align similar driving policies and disjoin dissimilar ones in an unsupervised manner, given the observed interactions between the Ego Vehicle (EV) and OVs. The efficacy of the proposed method is substantiated through experimental studies on a 1/10th scale racecar platform, demonstrating improved prediction accuracy and thereby safely overtaking against OVs. Furthermore, our method is computationally efficient for onboard computing units, affirming its viability in fast-paced racing environments. The video and source code can be found at https://github.com/HMCL-UNIST/OpponentPredictionWithKMDKL.git.

Traversability prediction is a critical component of autonomous navigation in unstructured environments, where complex and uncertain robot-terrain interactions pose significant challenges such as traction loss and dynamic instability. Despite recent progress in learning-based traversability prediction, these methods often fail to adapt to novel terrains. Even when adaptation is achieved, retaining experience from previously trained environments remains a challenge, a problem known as catastrophic forgetting. To address this challenge, we propose a continual learning framework for traversability prediction that incrementally adapts to new terrains using a generative experience recall model. A key virtue of the proposed framework is two folds: i) retain prior experience without storing past data; and ii) incorporate the uncertainty of the generated samples from the recall model, enabling uncertainty-aware adaptation. Real-world experiments with a skid-steering robot validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, demonstrating its ability to adapt across a series of diverse environments while mitigating catastrophic forgetting.

Geospatial foundation models provide reusable representations of satellite imagery that support downstream mapping with limited task-specific modelling. We evaluate whether annual AlphaEarth embeddings support binary cultivated-versus-non-cultivated mapping in Maine, USA, using 192 spatially separated patches and labels derived from the USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL). Without fine-tuning the foundation model, a lightweight classifier reaches 93.7% overall accuracy and 90.8% balanced accuracy on held-out patches. Logistic regression is within 0.3 percentage points of a gradient-boosted ensemble, while a nearest-class-centroid rule, which uses class centroids but fits no parameters, reaches 90.2%. A balanced sample of 60,000 labelled pixels is within 1.3 percentage points of the full pool of 8.6 million pixels; because pixels are spatially autocorrelated, this result concerns pixel-sample efficiency rather than 60,000 independent annotation sites. In a same-region transfer experiment, classifiers trained in one year remain accurate across 2018 to 2023. Against a blind, two-interpreter consensus at 385 randomly sampled points in one contiguous 2023 block, the AlphaEarth-plus-random-forest map agrees at 95.3% ($\kappa=0.82$), compared with 91.7% for the CDL ($\kappa=0.72$; exact two-sided McNemar $p=0.0161$). This local result is consistent with partial smoothing of CDL label noise, but it does not establish statewide correction of the reference product. On the same points, the difference from a fine-tuned TerraMind segmentation model is not statistically significant (95.3% versus 93.5%; $p=0.14$), and the experiment is not a controlled comparison of computational cost. These results support frozen geospatial embeddings as a low-compute candidate for regional cropland mapping, subject to the limits of a single-state study, a 30 m-derived training reference, and a one-block human validation.

Vision-language-action (VLA) systems already bring together two valuable resources for robot learning: rich visual representations and demonstrations of successful task execution. Intrinsic Robot Rewarding (IRR) proposes to use these resources for a second, complementary purpose: evaluating the robot's own outcomes and providing feedback for policy improvement. Successful demonstration endpoints define task-specific references, and the policy's frozen visual encoder provides the feature space in which new outcomes are assessed. The core reward mechanism adds a reference bank and a scoring operation to the existing pipeline, without requiring a separate learned evaluator or an additional perception backbone. Our position is that this reuse offers a promising route to lower integration effort, efficient reward computation, and reduced recurring human outcome scoring. Building on established research in visual rewards and learning from experience, IRR brings these ideas into the robot's existing perception and demonstration pipeline. An operational COMAU Racer 3 demonstrator is available at technology readiness level 4 (TRL 4). This laboratory foundation supports the next research step: connecting internal outcome evaluation to physical policy improvement. We present the reward formulation, central research questions, and an evaluation methodology linking reward reliability to task success and supervision effort. The intended contribution is a reusable approach to learn and improve from the data and experience already available in industrial robot systems.

The purpose of this paper is the identification of high-fidelity digital twin data models from numerical code outputs by non-intrusive techniques (i.e., not requiring Galerkin projection of the governing equations onto the reduced modes basis). In this paper the author defines the concept of the digital twin data model (DTM) as a model of reduced complexity that has the main feature of mirroring the original process behavior. The significant advantage of a DTM is to reproduce the dynamics with high accuracy and reduced costs in CPU time and hardware for settings difficult to explore because of the complexity of the dynamics over time. This paper introduces a new framework for creating efficient digital twin data models by combining two state-of-the-art tools: randomized dynamic mode decomposition and deep learning artificial intelligence. It is shown that the outputs are consistent with the original source data with the advantage of reduced complexity. The DTMs are investigated in the numerical simulation of three shock wave phenomena with increasing complexity. The author performs a thorough assessment of the performance of the new digital twin data models in terms of numerical accuracy and computational efficiency.

The choice of Riemannian metric can strongly influence the convergence of gradient-based optimization over covariance matrices. Euclidean, Bures-Wasserstein and affine-invariant metrics are common choices, but their relative effectiveness depends on the objective. We introduce a two-parameter family defined by $X^{p}LX^{q}+X^{q}LX^{p}=U$, solved for $L$ at each tangent vector $U$, that contains all three as exact members, at $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(1,1)$, and extends past them. We treat the choice of member as a particular way of preconditioning for a given problem. To this end, we analyze the conditioning of the Riemannian Hessian at the solution. We show that it obeys a lower bound that depends on $(p,q)$ only through the exponent $r=p+q$. When the Euclidean Hessian is a pure power that mixes no eigendirections, the member $p=q=r/2$ attains that bound, and a closed-form criterion identifies the other members that do. We discuss ways to tune $r$ for a given problem. Experiments on real covariance data confirm the predicted conditioning and the benefit of tuning $r$. A task covariance example shows a further gain from tuning the shape.

Indirectly encoded neural networks can assign different activation functions to individual nodes, but the right functions are rarely known in advance. When the available set contains only standard monotonic functions, problems like parity become unsolvable, yet an all-inclusive palette underperforms a curated one. How should evolution discover which functions to use? We address this as a meta-learning problem, designing 13 strategies (11 inspired by biological adaptation mechanisms, plus baseline and oracle controls) that modify the set of available activation functions during evolution. Each strategy translates a biological principle into an evolutionary operator: for example, circadian-inspired oscillatory gating cycles functions in and out of the palette on a fixed schedule, while immune-inspired Clonal Selection permanently protects functions that consistently correlate with fitness. We evaluate all strategies across more than 3,000 runs on parity and non-parity problems, first evolving the activation palette alone, then co-evolving a per-node aggregation palette on harder problems; an independent replication with new seeds confirms a stable high-reliability tier, with Circadian holding its top rank. Bio-inspired strategies match the solve rate of a tuned baseline but converge up to twice as fast, with Circadian halving total compute. Strategy rankings reverse across problem types, with no strategy dominating all domains. Strategy success is largely shaped by timescale compatibility: strategies whose characteristic timescale matches the evolutionary evaluation window consistently outperform those that operate too slowly. The practical guideline: match the mechanism's timescale to the evaluation budget. Rescaling the slowest strategy bypasses the oscillatory barrier entirely: all nine solutions solve parity with non-oscillatory activations paired with min or max aggregation.

Assistive autonomous systems must anticipate human goals before an observed behavior is complete. This article formulates anticipation as goal inference from a partially observed multimodal episode together with structured prediction of the remaining behavior, rather than exact motor forecasting. A compact Hierarchical Planning Decoder (HPD) is attached to a frozen neuro-symbolic recognition encoder and predicts, at four ontological levels, the next actions, the remaining activities and low-level intentions, and the episode high-level intention(HLI). The decoder is trained with soft neuro-symbolic regularization combining transition-coherence and hierarchical continuity losses, and is decoded with hard reachability masks that enforce ontological validity at inference. On a compositional four-level benchmark of 15,002 multimodal episodes built over NTU RGB+D 120 features, three headline properties are observed together. The advantage over the strongest sequential baseline grows with the anticipation horizon, from +1.7 points at step 1 to +7.3 points at step 3 (top-5). Under compositional generalization, where one parent association per multi-parent low level intention is held out, this advantage widens to +4.9 points at step 1. At the episode level, 96.8% of anticipated trajectories satisfy the joint logic constraints, above the 88.1% strongest-baseline value and the 73.9% ground-truth floor; soft logic terms alone account for a 59.8 to 71.1% relative reduction of HLI-reachability violations, and the hard masks then eliminate them entirely. Neural generation supplies predictive ranking, symbolic constraints supply onto logical validity, and their combination yields coherent hierarchical anticipation while exposing remaining challenges in compositional goal generalization and unordered set prediction.

Message-passing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) iteratively propagate and aggregate local neighborhood information followed by global readout to learn graph representations. However, their discriminative power is upper-bounded by the Weisfeiler–Lehman (1-WL) graph isomorphism test. This prevents GNNs from distinguishing certain non-isomorphic graphs with identical local neighborhood structures, often leading to similar graph representations. Unified Topological Signatures (UTS) capture compact, multi-scale representation of global graph topology derived from persistent homology. We introduce two complementary UTS signatures: Graph_UTS- a static signature of the input graph topology, and Embedding_UTS- a dynamic signature of the evolving embedding topology. They encode structural information inaccessible to 1-WL-based message-passing GNNs, yet their capabilities are explored solely for post-hoc embedding-space analysis. We integrate UTS into GNN training across three architectural interventions: (i) UTS-Aug: augmenting with standard readout feature that encodes graph's true topology; (ii) UTS-Reg: topological regularizer that constrains representation collapse; (iii) UTS-Pool: topology-guided pooling that retains structurally critical nodes. We further leverage UTS as a layer-wise diagnostic to quantify oversmoothing during GNN training. Theoretically, we show that integrating UTS into GNN optimization strictly extends GNN expressivity beyond the 1-WL hierarchy. Experiments on three graph classification benchmarks show consistent benefits: Graph-UTS, Dual-UTS, and UTS-Pool improve accuracy across all three datasets, Embedding-UTS provides smaller but similarly consistent gains, and UTS-Reg's benefit varies across graph domains. Accuracy improves by up to 5.8% with Graph-UTS augmentation, by up to 1.9% with UTS-Reg, and achieves comparable performance to TOGL with UTS-Pool.

We study nonconvex methods for matrix completion, the problem of recovering a low-rank matrix from a subset of its entries. Convex methods achieve sample complexity linear in the matrix dimension and the rank, up to logarithmic factors, whereas global guarantees for commonly used nonconvex methods require a higher polynomial dependence on the rank. We close this gap by analyzing Riemannian gradient descent (RGD) and Riemannian Gauss–Newton (RGN) methods. For an $n\times n$ matrix of rank $r$ with incoherence parameter $\mu$ and condition number $\kappa$, the two methods achieve exact recovery with high probability from $O(\mu nr\log n\log(n\kappa))$ and $O(\mu nr\log n\log(2\mu r\kappa))$ observations, respectively. The methods use a multiscale residual initialization, while the analysis simultaneously controls the spectral error and incoherence. The resulting RGD iterates converge linearly, whereas RGN eventually converges Q-quadratically.

Learning flexible motor primitives is a hallmark of skilled motor control. Recent neuroscience theory proposes that motor primitives may be implemented as low-rank perturbations of a shared recurrent network, but leaves open how such a system is learned. We translate this principle into a novel architecture for learning motor skills end-to-end: a shared recurrent core modulated by a bank of residual adapters, each selected by a discrete latent code. Trained on closed-loop biomechanical control, the adapters develop emergent low-rank perturbations of the recurrent dynamics despite no architectural rank constraint, placing task representations in disparate subspaces of the shared core network. A simple high-level policy over the learned options, optimized while the whole network is frozen, sequences the low-rank adapters to produce novel out-of-distribution movements. We demonstrate the ability to generalize to novel motor sequences within the closed-loop control setting, improving on the generalization error of a task-input-conditioned multitask baseline by upto order of magnitude.

Traditional energy forecasting solutions rely on task-specific supervision and energy asset representations, limiting transferability and the ability to capture general temporal dynamics across heterogeneous assets. We address this by proposing a distributed Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) for self-supervised learning from heterogeneous energy time-series. The framework predicts latent representations of masked temporal segments while integrating temporal observations and contextual information within a shared embedding space. To prevent representation collapse, training combines a latent-space predictive objective with covariance and temporal variance regularization. The evaluation was conducted on energy consumption and generation datasets under data-degradation scenarios and compared with a Transformer forecasting baseline. The learned representations remained stable (cosine similarity $\approx 0.98$; effective rank 185-235). JEPA achieved performance comparable to a Transformer on building energy data, higher $R^2$ in 3/5 consumer clusters, and outperformed the baseline on 9/10 unseen PVs ($R^2$=0.73-0.88 vs. <0.45), while showing greater robustness to missing data.

Continual learning must balance the learning of new knowledge with the retention of previously learned knowledge to incrementally learn tasks from a data stream without catastrophic forgetting. While leveraging pretrained models has significantly advanced continual learning, existing methods exhibit a scalability bottleneck when trained sequentially on many tasks, suffering from performance degradation due to inter-task interference and loss of plasticity. Inspired by evidence that sparse fine-tuning achieves performance comparable to full fine-tuning, this paper presents a novel sparsity-driven continual learning framework. Our continual learning method, termed CLARE, operates in two stages: it first identifies a sparse, task-critical parameter mask via a sparsity-inducing objective, then performs mask-constrained fine-tuning by only optimizing parameters selected by the mask. This two-stage sparse adapter mechanism enables all tasks to be accumulated within a shared adapter space while reducing destructive interference across tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate the scalability of CLARE. On the long task-sequence benchmark Omnibenchmark-1k, CLARE outperforms strong baselines in final accuracy by a large margin, e.g, improving EASE by 4.64% and 13.34% after learning 100 tasks, respectively.

Machine learning (ML) has become the dominant approach for network traffic classification, achieving very high predictive performance. However, a model is only valuable if it learns semantically meaningful and trustworthy patterns rather than exploiting spurious correlations. Conventional evaluation practices predominantly assess predictive performance. Consequently, whether the model relies on semantically meaningful patterns remains unknown. To address these challenges, we adapt the knowledge generation framework for network traffic classification. The adapted framework combines data, ML models, explainability, visualization, and expert reasoning to support the iterative exploration, verification, and refinement of model behavior and data preprocessing. The framework is grounded in findings from the literature, benchmark dataset analyses, practical experience with XAI-based traffic classification, and expert feedback, providing practical guidance for semantic model validation. By complementing predictive performance with semantic validation and human expertise, the proposed framework supports the development of network traffic classification models that are not only accurate but also robust and trustworthy.

Federated learning lets multiple participants train a shared model without pooling raw data, by exchanging locally trained model updates instead. Federated averaging assumes that averaging local models is a reasonable way to solve one shared problem when participants' data are broadly similar. Work on non-IID federated learning has shown that this assumption can withstand differences in label and feature distributions. We ask whether it survives a different strain specific to graph neural networks, where client graphs differ not in label or feature distribution but in structure itself, requiring the same shared weights to operate over fundamentally different topologies. We call the resulting harm structural negative transfer. In a federation of real citation networks and synthetic structural proxies, a structurally atypical client lost more than half its achievable accuracy simply by joining. In an initial six-client federation, two label-free structural statistics computable before training were strongly associated with this harm. Expanding to twenty clients showed that degree divergence remained associated with harm, although more weakly, and survived removal of domain contrast. Spectral divergence did not replicate, which we trace to a confound caused by the composition of the reference pool used for leave-one-out statistics. A causal intervention isolating topology found no significant effect. A degree-normalization mechanism held across twenty-four seeds but did not explain the harm when corrected. The best of five candidate fixes beat a tuned baseline only until a matched, structurally blind control was applied, after which the gain disappeared. What survives is a modest, partially replicated, degree-specific signal that is not yet a validated predictor at scale.

In various fields, such as medicine and marketing, accurately predicting individual treatment effects holds significant promise. However, achieving reliable predictions alone is often insufficient for making informed decisions; it is equally important to understand why the treatment effect is higher for some individuals than for others. To address this two-fold challenge of prediction and interpretation, we introduce an algorithm based on decision trees and random forests for estimating individual treatment effects. Our algorithm is simple: it operates exactly like a standard random forest, but with a different splitting criterion, and requires no additional workarounds such as double machine learning or orthogonalization as used in Generalized random forests. It handles observational studies with varying treatment propensities without requiring separate estimation of the full propensity function. This is achieved by combining two splitting criteria—one targeting heterogeneity in the treatment effect, the other targeting bias correction for the average treatment effect—which together improve split point selection and automatically distinguish confounders from features responsible for heterogeneity. As a result, interpretation follows directly from the fitted tree structure itself, that is, from which features the trees split on and with which split statistics, without requiring separate post-hoc analysis. For the theoretical analysis of this algorithm, we consider a change point model with step functions for potential outcomes and treatment propensity and provide insights into the theoretical underpinnings of our approach. Simulation studies show that our simple algorithm achieves comparable, and often better, prediction accuracy than existing methods, while substantially improving interpretability.