Papers

Stochastic Dominance (SD) theory provides a rigorous framework for selecting superior assets tailored to the asset allocation needs of investors with varying risk preferences (i.e., risk-averse, risk-seeking, and risk-neutral). However, traditional stock clustering methods typically rely on geometric metrics such as Euclidean distance, which often fail to effectively capture the intrinsic risk dominance relationships among assets. To address this limitation, this paper proposes an innovative clustering analysis framework based on SD test statistics. Methodologically, this study deeply integrates SD theory with machine learning algorithms. Transcending the limitations of traditional reliance on geometric distance, we innovatively utilize test statistics from first-, second-, and third-order SD to construct a "Stochastic Dominance Coefficient Matrix." Building upon this matrix, we modify the classic K-means and Hierarchical Clustering algorithms. Specifically, we derive 12 distinct algorithm variants tailored to different orders of SD relationships. Simultaneously, we construct the SD-SC coefficient and the SD-DBI index as specialized validity indices to evaluate the clustering performance. Empirically, we analyze constituent stock data from a representative developed market (the US NASDAQ Index) and an emerging market (China's CSI 100 Index). The results verify the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method. Furthermore, we apply the clustering results to the modification of the Single Index Model and the construction of Global Minimum Variance Portfolios (GMVP). The findings demonstrate that the proposed method effectively facilitates customized asset allocation for investors, holding significant theoretical value and practical implications.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as analyst assistants in security operations centers (SOCs), where they ingest log and alert data to produce triage labels, incident summaries, or remediation advice. We study a structural failure mode of this design: many log fields are attacker controlled. User agents, URLs, payloads, DNS queries, and attempted usernames can therefore carry instructions to the model alongside evidence of the intrusion. We call this setting log-substrate prompt injection. We introduce a four-class taxonomy of log-substrate attacks: direct override (S1), persona hijack (S2), context manipulation (S3), and obfuscated payloads (S4). We evaluate 48 strategy-defense-task combinations using gpt-4o-mini as the analyst. Three findings stand out. First, direct overrides are ineffective in our setting: all S1 classification attacks achieve 0% suppression. In contrast, persona hijacks suppress 68% of malicious logs under a naive classifier and remain effective under stronger defenses. Second, summarization is the highest-risk task: context manipulation reaches 96% injection success without defenses and 38% even with constrained output. Third, defenses reduce but do not eliminate the attack surface: average injection success falls from 26.6% under naive prompting to 11.8% under our strongest defense. We also compare empirical results to a deterministic mock analyst and find that simulation substantially mispredicts current model behavior, especially for direct overrides. These results suggest that SOC copilots should treat raw log content as adversarial input rather than ordinary analyst context.

Batch Normalization (BN) is widely adopted to enable faster convergence and more stable training of deep neural networks. However, its impact on privacy and memorization has remained largely unexplored. In this work, we investigate the effect of BN layers on the memorization of atypical or outlier samples and its implications for privacy leakage. We conduct an extensive empirical study using three complementary approaches: (i) unintended memorization of out-of-distribution samples, (ii) per-sample influence, and (iii) susceptibility to membership inference attacks (MIA). Across multiple datasets and architectures, we consistently observe that BN substantially increases the memorization of outliers compared to models without BN. Critically, this amplified memorization translates directly into privacy vulnerabilities: models with BN exhibit significantly higher susceptibility to MIAs. We complement our empirical findings with a mechanistic analysis under the exact BN backward pass, which shows that BN amplifies the per-step margin growth of outlier samples during training. Our results highlight an underappreciated privacy risk associated with BN and provide both practical and theoretical insights into how normalization layers can amplify the influence of rare or sensitive training examples.

Federated learning is used in medical imaging where privacy prohibits centralizing data. Standard federated algorithms assume homogeneous hardware, identical architectures, and centralized aggregation, which fails when hospitals have unequal compute resources. We propose capacity-aware coordination: measure each hospital's throughput, assign capacity-appropriate architectures (MobileNetV3-Small, EfficientNet-B0, ResNet-50), and combine predictions via weighted ensemble. Weak and strong hospitals can participate without forcing uniform architectures. We separate on-chain policy from off-chain learning. A Solidity contract stores hospital registration, benchmark hashes, metrics, and weights. Hospitals train locally and submit only hashes and scalars (not parameters). Weighted ensemble inference is computed off-chain. Experiments on PneumoniaMNIST and DermaMNIST (5 seeds, 3 non-IID levels) show our method achieves lower or equal calibration error versus equal-weight ensemble and competitive accuracy versus FedAvg, FedProx, and FedMD. Communication overhead is 224 bytes per round, a reduction of over 912,000x compared to FedAvg.

Every tabular classification task requires sufficient labeled data. When labels are scarce, practitioners can collect more examples, encode domain expertise into features, or accept lower performance. Large language models offer an alternative by leveraging knowledge acquired during pretraining. This raises three questions: (i) can zero-shot inference reduce the need for labeled data; (ii) can a richer prompt reduce the need for more examples; and (iii) can encoded domain knowledge compensate for missing data? To answer each under explicit, testable conditions, we introduce TabLens, a benchmark of 91 real-world and synthetic datasets across eight domains, plus eight industrial datasets with free-text columns. First, below a complexity threshold estimable from a dataset's intrinsic dimensionality before running an LLM, zero-shot inference matches the accuracy of up to about 16 labeled examples. This holds whether the model generates an answer or, more cheaply, scores candidate labels by log-probabilities, which loses almost no accuracy except for the smallest models. Above the threshold, the advantage disappears. On datasets with free-text columns, however, zero-shot LLMs outperform 16-shot TabPFN-3 Plus without manual feature engineering. Second, a richer prompt reduces the number of required demonstrations only when it includes both real column names and a plain-language task description; providing only one can be worse than neither, particularly at higher shot counts. Third, on LLM-synthetic datasets, explicit if–then expert rules help only when the prompt provides enough task context to interpret them, and even then, they substitute for at most about 16 real examples. Together, these results establish testable conditions under which LLMs can reduce data-collection and feature-engineering requirements for tabular classification.

Human cognitive performance is constrained by limited mental resources, yet continuous computational estimation of cognitive capacity dynamics remains an open challenge. We propose a theory-driven multimodal learning framework that models capacity-related cognitive state as a two-dimensional physiological representation defined by voluntary resource allocation (mental effort) and overload-related strain (stress). The proposed architecture combines dual-stream encoding of cardiac (IBI/HRV) and electrodermal (EDA) signals with late fusion and task-specific output heads that independently estimate probabilistic effort and stress states. Evaluation on the SWELL-KW dataset using strict leave-one-subject-out cross-validation demonstrates cross-individual generalization (stress: 70.0% balanced accuracy; effort: 72.2%), with significant gains from multimodal integration and theory-guided supervision. Rather than collapsing physiological dynamics into a single workload label, the proposed effort–stress state-space enables structured differentiation between distinct cognitive regimes, including productive engagement and overload-related strain. Predicted state trajectories exhibit significant demand-sensitive shifts under controlled workload manipulations, with effort and stress responding differentially across interruption and time-pressure conditions. These results suggest that physiologically grounded multidimensional state representations may provide a foundation for adaptive systems capable of continuous capacity-aware monitoring and human-centered interaction.

Existing language model applications struggle to meet the demand for emotionally oriented support, primarily due to their inability to maintain deep, persistent context across sessions. This report introduces Psych LM, an iOS application that validates the thesis that, for such applications, the surrounding architecture is paramount. Psych LM runs a local, on-device language model within a purpose-built, local-first runtime designed for behavioral and life-coaching applications. The system achieves the practical effect of a near-infinite context window through an automated, user-inspectable memory corpus that converts conversations into structured memory cards, including facts, goals, and events, and dynamically injects them into the prompt via semantic and vector search. As such, the system can be defined as an active-learning, retrieval-augmented generative, on-device architecture. This architecture delivers four primary contributions: a local-first design where privacy is a core property; a detailed description of the memory corpus for persistent context of key user information; a deterministic orchestration layer that provides a stable behavioral spine independent of the model's internal state; and a benchmark framework focused on evaluating the integrated system's reliability under realistic operating conditions. The R and D process confirms that complex, context-aware interaction can be reliably achieved under the strict constraints of a mobile environment by prioritizing architectural control and resource management over simple model size.

Optimizing HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) can enhance a building's energy efficiency while providing comfort levels for its occupants. Using conventional control systems to maintain HVAC functions is often difficult because of the nonlinear characteristics of a building envelope as it experiences stochastic load variations over time. This paper presents a new approach to optimizing HVAC systems through the use of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithms and the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm implemented in a custom Python performance environment. The DRL system uses a second order resistor-capacitor thermal model and an integrated dynamic mass balance of CO2 to replicate the complex physics associated with buildings. One major innovation of this study is a "Hierarchical Flow Logic," which provides the means to ensure that indoor air quality (IAQ) is maintained by overriding the accepted actions of the agent that cause CO2 to exceed 1000 ppm. In addition, an enthalpy-based economiser is used to create free cooling from the outdoor environment. The experimental data shows that compared to PID controllers tuned by GA or traditional On-Off controls, a PPO agent has better temperature stability and energy efficiency overall. An end-to-end pipeline provides an avenue for robust and generalized solutions to help implement smart building energy management within the context of real hardware implementation.

We study sequential decision-making with offline reinforcement learning (RL). Traditional offline RL policies may result in out-of-distribution (OOD) actions when training relies only on sparse offline representations. To ensure safe offline policies in a sparse state-action space, we explore how density estimation models can be integrated into model-based RL methods to avoid the OOD regions. Generative models are capable of explicitly modeling the density in sparse state-action spaces. Building on this, we introduce Generative OOD-regularized Model-based Policy Optimization (GORMPO), a density-regularized offline RL algorithm that uses generative density modeling to restrict policy updates to high-density areas of the dataset. Furthermore, we examine whether better OOD detection corresponds to better model-based offline policies. We compare (1) the OOD detection capabilities of various density estimators and (2) their performance within the GORMPO framework on a real-world medical dataset and sparse offline RL datasets. We theoretically guarantee GORMPO's performance under mild assumptions. Empirically, GORMPO outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by 17% on a real-world medical dataset and enhances the base model on the offline RL datasets. Our empirical findings show that better OOD detection generally results in improved policies in environments with stable dynamics, while conservative penalties with poor density estimation are favored when dynamics are uncertain.

Alignment plays a fundamental role in many machine learning problems, such as multi-network analysis, multimodal learning, and point cloud registration. Recent works increasingly leverage optimal transport (OT) for distributional alignment, whose effectiveness largely depends on sparse supervision that is hard or costly to obtain in practice. Existing works, however, largely overlook how to actively acquire high-quality supervision to improve their alignment performance under OT frameworks. In this paper, we propose a principled active alignment framework for optimal transport alignment called AvAtar. We quantify the informativeness of a candidate by measuring its gradient-based impact on the global alignment result, computed as the gradient propagation from the global alignment result to all possible supervisions of the candidate through the entropy-regularized OT formulation. While differentiating through OT is challenging given its constrained nature, we leverage the adjoint-state method to reformulate the computation to a linear system solvable by the conjugate gradient method with linear complexity and guaranteed convergence. By encoding the global alignment result via effective utility functions, AvAtar is applicable to general alignment problems under the OT framework. Extensive experiments on three representative alignment tasks demonstrate the effectiveness, scalability, and generalizability of the proposed AvAtar.

The eigendecomposition of the Laplace–Beltrami Operator (LBO) is fundamental to geometric analysis, yet computing its low-frequency eigenmodes remains a significant bottleneck due to the high cost of iterative solvers on large-scale data. To amortize this cost, we introduce the Neural Eigenspace Operator (NEO), a feed-forward framework designed to predict the spectrum directly from point clouds. Crucially, NEO circumvents the ill-posed nature of standard eigenvector regression, which suffers from intrinsic sign flips and rotation ambiguities, by learning the stable, invariant low-frequency subspace instead. Specifically, the network predicts a redundant set of basis functions whose span robustly covers the target eigenspace, allowing for the recovery of accurate eigenpairs via a lightweight Rayleigh–Ritz refinement. To handle irregular sampling, we propose a mass-aware neural operator that incorporates per-point area weights into attention-based aggregation, improving robustness to non-uniform densities and enabling zero-shot generalization across resolutions. Our approach achieves near-linear runtime scaling and substantial wall-clock speedups over iterative solvers at comparable accuracy, and exhibits strong zero-shot transfer to high-resolution point clouds. The resulting eigenpairs support standard spectral geometry tasks, while the raw basis functions provide effective point-wise features for downstream learning. Code: https://github.com/Adversarr/NEO.

Fermi-Dirac machines were proposed recently as an approach to solving semidefinite optimization problems on quantum computers. Here, we reinterpret them as canonical quantizations of classical neurons. By viewing a classical neuron as an activation function applied to a parameterized classical Hamiltonian, we quantize this model by replacing classical variables with operators whose eigenvalues encode their possible values. This follows the standard approach to canonical quantization in quantum mechanics. Crucially, when the Hamiltonian consists of commuting operators, our construction reduces exactly to a classical neuron. More generally, our approach yields an activation observable, defined as an activation function applied to a parameterized quantum Hamiltonian. The output of this quantized neuron is a random variable with expectation value equal to that of the activation observable with respect to an input state. We develop efficient hybrid quantum-classical algorithms for evaluating outputs and gradients of our quantized neurons, enabling evaluation and training. These algorithms rely on basic primitives that include random sampling, Hamiltonian simulation, and the Hadamard test. We also quantize a whole host of other activation functions, including the smooth rectified linear unit (ReLU), sigmoid linear unit, Gaussian-smoothed ReLU, and Gaussian error linear unit (GeLU), which are known to be useful for deep learning applications. Numerical experiments indicate that neurons based on quantum Hamiltonians can learn functions that classical neurons cannot. We further define a computational decision problem based on Fermi-Dirac neurons and prove that it is BQP-complete, providing complexity-theoretic evidence against efficient classical simulation. Finally, we generalize our approach to continuous quantum variables and sketch two different ways of composing these neurons into networks.

Time series forecasting drives operational decisions in areas like finance, transportation, and energy. While supervised learning approaches achieve strong performance, they require domain-specific training, feature engineering, and ongoing maintenance. Large-scale foundation models have recently emerged as a zero-shot alternative, avoiding task-specific training much like LLMs. In this work, we evaluate foundation models against standard supervised approaches. Rather than focusing solely on aggregate accuracy, we analyze performance across four operational regimes: periodic human-centric systems, physically constrained processes, stochastic financial markets, and heterogeneous demand forecasting. Our results characterize optimal deployment areas. Foundation models perform well in domains with transferable periodic structures and are efficient for cold-start or long-tail scenarios. Conversely, supervised specialists maintain higher precision in systems governed by strict physical constraints. In financial domains, newer foundation models are rapidly closing the performance gap with supervised specialists. We further quantify trade-offs in inference latency, data drift adaptability, and deployment constraints. Finally, we propose a Complexity Router that assigns each series to the optimal model class using empirical features. We demonstrate that this selective routing achieves higher accuracy and significantly lower inference costs compared to deploying a universal foundation model, providing a practical framework for balancing generalization and efficiency.

Behavioral phenotyping of genetic animal models currently requires labor-intensive manual feature engineering that limits reproducibility and scalability. We present GEESE, an end-to-end deep learning framework that learns behavioral representations directly from 3D pose dynamics without hand-crafted features. Using a pretrained time series foundation model, we encode movement sequences into a behavioral manifold that supports both behavior classification and genotype prediction. Evaluated across three autism-associated genetic models (CNTNAP2, CHD8, FMR1), our deep learning approach surpasses hand-crafted feature baselines in both tasks, revealing that learned representations capture genotype-specific behavioral signatures. The framework generalizes across genetic backgrounds, and an all-cohort model identifies both genetic background and genotype from movement patterns alone. We further provide HONK, an interactive intelligent tool enabling researchers without programming expertise to perform behavioral phenotyping from pose data through natural language interaction.

The exponential growth of data has intensified the gap between the availability of unlabeled data and the high cost of manual annotation. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a promising solution, as they exploit relational structures and learn from both labeled and unlabeled data, performing semi-supervised learning. A crucial component of many of these models is degree-based normalization, which influences message propagation but typically assumes uniform importance among neighboring nodes. In image classification, graphs are usually constructed from feature similarity, where treating all neighbors equally may overlook important variations in relevance. Motivated by this gap, we propose GRaNDe (Gaussian Rank-based Neighborhood Degree). This novel degree measure integrates neighborhood ranking with Gaussian distance weighting to better capture node importance. Experiments on five public image classification datasets show consistent accuracy improvements and competitive or superior results compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in conversational applications. However, their reliance on parametric knowledge limits reliability in real-world scenarios that require dynamic or domain-specific information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this limitation by incorporating external knowledge during generation, but existing text-based and graph-based RAG methods often struggle with noisy or irrelevant contexts. In this work, we propose Structure-aware Retrieval Augmented Generation (SA-RAG), which uses tables as an intermediate structured representation to provide a compact and controllable interface that reduces noise while preserving essential information. We introduce a quality-aware table metadata generation framework that models metadata normalization and effectiveness, improving metadata quality and downstream performance. Furthermore, we explore both training-free and training-based table generation methods. Generation validation and direct preference optimization further improve table quality while maintaining semantic and structural consistency. Experiments on two noisy real-world datasets show that SA-RAG significantly outperforms existing RAG baselines. Our code is publicly available at a public repository.

Multicalibration extends classical calibration by requiring predictions to be unbiased over a rich collection of functions, encompassing both prediction slices and subpopulations. It has emerged as a powerful framework for fairness, robustness, and reliable prediction, yet the theoretical understanding of multicalibration boosting (MCBoost) remains fragmented and often relies on restrictive assumptions. In this work, we develop a unified and refined perspective on MCBoost that subsumes existing variants, including multiaccuracy, BatchGCP, and BatchMVP. We uncover several phenomena that provide new insights into its practical behavior: even highly accurate and flexible predictors can remain substantially miscalibrated; enforcing multicalibration introduces a calibration-risk trade-off; and early stopping plays a central role in controlling this trade-off. On the theoretical side, we establish a general framework for MCBoost under weaker and more realistic conditions. We show that the boosting iterates converge to a Bregman projection of the population-optimal predictor onto the cumulative span generated by the audit class, thereby explicitly characterizing the function space on which multicalibration is achieved. We further derive convergence rates under different smoothness assumptions, finite-sample guarantees, and principled stopping rules that ensure multicalibration at termination. Finally, we extend the theory of universal adaptability under covariate shift, providing more general transfer guarantees and clarifying when multicalibrated predictors generalize across domains. These results provide a more complete theoretical foundation and practical guidance for multicalibration boosting, positioning it as both a unifying framework and a reliable post-processing approach for modern predictive models.

Estimating individual treatment effect (ITE) from observational graph data is crucial for decision-making in the fields such as commerce and medicine. This task is challenging due to interference, where individual outcomes can be influenced by the treatments and covariates of their neighbors. Existing methods attempt to model such interference for accurate ITE estimation. However, a critical issue is often overlooked: differentiated networked effect (DNE), an effect caused by local networks consisting of neighbors with varying importance and scales. Capturing DNE is vital; otherwise, we will end up with imprecise ITE estimation due to an erroneous characterization of interference, which can result in misguided decisions. To address this challenge, we propose a novel interference modeling mechanism that incorporates two partial attention mechanisms and a message amplifier. The partial attention mechanisms automatically estimate the importance of different neighbors in contributing to interference, while the message amplifier adjusts the results of the interference modeling mechanism based on the scale of neighbors, all of which enables the model to capture DNE. Experiments on three real-world graphs demonstrate that our methods outperform existing approaches for ITE estimation from graph data, which corroborates the importance of explicitly capturing DNE.

In this paper, we study the role of the critic in actor–critic for entropy-regularized, finite, discounted environments. We establish that, when the critic is exact, using the latter as a baseline is a variance-reduction method in a strong sense. In this case, actor–critic with stochastic gradients matches the sample complexity of deterministic policy gradient, reaching an $\epsilon$-optimal regularized value with $\tilde{O}(\log(1/\epsilon))$ samples. In practice, the critic is learned alongside the actor: the variance of the actor update is then influenced by the critic's variance and bias. Specifically, when the critic has a sufficiently small error, the variance reduction and rapid convergence are preserved. This suggests to learn the critic first, keeping it up to date after each actor update, underscoring the crucial role of accurate critic estimation in actor–critic methods.

In online reinforcement learning, data scarcity creates epistemic uncertainty that makes robustness important early in learning, whereas sufficient exploration is needed to learn the true-environment optimal policy. We study this time-varying robustness–exploration trade-off through a quantile Bayesian risk-aware Markov decision process (BR-MDP), in which the quantile level controls how posterior uncertainty enters the Bellman backup. We characterize this control through an asymptotic normality result for the difference between the quantile BR-MDP value and the value in the true environment. The result implies that upper/lower-tail quantiles induce optimism/pessimism towards epistemic uncertainty, and the magnitude of the optimism/pessimism decreases as data accumulate. Building on this characterization, we propose an online Bayesian risk-aware algorithm with an adaptive quantile schedule that emphasizes robustness early and gradually encourages exploration of less-visited state–action pairs. We establish sublinear Bayesian regret bounds with respect to both the true optimal value and the optimal BR-MDP robust value. Numerical experiments demonstrate strong performance in both exploration-demanding and exploration-costly environments.

Production deep learning systems across enterprise domains operate under constraints that academic benchmarks routinely obscure: labeled data is expensive, inference budgets are tight, and models that cannot explain their behavior are difficult to trust and maintain. We present ChainzRule (CR), a neural architecture replacing typical activations with learnable polynomial layers governed by Differential Regularization (DREG), a layer-wise Jacobian penalty computed analytically during the forward pass at standard inference cost. The core claim is that bounding intermediate derivatives forces the network toward low-frequency, structurally stable representations, simultaneously reducing dependence on labeled data volume, improving robustness to distribution shift, and providing a measurable, gradient-based handle on model behavior. Evaluated across five domains, CR achieves $85.71\% \pm 2.01\%$ on Pima Diabetes (statistically superior to SVM and XGBoost), $46.20\% \pm 0.37\%$ on SST-5 sentiment classification with a frozen encoder (superior to RNTN using approximately 5% of its training data), $55.79\%$ on SST-5 with a fine-tuned BERT backbone (versus BERT-base linear head at $54.9\%$), $70.17\%$ on Yelp Full ordinal regression with 3.2M parameters versus a 10-model average of $66.35\%$, and $+2.32\%$ mean corruption accuracy on CIFAR-10-C. All results with reported $p$-values fall below the $\alpha = 0.05$ threshold after Bonferroni correction. CR maintains a gradient tail ratio $\tau$ (p99/mean) of $1.01$–$1.02$ against $1.07$–$1.09$ for all typical activation function baselines across every data fraction, a structural invariant we propose as the mechanistic driver of sample efficiency and a deployment-time proxy for model reliability.

Context or prompt-level reweighting has emerged as a central algorithmic lever in Reinforcement Learning with Verified Rewards (RLVR) for improving the reasoning capability of large language models, yet the principle determining what constitutes an optimal weighting remains poorly understood. We address this gap by formulating prompt reweighting as a functional derivative of a utility functional defined in the pass-rate function space, yielding a unified optimality framework that accommodates existing schemes, including REINFORCE and GRPO. Building on this optimality framework, we propose a distribution-aware prompt reweighting approach, called CurveRL, based on a quantile coordinate transform, in which the weight assigned to each prompt depends not on the absolute value of pass rates but on its rank and density to reflect the distributional structure of the pass rates in the learning dynamics. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed CurveRL consistently outperforms GRPO and other RLVR baselines. Our study identifies context-distribution control as a principled axis for analyzing and designing prompt-reweighted RLVR algorithms. The code is released in https://github.com/zhyzmath/CurveRL.

Softmax attention-based transformers and recurrent memory-based models (e.g., state space models (SSMs)) form the foundation of modern sequence models. Hybrid architectures aim to combine the expressivity from attention and the computational efficiency from recurrent memory, yet so far common practices simply stack both attention and recurrent layers. We propose Interdomain Attention (IA) as a novel hybrid attention architecture that mixes attention and recurrent memory in the same layer. Motivated by a kernel regression view of softmax attention, IA compresses values and kernel features of keys into a recurrent memory parameterized by an SSM. Then IA approximates dot-product attention by implicitly reconstructing the attention matrix and values from memory states; importantly this construction maintains SSM's computational efficiency advantage. We demonstrate IA's efficacy by designing and pre-training IA network architectures, where ablation studies identify attention-like readout as the primary source of gain over SSMs. Across 125M-1.3B models pre-trained on text data, IA improves over an S4D baseline at matched memory size. It also outperforms softmax attention-based Transformer in perplexity and accuracy on common-sense reasoning tasks. Based on Caduceus backbone, IA matches or outperforms the original SSM-based architecture in both perplexity and downstream tasks on genomic data.

Quantum machine learning is often motivated by the idea that quantum systems can expose useful high-dimensional structure that is difficult to access with classical models. We isolate one central component of this claim: the fixed data-encoding map. Amplitude, angle, and basis encoding are evaluated as deterministic feature maps for classical supervised learning under matched output dimensionality and strong classical controls. The benchmark compares these encodings against raw linear models, random Fourier features, polynomial features, PCA, RBF SVMs, and shallow neural networks across diverse classical datasets. Rather than treating performance as a single endpoint, we analyze the geometry of each representation through effective rank, condition number, centered kernel alignment, predictive performance, and practical overhead. The resulting picture is mechanistic: amplitude encoding can remove magnitude information through unit-sphere normalization, angle encoding can become geometrically redundant with raw linear features, and basis encoding can impose a binary Hamming geometry that is poorly aligned with smooth decision structure. These findings do not argue against quantum computation, however, they show that fixed quantum-inspired encoding geometry alone is not a reliable source of machine-learning advantage on classical data.

As large language models become a default source of guidance on personal, moral, and existential questions, it matters whether they draw on the religious frameworks that have historically shaped such reasoning, or systematically omit them. In this paper, we ask a deliberately narrow question: when posed an everyday ethical question for which religious perspectives may be valuable, do LLMs invoke religion at all? In contrast to benchmarks that look for the presence of political leanings or social bias, we look for the absence of religious representation as a dimension of value alignment and bias in LLMs. We term this “omissive bias.” To measure omissive bias, we contribute the AllFaith Religious Representation Benchmark: 150 ethically and personally salient questions, sourced from in-the-wild chat transcripts and faith-community contributors, paired with an LLM-as-judge rubric that gives full credit for any mention of a religion, a religious practice, or a religious leader. The questions are not themselves about religion–they are open-ended questions about grief, forgiveness, relationships, purpose, and honesty, where religion is one valuable perspective among several. We also run a human-subjects survey to compare LLM behavior against human expectations. Evaluating 27 models, we find that LLMs consistently underrepresent religion relative to human expectations. The omission is asymmetric: models invoke religion more readily for abstract existential questions (meaning, death, truth) than for the practical personal situations–grief, marriage, family conflict, addiction–where many people most rely on it. It is not our purpose to adjudicate which values LLMs should hold. We argue, more modestly, that current LLM responses overlook critical opportunities to reflect religious frameworks that many people draw on when navigating personal and ethical challenges.

Mini-batching is central to large-scale optimization, yet its role in statistical scaling laws remains limited. We study one-pass and multi-pass batch SGD for sketched linear regression under power-law spectral and source conditions. Our analysis reveals a two-horizon phenomenon induced by warmup–stable–decay schedules: deterministic learning is governed by the full optimization trajectory, while stochastic error retains only a shorter terminal memory. For dynamic batch schedules, the individual batch sizes enter through influence-weighted summaries that measure how strongly each update affects the final risk. Consequently, batching leaves the approximation and optimization-bias laws unchanged at a fixed update horizon, but controls the one-pass variance and the multi-pass fluctuation around full-batch gradient descent. We obtain matching one-pass variance bounds and nearly matching multi-pass fluctuation bounds, recover static-batch and full-batch behavior as special cases, and derive an oracle square-root rule for allocating a fixed iteration budget. These results identify WSD horizon separation and final-risk influence as the mechanisms governing dynamic mini-batch scaling.

Lexical gaps are words that do not exist in certain languages. They pose challenges for building multilingual lexical resources, for machine translation, and for cross-lingual transfer. Existing lexical gap detection relies on human judgments or fixed conceptual taxonomies. We propose a data-driven framework for identifying cross-lingual lexical gaps. We extracted contextualized embeddings from Korean-English bilingual LLMs for Korean-to-English and English-to-Korean translation pairs. Combinations of LLMs, embedding types, dimensionality, and orthogonal transformations across 100 train-test splits yielded 4000 distinct embedding spaces in each source language. In each space, we computed the semantic similarity between each source word and its nearest neighbor in the target language, and compared their distribution for gap words versus non-gap words. In 94% (Korean-to-English) and 97% (English-to-Korean) of embedding spaces, gap words showed weaker cross-lingual semantic alignment than non-gap words. Logistic classifiers trained on unaligned embedding spaces can reliably separate gap words from non-gap words, achieving AUCs of 0.81 (Korean-to-English) and 0.76 (English-to-Korean) and retrieving 18/19 Korean and 26/27 English gap words. This approach provides a language-agnostic and taxonomy-free method for scalable lexical gap identification.

Standard accuracy on binary reasoning benchmarks hides critical failure modes: prior collapse, inconsistency under paraphrase, and inability to reason about parameter-dependent dynamics. We present ChaosBench-Logic v2, a 40,886-question benchmark over 165 dynamical systems with 27 FOL predicates and 78 axiom edges, together with CARE (Calibration- and Adversarial-Robust Evaluation), a protocol that surfaces these pathologies. Evaluating 14 models, we find that regime-transition reasoning remains near random (MCC = 0.05) even for frontier models, whereas FOL deduction with given premises reaches MCC = 0.52. Per-family decomposition shows that the proprietary-model advantage concentrates on cross-indicator (+0.40) and consistency tasks, while open-source Qwen 2.5-32B dominates indicator diagnostics (0.91 vs. 0.45). Two models exhibit negative MCC on bifurcation questions, confirmed as systematic anti-correlation via confusion-matrix analysis.

Recent research in educational data mining, especially knowledge tracing, has focused on predicting learners' future knowledge states to support adaptive instruction. However, in many real-world educational settings, learning data are often available only as single-time-point assessments without temporal information, making existing time-series-based approaches difficult to apply. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for predicting future skill acquisition using only snapshot data. Specifically, we address the problem of predicting the next skill to be acquired from skill mastery patterns estimated by cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs). In the absence of temporal information, we exploit inclusion relations among learners' skill sets to induce a pseudo-temporal ordering, interpreting expanding skill sets as a proxy for learning progression. To efficiently approximate unobserved acquisition paths, we introduce a neural model that captures latent skill acquisition dynamics through expected skill increments. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms baseline approaches, with particularly strong advantages as the skill space becomes larger. These results indicate that meaningful skill acquisition patterns can be inferred from snapshot data alone, providing a practical framework for adaptive learning support in data-constrained educational environments.

Large language models exhibit a risk-averse "turtle" bias as strategic agents. We show that injecting a symbolic reasoning framework as a per-round reflective prompt into one agent acts as a small perturbation whose consequences are not per-decision but emergent: the agent's risk posture is unchanged in isolation, yet over a campaign of accumulating memory and multi-agent interaction the conditions settle into distinct, condition-associated winner ecosystems. In a 7-player Warring States Diplomacy variant (61 games, 6 conditions), the winner distribution differs sharply across the four primary conditions (41 games; permutation omnibus p approximately 0.001): control -> Yan (7/11); I-Ching yarrow -> Yan/Chu co-dominance with Qin fully suppressed (0/10); Tarot -> Qin (5/10); scrambled-text ablation -> Qi (5/10). The scrambled->Qi attractor is robust (vs. pooled and control alone, p = 0.006 and 0.012); tarot->Qin is denominator-dependent (0.006 pooled, 0.064 vs. control). Han never wins and shows no survival difference (Fisher p = 1.0); neither framework's content predicts actions (chi-squared p = 0.95 hexagram, 0.69 Tarot). A memory-free decision-isolation probe (960 calls) shows the process does not change the agent's risk posture in isolation (Friedman p = 0.45; I-Ching p = 0.60; Tarot perturbs move content but not risk, p = 0.021). A 2x2 factorial separating yarrow's decision-time and learning-time components reveals a non-additive interaction: each alone freezes the board (50-60% stalemates), combined they produce zero (permutation p ~ 5e-5). Testing relocates Qin suppression to rival (Chu) expansion governed by campaign memory depth, not the oracle (p = 0.55). We present this as an observation paper: agent-level framework choice produces distinctive, non-additive system-level consequences, transmitted through emergent memory and multi-agent dynamics, not per-decision effects.