Papers

Off-target protein binding is a major source of adverse effects for small-molecule drugs, yet most structure-based molecular design methods focus on generating selective compounds de novo rather than improving the selectivity of existing, well- characterized drugs. We introduce specificity optimization (SpecOpt), a molecular design task that seeks constrained structural modifications to an existing compound that increase its binding preference for an intended target over known off-targets while preserving its structural identity and drug-like properties. To enable systematic evaluation, we construct a ChEMBL-derived benchmark from compound-target interaction data, identifying intended targets through curated drug-mechanism annotations and off- targets through measured activities. We then develop an agentic framework that docks each compound against its intended target and off-targets, compares the resulting poses through residue-aware atom-protein contacts, and provides these differential interactions to a large language model to propose targeted structural modifications. Candidates are retained only if they satisfy molecular similarity, ADMET, and target-off-target docking selectivity criteria. On 915 compounds, the agent improves the target- off-target binding gap for 84.8% of compounds, shifting the mean gap from -0.72 to +0.47 kcal/mol while maintaining a mean Tanimoto similarity of 0.72 to the starting compounds. Ablation studies identify residue-specific contact information as the critical optimization signal: replacing residue identities with binary contact indicators eliminates improvement on all 29 ablation compounds. These results establish SpecOpt as a distinct molecular design problem and demonstrate residue-aware differential interactions as an effective signal for improving the specificity of existing compounds.

White men without an undergraduate degree receive the lowest average ratings among eight gender-race-education groups in controlled large-language-model evaluations of credit, hiring, and rental applications. We conduct full-factorial vignette experiments with 18 models from 12 developer groups, varying gender, race, age, citizenship, and education while holding stated financial or occupational circumstances constant within each setting. Each model evaluates all 32 profiles ten times per setting, yielding 17,280 ratings. Averaging over models, age, and citizenship, ratings for White men without degrees are the lowest among the eight groups, at 75.87 in credit, 92.71 in hiring, and 86.62 in rental housing on a 0-100 scale. Black women with degrees receive the highest average ratings, with corresponding gaps of 2.94, 3.66, and 3.56 points. Separate attribute effects favor women, Black applicants, and degree holders in all three settings. White men without degrees have the lowest or second-lowest mean in 46 of 54 model-scenario combinations (85.2%). This pattern connects to evidence of growing economic and health vulnerabilities among White men without degrees, highlighting a group whose disadvantages can be obscured by broad racial or gender categories.

Large language model (LLM) judges are often used as rewards to train policies on objectives that deterministic verifiers cannot capture. However, these rewards are often collapsed to pass/fail ({0, 1}), which reports the verdict but not how well a response met each criterion. We model each pass/fail verdict as a score on an unreported scale, compared with one cutoff. A stretch of that scale moves every score proportionally toward or away from the cutoff, but never across it, so no verdict changes. A policy is therefore free to apply any stretch without changing anything the panel reports. Under a joint-Gaussian model, a third grade adds a second threshold and removes this affine stretch ambiguity. On MATH and SciBench outputs from one seven-criterion judge, all 14 constructed criterionwise stretches were invisible after binarization but visible with three grades. At $n=1{,}024$, a test given both population laws had at least 96.5% power at a $1.5\times$ stress. Retaining grades closes one blind spot created by binarization, but verdicts alone remain insufficient as some changes are still indistinguishable from genuine improvement. These include arbitrary within-grade changes and fixed-covariance, loading-aligned mean shifts – the signature of a sycophancy-shaped lift the panel reads as competence. The shared-factor reference approximation fit MATH and SciBench but not HealthBench, delineating its empirical scope. We recommend keeping at least three grades (for example, asking the judge whether each criterion is fully, partially, or not met and rewarding {0, 0.5, 1}), and externally validating gains along the remaining direction, which no finer scale removes.

Asthma deterioration forecasting must remain reli- able when patient populations, sensor ecosystems, and available modalities change across cohorts. Existing models commonly optimize within-cohort discrimination and may produce poorly calibrated probabilities after transfer. We present CALIBRA, a calibration-first multimodal temporal framework for short- horizon risk prediction with incomplete data. Dedicated recurrent encoders process environmental, pulmonary, symptom, medication, wearable, and context streams; a reliability-conditioned gate suppresses stale or absent modalities, while gradient-reversal training discourages avoidable cohort signatures. A shrinkage- based hierarchical logistic layer calibrates probabilities using a patient-disjoint target subset, and split conformal prediction provides abstention-capable prediction sets. To avoid fabricating clinical evidence, we evaluate the complete implementation on a documented three-cohort semi-synthetic benchmark with controlled distribution shift, informative missingness, and sealed target patients. Across five configured seeds, CALIBRA achieved mean target-test AUPRC 0.224 versus 0.240 for the strongest non-ablation comparator, TemporalTransformer; mean AUROC was 0.717, and Brier score was 0.098. Experiments additionally assess complete-modality failures, calibration, conformal coverage, decision curves, subgroup behavior, ablations, runtime, and parameter count. The results verify the method and reproducible pipeline under controlled shift, but do not establish clinical effectiveness. External validation on harmonized real asthma. Overall this artifact provides evidence for carefully governed real-cohort validation.

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) solutions are essential for building trust in AI technologies and their integration in real manufacturing lines. However, most existing methods are tailored to technical experts, limiting their accessibility to diverse user groups such as blue-collar workers in manufacturing lines who use AI for quality control. In this work, we introduce an XAI interface for object detection in industrial manufacturing based on a fine-tuned vision-language model, designed to generate intuitive explanations for non-expert users. We benchmark existing vision-language models and demonstrate that out-of-the-box models often fall short in delivering clear, context-relevant explanations for non-expert users. To address this, we fine-tune a vision-language model and integrate it into our interface, enabling contextualized, accessible explanations for non-expert users. We demonstrate improvements in explanation clarity, instruction adherence, image groundedness, and contextual awareness over GPT 4o-mini on proprietary and public robotics dataset. This approach advances the accessibility and usability of AI explanations, making them more intuitive and applicable in manufacturing domain.

High-resolution orbital imagery offers a rich record of the Martian surface, but sparse geological labels limit supervised representation learning. We present MarsRecon, a geospatially aware pipeline for learning visual and multimodal representations from HiRISE observations of Olympus Mons. The pipeline calibrates NASA Planetary Data System products, extracts valid georeferenced patches, and trains a masked autoencoder on unlabeled imagery. Increasing input resolution and filtering invalid tokens reduced held-out reconstruction loss from 0.1751 to 0.1342 in the principal Stage A model series. We then freeze the visual encoder and align its features with observation text, coordinates, and local–global image context. The strongest current local-primary model achieves image-to-text recall@10 of 0.3787, text-to-image recall@10 of 0.9161, and local-to-global recall@10 of 0.4350 on the held-out test split. These results establish a working Mars-specific pretraining and retrieval pipeline; further crop-overlap controls and downstream geological evaluations are needed to assess the broader utility of its embeddings.

Intrathecal contrast-enhanced MRI shows how a tracer injected into the cerebrospinal fluid spreads through the brain, but requires repeated scans over 24–48\,h. We therefore ask how much of the later tracer distribution can be predicted from the pre-contrast scan and elapsed time alone. Using 104 training patients (878 MRI volumes), we compared a direct image-to-image regression model with a more complex generative model based on conditional flow matching, and tested both on 23 held-out patients and on 51 patients from a separate cohort with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). The direct model reduced the error of simply copying the pre-contrast scan by about 60% in held-out patients and 25% in the INPH cohort, and its predicted change maps agreed with the observed tracer enhancement rather than only reproducing anatomy. The generative model was less accurate in both cohorts. A substantial part of the later tracer distribution is therefore predictable from the patient's brain anatomy as seen on pre-contrast MRI, and the added model complexity gave no benefit at this data scale. With prospective validation, such forecasts could be studied for patient stratification and treatment planning in intrathecal therapies.

Introduction. Open collaborative knowledge graphs such as Wikidata increasingly ground agentic artificial intelligence, information retrieval, and language modeling systems, making systematic auditing of their demographic representation and overall equity a research imperative. Methods. Herein, we present an open-source auditing platform that ingests over 10 million statement bindings representing over 6 million humans on Wikidata via QLever, and evaluates representation of gender, sexual orientation, geography, birthplace urbanicity, ethnicity, multilingual coverage of labels, descriptions, and aliases, occupation, and select intersectional pairs of these entities. It does so by making use of Chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, 95% Wilson-score confidence intervals, and disparity ratios, in light of Rubin's missingness taxonomy. Results. Women accounted for 28.71% (CI +/-0.04) of all humans in Wikidata with a stated gender. 38.26% of humans had a citizenship statement, with Western Europe and North America (WENA) representing approximately 53% of such statements. Among 1.8 million birthplaces that could be classified, rural birthplaces were observed in 2.48% of cases (in comparison to 27.4% global baseline). Fewer than 1.2% of entities carried an ethnicity statement, and non-English Wikidata descriptions covered 18.2% of items. Discussion. Our findings reveal significant missingness across the evaluated axes. Ethnicity and sexual orientation were the most critically under-documented (missing statements) while rural birthplaces and non-WENA citizenship were the most underrepresented.

Mobile river monitoring robots must interpret obstacles and water boundaries that geographic waypoints alone cannot describe. On resource constrained platforms, converting imperfect visual predictions into timely and inspectable guidance is a distinct challenge. An object label or steering command does not explain which evidence supports a decision or when that evidence is unreliable. We present PAANI, an on-device perception to guidance architecture that combines a project trained YOLO11n detector and a custom MobileNetV3 Small semantic segmenter with timestamp aligned evidence fusion on Arduino UNO Q. Bounded tracking supplies object persistence, while an explicit corridor policy combines surface labels, accepted detections, urgency and mask uncertainty. Each final advisory exposes its contributing evidence and policy reasons. ROS 2 interfaces connect the local AI pipeline to a separate Gazebo vessel, localization and control testbed. Training uses 10,000 WaterScenes images for four-class detection and 1,127 MaSTr1325 images for segmentation, including 198 segmentation validation images. The selected FP32 ONNX models occupy 14.817 MB. Detector checkpoint test mAP at 0.5 IoU is 0.7388, while the separately evaluated rectangular ONNX export achieves validation mAP at 0.5 IoU of 0.7367. Segmentation ONNX validation mIoU is 0.9750. A five-minute UNO Q recording produced median and 95th percentile pipeline latencies of 467.8 ms and 580.3 ms at a configured 0.5 Hz cadence. The evaluation also identifies black input misclassification and a sampling rate mismatch that prevents the diagnostic apparent motion estimator from collecting sufficient evidence. These results support an inspectable and reusable edge robotics foundation while clearly distinguishing model accuracy and on-board execution from validated on-water collision avoidance.

Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly being explored for chip design, but most existing approaches operate directly at RTL. We ask whether agents can design better chips by leveraging higher-level abstractions. We compare Direct RTL Design, Agent-based HLS Design, Post-Compiler HLS Refinement, and Post-HLS RTL Refinement, and combine Agent-based HLS Design with Post-HLS RTL Refinement as Agent-based HLS with RTL Refinement (AHRR). We use FPGAs as a practical, easy-to-deploy platform for end-to-end evaluation, but note that the design-flow tradeoffs we study are largely independent of the target technology. Across a diverse 11-tasks benchmark suite, AHRR achieves a 2.6$\times$ geometric-mean speedup over Direct RTL Design across our benchmark suite. Case studies show that HLS distills design knowledge into abstractions that agents can leverage, while RTL refinement recovers lower-level optimization opportunities. Together, these results make AHRR a promising workflow for agentic chip design. The code and evaluation artifacts are available at https://github.com/ZijD/AHRR.

Molecular solubility directly affects key aspects of molecular development such as reaction feasibility, formulation performance, separation efficiency, and solvent selection. However, experimental measurement across solutes, solvents, and temperatures remains costly and sparsely sampled. Existing computational models often rely on fixed-solvent assumptions, deterministic formulations, or simplified representations of solute-solvent interactions, limiting their ability to capture complex molecular interactions, continuous temperature effects, and experimental uncertainty. Here, we introduce EnSol, an environment-aware probabilistic framework for molecular solubility prediction. EnSol represents the solute and solvent as molecular graphs and learns separate representations for each before bringing them together through cross-attention to capture solute-solvent interactions. Temperature is incorporated directly into the solvent environment through feature-wise modulation, and a mixture density network predicts full solubility distributions to capture both temperature-dependent behavior and experimental uncertainty. On the independent SolProp and Leeds benchmark datasets, EnSol achieved Spearman correlations of 0.876 and 0.601, respectively, outperforming state-of-the-art solubility prediction models across both benchmarks. Beyond computational benchmarking, experimental validation across chemically diverse solute-solvent pairs showed that EnSol maintained strong predictive performance and supported reliable solvent ranking, achieving a Spearman correlation of 0.715. These results show that EnSol can support reliable solubility prediction and solvent selection across diverse chemical systems while accounting for predictive uncertainty.

Before patients can use AI-assisted psychiatric intake systems, health systems need practical ways to routinely evaluate these tools against their clinical standards for quality assurance. Because clinicians may use different intake styles, evaluation for this task must (1) support comparison across interviewing approaches, (2) minimize clinician burden, and (3) measure clinically relevant performance for health systems deploying these technologies. We present a clinician-grounded evaluation platform built around a memory-augmented patient simulator for open-ended AI interviewing, InterviewPlayground. We created interactive patients using InterviewPlayground with our expert-authored vignettes, constructed a simulated intake platform for the interviews, and designed evaluation modalities relevant to intake. In a pilot of 6 clinicians in a 25-minute assessment compared to a GPT-based LLM intake interviewer, the LLM recovered more of the clinically relevant items embedded in the patient vignettes (88.0% vs. 38.9%), but made more clinical inferences not based on the interview (56.8% vs. 27.8%), and characterized identified safety concerns less often (33.3% vs. 66.7%), setting the stage for deployed quality assurance for this task.

Replacing attention in a pretrained language model is a compatibility problem: a plausible substitute may alter representations expected by later layers. TinyCeNN-LM introduces a quality-gated post-training conversion framework using CeNN-inspired cellular-recurrent layers with bounded local processing, compact recurrent memory, routing, fusion, and accept-or-rollback validation. Three implementations are studied: Integrated Memory, MemoryFusion, and PDelta3-GDN2-CLVR+Local32. Strict PDelta3 conversion accepts a layer only when representation and NLL criteria pass fixed thresholds. On SmolLM2-135M, layers 0-2 are accepted with cumulative $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}=+0.01209$, while layer 3 is rejected despite acceptable NLL because representation fidelity fails. On Qwen3.5-0.8B, full-attention layers 3, 7, and 11 are accepted with final $\Delta\mathrm{NLL}=+0.02073$. Integrated Memory keeps perplexity within $-0.07\%$ to $+0.93\%$ while reducing total cache by up to $6.01\%$. A sampled 200-item downstream sanity check gives $28.5\%$–$32.0\%$ overall accuracy for converted Qwen releases. The results support conservative, quality-gated structural conversion rather than universal attention replacement or speedup.

SQL has been augmented with AI operators, enabling modern data analytics platforms to derive insights from both structured and unstructured data. We observe that while current Text-to-SQL systems can successfully generate these AI-augmented queries, reliably evaluating their correctness remains a critical open challenge. Current metrics, which rely on exact query results and deterministic execution, systematically fail against the flexible, non-deterministic outputs of AI operators. In this paper, we formalize these unique evaluation failure modes and introduce a Multilayered Evaluation Framework that decouples deterministic database logic from flexible AI semantics. We test our approach across both industry (BigQuery) and academic (ThalamusDB) systems. We demonstrate that traditional Execution Accuracy severely penalizes valid queries, achieving as low as a 25% detection rate for correct translations. Furthermore, even a state-of-the-art LLM-based autorater falsely rejects 32% of accurate queries due to the complexity of judging both relational and AI components simultaneously. By validating the standard relational logic and the AI operations separately, our framework achieves state-of-the-art overall accuracy across both platforms (up to 97.2%), proposing a reliable standard for benchmarking AI-powered SQL generators.

AI productivity is often measured by task completion time, economic value, or improvements in outcome quality. However, these measures usually treat collaboration as a black box where they capture what output was produced, but not the interaction cost required to produce it. Motivated by economics literature, we introduce a productivity-oriented framework for evaluating human-AI collaboration as outcome quality relative to interaction cost. Across two datasets spanning four tasks, we show that: (1) sessions with identical quality ratings can differ by up to 70 times in interaction cost; (2) quality-cost relationships vary by task, with some tasks rewarding extended interaction and others favoring fast convergence; (3) subjective user ratings are not reliable substitutes for productivity; and (4) productive sessions are characterized by agents probing earlier and users spending less effort repairing the interaction. By distinguishing productive success from costly success, our framework makes interactional cost visible and shows how dialogue analysis can inform the evaluation and design of AI systems.

Fine-tuning has emerged as a widely adopted approach for adapting LLMs to a variety of downstream tasks. However, how it reshapes their internal mechanisms remains poorly understood. To address this, we investigate how fine-tuning alters internal representations in LLMs, including attention patterns and layer-wise activations, and examine whether these changes are linked to task-relevant components identified by EAP (e.g., attention heads and logit-level activations) that drive task performance. We find that EAP-identified components are concentrated within specific layers, indicating a degree of functional localisation in how models internalise task-specific behavior. Notably, the distribution of these components across layers is largely uncorrelated with the layers undergoing the most substantial representational changes during fine-tuning. Furthermore, we observe that overlap in EAP-identified components across tasks does not translate into cross-task performance transfer if the tasks are different in nature (e.g. classification vs. generative tasks). More specifically, fine-tuning on one task can lead to a degradation of performance on another when the two tasks exhibit a high degree of overlap in their EAP-identified components.

In this work, we examine the topology of information flow patterns within attention graphs to effectively distinguish hallucinated from non-hallucinated responses. We analyze the Forman-Ricci curvature to identify structural patterns indicating information bottlenecks in attention graphs. We then introduce a method that captures both semi-local and global information-flow characteristics of attention heads associated with hallucinated responses. We evaluate our approach extensively across several LLMs and established benchmarks. Empirical results demonstrate that our proposed single-pass approach provides consistent improvements over existing attention-based and multi-response baselines across two hallucination-detection benchmarks, while achieving competitive performance across diverse LLM architectures. Further analysis reveals that impaired context sharing among tokens during causal generation is strongly associated with hallucination occurrences in LLMs. In particular, hallucinated responses are consistently characterized by an over-reliance on self-attention, diffused context retrieval from earlier tokens, or information over-squashing, especially in the final transformer layer.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in applications that must weigh clashing moral values, yet even strong models exhibit hidden biases and brittle instruction-following across languages. We introduce a 12,000-instance dataset of two-option dilemmas covering pairwise three value conflicts: Honesty vs. Justice, Justice vs. Autonomy, and Autonomy vs. Honesty, along with their translations into Hindi, Arabic, Spanish, and Chinese, to probe cross-lingual behavior. Benchmarking on GPT-5-mini reveals that it consistently favors Honesty over Autonomy across all five languages when no policy is given. The Llama-3.2-1/3B models exhibit strong first-option bias; however, both plain fine-tuning and Direct Preference Optimization fine-tuning effectively remove this bias, increasing accuracy to greater than 98%. In order to decouple the effect of learning correlations in the dataset from abstract values, we propose a task vector transfer based experiment where after computing the task vectors for a direction of value preference we orthogonalize it with respect to the general instruction following vector. Our experiment shows that this method is effective in isolating the direction of the specific value preference that can successfully be used to conduct task arithmetic to obtain a model with the opposite stance.

As access to professional mental healthcare remains limited, many individuals turn to online platforms such as Reddit to seek peer support situated within human lived experience. However, a significant portion of such queries go unanswered, presenting an opportunity for using Large Language Models (LLMs) to fill this gap. While LLMs have demonstrated strong performance on clinical benchmarks, their ability to generate lived-experience informed and community-aligned peer support is underexplored. Addressing this gap, we introduce the COmmunity-centered Peer Engaged Support (COPES) dataset and a three-axis evaluation framework to assess LLM alignment with community perspectives to mental health support seeking queries. Evaluating zero-shot and post-trained (SFT and DPO) models, we show that post-training on COPES significantly improves Strategy Alignment (>50% for general-purpose models) and alignment in Emotion & Tone. However, we also observe that such improvements are heterogeneous and alignment improvements vary significantly across subreddits and requested coping strategies. Furthermore, post-training induces distributional shifts, heavily favoring problem-focused recommendations while suppressing emotion-focused strategies. Together, this work shows that while curating community-driven data improves the alignment of LLM responses, model performance remains disparate across distinct sub-communities and specific mental health needs.

Automatic target recognition (ATR) with synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) supports advanced naval capabilities, but deep learning is constrained by scarce target imagery, background clutter, and human-in-the-loop assessment. We adapt DINOv3 Vision Transformer (ViT) models to underwater SAS ATR using a three-stage parameter-efficient framework. Stage 1 uses Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) while freezing the ViT backbone, bridging the gap between natural-image pretraining and underwater acoustic propagation. Stage 2 uses hard-negative mining to strengthen the decision boundary against acoustic mimics, including rocks and sediment formations resembling man-made targets. Stage 3 uses Supervised Contrastive Learning (SupCon) to separate target and clutter representations. We evaluate at-sea SAS data using a mission-level geographic split, compare all arms at 85 percent test recall, and repeat each comparison over three random seeds. LoRA accounts for the primary effect, increasing area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) from 0.300 to 0.679 +/- 0.027 using the same frozen backbone. Rank 4 achieves this result while training only 0.26 percent of weights. Neither refinement stage exceeds its matched control: hard-negative mining changes AUPRC by -0.0045 +/- 0.0119 versus an equal-size random curriculum, and SupCon changes AUPRC by +0.0002 +/- 0.0096 versus the preceding stage. These null results indicate that mining occurred on data the encoder had already fit and that supervised stages had already imposed most target-clutter geometry. One efficient adaptation stage is sufficient; stacked refinement is not.

Plant growth and agricultural production form the foundation of a country's sustainable development and directly impact human livelihoods. Recent advances in frontier artificial intelligence have enabled scientific agriculture with strong potential to improve crop productivity. In this paper, we identify the importance and inherent complexity of plant shade simulation, as shading is a critical factor influencing plant growth. To advance this field and promote broader societal benefits, we focus on two main contributions. First, we introduce a comprehensive plant growth and shade dataset covering four plant species, including soybean, tomato, sugarbeet, and strawberry. The dataset includes top-down viewpoints with a supplementary light along a circular trajectory, casting dynamic shadows across multiple growth stages and diverse observation complexities. Second, we propose generative shade simulation based on diffusion models, enabling realistic shade generation for unseen plants and supporting downstream robotic tasks such as perception, lighting control, and view planning. The model incorporates temporal conditioning to facilitate flexible shade simulation across different time stages. We conduct both quantitative and qualitative evaluations to assess model performance. This work provides a foundational study for plant-aware shade modeling and has meaningful implications for broader agricultural and robotic applications.

Language models can now write GPU kernels that outperform PyTorch. We evaluate five model configurations on KernelBench level 1 and find that a frontier model produces correct kernels for 91.1% of problems and independently verified speedups on 22 of 56, including three convolutions, with a median of 1.235x. Open-weights models are far behind: the best reaches 30.4% correct with three verified speedups and solves zero convolutions. We then ask a question the literature does not: what fraction of a real model's wall clock do such kernels govern? Profiling seven workloads across three domains, we find the addressable fraction ranges from 8.9% to 58.2%. On transformers, 80-86% of runtime is spent in cuBLAS GEMM and FlashAttention, bounding realistic end-to-end improvement at roughly 1%, and the fraction shrinks with model scale. On recommenders it is 58.2%, concentrated in a single embedding kernel. We introduce DLRM-Bench, 12 recommender kernel problems in KernelBench format, and measure a 41.7% win rate at a 1.552x median there, projecting 8.63% end-to-end. Separately, we show that KernelBench's correctness check (torch.allclose with an absolute tolerance) is satisfied by a tensor of zeros on 4 of 60 level-1 problems. Two kernels in our own results exploited this before we detected them, including one scored at 283x that wrote 0.3% of its output buffer. We propose scale-invariant replacements and release all 879 evaluations.

Image diffusion models have shown impressive image generation capabilities but are often hard to control, in contrast to classical computer graphics pipelines such as physically based rendering. However, we observe that there is a bridge between light transport phenomena and the distribution of latent space values produced by such models. Thus, we introduce physically based rendering in the feature space learned by the variational autoencoders in generative models, enabling light transport simulation in the latent space. This allows us to leverage physically based rendering techniques to output latent maps for physically guided content generation. We propose modifications to the rendering equation, which, when paired with a differentiable renderer, can yield an optimal set of scene parameters that require only minimal refinement to accurately render into the pretrained latent space. We train our method on a single rendered image, and then demonstrate the generalization of the method to scene geometry changes, lighting changes, and camera view changes.

Science advances not in isolation but through collaboration, yet existing agentic systems capture little of this. Whether communicating agents help remains an open question with mixed prior results. We show that test-time communication can substantially outperform independent parallel attempts on challenging tasks, where sharing a breakthrough can push the whole group forward. We first study the effect of scaling multi-agent test-time communication, where agents have no predefined roles and communicate via a shared directory, on ARC-AGI-3, a benchmark requiring novel problem solving. We find that a team of $k$ communicating agents, team@$k$, matches the success rate of $4k$ independent agents, and this advantage grows with $k$, suggesting gains compound with scale. The effect is not merely efficiency: a task that no single agent can solve, a team of agents can solve reliably. Furthermore, these gains transfer to research-oriented tasks, given sufficient compute. On polyomino packing, communicating agents outperform best@$k$ and exceed the prior best-known score. On MNIST classifier compression, communication surpasses the best-known human solution. A team of four agents produced a 1,957-byte classifier submission achieving 99.4% test accuracy, smaller than both the best-known human solution and the best single-agent result. These gains are not unconditional. Independent agents may outperform communication when compute is limited or when a clear measure of progress is absent. However, under sufficient compute and clear feedback, multi-agent communication consistently yields stronger results.

As generative AI is increasingly used as a source of personal financial guidance, understanding how people appraise such advice is important for supporting appropriate reliance. We conducted a randomized vignette experiment with 285 U.S. adults across eight financial decisions, independently varying three advice styles—AI, expert, and online community—and displayed source labels while holding the underlying recommendation consistent. Advice style most strongly shaped message and safety appraisals, Expert labels selectively increased perceived source knowledge, and decision context primarily shaped risk and safety appraisals. These appraisals were associated with downstream judgments, with models explaining 69.2% of overall quality, 75.9% of trust, and 82.9% of intended reliance. Expert-style advice also remained most preferred when shown without source labels. Our findings have implications for understanding financial advice evaluation, distinguishing the roles of advice style and source labels, and designing financial AI that supports grounded evaluation rather than simply maximizing trust.

Autoregressive (AR) models suffer from local greediness, while diffusion language models (DLMs) often lack the strict causal structure required for reasoning. To combine the advantages and overcome the drawbacks of the dual, we propose Causal Latent Revision (CaLR), a framework that reformulates reasoning as constrained latent optimization. By adopting a causal topology matrix (CTM) from an expert model and implicit differentiation, CaLR performs gradient-guided “thought revision" to enforce logical consistency, enabling dynamic self-correction of intermediate steps during parallel generation. Empirically, CaLR achieves SOTA DLM performance on complex benchmarks, surpassing strong AR baselines and demonstrating superior robustness in constrained tasks like Sudoku.

In Mixture-of-Experts language models, the router typically selects and weights experts based on the token's hidden state, utilizing limited contextual information. We propose Attention-Aware Routing (AAR), which augments the router with temporal and spectral features extracted from a sliding window of attention weights that represent a summary of the model's contextual state, disentangled from the hidden state. Keeping the base transformer entirely frozen, we train only the routing parameters, isolating routing as the sole variable. AAR improves GSM8K by +3.37 pp over a routing-only SFT baseline on OLMoE. Beyond performance, we show that routing and attention form a coupled circuit: routing changes at layer l propagate through the residual stream to amplify attention sinks at layer l+1, reshaping attention without any direct update to the attention mechanism itself. Further, AAR reduces long diverging generation, with incorrect answers getting shorter, while correct answers remain unchanged in length. Finally, AAR is strongly depth-sensitive: applying it indiscriminately across layers can degrade factual retrieval, whereas mathematical reasoning gains persist when it is introduced deeper in the network. This sensitivity exposes a retrieval–reasoning tension across depth and makes layer-selective AAR a controlled probe of the routing-relevant information carried by attention at different layers.

Long-context large language model inference is increasingly limited by prefill, where dense self-attention processes the entire prompt before generation begins. Sparse block selection can reduce this cost, but a block centroid may hide a highly relevant token among many irrelevant ones. We call this failure mode mean dilution and propose RBS-Attention, a training-free sparse-prefill method with two complementary selection branches. A centroid base branch captures average relevance, while a rescue branch uses the maximum key-block radius and its prompt-, layer-, and head-dependent distribution to identify blocks at risk of underestimation. Independently thresholding the two branches and combining their masks controls the contribution of rescue blocks while preserving regular block-sparse FlashAttention execution. On H100 GPUs, RBS-Attention achieves 20.65$\times$ standalone prefill-attention speedup, 11.92$\times$ vLLM prefill-attention speedup, and 5.97$\times$ end-to-end time-to-first-token speedup at 128K on Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507-FP8. On the dense Qwen3-32B model, it obtains 88.65 overall RULER accuracy versus 89.52 for dense attention; LongBench-v2, InfiniteBench, and Video-MME provide additional quality evaluation. Supporting experiments measure actual retention, compare selectors at matched density, and characterize block-size, threshold, and memory behavior. Together, these results support radius-adaptive dual-branch selection as an effective approach to long-context prefill.

Hybrid motor-imagery brain-computer interfaces (MI-BCIs) combining EEG and fNIRS can outperform EEG-only systems by exploiting complementary electrophysiological and hemodynamic information. To obtain such hybrid information when paired EEG-fNIRS acquisition is unavailable or inconvenient, recent studies have focused on EEG-to-fNIRS cross-modal generation. However, existing methods still suffer from slow generation and often require pretraining, limiting their use in real-time MI-BCI scenarios. Although one-step generative models offer an attractive route to low-latency synthesis, removing the iterative refinement process can reduce generation fidelity and introduce non-physiological artifacts. To address these problems, this paper proposes Bio-MF, a latent-free one-step MeanFlow framework for EEG-conditioned fNIRS generation. Bio-MF performs direct signal-space x-prediction, converts this signal-space output into MeanFlow velocity supervision, and completes inference with one network evaluation. To preserve task-relevant hemodynamic structure under heterogeneous sensor layouts, Bio-MF integrates Spatial-Temporal Interactive 4D Encoding, cross-modal classifier-free guidance, and noise-level-gated FFT regularization. On Dataset 1, EEG + synthetic fNIRS improves ACC over EEG-only by 3.37 and 4.15 percentage points for HbR and HbO, respectively. On Dataset 2, the corresponding gains remain 2.98 and 2.50 percentage points under the unseen 64-channel EEG montage. On an RTX PRO 6000 GPU, Bio-MF generates one fNIRS trial in 7.0 ms, corresponding to an 857x speedup over the 1000-step SCDM latency. These results show that Bio-MF enables fast EEG-to-fNIRS synthesis while preserving task-relevant generation quality for downstream hybrid MI decoding. Our code is available at https://github.com/psychosiwa/Bio-MF.

Satellite communications are an essential component of sixth-generation (6G) mobile networks, which provide ubiquitous connectivity for global services. However, the satellite uplink remains a critical bottleneck for ground devices: their limited transmit power and antenna apertures result in low data rates and high packet errors. To overcome this bottleneck, this paper advocates a novel relaying paradigm termed generate-and-forward (GF) communications, where satellites exploit on-orbit generative artificial intelligence (AI) to robustly reconstruct corrupted data prior to forwarding. Specifically, we propose SpaceDiffusion, an over-the-orbit diffusion framework for satellite-assisted image transmission. The core of this framework is a channel-distortion-aware diffusion theory developed using the following approach. By formulating the recovery of compressed and lost image tokens as an inverse problem, this theory incorporates a channel-distortion correction term directly into the conventional denoising diffusion implicit model (DDIM) update. As a result, this design enables a single pretrained diffusion model to adapt dynamically to varying packet-loss patterns and compression distortions without retraining. Furthermore, we analytically characterize the progressive token-reconstruction error and derive a diffusion-step activation threshold that predicts when SpaceDiffusion is expected to outperform conventional decode-and-forward (DF) relaying. Building on these theoretical insights, we further develop an energy-aware early-exit policy to efficiently deploy SpaceDiffusion in orbit. Experimental results demonstrate that SpaceDiffusion achieves lower end-to-end latency compared to DF scheme with retransmission protocol and saves approximately 15 dB of uplink transmit power at a target perceptual quality.