Papers

Orchestra composes two independently built bioinformatics MCP servers – RegNetAgents, which infers gene regulatory network topology from ARACNe networks, and CASCADE, which supplies four independent evidence sources (LINCS knockdown, DepMap essentiality, super-enhancer status, DoRothEA transcription-factor confidence) – into one multi-agent workflow exposed via the Model Context Protocol. Its central architectural claim is that requiring RegNetAgents' topology evidence and CASCADE's experimental evidence to agree on a candidate regulator yields a more trustworthy candidate than either alone – not previously tested directly, since RegNetAgents' own validation asked only whether its candidate lists beat chance. We test this on the TCGA tumor-acquired regulator tier (regulators in a gene's tumor ARACNe network but absent from the GREmLN population-averaged baseline), selecting candidates by ARACNe mutual-information (MI) edge weight. On RegNetAgents' published BRCA/COAD focal-gene panel plus matched negative controls, agreement among at least 2 of the 4 CASCADE sources predicts OncoKB cancer-gene status among focal genes (odds ratio 2.89, Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted p=0.0166) but not among negative controls (p=0.0721); a single source is not diagnostic for either group. The pattern replicates and strengthens in a third cancer type, STAD, on a separately constructed panel (odds ratio 5.82), and against an independently curated ground truth (the Sanger COSMIC Cancer Gene Census). MI edge weight is the strongest single predictor overall (p=0.0003); a logistic-regression likelihood-ratio test confirms corroboration adds value beyond it in both panels (p=0.0234; p=0.0001). Every experiment invokes Orchestra's real agentic entry point.

Scripted and rule-based non-player characters (NPCs) in combat video games often exhibit predictable behaviors that experienced players can exploit, while reinforcement learning (RL) agents typically retain a fixed policy after training and cannot readily adapt their strategy to different opponents. We investigate a runtime strategy-selection framework in which a large language model (LLM) guides a trained RL policy without modifying its underlying behavior. To demonstrate this, we train five NPC agents with a shared PPO policy in Unity and compare a baseline configuration, in which the policy acts independently, with an LLM-augmented configuration in which a locally hosted Mistral 7B model, accessed through Ollama, reads the live game state every five seconds and assigns one of four tactical tags. We evaluate both configurations against three scripted opponent types across 600 episodes and analyze outcomes using the Mann-Whitney U test. Against a Balanced opponent that changes tactics during an episode, the LLM-augmented agents more than doubled their win rate from 11% to 24% and produced significantly longer episodes. Against an Evasive opponent, the augmented agents achieved a higher win rate and faster kills, although their shorter episode duration did not satisfy the strict hypothesis definition. Against an Aggressive opponent, the LLM's near-constant preference for encirclement was counterproductive. Analysis of 2,430 strategy selections showed that Surround was selected in 83.8% of cases regardless of opponent type, indicating limited zero-shot strategic differentiation at this model scale. These results demonstrate both the potential and limitations of LLM-guided runtime strategy selection for adaptive multi-agent game AI.

Specializing Large Language Models (LLMs) toward distinct abilities underpins successes ranging from personalized assistants to multi-agent systems (MAS). Single-agent paradigms rely on pre-defined personas or steering vectors to induce specialization, yet they impose a single fixed specialization that fails to adapt to diverse queries. Conversely, MAS achieves dynamic multi-perspective problem solving by orchestrating agents with distinct text-based roles, but fusing these specializations requires multi-turn interactions that inflate context length and inference cost. To address these limitations, we propose Mixture of Roles (MoRe), which adaptively composes multiple specializations into a single steering vector for single-turn inference. Specifically, MoRe learns a diversified codeboox of steering vectors, each of which encodes a latent role. A query-aware router dynamically fuses the codebook into a steering vector that encompasses multiple roles. By steering the backbone LLM with the composed vector, MoRe enables multi-perspective specialization in a single-agent, single-turn inference process. The proposed MoRe can be efficiently trained via a three-stage SFT curriculum and GRPO post-training, while the backbone LLM remains frozen. Experiments across reasoning and personality benchmarks show that MoRe outperforms single-agent baselines by 2.2% on average, and achieves performance on par with MAS while reducing token cost by 20x.

Enterprise agentic systems must coordinate changing capabilities, execution capacity, and independently governed data. We define Skill, Harness, Scaffold, and an external data substrate as responsibility contracts. The central hypothesis, cost-aware capability-capacity separability, asks whether compatible capacity changes preserve semantic outcomes while capability changes preserve the capacity-response relationship within declared margins and enforcement budgets. We operationalize the data boundary through a source-oriented Data Wiki, an output-oriented Theme Wiki, and a versioned Intermediate Relation. Executable 5W1H+Which predicates bind source identity, validity, authorization, semantics, operations, relations, and evidence requirements. Request-bound tickets add execution-time revalidation and typed rejection. A conditional soundness argument states the required trust and atomicity assumptions; dependency invalidation makes change propagation explicit. A single-process reference model agrees with a declared specification oracle on all 1,024 combinations in a finite synthetic fault domain and passes five lifecycle checks. These are conformance results, not measurements of retrieval quality, production safety, or scaling. We specify a held-out data study and a cluster-period crossover with distinct supported, falsified, conditional-engineering, and inconclusive verdicts. The core separability hypothesis remains empirically untested.

Large language models can summarize financial information, but an operational stock-research system must first assemble heterogeneous evidence, expose unavailable data and model capabilities, and control how generated opinions affect a final report. We present DSA, an evidence-aware orchestration framework for multi-market stock research with large language model (LLM) agents. DSA organizes the workflow into evidence acquisition, structured context construction, model-routed analysis, optional role and Strategy Skill reasoning, and report generation with selected context and diagnostics. A default report profile and an optional agentic profile share evidence and model-routing services but use profile-specific output validation and risk safeguards. In the agentic profile, core role outputs are processed by role-specific parsers, whereas Strategy Skill opinions undergo an additional signal-eligibility partition before synthesis; disagreement is supplied explicitly to the decision agent, followed by a conservative risk override. The reference implementation includes six regional market paths, fifteen bundled Strategy Skills, hosted and local model routes, and multiple execution and delivery surfaces. At a frozen software snapshot, a selected manifest of 1,457 portable offline backend contract tests passed; 596 cases were retrospectively mapped to six contract families central to the reported LLM-agent architecture. This evidence establishes implementation conformance for the tested software contracts, not superior report quality, forecasting accuracy, or investment returns.

Space-efficient warehouse layouts often contain single-agent-width aisles and dead-end workstations where robots have few places to wait without blocking others. In Multi-Agent Pickup and Delivery (MAPD) on such constrained layouts, robots must accept online pickup-delivery tasks while preserving protected waiting locations called Havens. The Safe HAven Retreat Planner (SHARP) introduced a mechanism that extends each committed task path with a validated retreat to the agent's dedicated initial Haven, but fixed-Haven commitments can send agents toward distant Havens after deliveries. We present A-sharp (Adaptive SHARP), which changes an agent's retreat target at task assignment time. A naive switch can cause two agents to rely on the same waiting location or let another committed path pass through a location that is still occupied or reserved. A-sharp prevents these failures with an availability test for candidate Havens and a pending-release rule that keeps the previous Haven protected until the agent departs. Under explicit Haven-structure and Safe Interval Path Planning (SIPP) assumptions, we prove invariant preservation and finite-release completeness: every task in any finite release sequence is delivered in finite time. Across 72,000 runs on 14,400 paired map-agent-count-rate-seed cases over four maps, both SHARP and A-sharp complete their respective 14,400 runs. For makespan (final delivery time), a prespecified paired comparison with Holm correction over all 138 configurations with more Havens than agents finds A-sharp significantly better in 107 configurations and never significantly worse than SHARP; on the tested tree map, the median reduction is 16.7%.

As electricity market participants increasingly adopt learning-based agents for their bidding strategies, electricity markets are becoming algorithmic. Evidence from algorithmic markets in other domains shows that tacit collusion can arise purely through independent learning. Moreover, electricity markets are typically oligopolistic and feature repeated interaction among a small number of participants, making them structurally susceptible to non-competitive behavior. In the face of these observations, this paper investigates the hypothesis that tacit collusion may emerge in electricity markets where participants' actions are controlled by autonomous learning-based algorithms. We model strategic bidding as a repeated game with imperfect public monitoring, and model the participants' emergent behavior using multi-agent reinforcement learning. We propose a multi-dimensional set of criteria (going beyond profit comparisons against Nash equilibria) to assess whether the resulting behavior constitutes tacit collusion. Our experimental results showcase that such a danger is realistic for electricity markets: there are cases where agents do learn to sustain supra-competitive outcomes that are supportive of tacit collusion indicators, even though the agents were never instructed to collude.

User behavior simulation with large language models~(LLMs) is increasingly used to support multi-agent ecosystem simulation. Existing simulators typically rely on static user profiles inferred from historical observations, which become inadequate in socially intensive environments such as live streaming where interaction dynamics continuously reshape user behavior. We propose LiveSim, an LLM-based framework for live-stream ecosystem simulation. It represents users as editable behavioral hypotheses and progressively refines them through trajectory-grounded interactions, where discrepancies between simulated and observed trajectories reveal missing environmental shaping effects. These signals are further extracted as transferable environment-behavior patterns and accumulated in a collective behavioral memory to improve user-level behavioral fidelity and support ecosystem-level simulation. Experiments on real-world live-stream risk-control data validate the effectiveness of LiveSim in improving user-level behavioral fidelity and enabling ecosystem-level analysis of risk evolution and platform intervention effects.

Recent work shows that pre-trained, instruction-tuned vision-language models (VLMs) perform well at mapping from instructions and observations to high-level plans, but struggle to realize such plans as reliable low-latency action sequences in unfamiliar environments. At the same time, world-model controllers excel at fast observation-to-action control, but lack open-ended task guidance. In this work, we combine these strengths into a single system, Instruct-to-Act, where we train a world-model controller to act autonomously at high frequency when conditioned on sparse, higher-latency, and high-level text instructions generated by a VLM planner. To train controllers to be language-instructable, we relabel segments of controller policy rollouts with synthetic instructions and jointly optimize a behavior-cloning objective along with existing reward-maximizing and world-modeling objectives. We evaluate our proposed approach across seven embodied environments, including three multi-agent environments where VLM planners coordinate through language while trained controllers serve as their actuators. Under matched observation and action spaces, our decoupled approach consistently outperforms controller-only and direct VLM action-generation variants, preserves fast control, and lets us swap in different pretrained VLM planners without fine-tuning, while remaining competitive with strong vision-language-action and multi-agent RL baselines on six of seven tasks.

Dense warehouses often contain single-lane aisles, dead ends, and tree-like guidepaths that leave little room for idle agents to wait without blocking others. Existing Multi-Agent Pickup and Delivery (MAPD) guarantees for completing all finitely released tasks typically rely on extra waiting endpoints that planned paths can avoid, or on biconnected topology; these assumptions may fail in such layouts. We study fixed-Haven reservation for online MAPD, where pickup-delivery tasks are released over time. Each agent owns a fixed Safe Haven (Haven for short), usually its start cell, that only the owner may occupy and that other agents treat as blocked. For finite task releases, we prove that this fixed-Haven contract completes all released tasks under Haven-Reachability and explicit planning/progress assumptions. We implement the contract in SHARP, a Safe-Haven Retreat Planner that keeps every busy or retreating agent on a collision-free reserved route ending at its Haven. We compare SHARP with representative TP and PIBT-family MAPD baselines: Token Passing (TP), Priority Inheritance with Backtracking (PIBT), and PIBT with Temporary Priority and Temporary Avoidance (PIBTTP-TA) for biconnected main areas with attached trees. In the robustness sweep, SHARP is the only method with 100% success on all tested configurations, at substantially higher centralized planning cost on tree-like layouts. A TP-style fixed-home-return counterfactual with full-route validation also recovers robustness on tested tree-like layouts, suggesting that fixed return is a central robustness mechanism there. A no-overwrite variant shows that disabling mid-retreat reassignment worsens service time (release-to-delivery latency) by 1.89 times and makespan by 1.53 times in the tested high-load tree condition.

Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) faces significant challenges in maintaining robust coordination under noisy observations. Although observation disturbances are often introduced independently across agents, their downstream effects on cooperative decision-making can become structured through underlying cooperation structures. We characterize this phenomenon as structured noise effects, where noise-induced decision effects exhibit local correlation among agents with stronger task-related dependencies while remaining globally heterogeneous across different agents and local structures. Existing robust MARL methods, however, rarely explicitly characterize or exploit such structure-dependent noise effects. To address this limitation, we propose SIGMA, a hierarchical collaboration framework that exploits cooperation structures to learn robust representations under noisy observations. SIGMA first organizes agents into adaptive local structures through density-based grouping and performs intra-group consensus aggregation to preserve shared task-relevant information while smoothing agent-specific representation deviations. Inter-group attention then adaptively integrates information across different groups to preserve global coordination while accommodating their heterogeneous contributions. Experiments on noisy-observation tasks in StarCraft II empirically validate the structured noise effects and demonstrate that SIGMA consistently improves robustness under observation noise while maintaining competitive performance in noise-free environments.

This report presents a framework to help organisations, policymakers and researchers reason about the risks that emerge when AI agents interact with each other, how those risks change as interactions cross organisational boundaries, and the controls that may help address them. As organisations deploy AI agents, those agents will increasingly interact with each other: inside the organisation, with the agents of partners, customers and suppliers, and with unknown counterparties on the open internet. Failures can emerge from the interactions themselves, and once those interactions cross an organisation's perimeter, no single organisation can fully see, control or govern them. The report introduces three deployment tiers, defined by the minimum common governance binding any two interacting agents: singular governance, where one organisation governs every agent; federated governance, where multiple organisations deploy into a shared environment under agreed rules; and open environments, where agents operate with no central authority and shared standards are adopted voluntarily if at all. Within each tier, the report examines risk factors, failure modes and available controls. It identifies who is positioned to apply the controls, and where no actor is positioned to act, it characterises the gap and the collective action required to close it.

Frontier coding performance is typically attained with large, costly proprietary models. We introduce ledger-based zero-shot self-orchestration (GVS5H), a training-free method in which fresh instances of one model decompose problems and coordinate through a shared file system. Across eleven open and closed-weight models on the 100 latest hard LiveCodeBench problems, the method yields as much as 25.6 points improvement, boosting several cheaper models to frontier-level performance. Orchestrated Qwen3.8 Flash Next scores 93.0% against Fable 5's 90.4% at 9% of the cost, while the smaller Qwen3.8-27B reaches 92.4%. Gains are not universal: some models are unchanged or worse. Transcript analysis attributes the gain to decomposition and persistent context. Inference-time organization can reach or exceed frontier coding accuracy at a fraction of the cost on self-hostable weights.

Large language model (LLM) agents may perform well on isolated tasks yet drift into inconsistency over extended interaction. We evaluate temporal consistency in a controlled 20-step multi-agent setting inspired by delayed-gratification studies. At each step, an agent chooses between continuing to delay a reward or claiming it immediately (terminating the episode). Across a full-factorial manipulation of social visibility (private vs public), persona stressors, and deliberation policy, we run 84,540 trajectories spanning 8 model families. Treating the first reward-claim as a time-to-event outcome, we estimate Kaplan-Meier survival curves and fit discrete-time hazard regression to quantify how experimental factors shift failure risk over time. Then, to analyze rationales and language patterns associated with failure, we build a seven-category taxonomy from 13,780 deliberation traces from agents who choose to terminate the episode, using an LLM-assisted labeling paired with human audit ($\kappa=0.83$). Rationale profiles change systematically with time and context: early failures are more impulse-driven, later failures more fatigue- and cost-benefit-framed, while public settings increase norm-oriented justifications. We also find a deliberation-inconsistency association: among failures, longer deliberation correlates with higher rates of intra-rationale contradiction (simultaneous pro-delay and pro-claim statements), challenging the assumption that more reasoning text implies greater consistency. Together, the survival and rationale analyses reveal distinct temporal reliability regimes and model-specific "failure fingerprints", offering an evaluation lens for diagnosing inconsistency in multi-turn agent behavior.

Modern multi-agent systems are increasingly deployed at scale over large populations of agents in settings such as ad-auctions, traffic routing, and recommendation systems. The dominant approach in such settings is to optimize each agent's policy independently, treating the other agents as part of a fixed single-agent environment rather than modeling the population dynamics. In many large-population systems, the dynamics depend on an aggregate summary of the population rather than the identity of any individual. Mean-field RL exploits such structure, providing a principled framework that models each agent's environment as an explicit function of the population distribution. However, in large state-action spaces or high-dimensional control problems, modeling the population distribution is itself intractable. How can we design a scalable framework for high-dimensional control problems with large populations? This work explores this question from the perspective of representation learning. We introduce a mean-field RL framework in which the rewards and transition dynamics depend on the population only through an unknown low-dimensional aggregate statistic. We then study this framework in the offline setting and design a provable approach that learns a near-optimal policy by learning a low-dimensional representation. Motivated by real-life supply-chain optimization problems, we design a one-step routing game to test the hypothesis that learning a low-dimensional population representation improves reward prediction and Nash gap estimation relative to baselines that don't exploit this structure. We show that under a fixed neural-network parameter count and optimization budget, learning a low-dimensional population representation improves reward prediction and the equilibrium quality of the resulting policies.

Tool-augmented LLMs must arbitrate between two fallible sources when a tool return conflicts with their parametric memory, yet existing evaluations measure source preference without establishing source correctness. We introduce MemToC, a controlled benchmark for post-tool-return arbitration with executable tools. MemToC comprises 6,504 evaluation episodes constructed from 542 quality-controlled factual questions, independently elicited model-specific closed-book answers, and controlled tool returns of known correctness. These components instantiate four source-correctness cases; tool-error and no-tool conditions are separate controls. Across five open-weight 7-9B models, tool returns strongly dominate elicited closed-book answers. The four instruction-tuned models retain a verified-correct answer against an incorrect tool in only 6.5-17.1% of eligible cases, follow a correct tool in 86.0-93.1%, and repeat the tool return in 78.4-86.0% of cases where both sources are wrong. No cross-model ordering remains stable across three instruction-wording variants with the question and episode content held fixed. We compare prompting with SFT and DPO using chain-level cross-fitting over ToolHop, so questions sharing an underlying fact never straddle training and evaluation. We apply an asymmetric success criterion: correct-answer retention must improve without a detected reduction in correct-tool following. SFT and DPO meet this criterion on the same two of four instruction-tuned backbones. Improvements rarely come cleanly: 19 of 20 tested method-model combinations reduce abstention after tool errors or on unanswerable inputs. Transfer beyond MemToC is positive but partial and depends on the model and presentation frame. Correctness-conditioned arbitration can be improved through fine-tuning, but gains must be evaluated jointly with correct tool use, abstention, and robustness to formulation.

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly act as autonomous agents executing complex, long-running procedural skills. Existing agent runtimes maintain execution by continually appending observations, actions, and intermediate reasoning traces to an ever-growing conversation history, causing latency degradation and context-poisoning failures over long horizons. We present SKILL. state, a runtime architecture that replaces append-only conversational history with an explicit, mutable execution state. At each execution step, the model receives only the immutable skill specification, the current structured execution state, and the latest observation. Intermediate reasoning is discarded immediately after producing a validated state update, preventing prompt growth with execution history. Across diverse datasets, models, and execution environments, SKILL. state improves task accuracy while substantially reducing cumulative token consumption. Our results demonstrate that explicit execution state is an effective and architecture-agnostic abstraction for scalable long-horizon agent skills.

Autonomous agents increasingly perform bounded software tasks under an orchestrator that retries, resumes, and budgets them. The machinery such orchestrators reach for is the service mesh's: retry, timeout, and error-rate circuit breaking. We report a failure study of a production agentic software-delivery platform over 147 numbered incidents spanning 81 runs, each with a measured cost and, in most cases, a mutation proof reproducing the failure. All three assumptions those primitives rest on are violated in practice, and we quantify the consequences: a loop of fifty-four consecutive successful tool calls no error-rate breaker could see; a progress signal constant by construction, guaranteeing a false trip on the third repair round and driving one run from six of six components to three; twenty-one events accumulated across six invocations of one delegation, making a correct, idempotent component unwinnable; a misrouted failure that woke five components for a two-component fault, leaving three bystanders regressing working code; and twelve incidents in which the enforcement layer blocked correct work, the most expensive costing 107 agent turns and zero accepted writes. We find one cross-cutting cause and its dual. Identity adequacy: in five separate subsystems an identity that failed to discriminate produced a confident wrong answer, and two of them derived the corrective rule independently. Evidence adequacy: a reliability decision may be taken only on evidence capable of moving, attributable to what it measures, and deterministic under identical conditions. From the findings we derive seven reliability primitives whose enforcement unit is the delegation rather than the message, and specify the controlled evaluation the study motivates but does not constitute.

As generative AI gains traction, researchers are investigating its potential to serve as proxies for humans. From undergoing cognitive psychology experiments to experiencing an epidemic, generative agents, agents powered by generative AI models, produce realistic human behavior when prompted. This study explores the sensitivity of these generative agents' behavior to prompt modifications and varied persona names of the agents. To assess this sensitivity, we use a generative agent epidemic model, wherein each agent is prompted daily on whether it wants to isolate or commingle with other agents. We found that using synonymous prompts results in negligible changes to the model's outcomes. However, minor variations in prompts, as well as contextual changes, do influence the model's results. Lastly, our data indicates that different persona names assigned to generative agents, specifically those imbued with personas, do not significantly impact epidemic outcomes.

Multi-agent large language model (LLM) workflows have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving complex, open-ended tasks through collaborative reasoning among specialized LLM agents, but they incur substantial operating costs due to repeated LLM invocations and long-horizon context accumulation. Existing cascade routing methods make one-shot, query-level decisions and cannot adapt to the dynamic, state-dependent nature of multi-step workflows, in which the right LLM at each step depends on evolving task progress, remaining task difficulty, and cost-efficiency requirements. We present ProgRouter, an online progress-guided routing framework that adaptively selects LLM agents across workflow steps to preserve task-solving quality while adhering to time and cost budgets. ProgRouter introduces a multi-view task progress scorer that combines coarse workflow outcome regimes with fine-grained signals on subtask completion, progress trends, and workflow state quality. Then, a dual-path task progress predictor and an adaptive meta-gating mechanism estimate the progress gain for each candidate routed LLM. ProgRouter makes online step-wise routing decisions that balance progress gain, task time budgets, and long-term operating cost efficiency. Experiments on HumanEval Plus, MBPP, MATH-500, and ASQA, spanning agentic code generation, mathematical reasoning, and retrieval-augmented long-form question answering, demonstrate that ProgRouter reduces the operating cost relative to key baselines while maintaining strong task-solving performance.

Autonomous R&D agents now write, run, and improve executable artifacts under automated evaluation-but largely as laboratory instruments: shown on curated benchmarks, with gains that are hard to trace to a cause and costs well above what sustained engineering practice absorbs. The limitation is structural. Most systems treat each attempt as nearly self-contained, so logs, memories, and search trees record what happened without establishing which design element produced an improvement, whether its evidence survived validation, or how it recombines with others. Long campaigns therefore keep re-learning the same lessons. We introduce Praxist, a lineage-centered generational system that converts reproducible artifacts and evaluator outcomes into a typed evidence graph of findings, lane-structured frontiers, and agendas. Separating local artifact construction from cohort-level evidence synthesis lets later attempts inherit validated mechanisms, unresolved claims, and useful constraints, and leaves results attached to an inspectable lineage. On the standardized 75-task MLE-bench suite, the finalized official-grader results give Praxist 60 medals (80.0%), 49 of them gold, against 55 medals (73.3%) and 34 gold for a Claude Code baseline on Claude Opus 4.8-at a recorded model spend of $3054 versus $38370, roughly a twelfth of the cost. Five case studies-quantitative trading, LiDAR-inertial-visual SLAM, tokamak magnetic control, rocket landing, and job-shop rescheduling-carry the same process into open-ended engineering problems, improving on each task-native baseline in headline accuracy, survival, or resource cost, with the discovery path on record. Stronger artifacts at an order of magnitude less spend, each backed by an auditable lineage, are, to our knowledge, first brought together here: the operating profile production research requires, not the one a benchmark demonstration establishes.

Neighborhood livability is commonly assessed with static built-environment indicators, such as facility proximity, street connectivity, and access to public space. These measures describe available opportunities but do not directly represent how residents with different mobility capacities, household roles, schedules, and care responsibilities experience the neighborhood. This paper presents a prototype framework that uses a spatial knowledge graph (KG) and large language models (LLMs) to generate and revise household schedules, followed by rule-based feasibility checking and GIS-based network materialization. The spatial KG integrates residents, residences, facilities, neighborhood context, and sampled road hubs; Graph-RAG retrieves each household's nearby spatial context, including candidate POIs and approximate walking times, for the scheduling LLM. The LLM produces structured household schedules, while rules are used for lightweight repairs and auditable feasibility checks. The LLM then revises schedules in response to identified feasibility issues. A routing module derives the actual travel paths, travel times, modes, and event histories from the road network. The resulting events support synthetic resident-agent interviews about daily convenience, travel burden, activity feasibility, and household coordination. A prototype demonstration in a Shenzhen neighborhood shows that nominal facility availability does not necessarily imply convenient access: residents with limited mobility and households with care responsibilities experience greater travel and coordination burdens. The framework offers an auditable way to connect spatial opportunity, household activity constraints, and resident-specific livability interpretation, while keeping simulated experience distinct from observed perception.

Multi-agent systems (MAS) sometimes already have the potential to answer correctly, but still report a wrong answer. Explaining this outcome is difficult because generation, communication and final answer-selection rules usually change simultaneously. We conceptualize multi-agent reasoning as an evolutionary pipeline of candidate generation, peer communication and terminal selection, wherein consensus without quality control can exhibit patterns of memetic drift. We study two questions: (1) when an LLM judge provides effective selection pressure by supplying a signal of answer correctness for candidates generated in a multi-agent system, and (2) when using that signal improves the reported answer. To map judge reliability, we analysed 15,336 questions from MMLU-Pro, GPQA, MedXpertQA and MuSR, with Humanity's Last Exam analysed separately. To test these rules, we replayed 81,390 fixed candidate pools drawn from 16,278 questions across five benchmarks. We report three findings. (1) A correct answer is often already present among the generated candidates, but the system can still converge on and report a wrong answer. (2) Judge reliability is not a fixed trait of the model, but varies with the task, the generator and how rare the correct answer is. (3) Combining answer frequency with the judge's evaluation changed only the final answer-selection rule and raised accuracy from 63.82% to 70.82-70.95%, primarily by rescuing correct answers that were outnumbered by popular errors. In the systems studied here, the value of generating more candidates depends on whether those extra samples make correct answers present, frequent or recognisable. By isolating generation, recognition and selection, these findings establish a diagnostic basis for designing multi-agent architectures that protect generated correct answers from being lost.

Agentic systems enable the intelligent automation of complex workflows, specific to additive manufacturing this is applicable for complex tasks such as process parameter optimization for mechanical properties. This work investigates the AI enabled agentic process optimization within Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) to iteratively improve the tensile and flexural properties of 3 different materials on the Inova Mk1. These materials include PA12 GF, PA11 Onyx, and PA12 Blend (volume mixture of 25% PA12 GF and 75% PA12 White) and with using knowledge from previous builds and minimal guidance from the user, the agentic system was able to optimize process parameters over a small number of iterations to achieve comparable TDS specified mechanical properties. This work showcases the ability for an agentic system to continually learn from updated data, enabling the intelligent automation of complex tasks such as process parameter optimization for selective laser sintering.

Communication typically relies on a shared code, and any change to it must be coordinated between senders and receivers to avoid a breakdown of communication. The honeybee waggle dance illustrates this problem: species with horizontal combs point directly at a food source, while species with vertical combs cannot point directly and instead reference the dance to gravity, decoded against the position of the sun. We model the rise of the first of these codes and its evolutionary transition to the second in populations of bee-like agents, with selection acting at the level of colonies. In a horizontal-comb model, we find that direct pointing evolves readily when food is moderately hard to find by random search alone, whether because sites are few and large or many and small. Communication fails to evolve when food is too sparse to spark dances or so abundant that it is found without signaling. Adding an exogenous benefit for vertical combs, we then find that the transition to the gravity-referenced code is driven mainly by the magnitude of this benefit and by the mutation scale, with the coupling between sender and receiver mutations playing a further role when the mutation scale is low. Given a favorable confluence of these factors, the transition proceeds reliably and without a breakdown of communication. Outside that confluence it remains possible, though rarer, across a much wider range of settings.

Large language models (LLMs) have enabled AI scientist systems to automate scientific discovery, yet existing approaches most rely on static prompting or fixed workflows and fail to accumulate experience for continual improvement. We propose HypoForge, an experience-guided multi-agent framework that learns reusable scientific skills for automated hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing. HypoForge is built on the observation that these two stages involve different supervision signals. For hypothesis generation, where explicit feedback is unavailable, HypoForge adopts an adversarial generator–discriminator mechanism to improve reasoning through comparative critique. For hypothesis testing, where empirical feedback is available, HypoForge learns testing skills from execution outcomes and ground-truth results. By matching skill learning strategies with stage-specific supervision, HypoForge enables continual improvement without fine-tuning foundation models. Experiments on hypothesis generation and testing benchmarks show that HypoForge consistently outperforms existing AI scientist frameworks and skill-level variants. Further analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed stage-specific skill learning paradigms.

Sequential decision-making in multi-robot systems typically assumes that planning information is reliable and that agents execute the actions anticipated by the planner. Compromised agents can violate both assumptions, creating a mismatch between the planning model and physical execution. We study this problem in online multi-robot routing under localization spoofing. We introduce a distance-constrained spoofing model for monitor-aware adversaries, together with a tiered bipartite matching strategy that maximizes assignment influence while limiting spoofing magnitude. To mitigate such attacks, we develop a trust-aware monitor that combines probabilistic localization trust, calibrated using real GPS spoofing data, with behavioral evidence from task execution to classify agents and remove detected adversaries from subsequent planning. We further show that undetected adversaries can cause rollout to lose its expected cost-improvement behavior by violating planner-execution consistency. Trust-aware removal restores this consistency after detection, enabling stable routing and recovery of rollout's empirical advantage over the base policy. Experiments using real GPS spoofing datasets and San Francisco taxicab demand demonstrate effective detection and resilient routing across varying spoofing capabilities, adversarial fleet sizes, adaptive attacks, monitoring configurations, and rollout horizons.

Hardware kernel optimization requires repeated compilation, correctness testing, profiling, and revision. LLM agents can automate parts of this process, and stronger foundation models, longer context windows, and longer execution horizons have improved optimization within individual tasks. These advances alone do not enable an agent to learn from completed optimization runs. Existing kernel-optimization agents seldom preserve a decision, its observed execution feedback, and the later decisions that use that evidence. Retaining every prior trajectory is also impractical because an expanding history competes with the current task for context. We present KOPE, an experience-driven framework for hardware kernel optimization. KOPE records optimization trajectories with correctness and performance feedback in Experience Graph Memory, then uses Active Context Management and Injection to retrieve relevant experience under a fixed token budget. The graph retains decision order, observed outcomes, and alternative branches, allowing evidence collected on the target hardware to inform later optimization steps and tasks. Under the same GLM-5.2 setting, the geometric mean of KOPE's per-operator speedups is $1.54\times$ that of CANNBot, the strongest competing baseline. In a complete 53-operator ablation, Active Context Management and Injection raises pass rate from 60.0% to 84.6%, increases the evaluator-reported positive-field geometric mean from 0.0382 to 0.0661, and reduces optimization token consumption from 15.9B to 1.113B tokens relative to passive agent-led context construction. Enabling Experience Graph Memory raises full-suite pass rate from 55.2% to 84.6% and yields a $1.43\times$ geometric-mean speedup on valid timing comparisons. These results support continual optimization through external experience while the foundation model remains fixed.

Despite their strong ability to generate code, large language models often fail to produce secure code, as their outputs frequently contain security vulnerabilities. Secure code generation is inherently challenging because it requires solving a multi-objective problem: functional correctness and security. Existing approaches address this challenge by injecting external security knowledge or by using agentic feedback and iterative refinement. However, guideline retrieval often leaves the generator to translate generic advice into task-specific secure implementations, while shared-dialogue multi-agent feedback can blur role boundaries and suffer from context bloat. We present MACGen, a multi-agent framework that integrates planning, security analysis, code synthesis and refinement to jointly optimize security and functionality. A planner constructs a step-by-step plan to satisfy functional requirements. A security advisor identifies likely CWEs and synthesizes task-specific guidelines, a coder then generates code grounded in these artifacts, and a reviewer issues perspective-separated feedback. Rather than sharing full dialogue histories, each agent receives only structured artifacts from upstream stages, enforcing role specialization and reducing uncontrolled context growth. On CWEval and BaxBench, MACGen improves F&S@1 over direct prompting by 19.61 and 10.57 percentage points (pp) on average, respectively.

Beyond-visual-range (BVR) air combat is a challenging reinforcement-learning domain characterized by partial observability, long-horizon decision making, energy management, and limited weapons. We present BVR Sim, an open-source Gymnasium-style environment designed for heterogeneous air-combat reinforcement learning. BVR Sim supports multiple JSBSim aircraft models, including the F-15, F-16, F/A-18, and F-22, with configurable weapons, sensors, controllers, and opponents. A unified tactical action interface specifies desired heading, altitude, speed, and weapon release above aircraft-specific inner-loop controllers, enabling policies to operate across heterogeneous platforms. The environment provides interchangeable Python and accelerated C++ backends, entity-oriented observations, compositional rewards, scripted opponents, replay and visualization, and adapters for multi-agent learning frameworks. At a 0.4-s decision interval, the C++ backend achieves 104 simulated seconds per wall-clock second in 1-vs-1 and remains practical through 10-vs-10 scenarios. A policy trained only on the F-16 transfers without retraining to four unseen aircraft, reaching a 45.5% mean win rate with aircraft-specific controller adaptation. MAPPO and HAPPO experiments further verify end-to-end compatibility with standard multi-agent reinforcement-learning pipelines.