Computation and Language
Faithful by Definition: Emotion Analysis via Natural Semantic Metalanguage Explications
Frank Xing and Erik Cambria
Explanations for
emotion classifiers are usually produced post hoc, with no guarantee that they reflect the computation behind the label. We present an explication interface for event-based
emotion analysis. A parser maps the input text to an explication, a short script in the closed vocabulary of Natural Semantic Metalanguage organized into twelve typed slots, and a fixed decision list of rules transcribed from published semantic definitions computes the label from the explication alone. The faithfulness guarantee is therefore causal and definitional, while all empirical risk lives in the learned parser, which the per-line entailment interface makes auditable against the input. On crowd-sourced event descriptions, our fine-tuned parser reaches 0.33 accuracy and 0.48 selective accuracy on a small held-out set, suggesting that the interface trades insignificant accuracy difference to a black-box model for a verifiable, inspectable decision basis for first-person event-based
emotion analysis. We also release EmoExpl-1200 with per-line verification metadata and the full rule set.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
Arya Raeesi and Hanna Roed
Limited
Memory Language Models (LMLMs) externalize factual knowledge to a database to enable deletion-based unlearning without retraining. Existing evaluations measure post-deletion correctness in aggregate and cannot tell whether a deleted fact persists through residual parametric
memory, alternative
retrieval paths, or near-neighbor
retrieval artifacts. We propose a causal
auditing framework that holds the model fixed and varies the database state at inference time across three interventions: FULL, DEL-ON, and DEL-OFF. The framework decomposes post-deletion behavior into parametric leakage L(f),
retrieval-mediated correctness R(f), and a
retrieval artifact rate grounded in the inference-time
retrieval trace. We apply it to 12,228 alias-closure deletions across thirteen databases, including four
adversarial topologies (Base, Alias, Noise, Collision) we construct in three domains, and six
prompt formulations. Parametric leakage is near zero in every variant and every
prompt style: the model rarely returns the deleted answer in the absence of
retrieval. The residual that does survive lives in the
retrieval graph:
retrieval-mediated correctness and the
retrieval artifact rate match within rounding everywhere, so post-deletion correctness is, in our audit, predominantly reconstituted from near-neighbor
retrieval. This residual ranges from 0.7% on the released LMLM database to 13.6% on the most
adversarial variant, and
prompt formulation does not independently control how much of a deleted fact survives. These results suggest that, for this class of LMLM and deletion procedure, the unlearning boundary is drawn primarily by the database administrator rather than by the model.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
"Don't Say It!": Constraints, Compliance, and Communication when Language Models Play Taboo
Sara Candussio, Francesca Padovani, Daniel Scalena et al. (+1 more)
The game of Taboo requires describing a target word without using a set of forbidden words, so that other players can guess it. This deceptively simple task combines strict lexical constraints with the need for communicatively effective descriptions, making it a compelling playground for examining how LLMs navigate competing demands at inference time. We evaluate two open-weight models under conditions that intervene at progressively deeper levels of the generative process, from prompting to generation-time constraints to internal representations manipulations. We assess their outputs through forbidden word violation detection, LLM-as-a-judge measuring the degree to which generated descriptions successfully evoke the target concept for both human and machine guessers, and examining whether the strategies models adopt under constraint align with those of human players. Our results show that compliance with the rules of the game and communicative effectiveness trade off differently across conditions, and that models remain substantially weaker than humans as guessers, suggesting that lexical grounding under constraint is an open challenge for current
language models.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Sara Candussio, Francesca Padovani, Daniel Scalena, Malvina Nissim
Computation and Language
Multi-Turn Agentic Scientific Literature Search via Workflow Induction
Jisen Li, Bingxuan Li, Nanyi Jiang et al. (+10 more)
Scientific literature search often requires more than retrieving papers from a single query: users' intents are underspecified, preference-dependent, and evolve through interaction. Existing search
agents typically rely on fixed pipelines or implicit
language-only
reasoning, making their search strategies difficult to control, inspect, and refine. We introduce PaperPilot, a multi-turn literature search
agent that frames scientific search as workflow induction. Given an anchor paper and a user query, PaperPilot constructs an executable DAG of paper-search operators, including keyword search, citation expansion, filtering, scoring, reranking, and evidence extraction. User feedback is then used to refine both the query and the workflow itself. We train PaperPilot with supervised workflow imitation and preference optimization over controlled workflow corruptions. Experiments show that PaperPilot-9B improves over the base Qwen3.5-9B toolset
agent under multi-turn interaction, increasing Hit@5 from 58.0 to 77.0, MRR from 47.5 to 59.4, and nDCG@10 from 26.8 to 32.5, while reducing workflow execution errors from 9.5% to 0%. These results show that explicit, editable search workflows provide an effective and controllable interface for aligning literature search
agents with complex scientific intent.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Jisen Li, Bingxuan Li, Nanyi Jiang, Xuying Ning, Xiyao Wang, Yifan Shen, Heng Wang, Yuqing Jian, Xiaoxia Wu, Ben Athiwaratkun, Pan Lu, Jiaxuan You, Bingxin Zhao
Computation and Language
A Dominant Self-Conditioning Direction Drives Repetition in Unconditional Continuous Diffusion Language Models
Shuai Zhang, Zijie Chen, Huachuan Qiu et al. (+3 more)
Continuous
diffusion language models offer an alternative to autoregressive generation, but their generations may suffer from repetition. We find that unconditional generations from ELF, a recent family of continuous
diffusion language models, are more repetitive than human text, while Gen-PPL, a common likelihood-based metric, gives lower perplexity to repetitive generations and can conceal this problem while biasing quality evaluation. Our analysis links this behavior to a self-conditioning feedback loop in which clean-
embedding predictions are repeatedly carried into subsequent denoising steps, driving representations toward an effectively one-dimensional contractive attractor associated with repetition. Based on this mechanism, we introduce Attractor-Contrast-Escape (ACE), a training-free inference-time intervention that estimates a repetition direction by contrasting denoising paths trapped in repetition with paths relatively free of repetition and subtracts it from the self-conditioning feedback during denoising. Using a direction estimated only once on ELF-B, ACE reduces mean 4-gram self-repetition rate from 7.28% to 4.48%, while retaining competitive results on several text-quality metrics beyond Gen-PPL. The direction remains effective across ELF sizes and inference configurations, and ACE also generalizes to other unconditional self-conditioned continuous
diffusion language models. These results identify self-conditioning feedback as a source of repetition in continuous
diffusion language models and show that ACE can directly mitigate this repetition during inference.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Shuai Zhang, Zijie Chen, Huachuan Qiu, Hongliang He, Lun Du, Zhenzhong Lan
Computation and Language
Safe Alone, Unsafe Together: Safeguarding Against Implicit Toxicity When Benign Images Combine
Jiaxian Lv, Shiyao Cui, Yingkang Wang et al. (+3 more)
Multi-image content has become an increasingly prevalent form of visual communication in social media, giving rise to a new safety issue, multi-image implicit toxicity (MIIT), where each image appears benign in isolation, but harmful semantics emerge when the images are interpreted jointly. MIIT is particularly challenging for existing commercial moderation APIs and models due to the lack of explicit risky cues in each image. This paper aims to study how to identify MIIT. We first provide a formal definition of MIIT and analyze three key challenges for its detection. To alleviate the scarcity of data in this area, we construct MIIT-
dataset, an image-only multi-image safety
dataset covering seven representative risk categories through an automatic generation pipeline. Finally, we train MiShield with progressively distilled
reasoning supervision, enabling it to produce safety judgments accompanied by explicit analyses of the correlated entities that result in the hazards. Experiments show that MiShield-8B models outperform representative moderation services and even larger-scale models, revealing its effectiveness and practical value for this widely used visual format. Warning: This paper contains potentially sensitive content.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Jiaxian Lv, Shiyao Cui, Yingkang Wang, Guoxin Wu, Qingling Zhang, Minlie Huang
Computation and Language
Dual-Confidence Contrastive Decoding for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Raymond Li, Md Tawkat Islam Khondaker, Amirhossein Abaskohi et al. (+3 more)
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) increasingly requires models to answer questions from multiple retrieved documents, where only some sources are relevant and the retrieved bundle may contain stale, noisy, or conflicting evidence. Existing contrastive decoding methods primarily focus on resolving conflicts between the model's internal
memory and the retrieved context. In contrast, we study the complementary problem of intra-context conflict in multi-document RAG. To evaluate this setting, we introduce DRQA, a factual-conflict question answering
benchmark derived from enterprise deep-research scenarios, where answers are grounded in synthetic enterprise-specific facts that are designed not to be recoverable from the model's internal
memory. We further propose Dual-Confidence Contrastive Decoding (DCCD), a training-free decoding method that combines document-level confidence, which estimates whether a document appears sufficient for answering the question, with
token-level confidence, which estimates whether that document supports a confident next-
token prediction. DCCD selects positive and negative document-conditioned streams using these dual-confidence signals and scales a document-level contrast by their confidence margin. Across DRQA and standard multi-document QA
benchmarks, DCCD achieves the best average performance among full-context and contrastive decoding baselines, with the largest gains on DRQA. These results highlight the importance of source-aware, confidence-gated decoding when retrieved evidence is internally conflicting.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Raymond Li, Md Tawkat Islam Khondaker, Amirhossein Abaskohi, Gabriel Murray, Giuseppe Carenini, Issam H. Laradji
Computation and Language
A Task-State Representation for Long-Horizon Mobile GUI Agents
Yujie Zheng, Zikang Liu, Xin Zhao et al. (+1 more)
While long-horizon mobile GUI
agents typically rely on thought-action-observation loops, they struggle to separate persistent task states from transient screen observations. As execution histories grow, this
entanglement imposes a severe context burden, causing
agents to forget initial requirements, hallucinate progress, or repeatedly interact with stale interfaces. To address this, we introduce Task-State Representation (TSR), a training-free framework that explicitly decouples task state from sensory input. Acting as a lightweight external wrapper, TSR maintains three structured components: a global instruction summary, a dynamic progress tracker for subgoals, and a transition-aware action verifier. By continuously updating through pre- and post-action visual comparisons, TSR effectively guides the
agent's
reasoning without requiring architectural modifications. Experiments across four mobile GUI
benchmarks validate TSR's effectiveness, yielding up to a 12 absolute point increase in success rate on complex cross-application and
memory-intensive tasks.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Yujie Zheng, Zikang Liu, Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong Wen
Computation and Language
BaseRT: Best-in-Class LLM Inference on Apple Silicon via Native Metal
Prabod Rathnayaka, Fabian Waschkowski and Lukas Wesemann
We present BaseRT, a native Metal inference runtime for large
language models (LLMs) on Apple Silicon, and report the highest inference throughput on this hardware to date. Existing runtimes, including llama.cpp and MLX-based frameworks, incur overhead from abstractions not designed for Metal's execution model or Apple Silicon's unified
memory topology. By building natively on Metal with chip-specific kernel fusion, unified
memory-aware optimisation, and custom dispatch logic, BaseRT recovers performance that framework-based approaches leave on the table. BaseRT supports a wide range of model families across eight quantisation formats (Q2 to FP16) on all Apple M-series devices. In this paper, we evaluate the Qwen3, Llama 3.2, and Gemma 4 families at Q4 and Q8 quantisation on M3 and M4 Pro devices. BaseRT achieves up to 1.56x higher decode throughput than llama.cpp and up to 1.35x higher than MLX, with substantially larger margins on prefill for mixture-of-experts models, delivering consistent best-in-class throughput from sub-1B to 30B parameter models. These results establish Apple Silicon as a more capable inference platform than previously reported, with direct implications for the emerging edge inference paradigm: as
privacy requirements, latency constraints, and cloud cost pressures drive inference toward on-device deployment, performance-optimised local runtimes are a critical enabling layer for this transition. BaseRT is publicly available at https://github.com/basecompute/baseRT
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
MindEdit-Bench: Benchmarking Object-Level Counterfactual Spatial Reasoning in VLMs from In-the-Wild Photos
Leyuan Yu, Xiao Tang, Minghao Liu et al. (+6 more)
Benchmarks for
vision-
language models (VLMs) mostly test observational spatial
reasoning: models describe relations already visible in the input. Existing what-if tasks typically vary the observer while keeping the scene fixed. Can VLMs instead predict the consequences of hypothetically moving or rotating an object? We introduce MindEdit-Bench, a
benchmark of six spatial
reasoning tasks built from three-photo smartphone triplets of newly captured indoor scenes via an automatic in-the-wild 3D scene-graph extraction pipeline. Four tasks probe perception and perspective transformation over observed structure; two new tasks, L4 (spatial editing) and L5 (cross-view visibility editing), probe object-level counterfactual
reasoning, where correct answers are absent from all input images. Each question provides 8-24 structured answer choices, enabling answer-letter-level diagnosis of spatial and fallback errors. The
benchmark covers 120 private indoor scenes not drawn from public
datasets, reducing public-data pretraining-overlap risk. Across 15 VLMs on 1,003 human-verified questions, task-wise mean VLM accuracy is only 8%-31%, versus 81%-97% human majority-vote accuracy. The pooled human–best-VLM gap is 53 pp, with at least 39 pp on every task. The structured answer space further reveals non-uniform failures, including weaker camera-depth-axis inference and fallback behavior on difficult visibility-editing cases.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Leyuan Yu, Xiao Tang, Minghao Liu, Xinyuan Li, Xiaokai Bai, Sheng Zhou, Qunshu Lin, Weihao Xuan, Naoto Yokoya
Computation and Language
Efficient Multilingual Reasoning Transfer via Progressive Code-Switching
Zhijun Wang, Junxiao Liu, Hao Zhou et al. (+3 more)
Large
reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved strong
reasoning capabilities in English, yet their performance degrades significantly when required to reason in other
languages. A natural solution is to transfer the model's English
reasoning ability to target
languages. However, existing transfer approaches typically rely on distilled target-
language reasoning traces from stronger LRMs or online supervision from external judge models, which are costly and difficult to scale. In this paper, we propose PCS (Progressive Code-Switching), a more efficient transfer framework that requires only lightweight translation without any stronger model for
distillation or judging. PCS first constructs code-switched
reasoning traces by translating a subset of English
reasoning steps into the target
language, and uses them to initialize the model's code-switching ability via supervised fine-tuning. It then applies reinforcement learning with a step-level
language consistency curriculum, progressively raising the target-
language ratio until the model reasons entirely in the target
language. This progressive design provides a smooth transfer path that avoids the instability and performance degradation commonly observed when directly enforcing target-
language reasoning. Experiments on multiple
benchmarks and five typologically diverse
languages show that PCS substantially narrows the performance gap between target-
language and English
reasoning, yielding more
language-consistent
reasoning while maintaining competitive accuracy.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Zhijun Wang, Junxiao Liu, Hao Zhou, Hao-Ran Wei, Baosong Yang, Shujian Huang
Computation and Language
Know When to Stop: Segment-Level Credit Assignment for Reducing Overthinking
Chia-Hsuan Lee, Sihui Dai, Mingyang Zhou et al. (+5 more)
Reasoning language models frequently overthink: generating extended chains of behaviors such as hedging, approach abandonment, and self contradiction that consume
tokens without improving answers. We show that these behaviors are not merely a consequence of length; even when controlling for response length, incorrect traces exhibit higher rates of unproductive self-reflection than correct ones. Addressing this requires identifying where self-reflection helps vs hurts, but obtaining these step-level annotations is costly. We observe that intermediate answer commitments within
reasoning traces can provide a cheap proxy: by comparing each final answer candidate in the trace to the ground truth, we can determine whether subsequent reflection is productive without any additional supervision. Building on this insight, we propose DASH (Drift Aware advantage SHaping), which assigns segment-level credit based on whether each
reasoning segment leads toward or away from correctness. On competition-level math
benchmarks, DASH achieves the highest accuracy where overthinking is prevalent (Average Accuracy: 59.45% vs. 58.1% Dr.GRPO vs. 56.95% GRPO) while reducing overthinking behaviors and achieving more productive self-correction than baselines.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Chia-Hsuan Lee, Sihui Dai, Mingyang Zhou, Isha Slavin, Hsuan Su, Shi-Xiong Zhang, Sambit Sahu, William Campbell
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
StochasT: Learning with Stochastic Turn Depth for Visual Instruction Tuning
Yuan Qing, Chengzhi Mao and Boqing Gong
Large
Vision-
Language Models (LVLMs) rely extensively on Visual Instruction Tuning (VIT) to elicit their
multimodal reasoning capabilities. However, we find a discrepancy: VIT often packs multiple
language tasks about the same image for conversational, multi-turn training, whereas existing
benchmarks evaluate LVLMs in isolated, single-turn scenarios. The models can suffer from visual
attention decay and contextual overfitting during multi-turn training, making it hard for them to realize their full potential in the mismatched test phase. To close the gap, we propose learning with
Stochastic Turn Depth (StochasT), which stochastically groups
language tasks for the same image into clusters of varying sizes (turn depth) while preserving their organic order. Hence, while StochasT draws on Dropout and
stochastic depth for ResNets, it does not actually drop anything to maximize the utility of the training data. Furthermore, we introduce a challenging,
benchmark-agnostic evaluation mechanism based on the Balanced Latin Square to measure LVLMs' robustness under varying contextual dependencies. Extensive experiments demonstrate that StochasT effectively grants LVLMs strong, harmonized capabilities for both single-turn and multi-turn use cases.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG
MolSafeEval: A Benchmark for Uncovering Safety Risks in AI-Generated Molecules
Tong Xu, Xinzhe Cao, Zhihui Zhu et al. (+2 more)
Current molecular generation
benchmarks emphasize task complexity, molecule novelty, and property
alignment; they largely overlook a critical concern: the potential safety risks of AI-generated molecules. In practice, many generative models may produce molecules with toxic, reactive, or otherwise hazardous characteristics - posing hidden dangers that remain insufficiently addressed. To address this gap, we introduce MolSafeEval, a
benchmark dedicated to evaluating and analyzing the safety risks of molecular generation. Unlike prior approaches that rely on narrow toxicity predictors, MolSafeEval integrates heterogeneous safety knowledge - ranging from toxicological databases to hazard rules - into a structured molecular safety knowledge graph. This graph serves as a foundation for large
language model-based
reasoning, enabling systematic detection and explanation of unsafe features in generated compounds. We further categorize molecular generative models into four representative task types - unconditional generation, property optimization, target
protein-based design, and text-based generation - and provide standardized
datasets and safety evaluation protocols for each. By systematically revealing the safety vulnerabilities of current generative approaches, MolSafeEval offers a new lens for benchmarking molecular models and provides essential guidance toward safer, more trustworthy molecular design.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Tong Xu, Xinzhe Cao, Zhihui Zhu, Keyan Ding, Huajun Chen
Computation and Language
Understanding Why Language Models Hallucinate: Testing Reasoning Against Priors
Yangfan Hu, Xuhan Tong, Haoyue Bai et al. (+5 more)
Large
language models often produce hallucinated answers that violate
prompt-level constraints. A key diagnostic question is whether these failures reflect missing knowledge, or whether the model has the relevant information but follows the wrong inference path. We study this phenomenon as inference misalignment: a mismatch between the answer supported by the
prompt and the answer favored by statistically salient latent associations. We formalize this view with a latent key-task model, in which pretraining-frequency imbalance can cause a shortcut path to dominate the constraint-sensitive path and induce positive inference loss. The framework predicts two failure modes: task-
retrieval bias in entity disambiguation and key-selection bias in action choice. We introduce TrapQA, a controlled diagnostic testbed with two components. ScientistQA tests disambiguation among similar scientists with supplementary factual probes, while Real-Life Constrained QA tests everyday constraint following under salient shortcuts. Our results show that
hallucination can arise from biased latent inference rather than absent knowledge alone.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Yangfan Hu, Xuhan Tong, Haoyue Bai, Xi Ding, Shashank Muralidhar Bharadwaj, Siyang Cao, Robert Nowak, Jiawei Zhang
Computation and Language
Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating
Jaeho Han, Jisoo Yang, Hyeondong Woo et al. (+3 more)
Vision language models (VLMs) demonstrate strong zero-shot performance, but often perpetuate social stereotypes in person-centric queries, yielding skewed demographic distributions. Current debiasing methods apply uniform bias corrections across all input queries regardless of their bias sensitivity, creating a fundamental
fairness–utility trade-off. Strong debiasing distorts semantically meaningful information in bias-insensitive queries, while weak debiasing fails to mitigate stereotypes in bias-sensitive ones. This one-size-fits-all approach hampers simultaneously achieving high utility on bias-insensitive queries and
fairness on bias-sensitive queries. We introduce Reward-Gated Test-Time Adaptation (RG-TTA), a reinforcement learning-based test-time adaptation framework that selectively applies debiasing based on input sensitivity. RG-TTA adaptively triggers
fairness regularization based on the bias sensitivity of each input during test-time policy adaptation, while focusing exclusively on optimizing cross-modal
alignment for bias-insensitive inputs. Experiments on
fairness benchmarks (e.g., FairFace, UTKFace) demonstrate substantial bias reduction while simultaneously improving zero-shot utility, resolving the trade-off of uniform debiasing.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Jaeho Han, Jisoo Yang, Hyeondong Woo, Mingyu Jeon, Sunjae Yoon, Junyeong Kim
Computation and Language
Speech Playground: An Interactive Tool for Speech Analysis and Comparison
Stephen McIntosh, Daisuke Saito and Nobuaki Minematsu
This paper presents
Speech Playground, an interactive
speech visualization and comparison tool. While existing tools such as Praat are excellent, it can be cumbersome to integrate them with modern deep learning representations and use them for comparison.
Speech Playground addresses this by combining a Python backend with a web-based frontend for interactive exploration of multiple feature types, including continuous, discrete, and variable-length representations. It includes TextGrid and forced
alignment support together with configurable distance and
alignment settings for visual and auditory comparison.
Speech Playground is intended for use in
speech research, representation validation, and computer-aided pronunciation training (CAPT)-oriented experimentation.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
A Mechanistic View of Authority Hierarchy in LLM Sycophancy
Emil Joswin, Srujananjali Medicherla and Priyanka Mary Mammen
Authority bias poses a critical safety concern in
language models: models systematically prioritize social cues from authority figures over factual consistency, swaying their answers based on source credibility rather than evidence. We mechanistically investigate this phenomenon using a controlled medical QA setting, where hints suggesting incorrect answers are attributed to personas of varying expertise. Across Llama-3.1-8B, Qwen3-8B, and Gemma-2-9B, we find that models respond in a graded manner proportional to perceived authority, a hierarchy that is never explicitly prompted but emerges from training. Logit lens analysis and linear/non-linear probing localize this effect to a critical late layer where correct answer representations are actively erased, an erasure that scales with authority level, resists mean vector intervention, and is only partially reversible through chain-of-thought
reasoning. Our findings suggest that authority-induced sycophancy is not a surface-level output bias but mechanistic knowledge erasure, a precise, layer-localized overwriting of correct internal representations by high-status authority signals.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from q-bio.NC
NeuroCogMap Reveals Cognitive Organization of Large Language Models
Zhongxiang Sun, Haolang Lu, Qiang Ma et al. (+11 more)
Understanding how complex cognitive functions are organized within artificial systems is central to interpreting large
language models (LLMs) and relating them to biological cognition. Yet although LLMs exhibit broad cognitive-like behaviours, it remains unclear whether their internal representations form reproducible functional systems that explain behaviour, failure and links to human cognition. Here we present NeuroCogMap, a cognitive neuroscience-inspired framework that organizes internal features of LLMs into functional parcels and links them to interpretable functions, cognitive capabilities and a cognitive hierarchy. These parcels form a stable and semantically coherent organization that is partly conserved across models and functionally linked to model outputs. Within this organization, major LLM failures, including
hallucination, bias, refusal failure and sycophancy, correspond to distinct disruptions in representational and behavioural-control systems, yielding internal signatures for mechanism-guided detection and targeted intervention. Beyond model behaviour, NeuroCogMap improves prediction of human cortical responses during naturalistic
language comprehension, with the strongest correspondence in higher-order association cortex. At the cognitive level, its internal signatures expose latent strategies that guide refinements of classical models of human decision-making. Together, these findings establish NeuroCogMap as a system-level framework for mapping functional organization in artificial systems and for relating this organization to human cortical function and cognitive behaviour.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Zhongxiang Sun, Haolang Lu, Qiang Ma, Qi Li, Qipeng Wang, Liang Pang, Chenyu Liu, Qiankun Li, Hao Sun, Kun Wang, Yi Zeng, Jun Xu, Guoqi Li, Ji-Rong Wen
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.DB
When Classic Cache Policies Fail: Learning-Augmented Replacement for Semantic Retrieval Buffers
Yushi Sun, Bowen Cao and Wai Lam
LLM
agents increasingly rely on
retrieval buffers to store and reuse past experience, yet the cache management policies governing these buffers remain largely ad-hoc. We formalize this as an online semantic cache replacement problem with switching costs, where items are matched by
embedding similarity and hit quality is continuous rather than binary. Through experiments on two
datasets from MemoryBench-Full (LoCoMo, DialSim) with 8 replacement policies, we reveal a surprising finding: classic heuristics (LRU, LFU) consistently underperform the naive FIFO baseline on semantic workloads, due to the absence of temporal locality and frequency concentration. We propose
SOLAR, a learning-augmented framework that derives modification timing from regret accumulation (achieving $\sim$17% modification rate) and content selection from
Bayesian online learning over implicit
retrieval feedback. We prove
SOLAR achieves a constant competitive ratio $\leq 3$, independent of cache size and horizon (vs.\ $\Omega(K)$ for FIFO), and eviction regret $O(\sqrt{KT\log T})$, matching the $\Omega(\sqrt{KT})$ lower bound up to logarithmic factors. Experiments demonstrate 5–75% relative improvement over FIFO at tight cache sizes, with a clearly characterized phase transition at the working set boundary. Synthetic experiments with 5000-item pools further reveal an inverted-U relationship between pool size and
retrieval quality, justifying capacity constraints as a
retrieval noise phenomenon rather than a storage limitation.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
Learning to Compose: Revisiting Proxy Task Design for Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval
Jingjing Zhang, Lei Zhang, Zheren Fu et al. (+1 more)
Composed Image
Retrieval (CIR) retrieves a target image from a reference image and a textual modification. While supervised CIR relies on costly triplets, Zero-Shot CIR (ZS-CIR) alleviates this reliance through proxy tasks trained on image-text pairs. However, existing proxy tasks primarily enhance visual and textual representations to accommodate a predefined composition mechanism such as pseudo-word injection into a frozen text encoder or linear feature arithmetic. As a result, the composition function itself remains unlearned, limiting the model's ability to express diverse and fine-grained semantic modifications. To address this, we propose FoCo, which models composition as two coordinated stages: focusing on modification-relevant visual content, and then completing the target semantics. We realize these through two proxy tasks: text-anchored visual aggregation to selectively gather visual content guided by localized textual semantics, and context-conditioned semantic completion to transform these aggregated visuals with the remaining scene context into a coherent composed representation. The tasks are trained jointly with a cross-instance contrastive objective, encouraging semantic diversity and discouraging shortcut composition strategies. Extensive experiments on four ZS-CIR
benchmarks show FoCo's state-of-the-art performance and improved generalization.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Jingjing Zhang, Lei Zhang, Zheren Fu, Zhendong Mao
Computation and Language
Beyond Perplexity: A Behavioral Evaluation Framework for Deployment-Memory Claims in LLM Test-Time Training
Xiangchen Song, Zhenhao Chen, Lingjing Kong et al. (+4 more)
Large
language model test-time training (TTT) is often evaluated through local proxy metrics: models are updated on recent
tokens, retrieved context, target-domain data, or verifiable task attempts, and then judged by perplexity, future-
token loss, long-context performance, or reward. These metrics are well matched to claims about stream adaptation, domain adaptation, context compression, and reward-backed test-time improvement. They are weaker evidence, however, for a capability that TTT results are increasingly used to motivate: deployed assistant
memory, personalization, or sparse post-deployment learning, which instead requires behavioral evidence such as later recall, paraphrase robustness, retention, locality, conflict handling, and use in downstream actions after the original support context is removed. We introduce a behavioral evaluation framework that calibrates TTT
memory claims to the evidence that supports them. It has two components: a claim-calibrated evidence ladder that separates stream/domain adaptation, bridge internalization, and deployment-time behavioral learning; and an evaluation protocol with matched explicit-
memory baselines and mutually exclusive failure categories. We validate the framework by
auditing recent TTT and
memory-adjacent work and by instantiating it as a controlled diagnostic in which, in a sparse nonce-fact setting, one-step LoRA updates lower support and answer loss across three Qwen3 model scales while generated free-form recall stays at zero, exposing a measurable gap between proxy improvement and deployment behavior. The framework gives authors and evaluators a concrete standard for aligning TTT
memory claims with the evidence actually reported.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Xiangchen Song, Zhenhao Chen, Lingjing Kong, Shaoan Xie, Xinshuai Dong, Guangyi Chen, Kun Zhang
Computation and Language
DiscoLoop: Looping Discrete Embeddings and Continuous Hidden States for Multi-hop Reasoning
Hengyu Fu, Tianyu Guo, Zixuan Wang et al. (+5 more)
Large
language models achieve strong performance on many
reasoning tasks when allowed to externalize intermediate steps as Chain-of-Thought (CoT). However, many questions require the model to internalize the multi-step
reasoning within a single forward pass before generating the answer. We study this challenge through two-hop
reasoning, a representative task where the model must compose multiple pieces of parametric knowledge within a single forward pass. Standard non-recurrent
Transformers suffer from a depth-local storage problem: facts learned in earlier layers are unavailable where second-hop
retrieval happens. We found that Looped
Transformers mitigate this issue by reusing the same
memory, but still generalize imperfectly. We show that the remaining bottleneck is representational. In the two-hop
reasoning task, the first loop often makes the correct bridge entity nearly perfectly decodable, yet the corresponding hidden state remains poorly aligned with the bridge
token embedding. Surprisingly, an easy training-free realignment intervention nearly closes the generalization gap. Building upon this insight, we propose DiscoLoop, a looping architecture whose recurrence carries both a discrete
embedding channel and a continuous hidden-state channel. DiscoLoop achieves near-perfect accuracy with substantially fewer training steps across symbolic and synthetic-
language multi-hop
reasoning tasks. When applied to real-world pretraining, DiscoLoop attains lower training loss and stronger
benchmark performance than looped-
transformer baselines, suggesting that the mixed-channel design transfers to practical
language modeling.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Hengyu Fu, Tianyu Guo, Zixuan Wang, Hanlin Zhu, Jason D. Lee, Jiantao Jiao, Stuart Russell, Song Mei
Computation and Language
TRACE: State-Aware Query Processing over Temporal Evidence Graphs for Conversational Data
Maolin Wang, Yu Wang, Zichun Liu et al. (+5 more)
Conversational data is increasingly used as a persistent source of user state for long-running assistants and AI
agents. However, querying this data remains challenging because conversations naturally evolve: plans are revised, preferences change, and later messages frequently supersede or contradict earlier information. Existing long-
memory pipelines largely treat
memories as independent text or vector objects. This approach often retrieves semantically similar but stale evidence, offering limited support for state-aware
reasoning. To address this problem, we present TRACE, a query processing framework over temporal evidence graphs for evolving conversational data. TRACE models conversations as a hierarchical graph spanning events, sessions, and topics, enriched with typed temporal, causal, update, and contradiction relations. Crucially, the framework maintains validity annotations so obsolete facts remain accessible for historical queries but are discounted for current-state answers. At query time, TRACE combines vector-based note
retrieval with graph-guided evidence search, generating validity-aware support paths and a hybrid context for answer generation. This design separates lexical recall from evidence reconstruction, enabling bounded query-time
reasoning over long conversational histories. Experiments on long-conversation query-answering (QA)
benchmarks show that TRACE improves temporal and multi-hop
reasoning, with ablations highlighting the importance of hierarchy, update-aware seeding, and path-grounded evidence.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Maolin Wang, Yu Wang, Zichun Liu, Baiyuan Qiu, Chenbin Zhang, Jiguang Shen, Haoran Yang, Hao Miao
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG
Watermarking for Proprietary Dataset Protection
John Kirchenbauer, Brian R. Bartoldson, Bhavya Kailkhura et al. (+1 more)
A growing body of literature suggests that training data membership inference problems are fundamentally hard tasks in modern
language modeling settings. We argue that output watermarking techniques are the right gadget to make training membership tests for generative models more tractable, based on prior results showing that
language models exhibit residual watermark "radioactivity" under partially watermarked training
datasets. We pit a watermark-based
dataset inference approach head-to-head against traditional loss-based membership inference methods and show that watermarking can achieve comparable membership detection performance when subset exposure is high enough, under an alternate set of assumptions.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors John Kirchenbauer, Brian R. Bartoldson, Bhavya Kailkhura, Tom Goldstein
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.SD
A Text-Steerable Instrument for Sketching Procedural Soundscapes via Language Models
Prabal Gupta
We present a real-time musical interface that converts natural-
language scene descriptions into evolving procedural soundscapes. A performer types a
prompt such as "warm jazz cafe at midnight" and steers it through direct parameter adjustments - stepping brightness down, switching a rhythm style - each producing a predictable, audible shift without re-prompting. Where GPU-bound text-to-audio systems synthesize monolithic waveforms, our instrument generates human-readable configurations over a categorical schema, enabling fine-grained performer control; most valid combinations are designed to sound musically coherent. Three interchangeable backends -
embedding retrieval for sub-second CPU-only use, hosted LLMs via API, and a fine-tuned 270M local model - all emit the same schema. A live generator architecture continuously emits audio while resolving new instructions in the background, crossfading seamlessly when ready; even when an LLM takes 5-12 seconds to respond, the audience hears uninterrupted sound - reframing text-to-music as an ongoing performable stream rather than a one-shot generation. We evaluate text-audio semantic
alignment using LAION-CLAP on held-out
prompts as a technical proxy, finding that
retrieval-based configuration outperforms random valid configurations on this metric, while noting that LAION-CLAP also informed
retrieval-map construction. We report performance observations, informal listener feedback, and release materials for the SDK,
dataset artifacts, model, and audiovisual performance interface.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG
Mapping the Evaluation Frontier: An Empirical Survey of the Bias-Reliability Tradeoff Across Eleven Evaluator-Agent Conditions
Zewen Liu
The bias-reliability tradeoff
conjectures that LLM evaluation systems are constrained in (gamma, H, CV) space, where evaluator coupling (gamma), strategy diversity (H), and small-sample measurement reliability (CV(N)) cannot be simultaneously optimized at fixed sample size N. Prior evidence rests on n=5 conditions with complete metrics from a single study. We expand the empirical base to 11 conditions, measuring gamma and H for all 11 (nine with valid weight vectors) and CV(N=5) for seven with sufficient seeds (N >= 5). Five conditions provide the complete (gamma, H, CV) triple. The data confirm the trade-off: conditions with low evaluator coupling (gamma < 0.2) exhibit high measurement noise (CV(N=5) > 1.0), while conditions with strong coupling (gamma > 0.9) achieve low noise (CV(N=5) < 0.16). The correlation r(H, gamma) = -0.989 (n=5, excluding GPT-4o conditions) confirms that evaluator coupling suppresses strategy diversity. Four GPT-4o conditions show gamma=0.000 and H=1.000 across all seeds – a pattern we attribute to version drift in the June 2026 GPT-4o API. No condition occupies the region {gamma < 0.2, CV(N=5) < 0.3}. We release all per-condition metrics as a standardized
benchmark dataset for evaluator comparison.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG
EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems
Zewen Liu
When LLM
agents use evaluator feedback to adapt their behavior in closed loops, evaluator biases propagate through the
agent's strategy distribution – a phenomenon known as evaluator preference coupling. Prior work has documented coupling across multiple evaluator families and model versions, but the field lacks a standardized protocol that enables third-party researchers to (i) reproduce coupling measurements, (ii) compare results across evaluators and time points, and (iii) detect measurement decay as proprietary evaluators silently update. This paper provides the protocol. We specify EPC (Evaluator Preference Coupling) – a detailed, RFC-style protocol specification for the four-phase isolation paradigm, covering executor and evaluator configuration, strategy and task design, the TTRL update rule, metric computation (gamma, JSD, ECE, Brier), and output schema. We accompany the protocol with a versioned Reference Snapshot v1.0: coupling measurements for eight evaluator conditions (N=122 unique experimental repetitions across GPT-4o, Qwen, DeepSeek, and others) derived from five independent studies, annotated with evaluator version identifiers, API endpoints, and measurement dates. The snapshot is explicitly time-bound: all values are conditional on specific model versions and are expected to decay as proprietary evaluators update. We define a versioning convention (vX.Y-Z, encoding protocol version, snapshot version, and evaluator generation) and provide a usage guide covering adoption, interpretation, and known pitfalls. The protocol, reference snapshot, and implementation code are released as open infrastructure.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
Rosetta: Composable Native Multimodal Pretraining
Xiangyue Liu, Zijian Zhang, Miles Yang et al. (+3 more)
Achieving true artificial general intelligence requires foundation models capable of integrating new modalities without forgetting prior knowledge. However, accommodating continuous generative objectives alongside discrete understanding tasks causes severe gradient conflicts. Existing architectures, including standard Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), are highly susceptible to representation overwriting. Even structurally partitioned paradigms like Mixture-of-
Transformers (MoT) remain vulnerable to catastrophic forgetting, severely impeding
multimodal scalability. In this work, we introduce Rosetta, a composable native
multimodal pretraining framework designed for seamless and non-destructive modality expansion. Rosetta adopts a modular paradigm where core foundational knowledge is preserved within global shared experts, while modality-specific capabilities are distributed across plug-and-play experts. To guarantee non-destructive composition, we propose Momentum-Anchored Orthogonal Projection (MAOP). MAOP leverages the optimizer's momentum state as an implicit semantic anchor, selectively neutralizing conflicting gradient components from new modalities while preserving synergistic updates. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that, while standard MoE and MoT architectures suffer catastrophic forgetting of previously acquired knowledge, Rosetta robustly preserves established
language and visual understanding. Furthermore, it delivers superior image generation and unlocks cross-modal synergy, paving the way for truly composable and unified
multimodal foundation models. To facilitate further
multimodal research, we release our code and checkpoints to the community. Project page at https://rosetta-lmm.github.io/.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Xiangyue Liu, Zijian Zhang, Miles Yang, Zhao Zhong, Liefeng Bo, Ping Tan
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.NI
An LLM-Based Framework for Intent-Driven Network Topology Design
Kholoud El-Habbouli, Fen Zhou and Stephane Huet
Designing deployable and resilient network
topologies from natural
language requirements remains a challenging problem in network automation. This work investigates the ability of Large
Language Models (LLMs) to generate structurally valid and constraint-compliant network
topologies through a constraint-driven pipeline combining hierarchical modeling and systematic validation. The framework is evaluated via a multimodel comparison of proprietary and open-weight LLMs across four realistic network scenarios released as a public
dataset. We assess structural correctness using node and edge F1-scores against reference
topologies, and evaluate resilience through server and content connectivity metrics. In addition, we analyze common failure modes, including interface mismatches and directional inconsistencies in generated
topologies. Overall, this work provides a systematic
benchmark for understanding how LLMs handle structural and resilience constraints in
topology synthesis, and supports informed model selection for AI-driven network design.
Read the full abstract ▾