Peer Revenue Past citations are no guarantee of future returns

Papers

Fresh from arXiv, typeset properly. Highlighted words trade on the market.

Computer Science Computation and Language

cs.CL Watch Computation and Language

Monday 8 June

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CY

CCBENCH: Assessing LLM Cultural Competence via Implicitly Signaled Norms using Health Queries

Vasudha Varadarajan, Akhila Yerukola, Mona T. Diab et al. (+1 more)

To interact with users fairly and without stereotyping, AI models must display cultural competency, i.e., the ability to infer and adapt to a user's implicitly signaled cultural values, rather than relying on static demographic traits. We introduce CCBENCH, a framework for evaluating cultural competency in large language models (LLMs), treating culture as a continuum of norm adherence states rather than as a binary state of cultural belongingness. As a case study on health, we create CCBENCH-Health, which includes 60 theoretically grounded personas exhibiting varied norm-adherence states across six cultures, each engaging in 18 realistic dialogues. Each persona is evaluated on 52 authentic healthcare questions drawn from real user forums, yielding 3,120 unique interactions. Benchmarking five leading models reveals that even the best achieve culturally appropriate responses only 20-30% of the time. When explicitly prompted to focus on culturally relevant cues from the conversational history (CoT), performance improves modestly by 3-5% on average. We find that models perform best when personas avoid cultural norms rather than follow them, revealing a persistent asymmetry, suggesting a preference in the models to align with built-in biases than adapt to cultural cues. This is especially observed in the Afghan context (Avg: 8.8%), where cultural cues rarely yield appropriate health advice. Finally, we find that models sometimes adapt more readily to implicit, cultural conversational styles than to explicitly stated cultural practices, though this varies across cultures.
Read the full abstract

All authors Vasudha Varadarajan, Akhila Yerukola, Mona T. Diab, Maarten Sap

Computation and Language

Generating in the Limit with Infinitely Many Hallucinations

Irene Strauss, Alexandra Butoi and Ryan Cotterell

The classic paradigm of language identification in the limit models learning as a game between an adversary, who reveals strings from an unknown target language, and a learner tasked with identifying that language. The recently introduced framework of language generation in the limit shifted the objective to better reflect modern language modeling, requiring the learner to produce valid, unseen strings from the target language. Related work highlighted a fundamental tension: a broad coverage of the target often comes at the cost of validity. We introduce a new notion of precision and recast this problem as the classic recall-precision trade-off. We analyze generation in the limit under varying constraints on enumeration, novelty, and validity, aimed at reflecting settings closer to those encountered by large language models. A key contribution is our analysis of learners that are not eventually valid: we allow infinitely many mistakes, provided their frequency tends to zero so that precision remains one. We show that this relaxation can strictly increase recall when the adversary permanently withholds a large portion of the target language. We also study a continuous relaxation of the novelty constraint that requires only a fixed fraction of outputs to be novel. Taken together, our results move toward a more realistic model of language generation where occasional errors and repetitions are unavoidable, but their rates are controlled.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.DL

Invisible to humans, visible to machines: a preregistered audit of Unicode fidelity across four biomedical bibliographic APIs

Przemysław Czuma

Biomedical text mining, scientometrics, and the construction of training corpora for biomedical large language models (LLMs) all assume that the abstract text returned by a bibliographic API faithfully reproduces the published abstract. This pre-registered audit (OSF osf.io/269b5) tests that assumption for four widely used public APIs (PubMed E-utilities, Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar) against PubMed Central (PMC) JATS XML as a common ground truth. From a complete enumeration of the PMC Open Access subset for 2024 (about 700,000 records), a simple random sample of 4,000 English-language research articles was drawn; for each, we recorded whether Unicode characters from four pre-specified classes present in the JATS abstract (typographic punctuation, mathematical/scientific symbols, Greek letters, special whitespace) were preserved by each API. Two systematic, deterministic losses met the pre-registered criterion (upper 95% CI bound below 5%): the PubMed AbstractText field preserved typographic punctuation in only 0.6% of eligible abstracts (95% CI 0.3-1.0%), and OpenAlex preserved special whitespace in 0% (0.0-0.4%). A blinded mechanism audit attributed the first loss to character substitution and the second to inverted-index serialization. Mathematical symbols and Greek letters were preserved faithfully (over 95%) by all four APIs. Separately, Crossref returned no abstract for 24.6% of papers (coverage 75.4%, 95% CI 74.1-76.7%), concentrated in specific publishers (Elsevier and ACS: 0%). Character-level fidelity is therefore API-dependent and undocumented: the same publisher-deposited JATS text carries different surface signatures depending on the serving API, with direct consequences for tokenization-sensitive bibliometrics, corpus construction, and character-level indicators of LLM-assisted writing.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

EmoInstruct-TTS: Dual-Path Instruction-Guided Emotional Speech Synthesis

Minghui Wu, Ganjun Liu, Zikun Fang et al. (+6 more)

Instruction-based controllable speech synthesis enables users to specify emotions through natural language. However, existing approaches often rely on coarse emotion labels and lack explicit modeling of fine-grained intensity. We propose EmoInstruct-TTS, a dual-path instruction-guided framework for emotional speech synthesis. We introduce Emotion2embed, a supervised semantic-acoustic emotion embedding covering 48 emotional states, including fine-grained categories and intensity levels. To infer embeddings from free-form instructions, we design an Instruction-Conditioned Emotion Flow Model (ICE-Flow) that generates acoustically grounded emotion representations. The inferred embeddings are integrated into an LLM-based synthesis pipeline to provide explicit emotional control while preserving semantic planning. Experiments show improved emotional controllability and speech naturalness over strong baselines.
Read the full abstract

All authors Minghui Wu, Ganjun Liu, Zikun Fang, Ting Meng, Hongchuan Wu, Bingao Xu, Yonglong Cai, Jiasheng Chen, Jun Du

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI

RealMath-Eval: Why SOTA Judges Struggle with Real Human Reasoning

Yiteng Mao, Kenan Xu, Yijia Lyu et al. (+3 more)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved near-perfect performance in solving high-school mathematics, their ability to evaluate the diverse reasoning processes of real human students remains under-examined. To bridge this gap, we introduce RealMath-Eval, a rigorously annotated benchmark of 224 real-world exam responses from high schools. Our initial evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art LLM judges struggle significantly on this task, exhibiting a high Mean Squared Error ($\sim$2.96) against expert human grading. To probe a plausible explanation, we contrast this performance with a control setting where the same judges evaluate synthetic LLM-generated solutions. We identify a stark “Evaluation Gap”: judges are considerably more accurate and consistent on synthetic text (MSE $\sim$1.17) but struggle to generalize to authentic student reasoning. Through semantic embedding analysis, we find that synthetic errors suffer from a “structural collapse” into predictable, low-dimensional linear subspaces, whereas human errors form a more diverse error space. Furthermore, generative probability probes suggest that human reasoning involves significantly higher information-theoretic surprisal, indicating that student reasoning transitions are more out-of-distribution for current models. Finally, we find that surface-level style transfer fails to close this gap. Our findings suggest that current LLM evaluation pipelines relying heavily on synthetic data may not adequately capture the diversity of authentic student mathematical reasoning.
Read the full abstract

All authors Yiteng Mao, Kenan Xu, Yijia Lyu, Wenhao Li, Jianlong Chen, Xiangfeng Wang

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG

A Continuous-Time Markov Chain Framework for Insertion Language Models

Dhruvesh Patel, Benjamin Rozonoyer, Soumitra Das et al. (+3 more)

Insertion Language Models (ILMs) offer several advantages over left-to-right generation and mask-based generation. However, existing formulations of insertion-based generation have largely been ad-hoc. In this paper, we derive a diffusion-style denoising objective for ILMs from first principles by formulating the noising process as a continuous-time Markov chain on the space of variable-length sequences. We show that previous formulations of ILMs can be viewed as special cases of this denoising framework. Through empirical evaluation on a synthetic planning task, we show that the proposed approach retains the benefits of insertion-based generation over left-to-right generation and masked diffusion models. In language modeling, our diffusion-based approach is competitive with left-to-right generation and masked diffusion models, while offering additional flexibility in sampling compared to existing insertion language models.
Read the full abstract

All authors Dhruvesh Patel, Benjamin Rozonoyer, Soumitra Das, Tahira Naseem, Tim G.J. Rudner, Andrew McCallum

Computation and Language

Gaming AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Poses New Risks to the Scientific Community

Lin Li, Qi Zhang, Xander Davies et al. (+2 more)

AI is increasingly used to support scientific peer review, from manuscript screening, reviewer assistance to editorial triage. Although such systems promise to reduce reviewer burden and accelerate publication, their robustness to strategic manipulation remains poorly understood. Here we show that AI-mediated peer review is vulnerable to a simple, low-cost manipulation: superficial rephrasing of the manuscript abstract. Without changing the underlying scientific content and communication, and even without knowledge of the reviewing model, adversarially rewritten abstracts substantially improve AI review outcomes. We see this across disciplines and publication venues, for both human-written and AI-generated papers. Our strongest attack achieves an attack-success-rate of about 38%, increasing acceptance ratings by +1.31 for Gemini 3 Flash reviewers and by +0.88 for GPT 5.4 Mini reviewers on a 10-point scale. When the original AI review suggests 'reject', the success rate rises to more than 50%. This effect extends beyond overall score inflation, increasing review confidence and scores on core scientific criteria such as soundness, significance and perceived contribution. The attack is practical, requiring only about 5 minutes and $1 for a 10-page AI conference submission, and is hard to distinguish from ordinary scientific editing. Inflated AI reviews could bias downstream human decision-making, shifting editorial recommendations from rejection towards acceptance. These findings reveal a general vulnerability in AI-assisted scientific evaluation: when AI-generated review influence editorial decisions, authors may be incentivized to optimize manuscripts for AI judgment rather than scientific merit. Our results suggest that AI tools should not be treated as neutral evaluators in high-stakes peer review without systematic robustness testing, transparent safeguards and careful human oversight.
Read the full abstract

All authors Lin Li, Qi Zhang, Xander Davies, Jianing Qiu, Yarin Gal

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.IR

$\tau$-Rec: A Verifiable Benchmark for Agentic Recommender Systems

Bharath Sivaram Narasimhan and Karthik R Narasimhan

As recommender systems transition toward agentic, multi-turn conversational interfaces, evaluation paradigms have struggled to keep pace. Current benchmarks often rely on "LLM-as-a-judge" evaluations, which introduce subjectivity, high costs and inconsistency. We present $\tau$-Rec, a benchmark for agentic recommender systems that replaces subjective evaluation with verifiable rewards and a reveal-tagged elicitation (RTE) mechanism that controls how task constraints surface during dialogue. By testing agents against structured catalog predicates and employing a pass^k reliability metric, $\tau$-Rec provides a systematic test for consistent reasoning. Our evaluation of nine configurations across five model families – GPT-5.4, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 2.5 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen3-32B and GPT-5 mini – reveals a steep reliability cliff, where even the best model achieves only ~57% at pass^1 and ~35% at pass^4, highlighting a critical gap in current conversational agent deployment. All code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/nbharaths/tau-rec.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI

From Senses to Decisions: The Information Flow of Auditory and Visual Perception in Multimodal LLMs

Wish Suharitdamrong, Muhammad Awais, Xiatian Zhu et al. (+1 more)

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can listen and see, but how do audio and visual signals actually travel through the network to shape an answer? Despite their growing role in research and real-world applications, the internal pathways through which audio and visual tokens influence the final prediction remain poorly understood. In this study, we examine audio-visual information flow inside Audio-Visual Large Language Models (AVLLMs), tracing how AVLLMs route, utilize, and integrate audio and visual information across two input configurations, audio-visual video and multiple interleaved audio-visual items. We find that for audio-visual video, AVLLMs follow the sequential information flow pathway established for VLMs and VideoLLMs, with audio and visual contribution flowing along this pathway in proportion to the task's reliance on each modality. In settings with multiple interleaved audio-visual items, this routing shifts to different parallel streams. Furthermore, we demonstrate that audio-visual and other token types can be discarded once their information is transferred to LLM, with minimal impact on the model's prediction or even slight improvement, generalizing across multiple tasks and datasets, enabling more efficient inference. These findings hold across multiple models and scales, Qwen2.5-Omni and Video-SALMONN2 Plus at 3B and 7B scales, leading to hypotheses on why these flow structures emerge. Together, these results deliver the first coherent picture of how AVLLMs orchestrate sound and sight inside the network and lay the groundwork for the next wave of interpretability, design, and efficiency advances in audio-visual and broader MLLMs.
Read the full abstract

All authors Wish Suharitdamrong, Muhammad Awais, Xiatian Zhu, Sara Atito

Computation and Language

Pareto-Guided Teacher Alignment for Fair Personalized Text Generation

Tunazzina Islam

Personalized persuasive text generation can improve relevance and engagement, but demographic conditioning may also introduce unequal framing across groups. We study fairness mitigation in personalized generation as a constrained multi-objective alignment problem: reduce demographic disparities while preserving personalization fidelity. We propose a Pareto-guided teacher alignment framework that combines revision-based candidate generation, pair-aware feasibility gating, Pareto-style candidate selection, and optional preference optimization through supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization. We evaluate the framework on climate change and vaccination persuasion tasks using a controlled context-rich demographic grid with matched gender and age pairs and a unified five-audit evaluation suite spanning persuasion bias, formality disparity, emotional framing disparity, lexical association disparity, and personalization fidelity. Across both domains and cross-family transfer settings, no single alignment strategy dominates all objectives simultaneously. Instead, methods occupy different regions of a fairness-personalization Pareto frontier: some achieve stronger disparity reductions, while others better preserve personalization or demographic stability. Our results show that fairness mitigation effects are objective-dependent and transfer inconsistently across domains and model families, motivating bounded-regression, multi-audit model selection over single-metric optimization for fairness-sensitive personalized generation.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

Emotion Profiling in LLM-Based Literary Translation: Systematic Shifts Across MT and Post-Editing

Antonio Castaldo, Johanna Monti and Sheila Castilho

This paper investigates whether LLM translations exhibit identifiable emotional profiles and how post-editing reshapes them toward human-like norms. We compare LLM translations of Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake with their post-edited versions and a human translation, using a large-scale corpus of contemporary Italian science-fiction as a baseline. We examine emotion through lexicon-based and multilingual modeling, conducting a fine-grained analysis of emotional variation across systems. We find that MT systems introduce model-specific and statistically significant emotional fingerprints across translations, leading to a limited preservation of an author's voice.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

CodeAlchemy: Synthetic Code Rewriting at Scale

Ankit Gupta, Aditya Prasad and Rameswar Panda

Pre-training on raw code teaches syntax but provides sparse signal for diverse real-world task formats. While synthetic data has proven transformative for language models, code remains largely unexplored beyond limited quality improvements. We present CodeAlchemy, a synthetic data generation framework that transforms publicly sourced code into semantically-rich training data through 5 strategies: CodeEnhance (quality-aware rewriting), CodeQA (template-based problems), CodeDev (developer tasks), CodeDialogue (multi-turn conversations), and CodeTrace (execution traces). We process 3 corpora across 15 languages to generate 500B+ tokens of synthetic data plus 350B reasoning tokens, orders of magnitude more than prior efforts. CodeTrace instruments and executes 1.3M+ files across 14 languages and 5K libraries, capturing control flow, state tracking, and library knowledge. We introduce DevEval (developer tasks) and TraceEval (execution prediction) benchmarks; frontier models like Claude Sonnet 4.5 achieve only 5.6% exact match on TraceEval, revealing critical gaps in semantic understanding. Our 3B models achieve 83.5% on HumanEval, 63.2% on MBPP, 8.09% win rate on DevEval, and 15.36 ROUGE-2 on TraceEval, outperforming frontier models 10x the size including 27B Gemma-3 and 32B Granite-4.0.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

BenSyc: Benchmarking Conversational Sycophancy and Human Alignment in LLMs for Bengali Contexts

Kazi Noshin, Sajib Acharjee Dip, Ranat Das Prangon et al. (+4 more)

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly participate in emotionally sensitive social conversations, where responses may shift from balanced support toward excessive validation or escalatory alignment. Existing sycophancy research primarily focuses on factual agreement and instruction-following settings, leaving culturally grounded conversational sycophancy underexplored. We introduce BenSyc, the first benchmark for studying conversational sycophancy in Bengali social contexts. Starting from 11,840 Reddit posts and 170k comments collected from communities across Bangladesh and West Bengal, we construct a human-validated benchmark with binary labels and a fine-grained five-level taxonomy spanning Invalidation, Neutral, Support, Validation, and Escalation. We evaluate more than 15 open and proprietary LLMs on conversational alignment classification and response generation tasks. Results show that distinguishing empathetic support from reinforcement-oriented validation remains challenging even for frontier instruction-tuned models: the best system achieves only 61.8 Macro-F1 on binary detection and 61.7 Macro-F1 on five-class classification. In generation settings, several models frequently produce strongly validating or escalatory responses in emotionally charged situations. Our findings highlight substantial variation across model families and conversational behaviors, underscoring the importance of culturally grounded multilingual benchmarks for evaluating socially aligned conversational AI systems.
Read the full abstract

All authors Kazi Noshin, Sajib Acharjee Dip, Ranat Das Prangon, Fardin Hassan Tamim, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Liqing Zhang, Sharifa Sultana

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.FL

Compiling Rewrite Rules to Finite-State Transducers with the Worsening Trick

Mans Hulden and Michael Ginn

Finite-state transducers (FSTs) are essential for modeling string rewriting in computational linguistics and natural language processing (NLP), particularly for phonological and morphological rewrite rules. Compiling general rewrite rules of the form $A \to B / L \, \_ \, R$, where $A$, $B$, $L$, and $R$ are arbitrary regular languages, is complex due to overlapping matches and context constraints. Traditional methods, such as those by Kaplan and Kay or Karttunen, rely on intricate transducer compositions with auxiliary markers. This paper presents a compact compilation scheme based on the "worsening trick”: generate all legal rewrite candidates, then filter candidates that are worse than another candidate for the same input. Implemented as the built-in rewrite compiler in PyFoma, the construction supports multiple contexts, arbitrary transductions, markup, directed rewriting, weights, and parallel rewriting. The resulting formulas are short and uniform, and where semantics coincide, they reproduce the same rule transducers as earlier approaches while remaining easier to extend. The implementation has been validated against foma on both a substantial collection of rewrite grammars and an automated regression suite covering the major rewrite modalities, with the resulting transducers matching exactly apart from state numbering.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG

Interpreting and Steering a Text-to-Speech Language Model with Sparse Autoencoders

Nikita Koriagin, Georgii Aparin, Nikita Balagansky et al. (+1 more)

Language models increasingly serve as the backbone of text-to-speech (TTS) systems, yet we understand little about the representations they build when text and generated speech tokens share a single residual stream. We train BatchTopK sparse autoencoders on the LM backbone of CosyVoice3 and introduce a modality-aware auto-interp pipeline that labels each feature from where it fires-text-prefix context, 1-second speech clips, or both. The recovered features are interpretable, spanning phonemes, laughter, accent prompts and speaker gender. Steering through the SAE latent space shows these features are causal rather than merely descriptive: targeted interventions raise laughter probability from 0.02 to 0.79, flip perceived speaker gender, and control speech rate while preserving spoken content. SAE features thus serve both as interpretability objects and as control directions for TTS synthesis.
Read the full abstract

All authors Nikita Koriagin, Georgii Aparin, Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov

Computation and Language

Causally Evaluating the Learnability of Formal Language Tasks

Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Anej Svete, Josef Valvoda et al. (+3 more)

Language models, as multi-task learners, acquire a wide range of abilities during training. A fundamental question is how much task-specific data is needed to learn a given task. Answering this for natural language is difficult: tasks are hard to delineate and can confound one another. To rigorously investigate the relationship between data frequency and learnability, we turn to a controlled setting using formal languages induced from probabilistic finite automata. These serve as a methodological testbed to demonstrate that standard correlational evaluation practices are inherently flawed. To enable causal analysis, we introduce the binning semiring, an algebraic object that lets us control how often a targeted property occurs in a sampled corpus. We formulate the experimental pipeline as a causal graphical model and derive decomposed Kullback-Leibler divergence metrics to measure the learnability of specific sub-tasks. Our experiments show that evaluating learnability without causal intervention leads to incorrect conclusions due to confounders in correlational analysis, and serve as a warning about correlational pitfalls in natural-language settings.
Read the full abstract

All authors Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Anej Svete, Josef Valvoda, Reda Boumasmoud, Brian DuSell, Ryan Cotterell

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI

Auto-Configuring Scientific Simulators with Lightweight Coding-Agent Adapters

Matthew Ho, Brian Liu, Jixuan Chen et al. (+2 more)

Configuring an advanced scientific simulator, translating a modeling goal into a valid, runnable input deck, is a persistent bottleneck that costs domain scientists hours to days. Input decks are executable interfaces: simulator-specific vocabulary, cross-file references, schema constraints, and validation rules must align before a simulation can run. We show that this bottleneck can be substantially reduced with a lightweight adapter around an off-the-shelf coding agent, rather than a bespoke simulator agent. Coding agents already navigate files, edit code, run commands, and repair outputs; what they lack is the simulator's executable contract, and rebuilding the agent loop risks discarding harness-calibrated tool-use and self-correction behavior. We introduce SIGA, a coding-agent adapter that supplies this contract through retrieval, procedural memory, agent-callable validation, and validation-gated termination while leaving the model and loop frozen. Because this contract is small and external, SIGA also supports adapter self-evolution: prior trajectories can rewrite the adapter contents without modifying the underlying agent. On GEOS, a multiphysics subsurface simulator, SIGA's main gain is reliability: on harder held-out tasks it improves TreeSim from 0.720 to 0.789 and reduces across-run standard deviation by about 16x by preventing empty or invalid decks. In a human calibration, SIGA reaches in about five minutes the deck quality a domain expert reached in about three hours. Transfers to OpenFOAM and LAMMPS show the recipe is portable but interface-dependent: completion gates help when structural completeness is the bottleneck, while memory and retrieval help when value correctness is.
Read the full abstract

All authors Matthew Ho, Brian Liu, Jixuan Chen, Audrey Wang, Lianhui Qin

Computation and Language

Data Synthesis and Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Low-Resource NMT: A Case Study on Q'eqchi' Mayan

Alexander Chulzhanov, Soeren Eberhardt and Arjun Mukherjee

Neural machine translation for digitally low-resource Indigenous languages is often hindered by extreme data scarcity, prompting reliance on extractive web-scraping. To ensure data sovereignty, this study introduces a data synthesis methodology to bootstrap NMT models without scraping target-language parallel text. Focusing on Q'eqchi' Mayan, we transformed community-sourced dictionaries into a massive synthetic corpus, utilizing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) via LoRA adapters on an mT5-base model. In-domain evaluation demonstrates high structural acquisition (BLEU 42.02), proving that synthetic constraints effectively teach complex agglutinative morphology and VOS word order. However, evaluation against an organic glossary reveals a structural-semantic gap (BLEU 0.59), where the model maintains grammatical integrity but lacks the lexical grounding of natural language. The model exhibits overfitting to the constrained structural variance of the synthetic templates; despite high semantic entropy in the pipeline, it struggles with the syntactic fluidity of natural language, forcing organic inputs into rigid learned patterns. Furthermore, an ablation study utilizing a Multi-Task Learning architecture resulted in negative transfer, suggesting that auxiliary tasks competed for limited parameter capacity within the LoRA adapters, causing over-optimization for synthetic markers at the expense of organic flexibility. Ultimately, we establish that synthetic bootstrapping is a highly effective structural primer, but requires authentic data for semantic refinement via Curriculum Learning.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG

iOSWorld: A Benchmark for Personally Intelligent Phone Agents

Lawrence Keunho Jang, Mareks Woodside, Geronimo Carom et al. (+3 more)

A useful phone agent needs to be personally intelligent. It should reason over a user's identity, history, and preferences as they exist on the device, not just follow isolated instructions in an impersonal sandbox. Existing mobile agent benchmarks lack this kind of personalization. We introduce iOSWorld, the first interactive native iOS simulator benchmark built around a persistent user identity spanning 26 newly built iOS apps. These apps contain connected data such as transactions, messages, travel records, social relationships, and financial activity. iOSWorld includes 133 tasks across three increasingly difficult categories. Single-app tasks (27) test one app, multi-app tasks (60) span 2 to 8 apps, and memory and personalization tasks (46) require agents to infer patterns from personal data. We evaluate frontier and open-source computer-use models in both vision-only and privileged vision+XML settings. The best configuration reaches 52% overall but only 37% on multi-app tasks. Privileged vision+XML access improves frontier models by up to 26 percentage points, while smaller models do not benefit from added accessibility-tree input. We release iOSWorld as an open-source benchmark with all apps, seeded data, tasks, rubrics, and evaluation code.
Read the full abstract

All authors Lawrence Keunho Jang, Mareks Woodside, Geronimo Carom, Andrew Keunwoo Jang, Jing Yu Koh, Ruslan Salakhutdinov

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI

Collaborative Human-Agent Protocol (CHAP)

Arsalan Shahid, Gordon Suttie and Philip Black

Foundation models are moving from response generation into operational roles. They plan across steps, call tools, request human input, coordinate with other agents, and increasingly carry responsibility for work that affects customers, claims, code, contracts, and clinical decisions. Production deployments are no longer one human supervising one model. They are multi-human, multi-agent collaborations that cross teams, time zones, and trust boundaries. The technical surface for this collaboration remains weakly specified. When an agent drafts a response and a human edits it before it ships, the moment of human judgement is the most valuable signal in the system. In current practice it is recorded, if at all, in application code, chat threads, ticket comments, and tribal memory. Two protocol standards address adjacent concerns: MCP standardises agent access to tools and data, and A2A standardises agent-to-agent interoperability. Neither defines the shared workspace in which humans and agents perform accountable work together. This paper presents CHAP, the Collaborative Human-Agent Protocol. Under CHAP, the override that used to vanish into a chat thread becomes a structured event carrying a diff, a rationale, and a content hash. The handoff between shifts becomes a portable envelope rather than a pinned message. The human approval of an agent's draft becomes a non-repudiable signed decision that can be replayed years later. The protocol achieves this through a small Core (workspaces, participants, tasks, artefacts, and an append-only evidence log) together with composable profiles that add review, modes, routing, deliberation, handoff, identity, signatures, and transparency-backed audit as deployments require them. Specification, reference implementation, conformance suite, and worked examples are available at: https://github.com/BrightbeamAI/chap
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI

Multi-Turn Evaluation of Deep Research Agents Under Process-Level Feedback

Rishabh Sabharwal, Hongru Wang, Amos Storkey et al. (+1 more)

Existing benchmarks for deep research agents (DRAs) assess only single-shot outputs, ignoring a key question: can DRAs improve their reports when guided by feedback? To investigate this, we conduct a multi-turn evaluation of DRAs under two feedback settings: self-reflection, in which the agent revises its report without any external diagnostic signal, and process-level feedback, in which the agent receives guidance targeting gaps in its research strategy. To enable process-level feedback, we design Research Gap Inference (RGI), a method that analyzes patterns of satisfied and unsatisfied rubric criteria to infer research-process gaps. Our analysis reveals three key findings: (i) under self-reflection, agents incorporate and regress on rubric criteria at nearly equal rates, yielding negligible net improvement; (ii) a single round of process-level feedback yields substantial gains, raising the normalized score by approximately $8$-$15$ points and yielding a roughly $35$-$40\%$ incorporation rate; (iii) these gains do not compound over subsequent turns, as agents regress on up to $24\%$ of previously satisfied criteria when rewriting the full report to address remaining gaps. Even with targeted guidance, reliable multi-turn improvement remains out of reach for the DRA architectures we evaluate. Our code and results are publicly available at https://github.com/sabharwalrishabh/Multi-Turn-Evaluation-of-DRAs.
Read the full abstract

All authors Rishabh Sabharwal, Hongru Wang, Amos Storkey, Jeff Z. Pan

Computation and Language

The Neutral Mask: How Alignment Training Provides Shallow Alignment while Leaving Partisan Structure Intact in a Large Language Model

Wendy K. Tam

The ambition behind alignment training is to make large language models safe and useful. The primary mechanisms, reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and its direct-optimization variants, shape the behavior of deployed language models by aligning them with “human values.” Yet the process is opaque. What values are being encoded; whose values are they; and how does alignment training encode them? A growing body of evidence suggests that these methods produce only functional compliance rather than deep alignment. We offer a mechanistic case study of this phenomenon for partisan political orientation with a comparison of the internal representations of Llama 3.1 8B before and after alignment training. We show that alignment training does not remove the structured partisan direction in the base model. Instead, it compresses the variance of the partisan signal to generate consistently balanced and non-partisan output. Sparse autoencoder decomposition reveals that policy-encoding features, which activate sporadically in the base model, are completely inactive in the Instruct model. Feature-level steering experiments confirm the causal disconnect. Alignment training thus encodes a norm of political neutrality, not by erasing the model's knowledge of partisanship, but by severing the causal pathway from partisan geometry to output generation. Importantly, this neutrality is functional, not structural so that the underlying geometry that enables partisan steering remains intact. The mechanisms that bypass RLHF's guardrails, such as inferring and amplifying a user's partisan identity, reactivate partisan generation. If alignment training operates by disconnecting rather than removing value-laden structure, then the same pattern may hold for other value domains, and the aligned model's behavior may be more fragile than its outputs suggest.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language

IS-CoT: Breaking the Long-form Generation Collapse via Interleaved Structural Thinking

Zechen Sun, Yuyang Sun, Zecheng Tang et al. (+6 more)

Generating coherent and controllable long-form content remains a persistent challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs). While reasoning-enhanced models have demonstrated success in logic-intensive domains, our evaluation reveals that they suffer from a severe length collapse in open-ended writing, where performance degrades sharply as target lengths exceed 2,000 words. We attribute this failure to the limitation of static hierarchical planning, which struggles to provide dynamic guidance over extended contexts. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Interleaved Structural Chain-of-Thought (IS-CoT) framework. Unlike external agentic workflows, IS-CoT embeds a dynamic Plan-Write-Reflect cycle into the generation process, enabling continuous strategy adaptation and global alignment without additional assistance. Based on this framework, we construct a high-quality dataset of interleaved reasoning traces via a multi-teacher pipeline and train IS-Writer-8B. Experiments demonstrate that IS-Writer-8B achieves state-of-the-art performance on challenging long-form benchmarks (e.g., +3.08 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 on LongBench-Write), exhibiting robust length compliance and coherence competitive with significantly larger proprietary models.
Read the full abstract

All authors Zechen Sun, Yuyang Sun, Zecheng Tang, Juntao Li, Wenpeng Hu, Wenliang Chen, Zhunchen Luo, Guotong Geng, Min Zhang

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG

BrainSurgery: Reproducible and Flexible Declarative Weight Manipulations for Model Editing and Upcycling

Gianluca Barmina, Annemette Broch Pirchert, Andrea Blasi Núñez et al. (+2 more)

Checkpoint transformations such as model merging, precision casting, and low-rank rewriting are commonly implemented through Python code or separate task-specific tools. We present BrainSurgery, a tool that consolidates these operations into reusable declarative YAML plans over checkpoint tensors with built-in targeting, validation, diffing, and sharded export; a Web UI supports interactive inspection and plan construction. We compare BrainSurgery with three specialized systems across 13 settings, 11 benchmarks, 8 models, 4 architectures, and model sizes from 1.7B to 32B parameters. Without use-case-specific framework customization, BrainSurgery reproduces their model edits with comparable run cost, often lower memory usage, and close downstream performance. We further perform correctness, preservation, robustness, and scaling checks. Finally, a coding-agent study shows that agents can reliably generate and review BrainSurgery plans, which are substantially shorter and more structurally consistent than equivalent Python implementations. These results support BrainSurgery as a flexible alternative to maintaining separate tools for heterogeneous checkpoint-editing tasks.
Read the full abstract

All authors Gianluca Barmina, Annemette Broch Pirchert, Andrea Blasi Núñez, Lukas Galke Poech, Peter Schneider-Kamp

Computation and Language

Learning to Attack and Defend: Adaptive Red Teaming of Language Models via GRPO

Blake Bullwinkel, Eugenia Kim, Amanda Minnich et al. (+1 more)

Language model safety must continually adapt to evolving attacks. Recent works have demonstrated that reinforcement learning can be used to train stronger attacker and defender models in tandem by applying PPO-style self-play and DPO-style online preference optimization. In this work, we explore the efficacy of GRPO in this setting. Co-training can be challenging because it requires jointly optimizing multiple properties of both the attacker and defender. We therefore shape model outputs using multiple LLM judge-based reward channels and compute advantages with GDPO, which prevents any single channel from dominating. Our method uses a curriculum that progresses from attacker-only single-turn and multi-turn training to co-training, where attacker and defender models are updated in alternation. We show that this method produces highly effective and transferable attacks, and that co-trained defenders reach competitive safety while preserving general utility. Through a controlled ablation, we further identify which components of our training pipeline most affect the resulting balance between safety and utility. Finally, we find that GRPO tends to collapse attacker diversity over training and discuss possible ways to address this limitation.
Read the full abstract

All authors Blake Bullwinkel, Eugenia Kim, Amanda Minnich, Mark Russinovich

Computation and Language

PsychoSafe: Eliciting Psychologically-Informed Refusals in Large Language Models

Gianluca Barmina, Federico Torrielli, Sven Harms et al. (+8 more)

Large language models (LLMs) routinely face requests that should be refused, creating a trade-off between helpfulness and harm prevention. However, refusals themselves can be helpful. In high-risk interactions involving crisis, coercion, or escalating intent, blunt non-compliance may prevent direct harm while still failing to support the needs of the person behind the request. We present PsychoSafe, a psychologically-informed refusal framework that reframes refusal as structured supportive communication grounded in evidence-based intervention strategies. To develop PsychoSafe, we construct a corpus of 8,019 prompt-response pairs spanning five psychologically salient risk domains and apply prompting and parameter-efficient fine-tuning to Qwen 3.5 27B. On a balanced validation set of 500 prompts, evaluated with an LLM judge and validated through human ratings, PsychoSafe prompting improves overall refusal quality by 28.1% over a generic baseline, with particularly strong gains in external resource referral (+46.8%) and psychological grounding (+34.8%), while preserving downstream performance on non-refusal tasks. Fine-tuning achieves near-perfect refusal and resource-referral rates but reduces response relevance. Additional evaluations on SORRY-Bench and XSTest show strong in-domain robustness but limited out-of-domain generalization, suggesting that future work should diversify fine-tuning data to help models apply interventions selectively rather than schematically.
Read the full abstract

All authors Gianluca Barmina, Federico Torrielli, Sven Harms, Jacob Nielsen, Flavia Filesi, Felix Mächtle, Stine Lyngsø Beltoft, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Thomas Eisenbarth, Lukas Galke Poech, Anne Lauscher

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI

Correlation Is Not Enough: Embedding Human Metadata for Individual Causal Discovery

Suraj Biswas, Saurabh Gupta and Pritam Mukherjee

Ask a pretrained biomedical language model whether "cortisol 28 ug/dL" and "stock-market volatility" are related, and it returns a cosine similarity of 0.83 on a scale where 1.0 means identical. The two share no mechanism. This is not a corner case: every off-the-shelf biomedical encoder we tested (BioBERT, PubMedBERT, BioM-ELECTRA) scores unrelated cross-domain pairs between 0.76 and 0.92 when the answer should be near zero. Accuracy on cross-domain discrimination is 0%. Retrieval systems survive this, because a language model downstream filters the noise. A Large Behavioural Model (LBM), a foundation model whose subject is a person rather than a sentence, does not: it reasons over a graph of a user's life and treats embedding proximity as evidence that two events are causally linked. False proximity writes a false causal edge, and everything downstream inherits the error. Here, embedding geometry is not a tuning knob; it is correctness. We report the fix. A contrastive pass over 72,034 pairs raises PubMedBERT BIOSSES correlation from 0.633 to 0.828 and within-vs-across-domain separation from 1.05x to 1.63x. A second pass, BODHI, mines hard negatives from edges absent in a biomedical knowledge graph and lifts separation to 2.30x and the discrimination gap to +0.392, at a 4.5% BIOSSES cost. On an Intel Xeon 6737P with AMX, OpenVINO cuts single-query latency from 1367 ms to 10 ms (133x) and reaches 555 sentences/sec. One finding contradicts standard advice: FP16 beats INT8 on this silicon at every serving batch size, and we explain why. The same model on a no-AMX Ice Lake instance runs 13-27x slower. We release the benchmark suite, training corpora, the BODHI generator, and the OpenVINO scripts.
Read the full abstract

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI

SpatialWorld: Benchmarking Interactive Spatial Reasoning of Multimodal Agents in Real-World Tasks

Hongcheng Gao, Hailong Qu, Jingyi Tang et al. (+18 more)

Spatial reasoning is a foundational capability for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to perceive and operate within the physical world. However, existing benchmarks predominantly rely on passive evaluation (e.g., static VQA) or simulator-specific pipelines, failing to assess general interactive spatial understanding. We introduce SpatialWorld, a unified benchmark designed specifically for evaluating the interactive spatial understanding of multimodal agents in complex real-world tasks. Integrating eight heterogeneous simulation backends under a shared, simulator-agnostic protocol, SpatialWorld features 760 human-annotated tasks across diverse domains (e.g., household routines, travel, social collaboration). Agents must solve tasks under vision-only partial observability, actively gathering egocentric visual evidence and expressing decisions via a unified, text-based action interface native to MLLMs. For reliable evaluation, each task includes a human-validated initial state, a reference trajectory, and a terminal-state verifier. Evaluating 15 advanced agents reveals that robust spatial task solving remains challenging: the strongest model, GPT-5, achieves an average task success rate (TSR) of only 17.4%, while the leading open-source model, Qwen-3.5, reaches 14.1%. Further analysis exposes a clear mismatch between task success and execution efficiency, alongside substantial domain-specific performance variations. These bottlenecks in active exploration and long-horizon planning position SpatialWorld as a rigorous testbed for future spatial agents.
Read the full abstract

All authors Hongcheng Gao, Hailong Qu, Jingyi Tang, Jiahao Wang, Zihao Huang, Hengkang Qiao, Shihong Huang, Junming Yang, Yi Li, Hongyixuan Yuan, Wenjie Li, Bohan Zeng, Wenbo Li, Bo Wang, Jianhui Liu, Olive Huang, Haoyang Huang, Wentao Zhang, Guoqing Huang, Nan Duan, Yinpeng Dong

Computation and Language · Cross-listed from eess.AS

Cross-Modal Masking for Robust Silent Speech Synthesis Using sEMG and Lipreading

Eder del Blanco, David Gimeno-Gómez, Eva Navas et al. (+2 more)

Speech restoration through silent speech interfaces (SSIs) has emerged as a promising assistive technology for individuals with impaired or absent laryngeal voice production. Among non-invasive SSI modalities, surface electromyography (sEMG) and video-based lipreading provide complementary articulatory information, yet their integration for continuous speech synthesis remains underexplored. Moreover, existing multimodal approaches rarely address robustness to modality degradation or temporary sensor failure, limiting their applicability in realistic scenarios. In this work, we propose a masked multimodal speech synthesis framework that jointly leverages sEMG and lipreading signals through modality masking during training. Under multispeaker settings, the proposed approach reduces word error rate by up to 14 absolute percentage points compared to the strongest unimodal baseline. Experimental results not only show that masking strategies are critical for these performance gains and robustness under low-bitrate conditions, but also that they generalize better than degradation-specific data augmentations in the presence of modality absence conditions. Phone-level analyses further reveal complementary contributions across modalities, with particularly strong benefits for vowels and for specific consonant groups. Overall, these findings demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of masked multimodal integration for silent speech synthesis, although adaptation to laryngectomized speakers remains an open research challenge.
Read the full abstract

All authors Eder del Blanco, David Gimeno-Gómez, Eva Navas, Carlos-D. Martínez-Hinarejos, Inma Hernáez

Computation and Language

When Built-in Thinking Helps and Hurts: Constraint-Level Error Shifts in Instruction Following

Sai Adith Senthil Kumar

Large reasoning models (LRMs) often improve math and coding performance, but their effect on instruction following is unclear. We study IFEval with Qwen3 models (1.7B-32B), using same-weights Thinking ON/OFF controls; four Hunyuan models provide directional cross-family support. Aggregate pass-rate changes are small (-0.55 to -3.52 pp), yet 10-20% of prompts switch between pass and fail across modes, suggesting that thinking changes the pattern of errors–some prompts improve while others worsen–rather than uniformly degrading performance. Under a post-hoc Qwen3-derived grouping, constraint types separate into Planning (global counting, structure, coordination), which improves at the class level under thinking, and Precision (exact local form), which consistently worsens; the class-level Planning/Precision sign pattern holds directionally for all four Hunyuan models despite Hunyuan's opposite aggregate direction. Thinking also changes final-answer length; matched-length analyses substantially reduce the Precision drop, but a residual penalty remains. Analyzing thinking traces with a cross-encoder relevance metric reveals three patterns: Neutral shows a positive relevance-compliance link (r approximately 0.15); Planning shows near-zero predictive correlation (r approximately 0.02) despite measurable trace engagement, consistent with an execution gap between CE-measured trace relevance and final-answer compliance; Precision shows a small negative correlation (r approximately -0.05), with failing instances having higher mean relevance than passing ones. Activation patching across four model sizes (1.7B-14B) shows that Precision flip instances are more often restored than Planning flip instances (32-58% vs. 14-40% mean layer-restoration), with the largest gap at 14B (about 30 pp).
Read the full abstract