Papers

This study examines phonetic texture in Persian poetry as a literary-historical phenomenon rather than a by-product of meter or a feature used only for classification. The analysis draws on a large corpus of 1,116,306 mesras from 31,988 poems written by 83 poets, restricted to five major classical meters to enable controlled comparison. Each line is converted into a grapheme-to-phoneme representation and analyzed using six phonetic metrics: hardness, sonority, sibilance, vowel ratio, phoneme entropy, and consonant-cluster ratio. Statistical models estimate poet-level differences while controlling for meter, poetic form, and line length. The results show that although meter and form explain a substantial portion of phonetic variation, they do not eliminate systematic differences between poets. Persian poetic sound therefore appears as conditioned variation within shared prosodic structures rather than as either purely individual style or simple metrical residue. A multidimensional stylistic map reveals several recurrent phonetic profiles, including high-sonority lyric styles, hardness-driven rhetorical or epic styles, sibilant mystical contours, and high-entropy complex textures. Historical analysis indicates that phonetic distributions shift across centuries, reflecting changes in genre prominence, literary institutions, and performance contexts rather than abrupt stylistic breaks. The study establishes a corpus-scale framework for phonetic analysis in Persian poetry and demonstrates how computational phonetics can contribute to literary-historical interpretation while remaining attentive to the formal structures that shape Persian verse.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in narrative generation. However, they often produce structurally homogenized stories, frequently following repetitive arrangements and combinations of plot events along with stereotypical resolutions. In this paper, we propose a novel theoretical framework for analysis by incorporating Proppian narratology and narrative functions. This framework is used to analyze the composition of narrative texts generated by LLMs to uncover their underlying narrative logic. Taking Chinese web literature as our research focus, we extend Propp's narrative theory, defining 34 narrative functions suited to modern web narrative structures. We further construct a human-annotated corpus to support the analysis of narrative structures within LLM-generated text. Experiments reveal that the primary reasons for the singular narrative logic and severe homogenization in generated texts are that current LLMs are unable to correctly comprehend the meanings of narrative functions and instead adhere to rigid narrative generation paradigms.

As AI systems advance in capabilities, measuring their safety and alignment to human values is becoming paramount. A fast-growing field of AI research is devoted to developing such assessments. However, most current advances therein may be ill-suited for assessing AI systems across real-world deployments. Standard methods prompt large language models (LLMs) in a questionnaire-style to describe their values or behavior in hypothetical scenarios. By focusing on unaugmented LLMs, they fall short of evaluating AI agents, which could actually perform relevant behaviors, hence posing much greater risks. LLMs' engagement with scenarios described by questionnaire-style prompts differs starkly from that of agents based on the same LLMs, as reflected in divergences in the inputs, possible actions, environmental interactions, and internal processing. As such, LLMs' responses to scenario descriptions are unlikely to be representative of the corresponding LLM agents' behavior. We further contend that such assessments make strong assumptions concerning the ability and tendency of LLMs to report accurately about their counterfactual behavior. This makes them inadequate to assess risks from AI systems in real-world contexts as they lack construct validity. We then argue that a structurally identical issue holds for current AI alignment approaches. Lastly, we discuss improving safety assessments and alignment training by taking these shortcomings to heart.

Generating long-form linear fiction from open-ended themes remains a major challenge for large language models, which frequently fail to guarantee global structure and narrative diversity when using premise-based or linear outlining approaches. We present BiT-MCTS, a theme-driven framework that operationalizes a "climax-first, bidirectional expansion" strategy motivated by Freytag's Pyramid. Given a theme, our method extracts a core dramatic conflict and generates an explicit climax, then employs a bidirectional Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to expand the plot backward (rising action, exposition) and forward (falling action, resolution) to produce a structured outline. A final generation stage realizes a complete narrative from the refined outline. We construct a Chinese theme corpus for evaluation and conduct extensive experiments across three contemporary LLM backbones. Results show that BiT-MCTS improves narrative coherence, plot structure, and thematic depth relative to strong baselines, while enabling substantially longer, more coherent stories according to automatic metrics and human judgments.

The minimal pairs paradigm of comparing model probabilities for contrasting completions has proven useful for evaluating linguistic knowledge in language models, yet its application has largely been confined to binary grammaticality judgments over syntactic phenomena. Additionally, standard prompting-based evaluation requires expensive text generation, may elicit post-hoc rationalizations rather than model judgments, and discards information about model uncertainty. We address both limitations by extending surprisal-based evaluation from binary grammaticality contrasts to ordinal-scaled classification and scoring tasks across multiple domains. Rather than asking models to generate answers, we measure the information-theoretic "surprise" (negative log probability) they assign to each position on rating scales (e.g., 1-5 or 1-9), yielding full surprisal curves that reveal both the model's preferred response and its uncertainty via entropy. We explore this framework across four domains: social-ecological-technological systems classification, causal statement identification (binary and scaled), figurative language detection, and deductive qualitative coding. Across these domains, surprisal curves produce interpretable classification signals with clear minima near expected ordinal scale positions, and entropy over the completion tended to distinguish genuinely ambiguous items from easier items.

Safety tuning through supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback has substantially improved the robustness of large language models. However, it typically suppresses rather eliminates unsafe behaviors, leaving rare but critical failures hidden in the long tail of the output distribution. While most red-teaming work emphasizes adversarial prompt search, we show that these hidden risks can be systematically exposed through diverse response generation. Specifically, we show that, for a fixed safety-critical prompt, increasing the number and diversity of sampled responses monotonically raises the jailbreak success rate. To efficiently uncover these failures, we propose Progressive Diverse Population Sampling (PDPS). This approach replaces naive, large-scale IID sampling with a multi-stage expansion-and-selection strategy that generates a compact, semantically diverse set of responses at a substantially lower computational cost. Across multiple jailbreak benchmarks and open-source LLMs, PDPS achieves attack success rates comparable to large-scale IID sampling while using only 8%-29% of the computational cost, and outperforms IID sampling and Diverse Beam Search by 26%-40% under limited-response budgets, while uncovering a broader and more semantically diverse range of failure modes. Critically, this diversity translates directly into more effective safety hardening: when integrated into an RLHF-based safety-tuning pipeline, PDPS-generated unsafe responses yield 33% and 41% greater reductions in ASR than those generated by IID sampling and Diverse Beam Search, respectively. Finally, we show that while input-space prompt optimization methods fall short of output-space exploration when used in isolation, combining input-space perturbation with diversity-driven output-space exploration covers a wider range of failure modes more efficiently than either paradigm alone.

Motivation is a central driver of human behavior, shaping decisions, goals, and task performance. As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly aligned with human preferences, we ask whether they exhibit something akin to motivation. We examine whether LLMs "report" varying levels of motivation, how these reports relate to their behavior, and whether external factors can influence them. Our experiments reveal consistent and structured patterns that echo human psychology: self-reported motivation aligns with different behavioral signatures, varies across task types, and can be modulated by external manipulations. These findings demonstrate that motivation is a coherent organizing construct for LLM behavior, systematically linking reports, choices, effort, and performance, and revealing motivational dynamics that resemble those documented in human psychology. This perspective deepens our understanding of model behavior and its connection to human-inspired concepts.

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show promising performance in automated electrocardiogram interpretation, it remains unclear whether they perform actual step-by-step reasoning or just rely on superficial visual cues. To investigate this, we introduce ECG-Reasoning-Benchmark, a novel multi-turn evaluation framework comprising over 6,400 samples to systematically assess step- by-step reasoning across 17 core ECG diagnoses. Our comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals a systematic shortfall in executing multi-step logical deduction. Although models possess the medical knowledge to retrieve clinical criteria for a diagnosis, they exhibit consistently low success rates in maintaining a complete reasoning chain, primarily failing to ground the corresponding ECG findings to the actual visual evidence in the ECG signal. These results demonstrate that current MLLMs bypass actual visual interpretation, highlighting a limitation in their visual grounding capabilities and motivating robust, reasoning-centric medical AI. The code and data are available at https://github.com/Jwoo5/ecg-reasoning-benchmark.

Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statements are a major source of monetary-policy information, and even subtle changes in their wording can move global financial markets. A central task is therefore to measure the hawkish–dovish stance conveyed in these texts. Existing approaches typically treat stance detection as a standard classification problem, labeling each statement in isolation. However, the interpretation of monetary-policy communication is inherently relative: market reactions depend not only on the tone of a statement, but also on how that tone shifts across meetings. We introduce Delta-Consistent Scoring (DCS), an annotation-free framework that maps frozen large language model (LLM) representations to continuous stance scores by jointly modeling absolute stance and relative inter-meeting shifts. Rather than relying on manual hawkish–dovish labels, DCS uses consecutive meetings as a source of self-supervision. It learns an absolute stance score for each statement and a relative shift score between consecutive statements. A delta-consistency objective encourages changes in absolute scores to align with the relative shifts. This allows DCS to recover a temporally coherent stance trajectory without manual labels. Across four LLM backbones, DCS consistently outperforms supervised probes and LLM-as-judge baselines, achieving up to 71.1% accuracy on sentence-level hawkish–dovish classification. The resulting meeting-level scores are also economically meaningful: they correlate strongly with inflation indicators and are significantly associated with Treasury yield movements. Overall, the results suggest that LLM representations encode monetary-policy signals that can be recovered through relative temporal structure.

Existing KV cache compression methods generally operate on discrete tokens or non-semantic chunks. However, such approaches often lead to semantic fragmentation, where linguistically coherent units are disrupted, causing irreversible information loss and degradation in model performance. To address this, we introduce SemantiCache, a novel compression framework that preserves semantic integrity by aligning the compression process with the semantic hierarchical nature of language. Specifically, we first partition the cache into semantically coherent chunks by delimiters, which are natural semantic boundaries. Within each chunk, we introduce a computationally efficient Greedy Seed-Based Clustering (GSC) algorithm to group tokens into semantic clusters. These clusters are further merged into semantic cores, enhanced by a Proportional Attention mechanism that rebalances the reduced attention contributions of the merged tokens. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks and models demonstrate that SemantiCache accelerates the decoding stage of inference by up to 2.61 times and substantially reduces memory footprint, while maintaining performance comparable to the original model.

Recent advances in Retrieval-Augmented Generation enable LLMs to ground outputs in clinical evidence, but connections to external databases create the risk of contextual leakage, where unique combinations of medical details enable patient re-identification without explicit identifiers. Existing healthcare benchmarks emphasize accuracy while overlooking this risk. To fill this gap, we present MedPriv-Bench, the first benchmark for jointly evaluating privacy preservation and clinical utility in medical open-ended question answering. Our framework utilizes a multi-agent, human-in-the-loop pipeline to synthesize sensitive medical contexts and clinically relevant queries that create realistic privacy pressure. We also establish an automated evaluation protocol using a fine-tuned RoBERTa-NLI model, which achieved an instance-level F1 score of 75.3%, sensitivity of 90.7%, and an average inference time of 0.056 s per sample against human annotations. Across nine LLMs and three privacy-preserving methods, we observed a pervasive privacy-utility trade-off. Relative to unprotected Med42-v2-8B (utility 3.87/5; leakage 72.8%), supervised fine-tuning improved utility to 4.25 and reduced leakage to 38.9%, whereas local differential privacy reduced leakage to 20.5% but lowered utility to 3.03. These results demonstrate the need for domain-specific benchmarks to validate medical AI systems in privacy-sensitive settings.

Existing automatic scientific question generation studies mainly focus on single-document factoid QA, overlooking the inter-document reasoning crucial for scientific understanding. We present AIM-SciQA, an automated framework for generating multi-document, multi-hop scientific QA datasets. AIM-SciQA extracts single-hop QAs using large language models (LLMs) with machine reading comprehension and constructs cross-document relations based on embedding-based semantic alignment while selectively leveraging citation information. Applied to 8,211 PubMed Central papers, it produced 411,409 single-hop and 13,672 multi-hop QAs, forming the IM-SciQA dataset. Human and automatic validation confirmed high factual consistency, and experimental results demonstrate that IM-SciQA effectively differentiates reasoning capabilities across retrieval and QA stages, providing a realistic and interpretable benchmark for retrieval-augmented scientific reasoning. We further extend this framework to construct CIM-SciQA, a citation-guided variant achieving comparable performance to the Oracle setting, reinforcing the dataset's validity and generality.

Large Reasoning Language Models (LRLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities on complex tasks by utilizing long Chain-of-Thought reasoning. However, they are prone to overthinking, which generates redundant reasoning steps that degrade both performance and efficiency. Recently, early-exit strategies are proposed to mitigate overthinking by dynamically and adaptively terminating redundant reasoning. However, current early-exit methods either introduce extra training overhead by relying on proxy models or limit inference throughput due to the frequent content switching between reasoning and generating probing answers. Moreover, most early-exit methods harm LRLMs performance due to over-truncation. Our insight stems from an observation: overthinking often causes LRLMs to deviate from the correct reasoning path, which is frequently accompanied by high-entropy transition tokens. Given this, we propose an early-exit method deeply coupled with the native reasoning process, which leverages the path deviation index as a dedicated monitoring metric for the frequent occurrence of high-entropy transition tokens to dynamically detect and terminate overthinking trajectories. We conduct experiments across multiple benchmarks using LRLMs of different types and scales, and the results indicate that our method delivers the largest performance improvement over vanilla CoT compared to existing early-exit methods.

Large language model (LLM) web agents are increasingly used for web navigation but remain far from human reliability on realistic, long-horizon tasks. Existing evaluations focus primarily on end-to-end success, offering limited insight into where failures arise. We propose a hierarchical planning framework to analyze web agents across three layers (i.e., high-level planning, low-level execution, and replanning), enabling process-based evaluation of reasoning, grounding, and recovery. Our experiments show that structured Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) plans produce more concise and goal-directed strategies than natural language (NL) plans, but low-level execution remains the dominant bottleneck. These results indicate that improving perceptual grounding and adaptive control, not only high-level reasoning, is critical for achieving human-level reliability. This hierarchical perspective provides a principled foundation for diagnosing and advancing LLM web agents.

SystemVerilog Assertions (SVAs) are crucial for hardware verification. Recent studies leverage general-purpose LLMs to translate natural language properties to SVAs (NL2SVA), but they perform poorly due to limited data. We propose a data synthesis framework to tackle two challenges: the scarcity of high-quality real-world SVA corpora and the lack of reliable methods to determine NL-SVA semantic equivalence. For the former, large-scale open-source RTLs are used to guide LLMs to generate real-world SVAs; for the latter, bidirectional translation serves as a data selection method. With the synthesized data, we train CodeV-SVA, a series of SVA generation models. Notably, CodeV-SVA-14B achieves 75.8% on NL2SVA-Human and 84.0% on NL2SVA-Machine in Func.@1, matching or exceeding advanced LLMs like GPT-5 and DeepSeek-R1.

In cognitive science and linguistic theory, dialogue is not seen as a chain of independent utterances but rather as a joint activity sustained by coherence, consistency, and shared understanding. However, many systems for open-domain and personalized dialogue use surface-level similarity metrics (e.g., BLEU, ROUGE, F1) as one of their main reporting measures, which fail to capture these deeper aspects of conversational quality. We re-examine a notable retrieval-augmented framework for personalized dialogue, LAPDOG, as a case study for evaluation methodology. Using both human and LLM-based judges, we identify limitations in current evaluation practices, including corrupted dialogue histories, contradictions between retrieved stories and persona, and incoherent response generation. Our results show that human and LLM judgments align closely but diverge from lexical similarity metrics, underscoring the need for cognitively grounded evaluation methods. Broadly, this work charts a path toward more reliable assessment frameworks for retrieval-augmented dialogue systems that better reflect the principles of natural human communication.

We present Vavanagi, a community-run platform for Hula (Vula'a), an Austronesian language of Papua New Guinea with approximately 10,000 speakers. Vavanagi supports crowdsourced English-Hula text translation and voice recording, with elder-led review and community-governed data infrastructure. To date, 77 translators and 4 reviewers have produced over 12k parallel sentence pairs covering 9k unique Hula words. We also propose a multi-level framework for measuring community involvement, from consultation to fully community-initiated and governed projects. We position Vavanagi at Level 5: initiative, design, implementation, and data governance all sit within the Hula community, making it, to our knowledge, the first community-led language technology initiative for a language of this size. Vavanagi shows how language technology can bridge village-based and urban members, connect generations, and support cultural heritage on the community's own terms.

The rapid expansion of electronic health record (EHR) systems has generated large volumes of unstructured clinical narratives that contain valuable information for disease identification, patient cohort discovery, and clinical decision support. Extracting structured knowledge from these free-text documents remains challenging because clinical language is highly specialized, labeled datasets are limited, and full fine-tuning of large pretrained language models can require substantial computational resources. Efficient adaptation strategies are therefore essential for practical clinical natural language processing applications. This study proposes a parameter-efficient selective fine-tuning framework for adapting GPT-2 to clinical text classification tasks. Instead of updating the entire pretrained model, the majority of network parameters are frozen, and only the final Transformer block, the final layer normalization module, and a lightweight classification head are updated during training. This design substantially reduces the number of trainable parameters while preserving the contextual representation capabilities learned during pretraining. The proposed approach is evaluated using radiology reports from the MIMIC-IV-Note dataset with automatically derived CheXpert-style labels. Experiments on 50,000 radiology reports demonstrate that selective fine-tuning achieves approximately 91% classification accuracy while updating fewer than 6% of the model parameters. Comparative experiments with head-only training and full-model fine-tuning show that the proposed method provides a favorable balance between predictive performance and computational efficiency. These results indicate that selective fine-tuning offers an efficient and scalable framework for clinical text classification.

I describe my experience writing the first original, modern Computer Science research paper expressed entirely in an Indian language. The paper is in Telugu, a language with approximately 100 million speakers. The paper is in the field of distributed computing and it introduces a technique for proving epistemic logic based lower bounds for multiprocessor algorithms. A key hurdle to writing the paper was developing technical terminology for advanced computer science concepts, including those in algorithms, distributed computing, and discrete mathematics. I overcame this challenge by deriving and coining native language scientific terminology through the powerful, productive, Pāninian grammar of Samskrtam. The typesetting of the paper was an additional challenge, since mathematical typesetting in Telugu is underdeveloped. I overcame this problem by developing a Telugu XeLaTeX template, which I call TeluguTeX. Leveraging this experience of writing an original computer science research paper in an Indian language, I lay out a vision for how to ameliorate the state of scientific writing at all levels in Indic languages – languages whose native speakers exceed one billion people – through the further development of the Sanskrit technical lexicon and through technological internationalization.

A core challenge for faithful LLM role-playing is sustaining consistent characterization throughout long, open-ended dialogues, as models frequently fail to recall and accurately apply their designated persona knowledge without explicit cues. To tackle this, we propose the Memory-Driven Role-Playing paradigm. Inspired by Stanislavski's "emotional memory" acting theory, this paradigm frames persona knowledge as the LLM's internal memory store, requiring retrieval and application based solely on dialogue context, thereby providing a rigorous test of depth and autonomous use of knowledge. Centered on this paradigm, we contribute: (1) MREval, a fine-grained evaluation framework assessing four memory-driven abilities - Anchoring, Recalling, Bounding, and Enacting; (2) MRPrompt, a prompting architecture that guides structured memory retrieval and response generation; and (3) MRBench, a bilingual (Chinese/English) benchmark for fine-grained diagnosis. The novel paradigm provides a comprehensive diagnostic for four-staged role-playing abilities across 12 LLMs. Crucially, experiments show that MRPrompt allows small models (e.g., Qwen3-8B) to match the performance of much larger closed-source LLMs (e.g., Qwen3-Max and GLM-4.7), and confirms that upstream memory gains directly enhance downstream response quality, validating the staged theoretical foundation.

Regulating the importance ratio is critical for the training stability of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) based frameworks. However, prevailing ratio control methods, such as hard clipping, suffer from non-differentiable boundaries and vanishing gradient regions, failing to maintain gradient fidelity. Furthermore, these methods lack a hazard-aware mechanism to adaptively suppress extreme deviations, leaving the optimization process vulnerable to abrupt policy shifts. To address these challenges, we propose Modulated Hazard-aware Policy Optimization (MHPO), a novel framework designed for robust and stable reinforcement learning. The proposed MHPO introduces a Log-Fidelity Modulator (LFM) to map unbounded importance ratios into a bounded, differentiable domain. This mechanism effectively prevents high-variance outlier tokens from destabilizing the loss landscape while ensuring global gradient stability. Complementarily, a Decoupled Hazard Penalty (DHP) integrates cumulative hazard functions from survival analysis to independently regulate positive and negative policy shifts. By shaping the optimization landscape with hazard-aware penalties, the proposed MHPO achieves fine-grained regulation of asymmetric policy shifts simultaneously mitigating mode collapse from over-expansion and preventing policy erosion from catastrophic contraction within a stabilized trust region. Extensive evaluations on diverse reasoning benchmarks across both text-based and vision-language tasks demonstrate that MHPO consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving superior performance while significantly enhancing training stability.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown strong performance in visual and audio understanding when evaluated in isolation. However, their ability to jointly reason over omni-modal (visual, audio, and textual) signals in long and complex videos remains largely unexplored. We introduce MMOU, a new benchmark designed to systematically evaluate multimodal understanding and reasoning under these challenging, real-world conditions. MMOU consists of 20,000 carefully curated questions paired with 11877 web-collected videos of varying length, spanning diverse domains and exhibiting rich, tightly coupled audio-visual content. The benchmark covers 13 fundamental skill categories, all of which require integrating evidence across modalities and time. All questions are manually annotated across multiple turns by professional annotators, ensuring high quality and reasoning fidelity. We evaluate 20+ state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary multimodal models on MMOU. The results expose substantial performance gaps: the best closed-source model achieves only 64.2% accuracy, while the strongest open-source model reaches just 46.8%. Our results highlight the challenges of long-form omni-modal understanding, revealing that current models frequently fail to apply even fundamental skills in long videos. Through detailed analysis, we further identify systematic failure modes and provide insights into where and why current models break.

This paper introduces GELATO (Government, Executive, Legislative, and Treaty Ontology), a dataset of U.S. House and Senate bills from the 118th Congress annotated using a novel two-level named entity recognition ontology designed for U.S. legislative texts. We fine-tune transformer-based models (BERT, RoBERTa) of different architectures and sizes on this dataset for first-level prediction. We then use LLMs with optimized prompts to complete the second level prediction. The strong performance of RoBERTa and relatively weak performance of BERT models, as well as the application of LLMs as second-level predictors, support future research in legislative NER or downstream tasks using these model combinations as extraction tools.

Sentence simplification aims to make complex text more accessible by reducing linguistic complexity while preserving the original meaning. However, progress in this area remains limited for mid-resource and low-resource languages due to the scarcity of high-quality data. To address this gap, we introduce the OasisSimp dataset, a multilingual dataset for sentence-level simplification covering five languages: English, Sinhala, Tamil, Pashto, and Thai. Among these, no prior sentence simplification datasets exist for Thai, Pashto, and Tamil, while limited data is available for Sinhala. Each language simplification dataset was created by trained annotators who followed detailed guidelines to simplify sentences while maintaining meaning, fluency, and grammatical correctness. We evaluate eight open-weight multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) on the OasisSimp dataset and observe substantial performance disparities between high-resource and low-resource languages, highlighting the simplification challenges in multilingual settings. The OasisSimp dataset thus provides both a valuable multilingual resource and a challenging benchmark, revealing the limitations of current LLM-based simplification methods and paving the way for future research in low-resource sentence simplification. The dataset is available at https://OasisSimpDataset.github.io/.

Trained Transformers have been shown to compute abstract features that appear redundant for predicting the immediate next token. We identify which components of the gradient signal from the next-token prediction objective give rise to this phenomenon, and we propose a method to estimate the influence of those components on the emergence of specific features. After validating our approach on toy tasks, we use it to interpret the origins of the world model in OthelloGPT and syntactic features in a small language model. Finally, we apply our framework to a pretrained LLM, showing that features with extremely high or low influence on future tokens tend to be related to formal reasoning domains such as code. Overall, our work takes a step toward understanding hidden features of Transformers through the lens of their development during training.

Textual Emotion Classification (TEC) is one of the most difficult NLP tasks. State of the art approaches rely on Large language models (LLMs) and multi-model ensembles. In this study, we challenge the assumption that larger scale or more complex models are necessary for improved performance. In order to improve logical consistency, We introduce CMHL, a novel single-model architecture that explicitly models the logical structure of emotions through three key innovations: (1) multi-task learning that jointly predicts primary emotions, valence, and intensity, (2) psychologically-grounded auxiliary supervision derived from Russell's circumplex model, and (3) a novel contrastive contradiction loss that enforces emotional consistency by penalizing mutually incompatible predictions (e.g., simultaneous high confidence in joy and anger). With just 125M parameters, our model outperforms 56x larger LLMs and sLM ensembles with a new state-of-the-art F1 score of 93.75% compared to (86.13%-93.2%) on the dair-ai Emotion dataset. We further show cross domain generalization on the Reddit Suicide Watch and Mental Health Collection dataset (SWMH), outperforming domain-specific models like MentalBERT and MentalRoBERTa with an F1 score of 72.50% compared to (68.16%-72.16%) + a 73.30% recall compared to (67.05%-70.89%) that translates to enhanced sensitivity for detecting mental health distress. Our work establishes that architectural intelligence (not parameter count) drives progress in TEC. By embedding psychological priors and explicit consistency constraints, a well-designed single model can outperform both massive LLMs and complex ensembles, offering a efficient, interpretable, and clinically-relevant paradigm for affective computing.

Modern Translation Systems heavily rely on high-quality, large parallel datasets for state-of-the-art performance. However, such resources are largely unavailable for most of the South Asian languages. Among them, Nepali and Tamang fall into such category, with Tamang being among the least digitally resourced languages in the region. This work addresses the gap by developing NepTam20K, a 20K gold standard parallel corpus, and NepTam80K, an 80K synthetic Nepali-Tamang parallel corpus, both sentence-aligned and designed to support machine translation. The datasets were created through a pipeline involving data scraping from Nepali news and online sources, pre-processing, semantic filtering, balancing for tense and polarity (in NepTam20K dataset), expert translation into Tamang by native speakers of the language, and verification by an expert Tamang linguist. The dataset covers five domains: Agriculture, Health, Education and Technology, Culture, and General Communication. To evaluate the dataset, baseline machine translation experiments were carried out using various multilingual pre-trained models: mBART, M2M-100, NLLB-200, and a vanilla Transformer model. The fine-tuning on the NLLB-200 achieved the highest sacreBLEU scores of 40.92 (Nepali-Tamang) and 45.26 (Tamang-Nepali).

Graph-RAG systems achieve strong multi-hop question answering by indexing documents into knowledge graphs, but strong retrieval does not guarantee strong answers. Evaluating KET-RAG, a leading Graph-RAG system, on three multi-hop QA benchmarks (HotpotQA, MuSiQue, 2WikiMultiHopQA), we find that 77% to 91% of questions have the gold answer in the retrieved context, yet accuracy is only 35% to 78%, and 73% to 84% of errors are reasoning failures. We propose two augmentations: (i) SPARQL chain-of-thought prompting, which decomposes questions into triple-pattern queries aligned with the entity-relationship context, and (ii) graph-walk compression, which compresses the context by ~60% via knowledge-graph traversal with no LLM calls. SPARQL CoT improves accuracy by +2 to +14 pp; graph-walk compression adds +6 pp on average when paired with structured prompting on smaller models. Surprisingly, we show that, with question-type routing, a fully augmented budget open-weight Llama-8B model matches or exceeds the unaugmented Llama-70B baseline on all three benchmarks at ~12x lower cost. A replication on LightRAG confirms that our augmentations transfer across Graph-RAG systems.

State-of-the-art spoken dialogue models (Défossez et al. 2024; Schalkwyk et al. 2025) use neural audio codecs to "tokenize" audio signals into a lower-frequency stream of vectorial latent representations, each quantized using a hierarchy of vector codebooks. A transformer layer allows these representations to reflect some time- and context-dependent patterns. We train probes on labeled audio data from Cole et al. (2023) to test whether the pitch trajectories that characterize English phrase-final (nuclear) intonational tunes are among these patterns. Results: Linear probes trained on the unquantized latents or some of the associated codewords yield above-chance accuracy in distinguishing eight phonologically specified nuclear tunes with monotonal pitch accents (top average test accuracy (TATA): 0.31) and the five clusters of these tunes that are robust in human speech production and perception (TATA: 0.45). Greater accuracy (TATAs: 0.74-0.89) is attained for binary distinctions between classes of rising vs. falling tunes, respectively used for questions and assertions. Information about tunes is spread among all codebooks, which calls into question a distinction between 'semantic' and 'acoustic' codebooks found in the literature. Accuracies improve with nonlinear probes, but discrimination among the five clusters remains far from human performance, suggesting a fundamental limitation of current codecs.

Political speakers often avoid answering questions directly while maintaining the appearance of responsiveness. Despite its importance for public discourse, such strategic evasion remains underexplored in Natural Language Processing. We introduce SemEval-2026 Task 6, CLARITY, a shared task on political question evasion consisting of two subtasks: (i) clarity-level classification into Clear Reply, Ambivalent, and Clear Non-Reply, and (ii) evasion-level classification into nine fine-grained evasion strategies. The benchmark is constructed from U.S. presidential interviews and follows an expert-grounded taxonomy of response clarity and evasion. The task attracted 124 registered teams, who submitted 946 valid runs for clarity-level classification and 539 for evasion-level classification. Results show a substantial gap in difficulty between the two subtasks: the best system achieved 0.89 macro-F1 on clarity classification, surpassing the strongest baseline by a large margin, while the top evasion-level system reached 0.68 macro-F1, matching the best baseline. Overall, large language model prompting and hierarchical exploitation of the taxonomy emerged as the most effective strategies, with top systems consistently outperforming those that treated the two subtasks independently. CLARITY establishes political response evasion as a challenging benchmark for computational discourse analysis and highlights the difficulty of modeling strategic ambiguity in political language.