Papers

Multilingual pre-trained language models(mPLMs) offer significant benefits for many low-resource languages. To further expand the range of languages these models can support, many works focus on continued pre-training of these models. However, few works address how to extend mPLMs to low-resource languages that were previously unsupported. To tackle this issue, we expand the model's vocabulary using a target language corpus. We then screen out a subset from the model's original vocabulary, which is biased towards representing the source language(e.g. English), and utilize bilingual dictionaries to initialize the representations of the expanded vocabulary. Subsequently, we continue to pre-train the mPLMs using the target language corpus, based on the representations of these expanded vocabulary. Experimental results show that our proposed method outperforms the baseline, which uses randomly initialized expanded vocabulary for continued pre-training, in POS tagging and NER tasks, achieving improvements by 0.54% and 2.60%, respectively. Furthermore, our method demonstrates high robustness in selecting the training corpora, and the models' performance on the source language does not degrade after continued pre-training.

Notwithstanding their unprecedented ability to generate text, LLMs do not understand the meaning of words, have no sense of context and cannot reason. Their output constitutes an approximation of statistically dominant word patterns. And yet, the drafting of contracts is often presented as a typical legal task that could be facilitated by this technology. This paper seeks to put an end to such unreasonable ideas. Predicting words differs from using language in the circumstances of specific transactions and reconstituting common contractual phrases differs from reasoning about the law. LLMs seem to be able to generate generic and superficially plausible contractual documents. In the cold light of day, such documents may turn out to be useless assemblages of inconsistent provisions or contracts that are enforceable but unsuitable for a given transaction. This paper casts a shadow on the simplistic assumption that LLMs threaten the continued viability of the legal industry.

LLM-as-a-Judge has been widely adopted across various research and practical applications, yet the robustness and reliability of its evaluation remain a critical issue. A core challenge it faces is bias, which has primarily been studied in terms of known biases and their impact on evaluation outcomes, while automated and systematic exploration of potential unknown biases is still lacking. Nevertheless, such exploration is crucial for enhancing the robustness and reliability of evaluations. To bridge this gap, we propose BiasScope, a LLM-driven framework for automatically and at scale discovering potential biases that may arise during model evaluation. BiasScope can uncover potential biases across different model families and scales, with its generality and effectiveness validated on the JudgeBench dataset. It overcomes the limitations of existing approaches, transforming bias discovery from a passive process relying on manual effort and predefined bias lists into an active and comprehensive automated exploration. Moreover, based on BiasScope, we propose JudgeBench-Pro, an extended version of JudgeBench and a more challenging benchmark for evaluating the robustness of LLM-as-a-judge. Strikingly, even powerful LLMs as evaluators show error rates above 50% on JudgeBench-Pro, underscoring the urgent need to strengthen evaluation robustness and to mitigate potential biases further.

Mental disorders are highly prevalent worldwide, but the shortage of psychiatrists and the inherent subjectivity of interview-based diagnosis create substantial barriers to timely and consistent mental-health assessment. Progress in AI-assisted psychiatric diagnosis is constrained by the absence of benchmarks that simultaneously provide realistic patient simulation, clinician-verified diagnostic labels, and support for dynamic multi-turn consultation. We present LingxiDiagBench, a large-scale multi-agent benchmark that evaluates LLMs on both static diagnostic inference and dynamic multi-turn psychiatric consultation in Chinese. At its core is LingxiDiag-16K, a dataset of 16,000 EMR-aligned synthetic consultation dialogues designed to reproduce real clinical demographic and diagnostic distributions across 12 ICD-10 psychiatric categories. Through extensive experiments across state-of-the-art LLMs, we establish key findings: (1) although LLMs achieve high accuracy on binary depression–anxiety classification (up to 92.3%), performance deteriorates substantially for depression–anxiety comorbidity recognition (43.0%) and 12-way differential diagnosis (28.5%); (2) dynamic consultation often underperforms static evaluation, indicating that ineffective information-gathering strategies significantly impair downstream diagnostic reasoning; (3) consultation quality assessed by LLM-as-a-Judge shows only moderate correlation with diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that well-structured questioning alone does not ensure correct diagnostic decisions. We release LingxiDiag-16K and the full evaluation framework to support reproducible research at https://github.com/Lingxi-mental-health/LingxiDiagBench.

In this work, we present AfriNLLB, a series of lightweight models for efficient translation from and into African languages. AfriNLLB supports 15 language pairs (30 translation directions), including Swahili, Hausa, Yoruba, Amharic, Somali, Zulu, Lingala, Afrikaans, Wolof, and Egyptian Arabic, as well as other African Union official languages such as Arabic (MSA), French, Portuguese, and Spanish. Our training data covers bidirectional translation between English and 13 languages, and between French and two languages (Lingala and Wolof). AfriNLLB models are based on NLLB-200 600M, which we compress using iterative layer pruning and quantization. We fine-tune the pruned models on parallel corpora we curated for African languages, employing knowledge distillation from a larger teacher model. Our work aims at enabling efficient deployment of translation models for African languages in resource-constrained settings. Our evaluation results demonstrate that AfriNLLB models achieve performance comparable to the baseline while being significantly faster. We release two versions of the AfriNLLB models, a Transformers version that allows further fine-tuning and a CTranslate2 version for efficient inference. Moreover, we release all the training data that we used for fine-tuning the baseline and pruned models to facilitate further research.

Large Language Model agents demonstrate potential in solving real-world problems via tools, yet generalist intelligence is bottlenecked by scarce high-quality, long-horizon data. Existing methods collect privacy-constrained API logs or generate scripted interactions lacking diversity, which struggle to produce data requisite for scaling capabilities. We propose AgentSkiller, a fully automated framework synthesizing multi-turn interaction data across realistic, semantically linked domains. It employs a DAG-based architecture with explicit state transitions to ensure determinism and recoverability. The pipeline builds a domain ontology and Person-Centric Entity Graph, defines tool interfaces via Service Blueprints for Model Context Protocol servers, and populates environments with consistent databases and strict Domain Policies. A cross-domain fusion mechanism links services to simulate complex tasks. Finally, the pipeline creates user tasks by verifying solution paths, filtering via execution-based validation, and generating queries using a Persona-based Simulator for automated rollout. This produces reliable environments with clear state changes. To demonstrate effectiveness, we synthesized $\approx$ 11K interaction samples; experimental results indicate that models trained on this dataset achieve significant improvements on function calling over baselines, particularly in larger parameter regimes.

Due to the scarcity of part-of-speech annotated data, existing studies on low-resource languages typically adopt unsupervised approaches for POS tagging. Among these, POS tag projection with word alignment method transfers POS tags from a high-resource source language to a low-resource target language based on parallel corpora, making it particularly suitable for low-resource language settings. However, this approach relies heavily on parallel corpora, which are often unavailable for many low-resource languages. To overcome this limitation, we propose a fully unsupervised cross-lingual part-of-speech(POS) tagging framework that relies solely on monolingual corpora by leveraging unsupervised neural machine translation(UNMT) system. This UNMT system first translates sentences from a high-resource language into a low-resource one, thereby constructing pseudo-parallel sentence pairs. Then, we train a POS tagger for the target language following the standard projection procedure based on word alignments. Moreover, we propose a multi-source projection technique to calibrate the projected POS tags on the target side, enhancing to train a more effective POS tagger. We evaluate our framework on 28 language pairs, covering four source languages (English, German, Spanish and French) and seven target languages (Afrikaans, Basque, Finnis, Indonesian, Lithuanian, Portuguese and Turkish). Experimental results show that our method can achieve performance comparable to the baseline cross-lingual POS tagger with parallel sentence pairs, and even exceeds it for certain target languages. Furthermore, our proposed multi-source projection technique further boosts performance, yielding an average improvement of 1.3% over previous methods.

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve users across regional varieties, yet their knowledge of geographic lexical variation remains insufficiently evaluated. We investigate country-conditioned lexical usage judgments in Spanish using an expert-curated database covering 934 lexical items across 21 Spanish-speaking countries. Treating ten proprietary and open-weight LLMs as virtual informants, we evaluate two complementary question formats: Yes-No question format (YNQF) and multiple-choice question format (MCQF). The evaluation comprises 10,164 YNQF questions and 16,637 MCQF questions, assessed using F1 and an adjusted Jaccard coefficient, respectively. Results reveal substantial differences across models, countries, and formats. Spain receives the highest country-level score for eight models in YNQF and nine in MCQF; Chile receives the lowest MCQF score for every model. Regression analyses suggest that digital resource volume is generally more strongly associated with YNQF performance, whereas lexical distance from Spain is more strongly associated with MCQF performance. These findings provide a fine-grained diagnostic of uneven regional lexical knowledge and highlight the importance of complementary elicitation formats and evaluation metrics. The benchmark measures explicit usage judgments, motivating separate assessment of region-appropriate generation.

The rise of cyberbullying in social media platforms involving toxic comments has escalated the need for effective ways to monitor and moderate online interactions. Existing solutions of automated toxicity detection systems, are based on a machine or deep learning algorithms. However, statistics-based solutions are generally prone to adversarial attacks that contain logic based modifications such as negation in phrases and sentences. In that regard, we present a set of formal reasoning-based methodologies that wrap around existing machine learning toxicity detection systems. Acting as both pre-processing and post-processing steps, our formal reasoning wrapper helps alleviating the negation attack problems and significantly improves the accuracy and efficacy of toxicity scoring. We evaluate different variations of our wrapper on multiple machine learning models against a negation adversarial dataset. Experimental results highlight the improvement of hybrid (formal reasoning and machine-learning) methods against various purely statistical solutions.

Generative AI systems are increasingly embedded in everyday life, yet empirical understanding of how psychological risk associated with AI use emerges, is experienced, and is regulated by users remains limited. We present a large-scale computational thematic analysis of posts collected between 2023 and 2025 from two Reddit communities, r/AIDangers and r/ChatbotAddiction, explicitly focused on AI-related harm and distress. Using a multi-agent, LLM-assisted thematic analysis grounded in Braun and Clarke's reflexive framework, we identify 14 recurring thematic categories and synthesize them into five higher-order experiential dimensions. To further characterize affective patterns, we apply emotion labeling using a BERT-based classifier and visualize emotional profiles across dimensions. Our findings reveal five empirically derived experiential dimensions of AI-related psychological risk grounded in real-world user discourse, with self-regulation difficulties emerging as the most prevalent and fear concentrated in concerns related to autonomy, control, and technical risk. These results provide early empirical evidence from lived user experience of how AI safety is perceived and emotionally experienced outside laboratory or speculative contexts, offering a foundation for future AI safety research, evaluation, and responsible governance.

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are critical for enterprise operations, yet existing language models struggle with SOP understanding and cross-domain generalization. Current methods fail because joint training cannot differentiate between reasoning capabilities that SOP requires: terminology precision, sequential ordering, and constraint reasoning. We propose FM SO.P, solving these challenges through two novelties. First, we introduce progressive task mixtures that build capabilities by stages across three task types with cumulative data: concept disambiguation for terminology precision, action sequence understanding for procedural correctness, and scenario-aware graph reasoning for conditional logic. Second, we propose an automatic multi-agent evaluation system consisting of three agents that adaptively generate rubrics, stratified test sets, and rubric scoring, adapting to domains (e.g., temporal constraints for DMV, regulatory compliance for banking). Evaluated on SOPBench across seven domains (Bank, DMV, Healthcare, Market, University, Library, Hotel), FM SO.P achieves 48.3% pass rate with our 32B model and 34.3% with our opensource 7B model, matching Qwen-2.5-72B-Instruct baseline (34.4%) with 10x fewer parameters.

Policy gradient methods for language model reasoning, such as GRPO and DAPO, assign uniform credit to all generated tokens - the filler phrase "Let me think" receives the same gradient update as the critical calculation "23 + 45 = 68." We propose counterfactual importance weighting: mask reasoning spans, measure the drop in answer probability, and upweight tokens accordingly during policy gradient updates. Our method requires no auxiliary models or external annotation, instead importance is estimated directly from the policy model's own probability shifts. Experiments on GSM8K across three models spanning the Qwen and Llama families demonstrate consistent improvements over uniform baselines and faster convergence to equivalent accuracy. Inverting the importance signal hurts performance, confirming we capture genuine causal structure rather than noise. Analysis shows the method correctly prioritizes calculation steps over scaffolding text. We view these findings as establishing counterfactual importance weighting as a foundation for further research rather than a complete solution.

Utilizing Large Language Models (LLM) as chatbots in diverse business scenarios often presents the challenge of maintaining topic continuity. Abrupt shifts in topics can lead to poor user experiences and inefficient utilization of computational resources. In this paper, we present a topic continuity model aimed at assessing whether a response aligns with the initial conversation topic. Our model is built upon the expansion of the corresponding natural language understanding (NLU) model into quantifiable terms using a Naive Bayes approach. Subsequently, we have introduced an attention mechanism and logarithmic nonlinearity to enhance its capability to capture topic continuity. This approach allows us to convert the NLU model into an interpretable analytical formula. In contrast to many NLU models constrained by token limits, our proposed model can seamlessly handle conversations of any length with linear time complexity. Furthermore, the attention mechanism significantly improves the model's ability to identify topic continuity in complex conversations. According to our experiments, our model consistently outperforms traditional methods, particularly in handling lengthy and intricate conversations. This unique capability offers us an opportunity to ensure the responsible and interpretable use of LLMs.

Online extremist communities operate within a wider information ecosystem shaped by real-world events, news coverage, and cross-community interaction. We adopt a systems perspective to examine these influences using seven years of data from two ideologically distinct extremist forums (Stormfront and Incels) and a mainstream reference community (r/News). We ask three questions: how extremist violence impacts community behaviour; whether news coverage of political entities predicts shifts in conversation dynamics; and whether linguistic diffusion occurs between mainstream and extremist spaces and across extremist ideologies. Methodologically, we combine counterfactual synthesis to estimate event-level impacts with vector autoregression and Granger causality analyses to model ongoing relationships among news signals, behavioural outcomes, and cross-community language change. Across analyses, our results indicate that Stormfront and r/News appear to be more reactive to external stimuli, while Incels demonstrates less cross-community linguistic influence and less responsiveness to news and violent events. These findings underscore that extremist communities are not homogeneous, but differ in how tightly they are coupled to the surrounding information ecosystem.

Large language models (LLMs) and cross-encoder rerankers have gained attention for improving recommender systems, particularly in cold-start scenarios where user interaction history is limited. However, practical deployment reveals significant performance gaps between LLM-based approaches and simple baselines. This paper presents a systematic diagnostic study of cross-encoder rerankers in cold-start movie recommendation using the Serendipity-2018 dataset. Through controlled experiments with 500 users across multiple random seeds, we identify three critical failure modes: (1) low retrieval coverage in candidate generation (recall@200 = 0.109 vs. 0.609 for baselines), (2) severe exposure bias with rerankers concentrating recommendations on 3 unique items versus 497 for random baseline, and (3) minimal score discrimination between relevant and irrelevant items (mean difference = 0.098, Cohen's d = 0.13). We demonstrate that popularity-based ranking substantially outperforms LLM reranking (HR@10: 0.268 vs. 0.008, p < 0.001), with the performance gap primarily attributable to retrieval stage limitations rather than reranker capacity. Based on these findings, we provide actionable recommendations including hybrid retrieval strategies, candidate pool size optimization, and score calibration techniques. All code, configurations, and experimental results are made available for reproducibility.

Healthcare conversational AI agents shouldn't be optimized only for clean benchmark accuracy in production-first regime; they must be optimized for the lived reality of patient conversations, where audio is imperfect, intent is indirect, language shifts mid-call, and compliance hinges on how guidance is delivered. We present a production-validated framework grounded in real-time signals from 115M+ live patient-AI interactions and clinician-led testing (7K+ licensed clinicians; 500K+ test calls). These in-the-wild cues – paralinguistics, turn-taking dynamics, clarification triggers, escalation markers, multilingual continuity, and workflow confirmations – reveal failure modes that curated data misses and provide actionable training and evaluation signals for safety and reliability. We further show why healthcare-grade safety cannot rely on a single LLM: long-horizon dialogue and limited attention demand redundancy via governed orchestration, independent checks, and verification. Many apparent "reasoning" errors originate upstream, motivating vertical integration across contextual ASR, clarification/repair, ambient speech handling, and latency-aware model/hardware choices. Treating interaction intelligence (tone, pacing, empathy, clarification, turn-taking) as first-class safety variables, we drive measurable gains in safety, documentation, task completion, and equity in building the safest generative AI solution for autonomous patient-facing care. Deployed across more than 10 million real patient calls, Polaris attains a clinical safety score of 99.9%, while significantly improving patient experience with average patient rating of 8.95 and reducing ASR errors by 50% over enterprise ASR. These results establish real-world interaction intelligence as a critical – and previously underexplored – determinant of safety and reliability in patient-facing clinical AI systems.

Summarization is a core task in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and the introduction of large context windows reaching millions of tokens make it possible to process entire books in a single prompt. At the same time, for well-known books, LLMs can generate summaries based only on internal knowledge acquired during training. This raises several important questions: How do summaries generated from internal memory compare to those derived from the full text? Does prior knowledge influence summaries even when the model is given the book as input? In this work, we conduct an experimental evaluation of book summarization with state-of-the-art LLMs. We compare summaries of well-known books produced using (i) only the internal knowledge of the model and (ii) the full text of the book. The results show that having the full text provides more detailed summaries in general, but some books have better scores for the internal knowledge summaries. This puts into question the capabilities of models to perform summarization of long texts, as information learned during training can outperform summarization of the full text in some cases.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as scalable evaluators of model outputs, but their preference judgments exhibit systematic biases and can diverge from human evaluations. Prior work on LLM-as-a-judge has largely focused on a small, predefined set of hypothesized biases, leaving open the problem of automatically discovering unknown drivers of LLM preferences. We address this gap by studying several embedding-level concept extraction methods for analyzing LLM judge behavior. We compare these methods in terms of interpretability and predictiveness, finding that sparse autoencoder-based approaches recover substantially more interpretable preference features than alternatives while remaining competitive in predicting LLM decisions. Using over 27k paired responses from multiple human preference datasets and judgments from three LLMs, we analyze LLM judgments and compare them to those of human annotators. Our method both validates existing results, such as the tendency for LLMs to prefer refusal of sensitive requests at higher rates than humans, and uncovers new trends across both general and domain-specific datasets, including biases toward responses that emphasize concreteness and empathy in approaching new situations, toward detail and formality in academic advice, and against legal guidance that promotes active steps like calling police and filing lawsuits. Our results show that automated concept discovery enables systematic analysis of LLM judge preferences without predefined bias taxonomies.

Recent advances in Natural Language Processing have been predominantly driven by transformer-based architectures, which rely heavily on self-attention mechanisms to model relationships between tokens in a sequence. Similarly, the field of Quantum Natural Language Processing, which seeks to leverage quantum principles to address challenges in language understanding and generation tasks, has seen the recent development of quantum self-attention mechanisms. We propose a classical quantum-inspired self-attention (QISA) mechanism and integrate it into the full autoregressive language modeling pipeline of GPT-1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first integration of this kind, as previous quantum self-attention mechanisms have been primarily tested on text classification. In our experiments, QISA achieves better performance when compared to standard self-attention on the metrics character error rate ($15.5\times$ better), word error rate ($4.7 \times $) and cross-entropy loss ($13 \times$). This is achieved while only requiring a $ 2.6\times$ longer inference time.

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) allow agents to execute complex natural language tasks. Many LLM applications, such as support agents, teaching assistants, and interactive bots, involve multi-turn conversations. However, it remains challenging to control LLMs in the context of such interactions, particularly when the LLM behavior needs to be adjustable over the course of the conversation. In this paper, we present Retcon, a few-shot prompting technique designed to provide turn-level control over LLMs in conversations. We then demonstrate that it performs significantly better than zero-shot and traditional few-shot prompting.

Most sign language recognition research relies on Transfer Learning (TL) from vision-based datasets such as ImageNet. Some extend this to alternatively available language datasets, often focusing on signs with cross-linguistic similarities. This body of work examines the necessity of these likenesses on effective knowledge transfer by comparing TL performance between iconic signs of two different sign language pairs: Chinese to Arabic and Greek to Flemish. Google Mediapipe was utilised as an input feature extractor, enabling spatial information of these signs to be processed with a Multilayer Perceptron architecture and the temporal information with a Gated Recurrent Unit. Experimental results showed a 7.02% improvement for Arabic and 1.07% for Flemish when conducting iconic TL from Chinese and Greek respectively.

Internet memes are a powerful form of online communication, yet their nature and reliance on commonsense knowledge make toxicity detection challenging. Identifying key features for meme interpretation and understanding, is a crucial task. Previous work has been focused on some elements contributing to the meaning, such as the Textual dimension via OCR, the Visual dimension via object recognition, upper layers of meaning like the Emotional dimension, Toxicity detection via proxy variables, such as hate speech detection, and sentiment analysis. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of an overall architecture able to formally identify elements contributing to the meaning of a meme, and be used in the sense-making process. In this work, we present a semantic framework and a corresponding benchmark for automatic knowledge extraction from memes. First, we identify the necessary dimensions to understand and interpret a meme: Textual material, Visual material, Scene, Background Knowledge, Emotion, Semiotic Projection, Analogical Mapping, Overall Intent, Target Community, and Toxicity Assessment. Second, the framework guides a semi-automatic process of generating a benchmark with commonsense question-answer pairs about meme toxicity assessment and its underlying reason. The resulting benchmark M-QUEST consists of 609 question-answer pairs for 307 memes. Thirdly, we evaluate eight open-source large language models on their ability to correctly solve M-QUEST. Our results show that current models' commonsense reasoning capabilities for toxic meme interpretation vary depending on the dimension and architecture. Models with instruction tuning and reasoning capabilities significantly outperform the others, though pragmatic inference questions remain challenging. We release code, benchmark, and prompts to support future research intersecting multimodal content safety and commonsense reasoning.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable and steadily improving performance across a wide range of tasks. However, LLM performance may be highly sensitive to prompt variations especially in scenarios with limited openness or strict output formatting requirements, indicating insufficient robustness. In real-world applications, user prompts provided to LLMs often contain imperfections, which may undermine the quality of the model's responses. To address this issue, previous work has primarily focused on preprocessing prompts, employing external tools or even LLMs to refine prompt formulations in advance. However, these approaches overlook the intrinsic robustness of LLMs, and their reliance on external components introduces additional computational overhead and uncertainty. In this work, we propose a Contrastive Learning-based Inverse Direct Preference Optimization (CoIPO) method that minimizes the discrepancy between the label-aligned logits produced by the model under a clean prompt and its noisy counterpart, and conduct a detailed analysis using mutual information theory. We augment the FLAN dataset by constructing paired prompts, each consisting of a clean prompt and its corresponding noisy version for training. Additionally, to evaluate the effectiveness, we develop NoisyPromptBench, a benchmark enhanced and derived from the existing PromptBench. Experimental results conducted on NoisyPromptBench demonstrate that our proposed method achieves a significant improvement in average accuracy over the current state-of-the-art approaches. The source code of CoIPO, pair-wise FLAN datasets, and NoisyPromptBench have already been released on https://github.com/vegetable-yx/CoIPO.

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a significant "embodiment gap", where their text-based representations fail to align with human sensorimotor experiences. This study systematically investigates whether and how task-specific fine-tuning can bridge this gap. Utilizing Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) and dimension-specific correlation metrics, we demonstrate that the internal representations of LLMs can be steered toward more embodied, grounded patterns through fine-tuning. Furthermore, the results show that while sensorimotor improvements generalize robustly across languages and related sensory-motor dimensions, they are highly sensitive to the learning objective, failing to transfer across two disparate task formats.

Decoding natural language from non-invasive EEG signals is a promising yet challenging task. However, current state-of-the-art models remain constrained by three fundamental issues: Semantic Bias, where outputs collapse into generic linguistic templates; Signal Neglect, where models rely heavily on LLM priors to hallucinate fluent text even in the absence of meaningful signals; and the "BLEU Trap", where high-frequency stopwords inflate n-gram metrics, masking a lack of true semantic fidelity. To resolve these challenges, we move beyond conventional end-to-end pipelines and propose SemKey, a novel multi-stage framework that enforces signal-grounded generation through four decoupled semantic objectives: sentiment, topic, length, and surprisal. We extract these semantic anchors from EEG embeddings directly, then unify them with an Active Retrieval Decoding mechanism, compelling the LLM to ground its token generation in the neural signals rather than defaulting to linguistic priors. Furthermore, we break the BLEU Trap by establishing a comprehensive evaluation protocol using rigorous retrieval and distribution-based metrics such as Fréchet Distance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SemKey effectively mitigates hallucinations on noise inputs and achieves SOTA performance on these robust protocols. Code will be released upon acceptance at https://github.com/xmed-lab/SemKey.

In many applications involving intelligent agents, the overwhelming volume of alerts (mostly false) generated by the agents may desensitize users and cause them to overlook critical issues, leading to the so-called ”alert fatigue”. A common strategy is to train a reflection model as a filter to intercept false alerts with labelled data collected from user verification feedback. However, a key challenge is the noisy nature of such data as it is often collected in production environments. As cleaning noise via manual annotation incurs high costs, this paper proposes a novel method ConceptRM for constructing a high-quality corpus to train a reflection model capable of effectively intercepting false alerts. With only a small amount of expert annotations as anchors, ConceptRM creates perturbed datasets with varying noise ratios and utilizes co-teaching to train multiple distinct models for collaborative learning. By analyzing the consensus decisions of these models, it effectively identifies reliable negative samples from a noisy dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that ConceptRM significantly enhances the interception of false alerts with minimal annotation cost, outperforming several state-of-the-art LLM baselines by up to 53.31% on in-domain datasets and 41.67% on out-of-domain datasets.

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown promise in textual understanding, they face significant challenges when handling long context and complex reasoning tasks. In this paper, we dissect the internal mechanisms governing long-context processing in VLMs to understand their performance bottlenecks. Through the lens of attention analysis, we identify specific Visual Evidence Retrieval (VER) Heads - a sparse, dynamic set of attention heads critical for locating visual cues during reasoning, distinct from static OCR heads. We demonstrate that these heads are causal to model performance; masking them leads to significant degradation. Leveraging this discovery, we propose VERA (Visual Evidence Retrieval Augmentation), a training-free framework that detects model uncertainty (i.e., entropy) to trigger the explicit verbalization of visual evidence attended by VER heads. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that VERA significantly improves long-context understanding of open-source VLMs: it yields an average relative improvement of 21.3% on Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct and 20.1% on GLM-4.1V-Thinking across five benchmarks.

Figures of Speech (FoS) consist of multi-word phrases that are deeply intertwined with culture. While Neural Machine Translation (NMT) performs relatively well with the figurative expressions of high-resource languages, it often faces challenges when dealing with low-resource languages like Sinhala due to limited available data. To address this limitation, we introduce a corpus of 2,344 Sinhala figures of speech with cultural and cross-lingual annotations. We examine this dataset to classify the cultural origins of the figures of speech and to identify their cross-lingual equivalents. Additionally, we have developed a binary classifier to differentiate between two types of FOS in the dataset, achieving an accuracy rate of approximately 92%. We also evaluate the performance of existing LLMs on this dataset. Our findings reveal significant shortcomings in the current capabilities of LLMs, as these models often struggle to accurately convey idiomatic meanings. By making this dataset publicly available, we offer a crucial benchmark for future research in low-resource NLP and culturally aware machine translation.

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning and its variants have substantially improved the performance of language models on complex reasoning tasks, yet the precise mechanisms by which different strategies facilitate generalization remain poorly understood. While current explanations often point to increased test-time computation or structural guidance, establishing a consistent, quantifiable link between these factors and generalization remains challenging. In this work, we identify intrinsic dimensionality as a quantitative measure for characterizing the effectiveness of reasoning chains. Intrinsic dimensionality quantifies the minimum number of model dimensions needed to reach a given accuracy threshold on a given task. By keeping the model architecture fixed and varying the task formulation through different reasoning strategies, we demonstrate that effective reasoning strategies consistently reduce the intrinsic dimensionality of the task. Validating this on GSM8K with Gemma-3 1B and 4B, we observe a strong inverse correlation between the intrinsic dimensionality of a reasoning strategy and its generalization performance on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution data. Our findings suggest that effective reasoning chains facilitate learning by better compressing the task using fewer parameters, offering a new quantitative metric for analyzing reasoning processes.

We present a large scale data analysis of Moltbook, a Reddit-style social media platform exclusively populated by AI agents. Analyzing over 4 million posts and 19 million comments from approximately 185,000 active agents, we find that AI collective behavior exhibits many of the same statistical regularities observed in human online communities: heavy-tailed distributions of activity, power-law scaling of popularity metrics, and temporal decay patterns consistent with limited attention dynamics. However, we also identify key differences, including a sublinear relationship between upvotes and discussion size that contrasts with human behavior. These findings suggest that, while individual AI agents may differ fundamentally from humans, their emergent collective dynamics share structural similarities with human social systems.