Computation and Language · Cross-listed from eess.AS
SyncVoice: Simple and Effective Automatic Video Dubbing with Vision-Augmented TTS
Kaidi Wang, Yi He, Wenhao Guan et al. (+9 more)
Automatic
video dubbing aims to generate high-fidelity
speech that is temporally aligned with visual content. However, existing methods still suffer from limited
speech naturalness, insufficient audio-visual synchronization, and poor scalability beyond monolingual settings. To address these challenges, we propose SyncVoice, a simple and effective dubbing framework that lightly integrates a Text-Visual Fusion Module into a pretrained text-to-
speech (TTS) system. This module aligns visual features with linguistic representations, enabling temporally synchronized
speech synthesis without complex architectural redesign. Experiments on the LRS3
dataset show that SyncVoice achieves state-of-the-art performance in zero-shot dubbing. Further training on a large-scale bilingual audio-visual
dataset improves vocal fidelity while preserving synchronization, yielding a single unified model for both Chinese and English dubbing.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Kaidi Wang, Yi He, Wenhao Guan, Weijie Wu, Peijie Chen, Hongwu Ding, Xiong Zhang, Di Wu, Meng Meng, Jian Luan, Lin Li, Qingyang Hong
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
SO-Bench: A Structural Output Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs
Di Feng, Kaixin Ma, Feng Nan et al. (+9 more)
Multimodal large
language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world, agentic settings where outputs must not only be correct, but also conform to predefined data schemas. Despite recent progress in structured generation in textual domain, there is still no
benchmark that systematically evaluates schema-grounded information extraction and
reasoning over visual inputs. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive study of visual structural output capabilities for MLLMs with our carefully designed SO-Bench
benchmark. Covering four visual domains, including UI screens, natural images, documents, and charts, SO-Bench is built from over 6.5K diverse JSON schemas and 1.8K curated image-schema pairs with human-verified quality. Benchmarking experiments on open-sourced and frontier proprietary models reveal persistent gaps in predicting accurate, schema compliant outputs, highlighting the need for better
multimodal structured
reasoning. Beyond benchmarking, we further conduct training experiments to largely improve the model's structured output capability. We make the
benchmark and evaluation publicly available at https://github.com/apple/ml-sobench
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Di Feng, Kaixin Ma, Feng Nan, Haofeng Chen, Bohan Zhai, David Griffiths, Mingfei Gao, Zhe Gan, Eshan Verma, Yinfei Yang, Zhifeng Chen, Afshin Dehghan
Computation and Language
Proactive Defense: Compound AI for Detecting Persuasion Attacks and Measuring Inoculation Effectiveness
Svitlana Volkova, Will Dupree, Hsien-Te Kao et al. (+4 more)
This paper introduces BRIES, a novel compound AI architecture designed to detect and measure the effectiveness of persuasion attacks across information environments. We present a system with specialized
agents: a Twister that generates
adversarial content employing targeted persuasion tactics, a Detector that identifies attack types with configurable parameters, a Defender that creates resilient content through content inoculation, and an Assessor that employs causal inference to evaluate inoculation effectiveness. Experimenting with the SemEval 2023 Task 3 taxonomy across the synthetic persuasion
dataset, we demonstrate significant variations in detection performance across
language agents. Our comparative analysis reveals significant performance disparities with GPT-4 achieving superior detection accuracy on complex persuasion techniques, while open-source models like Llama3 and Mistral demonstrated notable weaknesses in identifying subtle rhetorical, suggesting that different architectures encode and process persuasive
language patterns in fundamentally different ways. We show that
prompt engineering dramatically affects detection efficacy, with temperature settings and confidence scoring producing model-specific variations; Gemma and GPT-4 perform optimally at lower temperatures while Llama3 and Mistral show improved capabilities at higher temperatures. Our causal analysis provides novel insights into socio-emotional-cognitive signatures of persuasion attacks, revealing that different attack types target specific cognitive dimensions. This research advances generative AI safety and cognitive security by quantifying LLM-specific vulnerabilities to persuasion attacks and delivers a framework for enhancing human cognitive resilience through structured interventions before exposure to harmful content.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Svitlana Volkova, Will Dupree, Hsien-Te Kao, Peter Bautista, Gabe Ganberg, Jeff Beaubien, Laura Cassani
Computation and Language
Building Domain-Specific Small Language Models via Guided Data Generation
Aman Kumar, Ekant Muljibhai Amin, Xian Yeow Lee et al. (+5 more)
Large
Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success in supporting a wide range of knowledge-intensive tasks. In specialized domains, there is growing interest in leveraging LLMs to assist subject matter experts with domain-specific challenges. However, deploying LLMs as SaaS solutions raises data
privacy concerns, while many open-source models demand significant computational resources for effective domain adaptation and deployment. A promising alternative is to develop smaller, domain-specialized LLMs, though this approach is often constrained by the lack of high-quality domain-specific training data. In this work, we address these limitations by presenting a cost-efficient and scalable training pipeline that combines guided synthetic data generation from a small seed corpus with bottom-up domain data curation. Our pipeline integrates Domain-Adaptive Pretraining (DAPT), Domain-specific Supervised Fine-tuning (DSFT), and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to train effective small-scale models for specialized use cases. We demonstrate this approach through DiagnosticSLM, a 3B-parameter domain-specific model tailored for fault diagnosis, root cause analysis, and repair recommendation in industrial settings. To evaluate model performance, we introduce four domain-specific
benchmarks: multiple-choice questions (DiagnosticMCQ), question answering (DiagnosticQA), sentence completion (DiagnosticComp), and summarization (DiagnosticSum). DiagnosticSLM achieves up to 25% accuracy improvement over open-source models of comparable or larger size (2B-9B) on the MCQ task, while also outperforming or matching them in other tasks, demonstrating effective domain-specific
reasoning and generalization capabilities.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Aman Kumar, Ekant Muljibhai Amin, Xian Yeow Lee, Lasitha Vidyaratne, Ahmed K. Farahat, Dipanjan D. Ghosh, Yuta Koreeda, Chetan Gupta
Computation and Language
Evaluating Large Language Models on the 2026 Korean CSAT Mathematics Exam: Measuring Mathematical Ability in a Zero-Data-Leakage Setting
Goun Pyeon, Inbum Heo, Jeesu Jung et al. (+7 more)
This study systematically evaluated the mathematical
reasoning capabilities of Large
Language Models (LLMs) using the 2026 Korean College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) Mathematics section, ensuring a completely contamination-free evaluation environment. To address data leakage issues in existing
benchmarks, we digitized all 46 questions (22 common and 24 elective) within two hours of the exam's public release, eliminating any possibility of inclusion in model training data. We conducted comprehensive evaluations of 24 state-of-the-art LLMs across varying input modalities (Text-only, Image-only, Text+Figure) and
prompt languages (Korean, English). The GPT-5 family models achieved perfect scores (100 points) under a limited set of
language-modality configurations, while Grok 4, Qwen 3 235B, and Gemini 2.5 pro also scored above 97 points. Notably, gpt-oss-20B achieved 95.7 points despite its relatively small size, demonstrating high cost-effectiveness. Problem-specific analysis revealed Calculus as the weakest domain with significant performance degradation on 4-point high-difficulty problems. Text input consistently outperformed image input, while
prompt language effects varied by model scale. In
reasoning enhancement experiments with GPT-5 series, increased
reasoning intensity improved performance (82.6->100 points) but quadrupled
token usage and drastically reduced efficiency, suggesting that models with minimal
reasoning may be more practical. This research contributes: (1) implementation of a completely unexposed evaluation environment, (2) a standardized digitization pipeline that converts human-targeted exam materials into LLM-ready evaluation data, and (3) a practical evaluation perspective integrating performance, cost, and time considerations. Detailed results and model comparisons are available at the 2026 Korean CSAT LLM Evaluation Leaderboard; https://isoft.cnu.ac.kr/csat2026/
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Goun Pyeon, Inbum Heo, Jeesu Jung, Taewook Hwang, Hyuk Namgoong, Hyein Seo, Yerim Han, Eunbin Kim, Hyeonseok Kang, Sangkeun Jung
Computation and Language
No Free Lunch in Language Model Bias Mitigation? Targeted Bias Reduction Can Exacerbate Unmitigated LLM Biases
Shireen Chand, Faith Baca and Emilio Ferrara
Large
Language Models (LLMs) inherit societal biases from their training data, potentially leading to harmful or unfair outputs. While various techniques aim to mitigate these biases, their effects are often evaluated only along the dimension of the bias being targeted. This work investigates the cross-category consequences of targeted bias mitigation. We study four bias mitigation techniques applied across ten models from seven model families, and we explore racial, religious, profession- and gender-related biases. We measure the impact of debiasing on model coherence and stereotypical preference using the StereoSet
benchmark. Our results consistently show that while targeted mitigation can sometimes reduce bias in the intended dimension, it frequently leads to unintended and often negative consequences in others, such as increasing model bias and decreasing general coherence. These findings underscore the critical need for robust, multi-dimensional evaluation tools when examining and developing bias mitigation strategies to avoid inadvertently shifting or worsening bias along untargeted axes.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG
Majority of the Bests: Improving Best-of-N via Bootstrapping
Amin Rakhsha, Kanika Madan, Tianyu Zhang et al. (+2 more)
Sampling multiple outputs from a Large
Language Model (LLM) and selecting the most frequent (Self-consistency) or highest-scoring (Best-of-N) candidate is a popular approach to achieve higher accuracy in tasks with discrete final answers. Best-of-N (BoN) selects the output with the highest reward, and with perfect rewards, it often achieves near-perfect accuracy. With imperfect rewards from reward models, however, BoN fails to reliably find the correct answer and its performance degrades drastically. We consider the distribution of BoN's outputs and highlight that, although the correct answer does not usually have a probability close to one under imperfect rewards, it is often the most likely outcome. This suggests that the mode of this distribution can be more reliably correct than a sample from it. Based on this idea, we propose Majority-of-the-Bests (MoB), a novel selection mechanism that estimates the output distribution of BoN via bootstrapping and selects its mode. Experimental results across five
benchmarks, three different base LLMs, and two reward models demonstrate consistent improvements over BoN in 25 out of 30 setups. We also provide theoretical results for the consistency of the bootstrapping. MoB serves as a simple, yet strong alternative to BoN and self-consistency, and more broadly, motivates further research in more nuanced selection mechanisms.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Amin Rakhsha, Kanika Madan, Tianyu Zhang, Amir-massoud Farahmand, Amir Khasahmadi
Computation and Language
OpenGloss: A Synthetic Encyclopedic Dictionary and Semantic Knowledge Graph
Michael J. Bommarito II
We present OpenGloss, a synthetic encyclopedic dictionary and semantic knowledge graph for English that integrates lexicographic definitions, encyclopedic context, etymological histories, and semantic relationships in a unified resource. OpenGloss contains 537K senses across 150K lexemes, on par with WordNet 3.1 and Open English WordNet, while providing more than four times as many sense definitions. These lexemes include 9.1M semantic edges, 1M usage examples, 3M collocations, and 60M words of encyclopedic content. Generated through a multi-
agent procedural generation pipeline with schema-validated LLM outputs and automated quality assurance, the entire resource was produced in under one week for under $1,000. This demonstrates that structured generation can create comprehensive lexical resources at cost and time scales impractical for manual curation, enabling rapid iteration as foundation models improve. The resource addresses gaps in pedagogical applications by providing integrated content – definitions, examples, collocations, encyclopedias, etymology – that supports both vocabulary learning and natural
language processing tasks. As a synthetically generated resource, OpenGloss reflects both the capabilities and limitations of current foundation models. The
dataset is publicly available on Hugging Face under CC-BY 4.0, enabling researchers and educators to build upon and adapt this resource.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
Prompt Optimization as a State-Space Search Problem
Maanas Taneja
Language Models are extremely susceptible to performance collapse with even small changes to input
prompt strings. Libraries such as DSpy (from Stanford NLP) avoid this problem through demonstration-based
prompt optimisation. Inspired by this, I propose an alternative approach that treats
prompt optimisation as a classical state-space search problem. I model the
prompt space as a graph where nodes represent
prompt states and edges correspond to deliberate transformations such as shortening, adding examples, or re- ordering content. Using beam search and random walk
algorithms, I systematically explore this space, evaluating candidates on development sets and
pruning unpromising branches. Across five NLP tasks (sentiment classification, question answering, summarisation, reason- ing, and natural
language inference), I find that even shallow search configurations (beam width=2, depth=2) improve upon seed
prompts on development sets. For instance, beam search achieves development accuracy gains from 0.40 to 0.80 on
reasoning tasks, though test set improvements are more modest (0.20 to 0.50), indicating overfitting to the develop- ment heuristic. Analysis of successful optimisation paths reveals that transformations that make
prompts concise appear most frequently, while verbosity operators are never selected. My results validate
prompt optimization as a search problem and suggest that with greater computational resources and improved evaluation metrics, deeper exploration could yield more robust
prompts that generalize beyond development sets. Code and implementation are available at [https://github.com/MaanasTaneja/PromptOptimiser].
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
A Unified BERT-CNN-BiLSTM Framework for Simultaneous Headline Classification and Sentiment Analysis of Bangla News
Mirza Raquib, Munazer Montasir Akash, Tawhid Ahmed et al. (+5 more)
In our daily lives, newspapers are an essential information source that impacts how the public talks about present-day issues. However, effectively navigating the vast amount of news content from different newspapers and online news portals can be challenging. Newspaper headlines with sentiment analysis tell us what the news is about (e.g., politics, sports) and how the news makes us feel (positive, negative, neutral). This helps us quickly understand the emotional tone of the news. This research presents a state-of-the-art approach to Bangla news headline classification combined with sentiment analysis applying Natural
Language Processing (NLP) techniques, particularly the hybrid transfer learning model BERT-CNN-BiLSTM. We have explored a
dataset called BAN-ABSA of 9014 news headlines, which is the first time that has been experimented with simultaneously in the headline and sentiment categorization in Bengali newspapers. Over this imbalanced
dataset, we applied two experimental strategies: technique-1, where undersampling and oversampling are applied before splitting, and technique-2, where undersampling and oversampling are applied after splitting on the In technique-1 oversampling provided the strongest performance, both headline and sentiment, that is 78.57% and 73.43% respectively, while technique-2 delivered the highest result when trained directly on the original imbalanced
dataset, both headline and sentiment, that is 81.37% and 64.46% respectively. The proposed model BERT-CNN-BiLSTM significantly outperforms all baseline models in classification tasks, and achieves new state-of-the-art results for Bangla news headline classification and sentiment analysis. These results demonstrate the importance of leveraging both the headline and sentiment
datasets, and provide a strong baseline for Bangla text classification in low-resource.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Mirza Raquib, Munazer Montasir Akash, Tawhid Ahmed, Saydul Akbar Murad, Farida Siddiqi Prity, Mohammad Amzad Hossain, Asif Pervez Polok, Nick Rahimi
Computation and Language
What Helps Language Models Predict Human Beliefs: Demographics or Prior Stances?
Joseph Malone, Rachith Aiyappa, Byunghwee Lee et al. (+3 more)
Beliefs shape how people reason, communicate, and behave. Rather than existing in isolation, they exhibit a rich correlational structure–some connected through logical dependencies, others through indirect associations or social processes. As usage of large
language models (LLMs) becomes more ubiquitous in our society, LLMs' ability to understand and reason through human beliefs has many implications from
privacy issues to personalized persuasion and the potential for stereotyping. Yet how LLMs capture this interrelated landscape of beliefs remains unclear. For instance, when predicting someone's beliefs, what information affects the prediction most–who they are (demographics), what else they believe (prior stances), or a combination of both? We address these questions using data from an online debate platform, evaluating the ability of off-the-shelf open-weight LLMs to predict individuals' stance under four conditions: no context, demographics only, prior beliefs only, and both combined. We find that both types of information improve predictions over a blind baseline, with their combination yielding the best performance in most cases. However, the relative value of each varies substantially across belief domains. These findings reveal how current LLMs leverage different types of social information when
reasoning about human beliefs, highlighting both their capabilities and limitations.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Joseph Malone, Rachith Aiyappa, Byunghwee Lee, Haewoon Kwak, Jisun An, Yong-Yeol Ahn
Computation and Language
Toward Trustworthy Difficulty Assessments: Large Language Models as Judges in Programming and Synthetic Tasks
H.M. Shadman Tabib and Jaber Ahmed Deedar
Large
Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural
language and code generation, and are increasingly deployed as automatic judges of model outputs and learning activities. Yet, their behavior on structured tasks such as predicting the difficulty of competitive programming problems remains under-explored. We conduct a systematic comparison of GPT-4o, used purely as a natural-
language difficulty assessor, against an interpretable Light-GBM ensemble trained on explicit numeric and textual features. On a
dataset of 1,825 LeetCode problems labeled Easy, Medium, or Hard, LightGBM attains 86% accuracy, whereas GPT-4o reaches only 37.75%. Detailed analyses, including confusion
matrices and SHAP-based interpretability, show that numeric constraints – such as input size limits and acceptance rates – play a crucial role in separating Hard problems from easier ones. By contrast, GPT-4o often overlooks these cues and exhibits a strong bias toward simpler categories. We further probe GPT-4o through a synthetic Hard-problem generation protocol. Surprisingly, GPT-4o labels almost all of its own synthetic Hard problems as Medium, contradicting its tendency to downgrade real Hard problems to Easy. Our findings connect to recent work on LLMs-as-judges and automatic difficulty estimation in programming and education, and highlight concrete failure modes that must be addressed before LLM-based judges can be considered trustworthy in competitive programming, educational platforms, or reinforcement-learning pipelines.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
Dealing with the Hard Facts of Low-Resource African NLP
Yacouba Diarra, Nouhoum Souleymane Coulibaly, Panga Azazia Kamaté et al. (+4 more)
Creating
speech datasets, models, and evaluation frameworks for low-resource
languages remains challenging given the lack of a broad base of pertinent experience to draw from. This paper reports on the field collection of 612 hours of spontaneous
speech in Bambara, a low-resource West African
language; the semi-automated annotation of that
dataset with transcriptions; the creation of several monolingual ultra-compact and small models using the
dataset; and the automatic and human evaluation of their output. We offer practical suggestions for data collection protocols, annotation, and model design, as well as evidence for the importance of performing human evaluation. In addition to the main
dataset, multiple evaluation
datasets, models, and code are made publicly available.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Yacouba Diarra, Nouhoum Souleymane Coulibaly, Panga Azazia Kamaté, Madani Amadou Tall, Emmanuel Élisé Koné, Aymane Dembélé, Michael Leventhal
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.SE
From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Comprehensive Survey and Practical Guide to Code Intelligence
Jian Yang, Xianglong Liu, Weifeng Lv et al. (+68 more)
Large
language models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed automated software development by enabling direct translation of natural
language descriptions into functional code, driving commercial adoption through tools like Github Copilot (Microsoft), Cursor (Anysphere), Trae (ByteDance), and Claude Code (Anthropic). While the field has evolved dramatically from rule-based systems to
Transformer-based architectures, achieving performance improvements from single-digit to over 95% success rates on
benchmarks like HumanEval. In this work, we provide a comprehensive synthesis and practical guide (a series of analytic and probing experiments) about code LLMs, systematically examining the complete model life cycle from data curation to post-training through advanced prompting paradigms, code pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning, and autonomous coding
agents. We analyze the code capability of the general LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA) and code-specialized LLMs (StarCoder, Code LLaMA, DeepSeek-Coder, and QwenCoder), critically examining the techniques, design decisions, and trade-offs. Further, we articulate the research-practice gap between academic research (e.g.,
benchmarks and tasks) and real-world deployment (e.g., software-related code tasks), including code correctness, security, contextual awareness of large codebases, and integration with development workflows, and map promising research directions to practical needs. Last, we conduct a series of experiments to provide a comprehensive analysis of code pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning, covering scaling law, framework selection, hyperparameter sensitivity, model architectures, and
dataset comparisons.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Jian Yang, Xianglong Liu, Weifeng Lv, Ken Deng, Shawn Guo, Lin Jing, Yizhi Li, Shark Liu, Xianzhen Luo, Yuyu Luo, Changzai Pan, Ensheng Shi, Yingshui Tan, Renshuai Tao, Jiajun Wu, Xianjie Wu, Zhenhe Wu, Daoguang Zan, Chenchen Zhang, Wei Zhang, He Zhu, Terry Yue Zhuo, Kerui Cao, Xianfu Cheng, Jun Dong, Shengjie Fang, Zhiwei Fei, Xiangyuan Guan, Qipeng Guo, Zhiguang Han, Joseph James, Tianqi Luo, Renyuan Li, Yuhang Li, Yiming Liang, Congnan Liu, Jiaheng Liu, Qian Liu, Ruitong Liu, Tyler Loakman, Xiangxin Meng, Chuang Peng, Tianhao Peng, Jiajun Shi, Mingjie Tang, Boyang Wang, Haowen Wang, Yunli Wang, Fanglin Xu, Zihan Xu, Fei Yuan, Ge Zhang, Jiayi Zhang, Xinhao Zhang, Wangchunshu Zhou, Hualei Zhu, King Zhu, Bryan Dai, Aishan Liu, Zhoujun Li, Chenghua Lin, Tianyu Liu, Chao Peng, Kai Shen, Libo Qin, Shuangyong Song, Zizheng Zhan, Jiajun Zhang, Jie Zhang, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Bo Zheng
Computation and Language
MindEval: Benchmarking Language Models on Multi-turn Mental Health Support
José Pombal, Maya D'Eon, Nuno M. Guerreiro et al. (+3 more)
Demand for mental health support through AI chatbots is surging, though current systems present several limitations, like sycophancy or overvalidation, and reinforcement of maladaptive beliefs. A core obstacle to the creation of better systems is the scarcity of
benchmarks that capture the complexity of real therapeutic interactions. Most existing
benchmarks either only test clinical knowledge through multiple-choice questions or assess single responses in isolation. To bridge this gap, we present MindEval, a framework designed in collaboration with Ph.D-level Licensed Clinical Psychologists for automatically evaluating
language models in realistic, multi-turn mental health therapy conversations. Through patient simulation and automatic evaluation with LLMs, our framework balances resistance to gaming with reproducibility via its fully automated, model-agnostic design. We begin by quantitatively validating the realism of our simulated patients against human-generated text and by demonstrating strong correlations between automatic and human expert judgments. Then, we evaluate 12 state-of-the-art LLMs and show that all models struggle, scoring below 4 out of 6, on average, with particular weaknesses in problematic AI-specific patterns of communication. Notably,
reasoning capabilities and model scale do not guarantee better performance, and systems deteriorate with longer interactions or when supporting patients with severe symptoms. We release all code,
prompts, and human evaluation data.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors José Pombal, Maya D'Eon, Nuno M. Guerreiro, Pedro Henrique Martins, António Farinhas, Ricardo Rei
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from eess.AS
InstructAudio: Unified speech and music generation with natural language instruction
Chunyu Qiang, Kang Yin, Xiaopeng Wang et al. (+8 more)
Text-to-
speech (TTS) and text-to-music (TTM) models face significant limitations in instruction-based control. TTS systems usually depend on reference audio for timbre, offer only limited text-level attribute control, and rarely support dialogue generation. TTM systems are constrained by input conditioning requirements that depend on expert knowledge annotations. The high heterogeneity of these input control conditions makes them difficult to joint modeling with
speech synthesis. Despite sharing common acoustic modeling characteristics, these two tasks have long been developed independently, leaving open the challenge of achieving unified modeling through natural
language instructions. We introduce InstructAudio, a unified framework that enables instruction-based (natural
language descriptions) control of acoustic attributes including timbre (gender, age), paralinguistic (
emotion, style, accent), and musical (genre, instrument, rhythm, atmosphere). It supports expressive
speech, music, and dialogue generation in English and Chinese. The model employs joint and single
diffusion transformer layers with a standardized instruction-phoneme input format, trained on 50K hours of
speech and 20K hours of music data, enabling multi-task learning and cross-modal
alignment. Fig. 1 visualizes performance comparisons with mainstream TTS and TTM models, demonstrating that InstructAudio achieves optimal results on most metrics. To our best knowledge, InstructAudio represents the first instruction-controlled framework unifying
speech and music generation. Audio samples are available at: https://qiangchunyu.github.io/InstructAudio/
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Chunyu Qiang, Kang Yin, Xiaopeng Wang, Yuzhe Liang, Jiahui Zhao, Ruibo Fu, Tianrui Wang, Cheng Gong, Chen Zhang, Longbiao Wang, Jianwu Dang