Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
Self-Cleaning and Captured Anyway: One Measured Primitive for Error in a Store an Agent Writes to Itself, and What a Falling Score Actually Measures
Wenhui Chen, Jianlin Chen, Ziyao Lin et al. (+1 more)
"An
agent that writes its conclusions into a store it later retrieves from closes a loop usually reported as one-way contamination. Taking the loop to the infinite-tenure limit against an append-only store gives a different picture: because writing never deletes, the reachable state space has a hard upper edge at (n-1)/n, so the outcome is a choice between two edges rather than a decay. At f_0 = 0.9 the interval between the two modes holds 3.6% of 220 runs where a uniform spread would put 20.6%, and is strictly empty on the first 15; the pooled mean describes 8.2% of the runs it summarises, the median 68.2%. Everything the model contributes is carried by one measured primitive with no fitted parameter, the copy function \gamma(\phi): on 36 Wikidata facts, sign(\hat{\gamma} - \gamma_{crit}), with \gamma_{crit} = 1/k at r = 0, w = 1, predicts the direction of drift on 353 of 360 real-fact runs (39 of 40 synthetic in the same batch). Scale does not rescue the store: pooled frontier capture is 0.850, with claude-sonnet-4.5 captured on 20 of 20 seeds against our registered prediction of <0.5. What the interval tests is distinguishability rather than count: on the real facts, multi-valued runs have 6.4x its occupancy of the rest. It survives at f_0 in {0.1, 0.3, 0.5}, capture peaks at f_0 = 0.5, and of four interventions with criteria frozen first, timing dominates fraction at matched budget while a consistency gate drives every model to 0.993. The resampling unit is the seed, at a design effect of 3.75 on a pooled level: under a 44-seed control the ordering supporting claim 4 collapses from Spearman +0.98 at three seeds to +0.31-0.80 at forty-four, while claim 2's ordering is exact there (+1.00, p = 0.017). All 87 graded rows are in Appendix W, 37 of them graded withdrawn, failed, self-correcting, undecidable or an acknowledged limit, against 50 that are not."
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Wenhui Chen, Jianlin Chen, Ziyao Lin, Chi Man Vong
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
LLM-Driven Training-free Location-Attribute Synergic Fusion: A Closed-Loop Paradigm for Dual-source Encrypted POIs and LULC Mapping
Chang Li, Xingtao Peng, Yongjun Zhang et al. (+2 more)
Dual-source encrypted points of interest (DSEP), POIs from two encrypted coordinate systems, suffer from intertwined location and attribute uncertainties, including nonlinear systematic misalignment and naming inconsistency, hindering land-use/land-cover (LULC) mapping. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to propose an LLM-driven, training-free location-attribute synergic closed-loop optimization paradigm for DSEP fusion. The paradigm jointly refines location transformation and attribute correspondences through iterative feedback. Attribute-synergic location fusion uses an LLM-driven attribute matching method to establish DSEP correspondences, reducing matching complexity from O(N^2) to O(N), and refines transformation coefficients using an improved particle swarm optimization
algorithm within ISODATA-clustered local subregions. Location-synergic attribute fusion then reassesses attribute confidence from updated
geometric residuals through an LLM-fuzzy method. The refined correspondences feed back into location optimization, forming a bidirectional closed loop. Sample purification and adaptive radius contraction enable convergence in essentially two iterations. We further propose a training-free LULC mapping method that inherits land-use classes from encrypted maps through location fusion, producing vector-raster integrated LULC maps. A reference-free POI fusion evaluation method is applied across 31 provincial capitals and municipalities in mainland China. Experiments show that our method achieves an average DSEP location fusion residual of 4.58 m and attribute fusion accuracy of 95.12%, improving upon the open-source baseline and state-of-the-art method by 1.77 m and 14.87%, respectively. Overall, the method provides a training-free solution for DSEP fusion and enables georeferencing of encrypted vector data to WGS-84 without field-surveyed ground control points.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Chang Li, Xingtao Peng, Yongjun Zhang, Yinfei He, Cairun Huang
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
FrontierMath Erdős
Tom Adamczewski and Thomas F. Bloom
We introduce FrontierMath Erdős (FME), a
benchmark of 68 Erdős problems that are open as of August 2026. To solve a task in FME, AI systems must resolve (prove or disprove) one of the 68
conjectures in the proof assistant Lean. Our 68 problems were selected by the second author among 652 open problems on erdosproblems.com for their mathematical interest and difficulty. AIs have recently resolved several open problems in mathematics, but these demonstrations fall short of a systematic study of AI capabilities. FME evaluates every AI model on the same fixed problems, autonomously and under the same budget. We evaluated five AIs with a budget of \$300 per problem. One (GPT-6 Astra) scored 3%, and all others scored 0%.
Read the full abstract ▾
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
Mitigating LLM Over-Refusal via Dynamic Semantic Routing Calibration
Zixuan Wang, Bingjie Zhang, He Zhao et al. (+1 more)
Large
language models (LLMs) aligned for safety often suffer from over-refusal, incorrectly rejecting benign yet safety-related instructions. Prior studies primarily attribute this to static representation overlap, largely overlooking the underlying dynamic mechanisms. In this paper, we present the mechanistic analysis of over-refusal through the lens of internal routing conflicts within
transformer attention. We discover that a sparse subset of Hypersensitive Safety Heads misfires on Hard-Safe
prompts, exhibiting abnormal
attention entanglement that forcefully binds harmless target entities to refusal semantics. This triggers a severe, high-
entropy routing conflict that deprives target entities of necessary
attention. To counteract this, we propose Semantic Routing Calibration (SRC), a lightweight, training-free inference framework. SRC precisely localizes and dynamically suppresses these hypersensitive safety heads at the inference stage. Coupled with a dual-branch logits fusion that acts as a safety regularizer during subsequent decoding, SRC seamlessly restores trustworthy
reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SRC alleviates over-refusal, with intrinsic safety performance preserved as much as feasible.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Zixuan Wang, Bingjie Zhang, He Zhao, Dandan Guo
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
Teaching a Moving Student: Rethinking the Curriculum of On-Policy Distillation
Lingxiang Hu, Tianle Xia, Yiding Sun et al. (+6 more)
In on-policy
distillation (OPD), the student determines which states receive teacher supervision. As its policy evolves, earlier response prefixes become less likely even though teacher-student disagreement on them persists. Under matched trajectory and optimization budgets, neither more queries nor more frequent rollout resampling is uniformly beneficial. Current-policy rollouts outperform initial-policy rollouts at shorter response budgets, but this ranking reverses at longer budgets. Replaying initial-policy rollouts after current-policy training improves accuracy, whereas replaying fixed recent rollouts does not reproduce the gain. We propose R-OPD, a gradient-triggered curriculum that adaptively selects when to revisit initial-student trajectories. When changes in mean gradients fall within minibatch-level variation for two consecutive comparisons, training switches from the next iteration onward to initial-policy replay. Across eight mathematics
benchmarks and three training-data orders, R-OPD improves average accuracy over continued current-policy sampling by 2.25/4.44 percentage points at 16K/32K for a 0.6B student and 2.81/6.15 points for a 1.7B student. With a 30B-A3B teacher, it improves 8B accuracy by 4.05 points at 32K. At 32K, R-OPD exceeds a fixed schedule of 40 current-policy updates followed by 20 replay updates by 1.39/1.66/1.85 points for 0.6B/1.7B/8B. At the same generation cap, R-OPD also produces longer responses, suggesting that well-timed revisits help students use more of their
reasoning capacity.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Lingxiang Hu, Tianle Xia, Yiding Sun, Ming Xu, Linfang Shang, Lan Xu, Ning Zheng, Wei Xu, Jie Jiang
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
AIBuildAI-2.5: Efficient Autonomous AI Model Development Through LLM-Guided Tree Search
Peijia Qin, Ruiyi Zhang, Qi Cao et al. (+3 more)
Autonomous
agents that automatically build artificial intelligence (AI) models could broaden access to AI across science and engineering. A popular line of such
agents frames model building as a code search problem and solves it by tree search, in which each node is a candidate program and the tree grows by generating a child program from a parent, and these
agents now approach the capability of experienced AI engineers on realistic
benchmarks. However, these
agents have three weaknesses in efficiency that have not been fully addressed. First, only a small number of candidates can be executed within a realistic budget, so search rules that rank nodes by executed rewards, such as Monte Carlo-style tree search, rely on few and noisy scores and select the next node to explore less effectively. Second, no resource-aware strategy is used to schedule training jobs, which can lower hardware utilization and training efficiency. Third, every
agent call is served by a single powerful model, which inflates inference cost. Here we introduce AIBuildAI-2.5, an agentic system that carries out the tree search with LLM
agents and addresses each of the three issues. AIBuildAI-2.5 proposes a novel LLM-guided tree search, in which a judge scores each candidate on its expected improvement, grounding, and feasibility, and a selector ranks the pool of candidates from these scores and the state of the search. In addition, AIBuildAI-2.5 comprises a scheduler that launches training jobs with the current hardware resource status taken into account and a router that assigns lower-cost LLMs to less demanding tasks while reserving the most capable LLM for the most challenging sub-tasks in the AI model building workflow. AIBuildAI-2.5 ranks first on MLE-Bench with a medal rate of 73.3%, and outperforms a strong baseline on six autonomous AI research tasks from AIRS-Bench.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Peijia Qin, Ruiyi Zhang, Qi Cao, Han Guo, Li Zhang, Pengtao Xie
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
Used, Mentioned, or Condemned? A Controlled Contrast-Set Diagnostic for the Use-Mention Distinction in Code-Mixed Hinglish Misogyny Detection
Ashanvi Yadav and Shubham Bhardwaj
Lexicon-driven misogyny detectors cannot, by construction, distinguish a slur used against a woman from the same slur mentioned in counter-
speech ("don't call her that") – yet exactly this distinction governs whether moderation protects or silences the people discussing abuse. We study this problem in code-mixed Hinglish and make three contributions. First, we diagnose two evaluation artifacts on a publicly available redacted corpus: category-encoding anonymization placeholders leak the label (a no-learning rule scores 1.000), and even after they are neutralized misogynistic and benign comments occupy lexically disjoint registers, so bag-of-words reaches macro-F1 approximately 1.00 under random cross-validation but collapses under template-disjoint evaluation. Second, we release Hinglish-MGY-Diag, a deterministic generator and a 416-item / 163-minimal-pair contrast-set diagnostic across five linguistically motivated categories in which slur presence and gendered register are decorrelated from the label by construction. Third, we introduce a strict pair-consistency metric that credits a model only when both members of a minimal pair are correctly labelled. Five from-scratch classical baselines evaluated under construction-disjoint five-fold cross-validation reveal that the strongest model reaches 0.93 accuracy on the cleanest use-mention subset but only 0.82 consistency – it still mislabels roughly one counter-
speech pair in five. A frontier LLM used as an author-model ceiling attains 1.000 on all metrics, doubling as independent label validation and confirming the
benchmark is a capability gradient rather than an
adversarial wall. We release all code, data, the generator, and an arms-length LLM harness for reproducing every number.
Read the full abstract ▾
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
Which Part of the Context Layer Does the Work? Separating Semantic Content from Retrieval Scaffolding in Text-to-SQL Agents
Qing Ye
Context layers, curated documentation that an analytics
agent fetches at query time, produce large accuracy gains on text-to-SQL
benchmarks. A with/without comparison cannot say which part of the layer does the work: the semantic content, the
retrieval scaffolding that delivers it, or the pre-computed views that usually accompany it. We report a four-arm ablation on DABStep on four models that separates the three. The instrument is a data contract: a YAML artifact that carries a domain's semantics and the rules an
agent's tools enforce. One arm empties every field of prose in the frozen contract while holding the tool surface,
retrieval instruction, table allow-list and operation rules byte-for-byte fixed. Compiling the contract's own SQL expressions into views gives the ceiling a pre-computed layer would reach: gold on all 176 tasks it covers. Content dominates. It raises hard-task accuracy from 13.9% to 55.1%, 22.6% to 56.6%, 22.9% to 68.4% and 37.0% to 77.4%, beating the same knowledge pasted into the
prompt on every model. Scaffolding without content is worth 0 to 5 points on two flash models and 14 to 15 on two frontier models. Against the compiled ceiling the contract arm's shortfall is a failure to derive, and it falls from 39 points to 5 with model capability. The contract beats the
prompt because the rule it needs is one lookup away rather than buried in a long
prompt: its SQL carries the fee semantics up to 98% of the time against the
prompt arm's 4%, and at the lowest cost per correct answer on three of four models. For practitioners: semantics first, scaffolding second, pre-computed macros only where an
agent demonstrably fails to derive. Ungoverned arms submitted 166 mutating statements; governed arms none. The gain is confined to the contract's domain. On one model the
benchmark's own withheld golds grade the contract arm at 51.9% against 18.8% for the
prompt baseline.
Read the full abstract ▾
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.LG
RS-Claw-Evolution: Environment-Feedback-Driven Evolution for Lightweight Remote Sensing Agents in Long-Horizon Tasks
Kai Ouyang, Dongyang Hou, Liangtian Liu et al. (+9 more)
Large
language model-driven remote sensing (RS)
agents offer a promising approach to automating geospatial analysis. However, lightweight RS
agents based on compact
language models struggle with multi-step interactive tasks due to loss of long-horizon states, inefficient environmental feedback utilization, and sparse optimization signals. We propose RS-Claw-
Evolution, an environment-feedback-driven framework that progressively improves lightweight
agents through three stages. Interaction
evolution uses executable code to control observations, maintain intermediate states, and reduce context redundancy. Experience
evolution combines failure-aware trajectory generation with error-turn masking to learn from informative failure-recovery experiences without imitating faulty actions. Decision
evolution uses reinforcement learning with multi-dimensional environment rewards and turn-level advantage protection to optimize tool-use behaviors and improve credit assignment in long sequences. On Earth-Bench, the optimized Qwen3-4B-based
agent achieves 65.9% accuracy in Autonomous Planning mode, outperforming the untrained Qwen3-32B baseline (43.8%) and DeepSeek-V3.1 (60.8%), while approaching GPT-5 (71.6%). These results demonstrate that learning from environmental feedback can improve lightweight
agents and narrow their performance gap with larger models in long-horizon RS tasks.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Kai Ouyang, Dongyang Hou, Liangtian Liu, Zeyuan Wang, Ziyu Li, Chengfu Liu, Zichao Tang, Xuezhi Cui, Shengwu Ouyang, Wentao Yang, Hanwen Yu, Haifeng Li
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.LG
Strategy Accumulation and Guided Execution for Automated LLM Fine-Tuning
Haoran Zhao, Wei Du, Dingwen Yang et al. (+7 more)
Producing task-specific large
language models requires discovering effective training strategies through experimentation. Automated fine-tuning systems have made this experimentation feasible with far less manual effort. However, these systems are stateless: each search discards its discovered strategies,
dataset insights, and hyperparameter findings once it ends. Every new task must then repeat this costly search from a cold start. To address this, we propose Strategy Accumulation and Guided Execution (SAGE), a two-stage framework that makes automated fine-tuning search cumulative. In the first stage, a multi-
agent pipeline performs Monte Carlo Tree Search-based exploration. A parallel
Distillation Agent extracts task-specific exploration records and confidence-scored cross-task insights, which together constitute a structured experience repository. In the second stage, SAGE retrieves relevant experience from this repository and selects what applies to guide training on the new task. We evaluate SAGE on nine unseen tasks spanning both single- and cross-category settings. In single-round execution, SAGE's accumulated experience raises the average relative improvement over baseline from 3.2% to 15.6%, a 12.4-percentage-point gain over the same pipeline without it. These results show that persistent strategy experience provides effective guidance for automated fine-tuning on unseen tasks.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Haoran Zhao, Wei Du, Dingwen Yang, Jixuan Huang, Junlin Shang, Lingyong Fang, Ya Guo, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
DIPLOMAT: Dialogue-Span-Aware Direct Preference Optimization for Polite Persuasive Workplace Negotiation Dialogues
Bibhuti Jha, Rishikant Chigrupaatii, Priyanshu Priya et al. (+1 more)
Effective workplace negotiation requires balancing multiple objectives, including achieving task goals, preserving professional relationships, and resolving conflicts constructively. However, misunderstandings, misaligned preferences, and interpersonal friction often impede successful outcomes. Politeness mitigates these challenges by fostering trust, reducing tension, and preventing escalation, and persuasive communication helps overcome resistance, align preferences, and guide participants toward mutually beneficial agreements. Motivated by these insights, we present DIPLOMAT, a dialogue system for polite and persuasive workplace negotiation. To support its development, we introduce PROWESS, a
dataset of multi-turn workplace negotiation dialogues generated via a multi-
agent framework and enriched withnegotiation strategies, politeness levels, persuasive strategies. DIPLOMAT is trained using Dialogue-Span-Aware Direct Preference Optimization (DSA-DPO), a novel preference learning objective that identifies key dialogue spans for preference
alignment. This enables DIPLOMAT to generate contextually coherent responses that employ intended negotiation strategies, maintain politeness, and incorporate effective persuasion strategies throughout interactions. Automatic and human evaluation on PROWESS confirm that DIPLOMAT consistently outperforms baselines in generating coherent, polite, and persuasive negotiation responses.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Bibhuti Jha, Rishikant Chigrupaatii, Priyanshu Priya, Asif Ekbal
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CL
Deep Persona: A Psychologically Grounded Architecture and Evaluation Framework for Role-Playing Agents and Simulations
Rotem Dror, Zohar Elyoseph, Yuval Haber et al. (+3 more)
Existing approaches to persona simulation with Large
Language Models (LLMs) mostly rely on shallow character descriptions that fail to sustain coherent character behavior across extended interactions. We introduce Deep Persona, a psychologically grounded, three-layered architecture that organizes personas into hierarchical levels of observable expression, latent beliefs, and core motivational drives, for constructing highly convincing role-playing
agents. Governed by the principles of scripted determinism and bounded agency, the architecture restricts the model to a reactive engine guided by a structured internal script. We further propose a reference-free evaluation framework that
benchmarks dialogue naturalness against empirical human distributions using established psychological clinical instruments and
adversarial stress-tests. Empirical evaluation reveals that while LLMs achieve high pragmatic fluency, they exhibit systematic limitations in emotional expression and joint
attention. In addition, we present a case study of two Deep Personas and evaluate them using the proposed framework, demonstrating that structured personas can produce interactions that more closely align with human conversational behavior.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Rotem Dror, Zohar Elyoseph, Yuval Haber, Elad Refoua, Oshrat Ayalon, Adir Solomon
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.LG
Teacher Should Think Ahead: Adaptive Continuations for Reliable On-Policy Distillation
Jingang Zhou, Yuyi Zhou, Haiyang Guo et al. (+6 more)
On-policy
distillation (OPD) is a promising approach for transferring knowledge between
language models, where a student receives dense
token-level supervision along its own generated trajectories. However, teacher supervision can be unreliable when conditioned on incomplete or low-quality student prefixes. We identify Teacher Uncertainty Contraction (TUC), a systematic phenomenon whereby the teacher's predictive uncertainty decreases as it continues from a student-generated prefix. We theoretically characterize this trade-off through a variance-bias decomposition of teacher-branch gradients, showing that uncertainty contraction reduces variance while teacher-student path divergence increases bias, thereby favoring a finite continuation. Guided by this insight, we propose Adaptive-Continuations On-Policy
Distillation (AC-OPD), which augments informative states along student rollouts with teacher continuations and adaptively selects their effective supervision horizons. Experiments on mathematical
reasoning and code generation across model scales demonstrate that AC-OPD consistently improves over standard OPD. Controlled-continuations and matched-budget analyses further validate the adaptive-continuations design, highlighting adaptive teacher continuations as an effective principle for reliable on-policy
distillation.The code will be made publicly available upon publication.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Jingang Zhou, Yuyi Zhou, Haiyang Guo, Xukai Wang, Shuai Feng, Sirui Gao, Jian Xu, Qingpei Guo, Xu-Yao Zhang
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.LG
CAMFT: Conflict-Aware Mergeable Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models
Jingang Zhou, Haiyang Guo, Yuan Ma et al. (+2 more)
Model merging has emerged as a promising paradigm for integrating multiple task-specific capabilities into a single large
language model. However, existing methods predominantly focus on post-hoc processing of independently fine-tuned models, overlooking how the training phase itself impacts cross-task compatibility. Resolving parameter conflicts after fine-tuning is inherently sub-optimal. To address this, we propose CAMFT, a Conflict-Aware Mergeable Fine-Tuning method that makes task adaptation both efficient and mergeaware. CAMFT treats mergeability as a property shaped during fine-tuning, rather than only a problem to be solved after fine-tuning. By guiding each task to update sparse coordinates with lower cross-task conflict, CAMFT produces task updates that are efficient to train and more compatible for downstream model merging. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAMFT outperforms standard finetuning baselines in multi-task merging scenarios. Codes are available at https://github.com/gyanchow/CAMFT-LLM.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Jingang Zhou, Haiyang Guo, Yuan Ma, Han Zhu, Xu-Yao Zhang
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.LG
CALM: A Calibrated LLM Choice Network Framework for Activity-Based Traveler Simulation
Yezhou Cheng
We present CALM, a reproducible hybrid framework that integrates an optional large
language model (LLM) activity planner with calibrated
stochastic choice, shared network feedback,
memory and habit, typed feasibility checks, and deterministic offline replay. Unlike trip-mode classifiers or diary-only generators, CALM executes a closed traveler-day loop and evaluates each generative module against an empirical, reproducible baseline. On the 2024 New York City Citywide Mobility Survey (CMS), 110,691 seven-mode trips are split by respondent into 78,487 training and 32,204 holdout trips. Training-only alternative-specific constant calibration reduces mean holdout mode Jensen-Shannon divergence from 0.15599 to 0.00394 across ten seeds. A matched live-LLM ablation then quantifies trade-offs among aggregate fit, temporal fit, behavioral persistence, and feasibility, while frozen
prompt-response pairs support deterministic replay of downstream simulation. Controlled weather, delay, fare, and parking ladders further demonstrate consistent and interpretable responses under intervention. CALM contributes a reproducible protocol for integrating and evaluating generative planners in traveler simulation through person-disjoint calibration, matched module ablation, controlled stress testing, and end-to-end traceability.
Read the full abstract ▾
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.LG
Predictors and Orchestrators: Parsimonious Machine Learning within an Agentic AI Harness for Multi-Horizon Karst Aquifer Forecasting
Pramod Lekhak, Chetan Sharma, Hakan Başağaoğlu et al. (+2 more)
Forecasting karst aquifer dynamics is difficult because recharge responses are nonlinear, event-driven, and governed by strongly heterogeneous flow paths. This study develops and evaluates a deployment-aware framework for 1-12-week-ahead prediction of spring discharge and groundwater level using approximately 79 years of hydroclimatic observations from the Edwards Aquifer, Texas. Five model families were compared under a common temporal evaluation design: extreme gradient boosting, extremely randomized trees, long short-term
memory, convolutional neural networks, and
Transformers. Predictions were evaluated using coefficient of determination, Kling-Gupta efficiency, root-mean-square error, and agreement with operational drought thresholds. Extreme gradient boosting was consistently most reliable, with R2 at least 0.97, 0.96, and 0.94 across 1-4-, 5-8-, and 9-12-week horizons, respectively, and greater than 90% critical-stage agreement at the first three drought stages across all horizons. Deep models were competitive at short horizons but degraded progressively and exhibited isolated failures at longer lead times. We attribute this contrast to an
alignment between tree partitioning and low-dimensional, axis-aligned hydroclimatic predictors, together with the tendency of neural models to smooth irregular extremes. The validated models were embedded in a five-
agent operational architecture that automates data acquisition, model assignment, deterministic prediction, threshold monitoring, prospective verification, literature
retrieval, and reporting. The contribution is therefore a transferable framework joining parsimonious model selection, leakage-aware multi-horizon evaluation, decision-relevant threshold skill, and auditable agentic automation.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Pramod Lekhak, Chetan Sharma, Hakan Başağaoğlu, F. Paul Bertetti, Debaditya Chakraborty
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.MA
From Process Loss to Assembly Bonus: Human-Grounded Diagnosis of Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration
Ala N. Tak, Teruhisa Misu, Kumar Akash et al. (+3 more)
LLM
agents are increasingly used for collaborative problem solving and human-group simulation. This makes outcome-only evaluation insufficient: if LLM groups are used as models of human groups, we need to know whether they succeed or fail through human-like deliberative mechanisms. We compare human group chats with matched LLM deliberation traces on Wason-style deductive
reasoning, then test whether the same process signatures generalize to analogical, abductive, and analytical tasks. Humans and LLMs show the same assembly bonus asymmetry: discussion improves the average member more often than the best initial member. Initial-answer diversity accounts for the effect of model heterogeneity, increasing movement in both corrective and destructive directions. The main differences are process-level. Compared with humans, LLM groups follow majorities more often, surface less unique information, and converge earlier; correct minority signals succeed mainly when re-expressed early. Interventions motivated by human group-decision research yield modest improvements in collective outcomes, but do not remove the coordination bottleneck. Together, these results suggest that LLM groups can reproduce some outcome-level patterns of human deliberation while diverging in the mechanisms that generate assembly bonus and process loss, with implications for group simulation and human-AI collaboration.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Ala N. Tak, Teruhisa Misu, Kumar Akash, Zhaobo K. Zheng, Kevin H. Joo, Jonathan Gratch
Artificial Intelligence · Cross-listed from cs.CV
TryOnReward: Learning Foveated Consistency for Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of Virtual Try-On
Xueheng Li, Yong Liu, Xiaolong Fu et al. (+5 more)
Virtual Try-On (VTON) aims to dress a person with the reference garment, producing visually reasonable results aligned with human preferences. Turning this preference-oriented goal into an actionable objective relies on a scoring function aligned with human taste. However, classic fidelity metrics exhibit weak correlation with human judgments, and generic VLMs fail to provide the discriminative granularity demanded by try-on quality evaluation, which hinges on faithfully preserving garment and person details. This shortcoming is further exacerbated in the reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) optimization and leads to severe reward hacking. To this end, we present TryOnReward, a fine-grained reward model tailored for VTON. Built on a
vision-
language backbone, it adopts a foveation calibration objective that grounds each quality dimension in the relevant region to avoid global shortcut learning. Meanwhile, TryOnReward jointly optimizes pairwise preferences and per-dimension quality scores via margin-aware supervision, leveraging both relative and absolute quality signals. For model training and evaluation, we build TryOnReward-100K, a human-annotated per-dimension rating
dataset, alongside TryOn-Bench and TryOnRewardBench, two
benchmarks covering diverse real scenarios. Extensive experiments confirm that TryOnReward significantly outperforms generic judges in human preference
alignment, and when serving as the RFT reward function, it consistently yields human-preferred try-on results across multiple baselines.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Xueheng Li, Yong Liu, Xiaolong Fu, Wen Xue, Chengjun Xie, Yipeng Sun, Yan Li, Simiu Gu