Papers

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as interfaces for information retrieval, but they remain prone to hallucinations and faithfulness errors, in which the generated answers diverge from the retrieved evidence. While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and recent hybrid or semi-extractive approaches mitigate this issue, they do not guarantee that quoted or extracted spans are verbatim from the retrieved context. This limitation can have severe consequences in safety-critical domains, where answers must exactly match certified documentation. We introduce Constrained Hybrid Decoding (CHyD), a novel faithfulness-first paradigm for speculative RAG. While traditional speculative decoding is optimized for inference speed, CHyD repurposes this architecture to ensure faithful verbatim evidence extraction when the extraction mode is correctly triggered. Our approach enforces hard decoding constraints that restrict generation to continuous spans present in the retrieved documents. This design provides a robust but straightforward guarantee: any explicitly quoted span in the output appears verbatim in the provided context. We evaluate our method across state-of-the-art LLMs on diverse abstractive, extractive, and semi-extractive QA benchmarks, including technical datasets motivated by aircraft maintenance. Results show that existing hybrid methods frequently hallucinate quoted spans, with exact extraction accuracy dropping below 40% in technical domains. In contrast, our approach achieves near-perfect extraction faithfulness regardless of the model used. Although enforcing hard constraints introduces a trade-off with fluency-oriented metrics, our method improves exact answer correctness and remains competitive overall, highlighting its suitability for safety-critical information retrieval applications.

How often does a generative assistant persuade someone to buy, or persuade them not to buy? Conversation logs contain recommendations, but they do not necessarily record subsequent decisions. We audit 317 historical interactions from Aiso's proprietary research database of licensed, consent-based, de-identified conversations with commercially available AI assistants. Single-agent AI-assisted screening identifies 68 purchase-directed records; collapsing one shared-prefix copy yields 67 retained episodes, dated April 2023 to July 2025. Assistant responses provide candidate options, acquisition channels, or conditional preferences in 52 episodes (77.6%). One episode contains conditional redirection away from a named accommodation candidate. No episode is coded as advice to abandon or defer the purchase category. Only 18 episodes (26.9%) contain a subsequent user turn within the same purchase-related mission, compared with 23 (34.3%) that contain any later user turn. Using conversation depth alone therefore overstates this follow-up availability by 27.8%. Across 47 retained user follow-up messages, no explicit post-advice purchase commitment, completed-purchase report, or purchase-category abandonment statement is observed. These zeros describe recorded statements, not conversion or persuasion rates. The paper supplies operational definitions, text-free annotations, and reproducible descriptive results. Its central finding is a measurement limitation: recommendation content is observable much more often than a buyer's subsequent decision. The selected historical sample, unvalidated AI annotations, and missing transaction outcomes do not support a population-level or causal estimate of persuasion.

Low-bit quantization can achieve high recall on some vector representations and fail sharply on others, while average distortion and global rank correlation do not explain the difference. We study quantized vector search at the level of the comparisons consumed by ranking and graph-pruning algorithms. Our first result is a distribution-free decomposition: the probability that a comparison flips is bounded by the probability mass of exact margins near zero plus the tail probability of the calibrated residual. We then account for dependence between residuals that share a query or graph node, and derive covariance-aware second-moment identities and tail bounds under a joint MGF proxy. For a frozen candidate permutation, we prove a deterministic coupling theorem for Vamana neighbour selection: the approximate replay returns the exact neighbour list exactly when all candidate-level pruning actions agree on the frozen exact states. We connect these results to representation geometry through an exact Gaussian oracle, establish a strict correlation gain from a deterministic magnitude bit in an aligned bilinear model, and give a rare-contamination construction showing why marginal Gaussian diagnostics do not imply the required residual tails. When analytical assumptions are unavailable, a held-out block certificate bounds the selective failure risk of a frozen quantized rule. Across learned, classical, and synthetic embeddings, standardized exact margins predict held-out ranking and pruning flip rates substantially better than global rank correlation. The framework applies to coordinate binary codes, RaBitQ, Lucene BBQ, and product quantizers through a common decision interface.

Large language models are increasingly used as relevance judges, yet their labels can shift with prompt surface form. We study one such feature – tone – on 3,498 TREC DL19/DL20 query-passage pairs, across eight judge models, five classifier-calibrated politeness levels, and three paraphrases per level. Effects are strongly model-dependent: one judge shows a structured U-shaped response, whereas most show only small changes. Where tone changes agreement, the results are more consistent with a shift in the judge's severity operating point – its overall scoring leniency – than with improved judgment. Agreement rises or falls as this shift moves the judge toward or away from human annotators' strictness. A query-disjoint cross-fit retains the expected association (Spearman $\rho = -0.683$; exact model-block permutation $p = 0.019$). Tone affects calibration-based agreement more than ranking outcomes: across 32 model-tone contrasts, the largest absolute mean change in NDCG@10 is 0.011, although Kendall's $\tau$ as low as 0.743 shows that reordering is reduced, not absent. The account reconciles prior contradictory findings and identifies prompt tone as a potential validity threat when absolute relevance labels matter.

Neural networks can leverage feature superposition to encode more concepts than dimensions, but cross-feature interference constrains the linear accessibility of simultaneously active features. By framing linear accessibility as a compressed sensing problem, we derive high-probability bounds for fixed supports under subgaussian noise, proving the sufficient dimension scales linearly ($d=O_{\varepsilon}(k \log m)$) rather than prior worst-case quadratic limits. We characterize the asymmetry between active and inactive interference and the trade-off between interference and observation-noise budgets. We then validate these bounds across system parameters through Gaussian-tail approximations. We also introduce IHT-SAE, which uses learned iterative refinement to improve feature recovery beyond the limits of linear availability. These results quantify the geometric constraints of the linear representation hypothesis, providing a framework for evaluating sparse autoencoders, compositional generalization, and neural interpretability.

Livestock population data disaggregated by age, sex, and production are important inputs to calculations and models that inform our understanding of global health, yet these data are fragmented across disparate sources. Bridging data siloes to improve the findability of data requires interoperability. Conventional approaches to improving the findability and interoperability of data include indexing standardized metadata. However, creating metadata is time and resource-intensive and is often difficult in domains such as livestock, which lack standards that address the needs of broad user groups. When metadata exist, they typically need to be standardized against a pre-existing vocabulary, ontology, or thesaurus, requiring a technique known as `crosswalking'. To overcome issues in the absence of metadata, the lack of standards, and the resource-intensive solutions that currently exist, this study uses a bottom-up approach. By leveraging real-world reporting categories in datasets, the composition and semantics of terms already present in the data were extracted and analyzed. Using cattle data as a pilot, we find the age, sex, and production modifiers present across cattle terms from five datasets from four data sources capture granularity not present in AGROVOC, the largest agricultural vocabulary in the world. We discuss how the composition and semantics of these terms can be used to improve the interoperability and findability of data without first requiring metadata to be generated or standards to be created. Rather than forcing datasets to conform to an existing vocabulary, this approach uses the semantics embedded in terms already present in datasets, allowing systems to make data more discoverable and interoperable while maintaining culturally and dataset-specific terminology.

Automatic fact-checking systems assess the veracity of claims given evidence from relevant documents. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in fact-checking due to their general reasoning capabilities. However, it remains unclear whether they faithfully make use of the evidence provided to reach veracity judgments or rely on parametric knowledge. To investigate this, we introduce Fact-Ablated Evaluation (FAE), a new evaluation framework that iteratively ablates the cited evidence to assess whether LLMs revise their predictions accordingly. Our empirical results show that current off-the-shelf LLMs as fact-checking systems rely more on their parametric knowledge than on the evidence provided. To bridge this gap between prediction accuracy and evidence grounding, we propose REAL (Rigorous Evidence Ablation Learning), a training framework that promotes evidence-dependent verification through counterfactual evidence supervision for the LLM-as-verifier models. Experiments on four fact-checking datasets across different domains demonstrate that models trained with REAL obtain superior evidence-dependent capabilities compared to standard fine-tuned models. Our findings highlight that strong fact-checking performance can still coexist with weak evidence dependency, while REAL encourages veracity predictions to remain more closely tied to the availability of supporting evidence.

Dataset selection shapes the empirical conditions under which recommender-system algorithms are evaluated, yet existing tools provide limited support for constructing complete dataset sets that jointly satisfy experimental constraints and set-level selection objectives. To address this problem, I developed FINALLY, a web-based dataset recommender for constructing configurable dataset sets for offline recommender-systems evaluations. FINALLY combines required datasets, candidate-pool restrictions, metadata filters, configurable target-set sizes, Random selection, and diverse and non-diverse strategies based on adapted Effective Covariance and Convex Hull objectives. I evaluated FINALLY through 420 recommendation runs across ten systematically varied configurations. All evaluated dataset sets satisfied the applicable target-size, duplicate-avoidance, snapshot-membership, required-dataset, and metadata-filter requirements. All 40 deterministic strategy–configuration combinations were reproducible. Both the Effective-Covariance-based and Convex-Hull-based strategies produced the expected diverse-versus-non-diverse score ordering in all ten configurations. Under their corresponding objectives, the diverse strategies produced scores above all 30 configuration-specific Random results, whereas the non-diverse strategies produced scores below all 30 Random results. These results establish technical consistency for the evaluated FINALLY workflow and show that the implemented strategies follow their intended optimization directions within the investigated configuration space. They do not establish the scientific suitability, global optimality, or practical superiority of the generated selections.

Evaluating first-stage retrievers in large-scale production RAG requires a benchmark that pairs a large-scale corpus with a large set of agent-reformulated search queries based on real user queries and their conversation threads, and that labels many relevant documents per query. No existing public benchmark evaluates this setting: large-scale collections typically provide only a small number of evaluation queries, whereas benchmarks with many queries generally contain only millions of documents. Moreover, most benchmarks assess human-written queries, while the first-stage retrievers in agentic RAG pipelines serve machine-written reformulations whose distribution differs from human search behavior. To overcome these evaluation gaps, we introduce Q2D-Web (Query2Doc-Web), a large-scale agentic retrieval benchmark consisting of a 190M-document web corpus and 70k agentic search queries in ten languages, reformulated from real-world user queries in production systems. Q2D-Web provides three sets of fixed relevance judgments: agent citations, production rankings, and a combined set that unions both signals and adds LLM-based judgments of unlabeled pooled documents to reduce false negatives. We benchmark 13 retrievers including lexical, dense, and late-interaction models and find that their relative ordering is largely insensitive to the choice of judgment set, while diverging substantially across topical domains, query languages, and query types. To enable fast evaluation, we also study subcorpus sampling as an approximation to full-corpus evaluations. Retaining a third of the corpus, selected by reciprocal rank fusion over pooled retriever runs, preserves the full-corpus model ranking under the combined judgments while raising absolute Recall@1000 only by 4 to 7 points. The public leaderboard is accessible under: https://huggingface.co/spaces/perplexity-ai/q2d-web-leaderboard

The differentiable search index (DSI) framework (Tay et al., 2022) has become the de facto baseline for generative retrieval. However, DSI is hard to reproduce: no public implementation covers all three original document identifier types (atomic, naive, semantic), reported results vary widely, and the ubiquitous NQ320K dataset is built from Natural Questions through diverse and underspecified preprocessing. We introduce ReDSI, the first open-source DSI implementation supporting all three identifier types, together with a parameterizable and well-documented NQ320K construction pipeline. Experimentally, we achieve results that are competitive with or stronger than previous DSI baselines. Moreover, we conduct extensive experiments under model downscaling, covering retrieval effectiveness, parameter efficiency, training methods and decoding strategies, opening novel directions for future research.

Generative Retrieval (GR) models map queries directly to document identifiers, replacing conventional retrieval over external sparse or dense indexes with autoregressive identifier generation. However, most generative retrieval frameworks rely on a single-identifier assumption, mapping each document to a single target sequence. This forces the model to represent all document content with one sequence. Since documents are often multi-faceted, this can lead to lossy representations and reduced robustness to query variation, where multiple query intents must compete for a single generative access path. In this work, we introduce Passage-Driven Multi-ID Retrieval (PDMR), a generative retrieval framework that represents documents through multiple passage-level identifiers. PDMR segments each document and assigns one identifier to each selected passage, which provides multiple semantic entry points for retrieving the same document. This multi-entry representation allows the model to align queries with specific semantic facets, thereby reducing the dependence on a single document-level target. To address the supervision ambiguity of this one-to-many mapping, we formulate training as a multi-target learning problem and explore an objective function designed to distribute probability mass across multiple valid passage-level identifiers. We evaluate PDMR on NQ320K and MS MARCO Document. On NQ320K, PDMR improves over strong generative and non-generative baselines on Recall@1 and MRR@100. On MS MARCO Document, PDMR achieves the best Recall@1 and MRR@10 among the reported methods, while remaining competitive on Recall@10. Controlled ablations further show that passage-level supervision, identifier design, training-query augmentation, and multi-target learning contribute complementary gains.

This study examines whether individual text corpora (ICs) from search histories can be used to simulate individual knowledge. We collected ICs from 316 adults, who answered 36 multiple-choice knowledge items, and compared several large language models (LLMs) on this task, of which only Qwen3-1.7B proved viable. After task-specific fine-tuning via Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), Qwen3-1.7B outperformed both participants and a representative German norm sample on publicly available items. On non-public questions, however, the LLM performed worse than our participants, suggesting possible training data contamination for the public questions. When integrating ICs into retrieval-augmented generation to predict individual responses, LLM-participant Match accuracies significantly exceeded chance, which demonstrates a detectable individual knowledge signal. The probabilities assigned to the participants' answers were, however, low and far below the probability of correct answers, indicating poor calibration toward individual response patterns. Knowledge-gap prediction was sub-optimal, though it improved for corpora exceeding five million tokens. We discuss our entropy based evaluation benchmarks as calibration indices for individualized knowledge simulation.

Modeling long-term user behavior is central to sequential recommendation and billion-scale industrial recommender systems, yet production ranking models operate under strict latency, memory, communication, and training-throughput constraints. At the 100K scale, the challenge extends beyond attention complexity: raw sequence features must be stored, transferred, and repeatedly processed during training and online serving. Existing approaches based on history truncation, multi-stage behavior retrieval, compressed lifelong histories, or train-short/infer-long extrapolation either weaken end-to-end optimization or retain substantial length-dependent cost. We present SequenceO1, an end-to-end framework for ultra-long user behavior sequence modeling, deployed at full traffic on Douyin with histories of up to 100K interactions. SequenceO1 follows a compress-then-reason design. Its Sketch Attention (SA) uses learnable prototypes and prototype-wise normalization to compress the raw history into a fixed-size, target-agnostic user representation. Target-conditioned Stacked Target-to-History Cross Attention (STCA) then models complementary time scales: a recent 10K suffix for short-term interests and the compact sketch for long-term preferences. To make training and inference practical, SequenceO1 combines low-rank user representation caching, multi-request user-level batching, pipeline lift, and a fused FlashSA kernel to amortize feature storage, communication, and computation across targets, training instances, and consecutive requests. Production experiments show consistent offline and online gains, while the compact cached sketch retains most of the benefit of directly scaling end-to-end sequence ranking to 100K. These results provide a practical model-system approach to efficient attention, sequence compression, and scalable long-sequence and long-context recommendation systems.

In open-world scenarios with massive and evolving tool repositories, tool-augmented large language models rely on a retriever to surface relevant tools for a given query. Because such repositories often contain many tools that implement the same functionality, a single query can often be resolved by several distinct but functionally equivalent tool combinations, making the natural query-to-tool mapping inherently one-to-many. However, existing tool retrieval benchmarks annotate each query with a single relevant tool combination, collapsing this one-to-many mapping into a rigid one-to-one annotation and causing valid retrieved tools to be misjudged as failures. To address this, we propose ToolEX (Tool Equivalent eXpansion), a framework that automatically discovers and annotates the tool combinations functionally equivalent to the labeled ones. Applied to the 7,360-query Tool-DE benchmark, ToolEX finds that 67.9% of sub-queries admit equivalent alternatives, expanding the singular ground truth to an average of 5.3 valid combinations per query. Using the expanded benchmark ToolEQ, we re-evaluate eight base retrievers and two fine-tuned variants; metrics on ToolEQ rise substantially over Tool-DE, showing that one-to-one annotation systematically underestimates retrievers and that 30–47% of the reported fine-tuning gain is an evaluation artifact rather than genuine improvement. Applying the same pipeline to skill retrieval on SkillRet further confirms that the one-to-one problem extends beyond tool retrieval.

The success of generative retrieval has largely been attributed to the use of Semantic IDs, which improve over arbitrary item-level identifiers such as hashes by capturing the semantics of items. The main challenges faced when constructing Semantic IDs, however, is in mapping each identifier to a unique product and capturing information valuable to downstream tasks. Past works have appended additional codewords to de-duplicate item identifiers and utilized residual quantization to create hierarchical clusters. In this work, we present an algorithm for generating Semantic IDs that ensure the identifiers are both unique and preserve the structure of the original embedding. Key to our work is the use of bottom-up clustering to preserve local structure in the embedding space, improving the clustering quality of the resulting Semantic IDs and their utility for downstream generative retrieval.

Hallucination detection is crucial for large language models (LLMs), as hallucinated content creates significant barriers in applications requiring factual accuracy. Current detection methods mainly depend on internal signals like uncertainty and self-consistency checks, using the model's pre-trained knowledge to identify unreliable outputs. However, pre-trained knowledge may become outdated and has coverage limitations, especially for specialized or recent information. To address these limitations, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising solution by retrieving relevant evidence at inference time, grounding outputs beyond the model's parametric knowledge. In this paper, we target a critical and practical learning problem RAG-based hallucination detection (RHD), where RAG is employed to enhance hallucination detection by addressing information updating challenges. To address RHD, we propose a novel method Evidence-Aligned Entity Verification (EAEV), which detects entity-level hallucinations by leveraging RAG to align generated entities with retrieved evidence contexts. Specifically, EAEV evaluates entity-evidence alignment through three complementary dimensions and introduces counterfactual stability analysis to ensure robust alignments under evidence perturbations. Experiments across multiple RAG benchmarks demonstrate that EAEV achieves consistent improvements over existing methods with strong generalization capabilities.

Vision-language models (VLMs) augmented with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) benefit from access to external evidence. However, standard retrievers and rerankers optimize for semantic similarity rather than answer utility, creating a preference gap: documents that appear relevant may not help the generator produce a correct answer. Motivated by this, we propose a two-stage generator-in-the-loop alignment framework that closes this gap without human document-level relevance annotations. Our framework consists of two stages: in Stage 1, a VLM generates a hypothetical text passage from the image-query pair, which is used as the retrieval query for dense text search, bridging the image-to-text modality gap. In Stage 2, a cross-encoder reranker adapted with low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is fine-tuned using answer-supervised preference pairs mined from the frozen VLM: given the dataset answer label, a candidate document is labeled positive if the VLM produces the correct answer when given that document as context, and negative otherwise. This generator-guided signal is compatible with multiple alignment loss functions, including contrastive (triplet) loss, pairwise direct preference optimization (DPO), and supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and supports periodic re-mining to refresh preference pairs as the reranker improves. Experiments on VQA-X and A-OKVQA with Qwen3.5-2B and Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct show that our proposed framework consistently outperforms rank-order, random, and REPLUG-style likelihood baselines under various alignment losses and pool size settings, suggesting that answer-level generator feedback is an effective supervision signal for preference alignment.

Legal case retrieval (LCR) is an essential tool for not only assisting legal practitioners to efficiently retrieve precedents but also enabling ordinary individuals to find valuable legal case information without relying on expensive professional legal services. Our previous work CaseLink demonstrated the effectiveness of using case to case graph structures to improve retrieval accuracy. However, its high computational cost during inference on large-scale legal databases limits its practical use in real-world settings. The main inefficiency comes from constructing test time graphs and computing pairwise term frequency similarities of cases. This process has O(n^2) complexity for n legal cases, making the runtime prohibitive as the number of candidates grows. For example, the retrieval time for one query on a database (COLIEE2022) with 1,563 candidate cases is more than 500 milliseconds, while the runtime would increase drastically to more than 3,500 seconds for a database (LeCaRDv2) with 55,192 candidate cases. To further enhance the retrieval performance while achieving a significant speed-up, in this extension paper, Cassette framework is proposed with a distillation strategy involving ranking objective and eigen-matching objective for an effective transfer of knowledge from a powerful and well-trained heavy teacher retriever to a lightweight and efficient hybrid student dual encoder. Specifically, the student query encoder is implemented as a multilayer perceptron model designed for fast online processing, whereas the student candidate encoder adopts a GNN architecture, suitable for an offline manner within the case database. Extensive experiments are conducted on three benchmark datasets, and the results verify the effectiveness of the ranking distillation while achieving high efficiency. The code has been released on https://github.com/yanran-tang/Cassette/.

We describe the Snugi-AI-v2 submission to eRisk 2026 Task 2, the second edition of contextualized early depression detection from Reddit discussions. Our central contribution is a learned MLP stopping policy trained to directly optimize ERDE50, replacing the fixed and tiered threshold strategies used in all prior eRisk Task 2 submissions. Combined with a sustained confidence gate that commits only after N=3 consecutive rounds of high policy confidence, the system reduces false positives caused by transient emotional posts without sacrificing recall. The pipeline encodes each discussion thread with a frozen MentalRoBERTa model, maps the accumulated representation to a depression probability via an MLP classifier, and delegates the timing decision to the learned policy. Our best run achieves F1 = 0.73 (Run 1) and F_latency = 0.70 (Runs 0 and 3), with a median alert round of 8 out of 500, completing the full evaluation in 1 hour 26 minutes, the fastest among all complete-submission teams. We report a systematic ablation across five runs spanning two encoder variants, four stopping strategies, and three gate values, along with negative results from GRPO policy training, BDI-II post filtering, MentalLongformer encoding, and DeBERTa ensembling. Code: https://github.com/chiuyuwen91/erisk-2026

The Indonesian Digital Library of Culture (Perpustakaan Digital Budaya Indonesia, PDBI; budaya-indonesia.org) is a participatory platform that has collected tens of thousands of entries on Nusantara cultural heritage through public contribution since 2007. Manual contribution faces three structural barriers: coverage (knowledge is scattered across languages and sites), integrity (open sources mix authentic documentation with noise), and completeness (subjects are recorded but their data remain shallow). This paper presents a methodological framework for autonomous, AI-based harvesting of cultural knowledge from the open web, designed to expand corpus coverage while intensifying per-entry data depth. The methodology is organised as a five-stage economic funnel: focused crawling, multilingual extraction and canonicalisation, vector encoding with blocking, agentic decision-making, and idempotent publication, under the principle of deterministic orchestration, agentic decisions. Each stage is formalised: funnel economics and optimal filter ordering; crawl-frontier dynamics as a subcritical branching process that explains the necessity of recurrent re-seeding; fact-level novelty via a containment measure; Bayesian multi-source evidence fusion with elevated publication thresholds for sacred categories; exactly-once effects via idempotent upserts and the transactional outbox; sliding-window inference budgeting with a reservation protocol; statistical quality auditing; and seed selection as submodular coverage maximisation. The framework retains four high-value human roles: curator of direction, escalation approver, quality auditor, and guardian of meaning, while machine autonomy is raised in stages. Ethical, legal, and cultural-sensitivity implications are discussed, including the architectural guarantee that the machine never overwrites human contributions.

Citation-based measures of scientific influence typically treat citations as uniform signals, ignoring the different roles that cited works play in a paper's contribution. We introduce contribution-based credit scoring for research articles: a structured citation analysis that decomposes a paper's credit between its own original contribution and the prior work it builds on. Motivated by a cooperative-game view of scientific credit, we propose the contribution tree, a hierarchical framework that conserves importance across the document structure and separates original from citation-derived contribution. To make this framework scalable, we use LLMs as noisy comparative estimators of local importance. We further extend the model to article collections by propagating contributions through weighted citation graphs, yielding corpus-level contributions and normalized influence scores. Our experiments suggest that our framework captures contribution signals beyond surface-level heuristics. Our code is available at https://github.com/sanaebrahimi/Importance_Scoring/

A wrong number is worse than no answer. Across factuality-critical domains – audience metrics, scheduling and rights in media; dosages and lab values in healthcare; figures and citations in finance and legal – a confident but fabricated value is more damaging than an honest admission of uncertainty. Yet this is the dominant failure mode we observe on small local language models: even when correct evidence is present in context, models fabricate plausible numbers and timestamps. Recent work characterizes a real limit of this regime: below 7B parameters, the bottleneck of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is not retrieval quality but context utilization. We present Noesis, the deterministic-first query plane of the Noesis architecture, which makes every deterministic judgment before generation. Its mechanisms follow from the ingestion architecture (subject of a separate patent application): (a) a producer-side fact layer rendering precomputed metric facts verbatim without ranking; (b) positional addressing with deterministic cross-source alignment, resolved ahead of query time at zero LLM cost; (c) provenance scoping as an attribution constraint with multi-tier named-reference routing; and (d) two-tier context with model-triggered verbatim hydration. Across four ablations, a 2B model reaches parity with a 35B model on factual integrity (exact values in all runs; zero confabulated numbers on absent-entity traps); structured retrieval beats flat RAG by +11.4 points at 2B; skeleton-only context preserves quantitative answers at 20-30% smaller prompts; and hydration recovers verbatim narrative in ~8s versus ~29s. Two properties matter for regulated domains: each query resolves in a single generation call, and every reported value is traceable to its exact source and position by construction.

Democratizing access to the knowledge held in large corpora of tables such as data lakes is emerging as a central research challenge. Research in this space is advancing and broadening in scope, increasingly supplying the components to satisfy a person's insight need end-to-end. Yet these efforts remain fragmented across communities that frame the problem under their own conventions, such as table question answering, text-to-SQL, and data analysis agents, with works six times as likely to cite within the same task label as across labels. To bring these communities onto common ground, we establish a holistic framework for this pursuit, which we refer to as Open Tabular Insight Extraction (OpenTI). We formalize OpenTI from first principles around the analytical knowledge a person needs, the procedure for deriving it from a corpus of tables, and how well a result serves the person who sought it. In doing so we consolidate frameworks and terminology across information retrieval, natural language processing, machine learning, databases, and human-computer interaction, and apply this grounding in a systematic review and analysis of systems and benchmarks that work towards OpenTI. We find that current systems do not cover the end-to-end scope of OpenTI, mainly focusing on the analysis itself, and that benchmarks are largely unfit for evaluations in an open setting as inputs presuppose knowledge of tables, and validation mechanisms do not match the setup. Finally, we distill a research agenda towards OpenTI systems, evaluation, and interaction paradigms that surface the insights users need. An interactive companion to our paper is available at https://open-tabular-insight-extraction.github.io.

The same underlying computational problem is solved across unrelated fields under different names: recursive Bayesian state estimation appears as a "Kalman filter" in control, "Bayesian forecasting" in pharmacokinetics, and "data assimilation" in geoscience. Topical and citation-based scientific embeddings cannot see this shared problem. We distill each paper once into a domain- and method-name-stripped faceted computational fingerprint, a free-text mechanism skeleton plus controlled computational facets. We define a tunable, facet-selectable similarity over it. The goal is solution import: surface cross-field pairs solving the same problem, so a bespoke implementation can be swapped for another field's standard, specialized solver. On a benchmark of 18 method families across 109 papers, the skeleton lifts cross-domain retrieval average precision over the abstract from 0.222 to 0.513, and the whole fingerprint reaches 0.557. Strikingly, four trained scientific embedders all fall below plain abstract+TF-IDF: they encode topical and citation similarity, the wrong signal for this task. The gain is the representation: the abstract-to-skeleton swap lifts every embedder, and the pipeline is one cached LLM call per paper plus a cheap embedder. An interventional re-skin / math-edit test shows the fingerprint tracks the computation, not the field. On a 501-paper wild corpus, known twins dominate the top of the ranking (23 of the top 30); with planted pairs excluded from the results, three blind LLM judges rate 3 of the top 5 and 8 of the top 30 pairs genuine import candidates, and 0 of 30 random ones. The human verification is the four executed imports: in one, an open standard solver reproduces a bespoke clinical dosing engine's output. We release the benchmark, the code, and the distillation prompt.

Late-interaction models such as ColBERT achieve strong effectiveness by representing each document with many token-level vectors, but this expressivity leads to large indexing cost, storage footprints and expensive MaxSim scoring. We show that late-interaction representations exhibit an intrinsic low-rank structure: document token embeddings concentrate in a low-dimensional subspace that preserves most of the retrieval signal. Leveraging this observation, we introduce EigenLI, a spectral approximation framework that compresses late-interaction representations via document-specific low-dimensional subspaces. Unlike clustering or pooling methods, EigenLI identifies the dominant eigendirections of each document and uses them to construct reduced interaction representations. Empirically, $k$-EigenLI with $k \le 32$ outperforms k-means and Ward clustering based pooling methods on ColBERTv2 and AnswerAI-ColBERT-small; GTE-ModernColBERT exhibits a different tradeoff at $k=32$, where clustering methods perform better. The same spectral construction also yields EigenLI-SV, an ANN-compatible single-vector representation derived from the second-order summary of the reduced structure. Across multiple datasets and all three text models, EigenLI-SV consistently outperforms comparable single-vector surrogates such as MUVERA.

Large language models (LLMs) are no longer deployed only for single-turn conversation but increasingly act as agents that plan, call tools, retrieve evidence, maintain memory, and interact over long horizons, often together with other agents through multi-turn conversations. Therefore, knowing when to trust the agentic system is a prerequisite for safe deployment. However, existing work on quantifying uncertainty for LLMs was built almost entirely for single-turn question answering. This paper argues that errors and uncertainty arise from multi-turn conversations, environments, and tools rather than from a single-turn question answering setting. It comes late, however, and is compounded in a single score that is too coarse to represent the unreliability. We organize the literature with a three-axis taxonomy, (1) what the uncertainty is, (2) how it is estimated, and (3) where uncertainty arises during an agent pipeline. We investigate step-level and trajectory-level calibration and show with a simple counterexample that the first does not imply the second. Experiments on real agent traces across four models and up to a 50-step budget show that the proposed metric and reporting protocol (Trajectory-Checkpoint Expected Calibration Error, TC-ECE) can be computed and that step errors are coupled along a trajectory. We find that confidence estimates from the agent's own responses do not consistently outperform a simple baseline. The experiments also show that averaging all trajectories together can hide overconfidence at later stages, which becomes visible when results are analyzed across different horizons. In simpler terms, this paper identifies where the uncertainty comes from in the agentic system pipeline, how to teach agents to know when they are wrong, and why one confidence number is not enough.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) depends on dense retrieval: each document is stored as a learned vector, and a query is answered by finding its nearest neighbors in that vector space. Keeping one full-precision vector per document is the dominant index cost at corpus scale, so retrieval systems replace each vector with a short code of a few bytes—a step called quantization. Standard quantizers such as product quantization (PQ) pick the code that reconstructs the original vector most closely. A single code is even more useful if it serves several byte budgets at once: when its short prefixes are each directly searchable, a deployment can set its efficiency–quality operating point without re-encoding the corpus. But training all prefixes under one objective makes the early bits a compromise across budgets—short codes improve while the full-width code degrades. Quantization to low-bit representation, such as binary codes, further sharpens the conflict. We introduce Matryoshka Hash Representations (MHR), a two-stage procedure that separates full-width training from prefix organization. MHR first learns a longer binary code, then freezes the model and trains additional zero-initialized residual code adaptors for directly searchable prefixes. Documents are stored at one bit per coordinate, while queries keep continuous logits like PQ to attain sufficient expressivity. We implement the search process with FAISS FastScan. Trained on MS MARCO and zero-shot transferred to seven BEIR datasets, MHR reaches .5561 NDCG@10 and .6535 Recall@100 at 32 bytes, surpassing the best baseline of the same budget. The advantage is more pronounced in lower budgets. The same code also strengthens two common pipelines: shortlisting candidates for full-precision reranking, and pruning a low-storage graph index such as LEANN.

Industrial ranking models for recommendation have scaled feature interaction and sequence modeling separately; recent architectures such as HyFormer and MixFormer unify both in a stackable backbone. Real-world recommender systems, however, nearly always require multi-task learning, yet existing unified architectures confine multi-task modeling to shallow post-backbone towers, leaving the backbone without task-aware information flow. We propose MORE (Multi-task cO-evolving Ranking modEl), which embeds multi-task information flow inside the backbone, enabling task-specific signals to co-evolve with sequence and feature representations at every layer rather than in a post-hoc fusion. It introduces Anchor Tokens that persist across backbone layers: Shared Anchors encode cross-task commonalities, while Private Anchors capture task-specific priors. In each block, Anchor Tokens (1) read task-conditioned signals from behavior sequences, (2) mix with non-sequential features under a task-boundary mask, and (3) refine per-task representations through independent branches; as blocks stack, each task obtains a differentiated representation refined through all backbone layers. Experiments on large-scale industrial datasets show that MORE consistently outperforms baselines across all tasks under comparable parameter and FLOPs budgets, and scales well with model size. Online A/B tests on Momo, a leading Chinese social discovery platform with tens of millions of monthly active users, yield 3% improvement in usage duration, 3.6% in interaction rate, and 2% in deep-chat rate. MORE is deployed in production with request-level shared computation reducing scoring latency by about 30%.

Late-interaction visual document retrievers preserve fine-grained page evidence by storing many token embeddings per page, but the resulting storage and query-time interaction costs make large-scale deployment expensive. Pooling document tokens before indexing offers a natural remedy, yet static pooling must decide which visual evidence to preserve before the query is known. We study an alternative: a heavily compressed hot-path index generates candidates, after which query-aware token budgeting operates on the original token sets of the shortlisted pages. We formulate this stage-two selection as a budgeted MaxSim coverage problem, show that a clipped version is monotone submodular, and compare coverage-only, cluster-guided, token-wise, and marginal-gain policies. On ten ViDoRe tasks with ColModernVBERT, direct static pooling reduces macro normalized discounted cumulative gain at rank five from 0.6309 without compression to 0.4738 at a thirty-two-fold pool factor. Under the same candidate-generation regime and a pool-factor-eight-equivalent reranking budget, token top-k recovers 93.93 percent of the full-token score, while greedy marginal-gain selection recovers 98.39 percent. Held-out and leave-one-dataset-out evaluations yield positive greedy improvements over token top-k on every dataset. The latency analysis reveals two useful operating points: token top-k for interactive retrieval and the naive greedy implementation as a quality upper envelope. Together, these results show that late-interaction visual retrieval benefits from query-aware allocation rather than query-agnostic pooling alone.

E-commerce platforms increasingly display clickable query suggestions alongside items in the user feed, enabling users to refine or expand their intent without manually reformulating queries. Existing approaches either mine suggestions from historical logs – limited to past behavior and blind to long-tail, personalized intents – or rely on off-the-shelf LLMs whose lack of platform-specific knowledge yields fluent but generic queries disconnected from real click behavior. We propose EAGER (Enrich-and-AliGn gEnerative Query Recommendation), a two-stage framework for generating query suggestions from clicked items. In the enrichment stage, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) follows a four-stage curriculum that scales information richness (from item-only to user-conditioned) and reasoning depth (from direct to chain-of-thought). Each stage incorporates rationale augmentation, diversity regularization, and self-distillation. In the alignment stage, we post-train via GRPO with a hybrid reward of multiple rule-based business signals and a preference-aware click reward. Extensive offline experiments and online A/B test demonstrate the effectiveness of EAGER, which has been deployed in production at a major e-commerce platform.