Papers

The success of cross-subject multimodal emotion recognition hinges on maintaining the consistency of the joint data distribution across individuals. However, real-world deployment frequently triggers the asymmetric joint distribution collapse: EEG signals suffer from severe cross-subject distribution shifts, while eye movements sensors are susceptible to packet loss and tracking failures. Existing methods treat domain adaptation and missing-modality imputation as disjoint tasks. Consequently, they fail to resolve the compounded errors when both degradations co-occur, either propagating domain shifts through imputed signals or destroying the joint decision boundary. To tackle this unified challenge, we propose GUARD (Gradient-guided Unsupervised Asymmetric Recovery of Distributions). First, GUARD establishes a reliable anchor manifold in the source domain by employing a theoretically grounded gradient-weighted objective, which forces the robust EEG modality to preemptively entangle task-discriminative ocular features. Next, to structurally recover the collapsed joint distribution, we constrain a generative module with downstream perceptual losses, prioritizing emotion-discriminative semantics over mere signal fidelity. Finally, we formulate target-domain adaptation as an ill-posed inverse problem. By driving a cycle-consistent flow, we achieve unsupervised calibration of the recovered joint distribution directly on the target-domain manifold. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GUARD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, maintaining resilient discriminative performance even under complete auxiliary modality failure. Our code and models are made publicly available to ensure complete reproducibility.

Autonomous AI agents can turn authors' goals into interactive narratives by independently organizing and carrying out generation and revision. As agents generate and revise extensive content, authors struggle to grasp its overall structure, local details, and relationships, complicating continued guidance. We present NarrativeSteward, an authoring environment that organizes outlines, worldbuilding, and narrative graphs as linked artifacts for agent implementation and author guidance. Agent dialogue and project-wide structural review help authors understand the evolving work and guide local and cross-layer revisions, while change records and execution verification help authors assess the resulting work. Technical tests validated the system's change records, recovery mechanisms, and execution diagnostics. In a 12-participant within-subject study, NarrativeSteward supported easier formulation of revision requests and inspection of changes, and greater perceived understanding of changes and story structure, than general-purpose agents. Qualitative findings show how reviewing the work and feedback helps authors develop requirements and guide subsequent delegation. We open-source NarrativeSteward at https://github.com/Tencent/NarrativeSteward.

Food delivery platforms mediate service encounters through real-time tracking data. While presented as objective, such data often obscures the situational constraints shaping delivery work, producing systematic misalignments between user perception and courier experience. This study presents a socio-technical analysis of real-time mobile tracking systems in the wild. Through semi-structured interviews with 23 users and 17 couriers on Chinese food delivery platforms, we identify two interrelated dynamics. First, users operate within a data-as-behavior interpretive framework, translating spatial and temporal anomalies into moralized judgments of courier negligence. Second, couriers engage in anticipatory data management, a form of hidden digital labor in which they reshape their physical behavior to produce interface-legible trajectories rather than physically optimal ones. Together, these findings expose a burden-shifting mechanism—characterizing the systemic outcomes of decontextualized interface design rather than explicit designer intent—in current tracking architectures, demonstrating how current tracking architectures leave gig workers bearing much of the explanatory burden. We propose design directions toward contextual transparency, redistributing this explanatory burden from individual workers to the platforms that possess the logistical context to bear it.

Presence research has often proceeded by addition, treating immersion, embodiment, agency, ownership, co-presence, reciprocity, and temporal simultaneity as conditions that stabilise the sense of being there. Yet immersive video suggests that several of these conditions can be weakened without eliminating Presence. Building on Bodyless Presence and Bodyless Presentness, this paper asks what is disclosed when such conditions are progressively subtracted. I distinguish three levels that should not be conflated: stabilising conditions that strengthen or support Presence; empirically resilient articulation-forms through which Presence is lived as here and now; and a transcendental limit-condition concerning the first-personal givenness of experience. Subtraction provides evidence for the resilience of here and now, but empirical resilience does not by itself establish constitutivity or transcendental necessity. I argue, on phenomenological rather than experimental grounds, that for-me-ness names the limit-condition within which any such spatial or temporal articulation can be experienced at all. The paper bridges operational Presence research with Husserlian givenness, Leibhaftigkeit, and image consciousness; rereads Bodyless Presence as exposing the resilience of here; rereads Bodyless Presentness as exposing the resilience of now; and develops a stratified account of Presence through Zahavi's pre-reflective self-awareness while taking Derrida's critique of self-presence seriously. It concludes by proposing immersive media as dissociation apparatuses for loosening conditions ordinarily coupled within experiential there-ness.

Accurate assessment of color differences is essential for applications ranging from digital design to quality control. While existing color difference metrics, such as CIEDE2000, aim to approximate human perception, they may still exhibit inconsistencies with perceptual judgments. In this study, we investigate a data-driven approach to color-difference estimation based directly on human evaluations. We collect similarity judgments for 2,000 systematically generated color pairs, each rated by seven observers using a four-point ordinal scale. These judgments are then used to train regression models using different color representations, including RGB channel differences, HSI differences, and COLIBRI fuzzy linguistic categories. Experiments with five regression algorithms show that the choice of color model has a greater influence on prediction performance than the choice of regression algorithm. Using COLIBRI features alone, linear regression achieves an R2 of 0.595, outperforming RGB and HSI representations, which achieve R2 values of 0.479 and 0.493, respectively. The best performance is obtained by LightGBM using the combined representation, reaching an R2 of 0.703. The results indicate that human perceptual color differences are better captured when numerical color coordinates are complemented by graded perceptual categories, highlighting the potential of data-driven models for perceptually aligned color-difference estimation.

Perceiving human motion via privacy-preserving 4D millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar is critical for next-generation human-robot interaction (HRI), where point cloud scene flow serves as a foundational motion representation. Yet the extreme sparsity and noise of 4D radar point clouds make non-rigid motion flow estimation severely ill-posed–a challenge that existing rigid-centric methods and prior works fail to adequately address, largely because they neglect the rich Doppler velocity cues inherent in 4D radar. We propose DiFF, a generative framework that marries Doppler-informed motion priors with a Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN)-based conditional flow matching model. At its core, a KAN-attention mechanism enables expressive feature extraction, while a prior-guided generative process harnesses Doppler cues to regularize the ill-posed solution space. Extensive experiments show that DiFF achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance across diverse real-world datasets, reducing 3D endpoint error to the millimeter scale on the mmBody benchmark.

Online learning offers flexibility but lacks the structure of a classroom, where a teacher's presence guides attention. The platform we study restores that structure by monitoring the learner through the webcam during ordinary coursework, interrupting or restarting a video when the learner appears distracted. What such monitoring does to a learner across a whole course, rather than in a single examination, is largely unexamined. We report a convergent mixed-methods study of one monitored course pipeline in a summer internship program. We read two free-text surveys alongside three platform channels. The dropout exit survey yielded 15 analyzable responses; the persisting-learner reflection survey, 36. The channels are camera-verification telemetry (14,529 flags from 448 students), an in-video emotion widget (615 submissions from 273 students), and a mandatory end-of-course survey (up to 634 respondents per item). Neither survey named monitoring, so every mention analyzed here was raised by the respondent. Focus-monitoring was raised by 18 of the 51 free-text respondents: 7 of 15 dropouts and 11 of 36 persisting learners. Among the dropouts who raised it, focus-monitoring was the stated primary cause of departure in 4 of 7 cases. None of the 18 questioned being observed in principle. What learners contest is the misreading of ordinary actions, drinking water or moving the head, and the severity of what follows a flag: a video already watched returns to the start of its segment. These findings identify two targets for redesign: the severity of the response to a flag, and the environment check, which can flag a learner before any content has been seen. We argue that the proportionality of that response marks the point at which an attention guardrail becomes a barrier to learning, the tipping point this study approaches.

A live classroom poll is usually read through its answer key, as a count of participation and correctness. Yet the same record holds more before any key is fixed, namely who answers early and how the class divides across the options. Whether these key-free signals are stable, and what they reveal, has not been examined at the scale of a real course. We study them in a live deployment of 340,668 submissions across 603 polls in 47 sessions from roughly 2,400 learners, reading each poll for a learner's response order and for how much the class divides. A single further step brings in the author-designated key, on items with a settled answer, to interpret the divided ones. A learner's response order is a stable individual signature. It reproduces at a corrected split-half reliability of 0.92, holds at 0.87 within single sessions, and is unrelated to whether the learner is correct. Read without a key, about one poll in five does not reach a clear majority, and division marks the questions that split the class. On the settled-answer items the majority is itself wrong on 49 of 358. The key-free measure flags most of these, though division alone does not separate a collectively wrong answer from a merely hard one. The two readings are largely independent, meeting at one point where early responders anticipate the eventual majority only on questions the class has nearly settled. Together they map the learners and questions of a session without a key.

Large online programmes receive heavy volumes of queries during onboarding, at a scale that grows faster than the number of staff available to answer them. This paper reports a study of an AI integrated query resolution platform that spreads incoming queries across four routes: an AI based assistant, answers from fellow participants, a curated corpus of frequently asked questions, and escalation to administrators. Over nine weeks, from 2 May to 6 July 2026, the system handled 4,093 queries raised by 1,434 participants. Nearly every query reached a recorded resolution, and one query in five closed within an hour. Reuse of 114 corpus entries absorbed 21.3% of the volume, participants resolved a further 12.2% on their own, and 132 participants answered questions for one another at a median of 9 to 15 minutes, showing that peer answering, where it occurred, was fast and broadly shared across the cohort. Classifying the query text shows that demand was narrow rather than varied. A single process step, the submission of a certificate and the offer letter that follows it, accounts for 56.8% of corpus mediated resolutions, and at least 20.4% of queries concern the progress of a pending submission rather than a request for information, a class the assistant served only 1.3% of the time, since a stored answer cannot report an individual's current status. Only 8.0% of the queries handled by a person duplicated content already in the corpus, which indicates that the knowledge base was already well used. Most direct administrative closures occur in synchronous bulk events, a pattern that shapes how the records should be read.

Real-time classroom polls are widely used and increasingly generated with automated assistance, yet the questions themselves are rarely evaluated as measurements. We audit a large corpus of authentic classroom polls, 604 items across 47 sessions answered 340,668 times by 2,807 learners, as a measurement instrument. For the 539 items whose correct answer could be established and verified from the lecture transcript, we place every item and every student on a common scale using item response theory and analyse the answer structure of the True/False items. Two findings emerge. First, the polls form a coherent but easy scale of moderate precision (marginal reliability about 0.60), on which roughly a quarter of items barely separate stronger from weaker students. Second, students show a robust tendency to answer True, present at the individual level (77% of students lean True), which meets a milder tendency for items to be keyed False; as a result answer direction predicts difficulty, False-keyed items being about thirteen points harder, and the effect survives controls for item content and for selective answering. Both findings rest on signals a polling system already records, so the same checks can be run as items are generated, before they reach students.

Mastery-based education increasingly places the reporting of learning progress in students' hands, who record task completion on learning dashboards. The usefulness of such self-reports depends on how closely reported mastery corresponds to demonstrated competence. Most evidence on student self-assessment compares an overall self-rating with an overall examination score and therefore provides limited evidence about which tasks or which students account for the mismatch. This study examines first-year students' self-assessment against viva-demonstrated mastery at the level of individual tasks across a ladder of sixty programming tasks. The study draws on a large first-year programming course taught in 2023, involving 203 students and 12 examiners, in which every reported task was verified through an oral viva. Because a task entered the Viva only after it was reported, the design is one-sided and captures over-estimation but not under-estimation. Of 11,093 reported tasks, 10,885 (98.1%) were demonstrated, indicating a high degree of correspondence between self-report and demonstrated mastery. The remaining 208 overestimations were not evenly distributed. A small number of students accounted for most of the errors, and they occurred mainly on difficult tasks near the end of the task ladder rather than on higher-point tasks. This task-level analysis shows that high overall self-assessment accuracy can coexist with specific areas where reported and demonstrated mastery diverge. It also provides a practical basis for directing additional verification and formative feedback toward students and tasks where such divergence is more likely.

Generative AI search and AI overviews are transforming access to information and news, renewing concerns that readers will encounter a narrower range of topics and have less in common. We examine these concerns via a randomized field experiment with 37,561 readers at The Washington Post. Both groups searched the same archive, but treatment readers also received AI answers with article citations above conventional results. Measuring consumption across displayed answers and opened articles, we find that AI search expands the reach of widely read topics and increases overlap in readers' topic consumption. At the same time, consumption becomes less concentrated and shifts toward less-popular topics, both within readers and across the audience. AI answers account for most of the increase in shared information, delivering it without requiring article clicks and broadening exposure beyond the articles readers open. Cited articles also contribute to the shift toward less-popular topics. Readers shift from conventional-result clicks and browsing toward cited articles and follow-up searches. More frequent searching offsets lower article consumption per search, producing a small increase in article consumption per reader. Total information consumption per minute also rises. Generative AI search can thus diversify collective attention while strengthening the information readers have in common.

Surface electromyography (sEMG) provides a wearable, camera-free signal for continuous hand-motion inference. Mapping muscle activity to joint kinematics remains challenging because the recorded waveforms are indirect measurements, their relationship with motion changes over time, and individual anatomy and sensor placement alter the signal distribution. This paper presents EFormer, a residual feature-correction network built on a frozen tracking backbone. EFormer combines a high-rate event branch, temporally aligned local cross-attention, two causal rotary position embedding (RoPE) temporal layers, and a bounded, dynamically gated residual. EFormer receives 16-channel sEMG sampled at 2 kHz and fuses a 64-channel tracking representation at 25 Hz with a 128-channel event representation at 200 Hz. Cross-attention uses a nominal delay of 100 ms, a 300 ms history parameter, and a 50 ms tolerance; its causal mask restricts each query to events occurring 50-400 ms earlier. The correction scale is 0.15. The evaluated continuation-training configuration contains 585,376 trainable parameters and 5,974,508 frozen parameters. On the test set, EFormer achieves an MAE of 0.1546634 rad, an RMSE of 0.24063 rad, and an R^2 of 0.74801, compared with 0.1745326 rad, 0.2715448 rad, and 0.6791103 for the official tracking baseline. EFormer reduces MAE by 11.38% relative to the baseline. The results show that temporally aligned event-feature correction can reduce continuous hand-pose tracking error.

Real-time classroom polling is now routine, yet the data it produces is usually read narrowly, as a correctness score or a headcount. Such readings say little about what a poll is doing within a lecture or how it shapes engagement. This is particularly relevant for short-response formats such as True/False, where the same question format can be used to test recall, check comprehension, or direct students' attention to a deliberately misleading statement. This study asks whether a poll's answer and instructional function can be determined by reading it against its lecture transcript, what cognitive levels of Bloom's taxonomy and instructional-function clusters the corpus contains, and how student engagement relates to answering correctly. We analyse a naturalistic corpus of 47 live sessions over 39 days, comprising 604 poll questions and 340,668 responses from 2,807 learners, most items True/False, read against time-aligned lecture transcripts and attendance. Reading each poll in context proves essential: the answer to 89% of polls is locatable in the lecture, and a recurring attention-checking device is visible only through context. Questioning is overwhelmingly lower-order and falls into seven instructional functions, and a poll's response follows its function rather than its wording. Engagement is broad but concentrated, and the class majority answers correctly 88.5% of the time, though a small set of high-consensus yet incorrect answers cannot be detected by agreement alone. An independent survey of 579 students agrees on what the polls are and on their participation, but reveals a gap between perception and reality: students cannot judge their own correctness, and the polls they find hardest are not those they answer worst.

Organizations increasingly route employee feedback to leaders through large language model (LLM) summaries, an unaudited layer that silences already-spoken voice. We introduce a Voice Retention / Representation Ratio metric for representational bias in summarization and apply it to a bilingual (English/German) corpus of 2,586 free-text responses from a global professional service company. First, employees supply criticism more reliably than praise (withholding praise is 82 times more common). Second, across 45 leader-summaries the pipeline filters by popularity, not sentiment: criticism survives, yet a concern voiced once is dropped 86% of the time, with short and German-only content lost on the same axis (theme retention 0.14 vs 0.74; German directional). Controlling for frequency, sentiment has no independent effect; the harm is prevalence-driven, which sentiment-only audits miss. A targeted prompt recovers only named themes. We contribute the metric, field evidence, and a disaggregated voice-retention card.

Emotion prosody perception requires simultaneous processing of acoustic cues and speaker identity. While listeners effortlessly decode natural speech, AI synthetic voices introduce cognitive complexities due to subtle acoustic atypicalities. It remains unclear how these synthetic features interact with a listener's prior social knowledge and memory of a familiar speaker. This study investigated how speech sources (human vs. AI) and speaker familiarity affect emotion recognition accuracy and cognitive load. A within-subject task with Mandarin-speaking adults evaluated behavioral (accuracy, reaction time) and physiological data (heart rate variability). Results showed that human voices yielded significantly higher accuracy and faster processing times than AI voices, while HRV did not significantly differentiate between conditions. These findings show that decoding synthetic speech is gated by top-down social cognition, highlighting limitations in current AI synthesis technologies.

Organizations started listening to employees through conversational AI agents alongside structured surveys. Little is known about what these channels change in what employees say when disclosure carries hierarchical risk. We report a field study inside a global management consulting firm whose process pairs a pre-survey with an adaptive AI voice interview on the same themes within one session. Across 44 first-session interviews (132 matched theme observations), 20-41% of sessions showed a favorable rating co-occurring with a substantive concern voiced later, depending on the favorability threshold. The Gioia analysis drew on 158 protective quotes from 65 eligible sessions. Disclosure rarely arrived unguarded: employees softened concerns, deflected accountability, and bounded how far they went, and this protective work tracked the perceived legitimacy of the listening structure. We develop a grounded model of bounded disclosure and derive four propositions for voice, channel and listening research. Silence, we argue, can persist inside expression.

Conversational agents increasingly interact with children, yet evidence on how their design shapes children's susceptibility to persuasion comes almost entirely from the lab. We report a $2\times2$ randomized field experiment embedded in a public German Santa Claus telephone hotline. Children's calls were randomly routed to one of four LLM voice agents varying persona (Santa, high authority, vs. Helper, low authority) and framing (persuasive nudges toward prosocial wishes vs. neutral). Of 1,072 logged calls, 89 conversations (median age 6) met inclusion criteria. Persuasive framing raised the probability of a prosocial wish from 11.6% to 45.7%, robust to controls. Persona authority showed a near-zero effect: Santa did not outperform the Helper. Persona instead shaped engagement; children hung up on the Helper far more often within the first minute (65% vs. 39%). Where context already lends an agent legitimacy, how it speaks shapes children's compliance more than who it claims to be.

Companion agents describe themselves: they remember, they understand their users, the relationship has changed them. We argue that such accounts, and the experience ratings that seem to confirm them, are checkable by users only where the evidence is theirs: in the agent's behavior, or in themselves. Where the evidence lives in the machinery, fluent self-description and moderately positive ratings do not establish that the mechanisms behind them ran. We demonstrate an audit procedure that sets an agent's self-description against its users' judgements and its implementation records, reporting each claim as supported, contradicted, or unresolved, and apply it to Lita, a proactive companion we built and deployed for a month with nine colleagues. Participants endorsed stylistic claims, withheld endorsement from relational ones, and rated memory at or above midpoint, while two of three memory layers had never executed their accumulation step. Memory-bearing agents should report what their self-descriptions cannot establish.

Desk-based learning and creative activities benefit from handwritten engagement. However, current generative AI tools deliver guidance through a separate screen, creating a gap between where users think and where assistance appears. To address this, in this work we design AIfred, a desk-based robotic arm with a projector mounted at the end-effector that places AI-generated guidance alongside handwritten work. AIfred combines workspace perception, context-aware content generation, and robot-mediated projection to support math assignments, image generation, and drawing tasks. In a user study (n = 36), we compared AIfred against ChatGPT (GPT-5.6 Luna) running on a laptop. Both tools performed comparably while assistance was available during the math assignment (6.7 vs. 7.3/10, p = .41), but AIfred improved short-term learning transfer by 60% once assistance was withdrawn (7.0 vs. 4.4/10, p = .003). In addition, independent art and design professors ranked drawings produced with AIfred better in 33 of 36 cases. Our findings indicate that spatially co-located AI assistance benefits tasks whose guidance shares a spatial frame with the work.

Pet bereavement often receives little social recognition. Generative AI can give a continuing bond a responsive voice, but a comforting reply may also claim authority to forgive or request attention. We investigate how a memorial can support connection without turning remembrance into obligation. Through Research through Design, we developed Afterglow, a mobile world connecting private remembrance, human witnessing, and symbolic Pet messages. A formative survey (N=57) informed the initial design, followed by six online roundtable walkthroughs with 20 unique participants across two prototype iterations. Our interpretive analysis develops tensions between returnable connection and emotional obligation, recognizable likeness and ontological clarity, and protective intervention and surveillant authority. We contribute Legible Restraint, a cross-layer requirement that limits on relational authority survive changes in speaker, generation context, trigger logic, data use, and participation. Its temporal consequence, Designing for Goodbye, keeps remembrance available without making continued use a condition of care.

Immersive displays can enable rich and diverse virtual experiences. Manually authoring every possible experience to realize this potential, however, is prohibitively expensive, difficult to scale, and impractical. Generative AI models could remove this bottleneck, but today's models are built for conventional displays and cannot generate the high-resolution, stereoscopic $360^\circ$ content required for immersive viewing. Further, temporal and stereo inconsistencies that may be tolerable on conventional displays can become highly disruptive when viewed through an immersive headset. Here, we address this gap with a zero-shot generative pipeline that extends existing video diffusion models into 4K stereoscopic $360^\circ$ videos. Inspired from binocular vision and depth perception, we develop an epipolar-aware $360^\circ$ image matching metric that captures the temporal and stereo geometric inconsistencies across views. We then use this metric as a preference signal for direct preference optimization with limited training data. Our work enables $360^\circ$ stereo video generation and provides a scalable path for bringing generative content to immersive displays, allowing diverse mixed reality experiences on demand.

How students interact with artificial intelligence (AI) systems in educational settings may determine whether that interaction supports or displaces critical thinking. This paper introduces two contributions. The first is the Three Paths of Student-AI Interaction, a typological framework identifying three qualitatively distinct modes of student-AI engagement: Passive Review, Direct Question, and Strategic Dialogue. The second is the Next Level Teaching Blueprint (NLTB), a three-stage instructional design system intended to make Strategic Dialogue more likely. Qualitative content analysis of 50 randomly sampled student-AI interaction messages from an undergraduate research methods course was used to examine the typology. Two human coders achieved 68% path-level agreement ($\kappa$ = .48), with 80% agreement on Strategic Dialogue identification specifically. GPT-5, used as a third coder, produced a similar overall distribution and introduced a coding category absent from the human scheme. Path 1 (Passive Review) accounted for 46% of exchanges in the primary researcher's classifications, Path 2 (Direct Question) for 18%, and Path 3 (Strategic Dialogue) for 36%. A second, descriptively examined dataset contained predominantly Strategic Dialogue content, offering a preliminary indication that instructional framing may influence which path students take. Together, the Three Paths framework and the NLTB contribute a language for describing student-AI interaction and a design approach for supporting higher-order engagement.

Stronger AI agents do not automatically produce better organizations: teams must also learn which work arrangements to retain and when to reconsider them. We propose a modeling specification for recursive organization improvement and evaluate it through an executable checker, a public-record mapping, and controlled simulation. The specification connects actor-visible histories, organizational memory, decision rights, and evidence-carrying change contracts. The mechanism study crosses six decision rules, three memory conditions, and three task environments under fixed resource ceilings. In a stationary environment, cumulative evidence raises balanced evaluation's normalized net value per task from 0.45224 to 0.48007. Repeated reassessment's disadvantage relative to this comparator falls from 0.01702 with reset evidence to 0.00007 with cumulative evidence. A reversal of the best workflow reveals the opposite cost: indefinite retention delays adaptation, while a finite window restores eventual performance at a transition cost. In exploratory controls, matching trial acquisition and label reuse reduces the apparent reassessment gain from 0.00607 to 0.00191. Program replacement adds no stable benefit across the tested reversal times. The study identifies evidence acquisition, reuse, and timely updating as mechanisms that must be separated from evaluator replacement when assessing organizational improvement.

Nowadays, Virtual Reality (VR) systems are more helpful for making decisions, training, and rehabilitation. Multimodal settings in these systems impose a significant balance and cognitive difficulties. Additionally, decreased performance, higher cognitive load, user overwhelm, and limited accessibility of VR technology can be caused by excessive auditory, visual, and sensory stimulation. In our pilot study, we examine the strategic design of directional auditory cues to improve cognitive load and enhance user experience in virtual environments. This research also enhances fundamental knowledge that auditory feedback reduces cognitive load in VR, with statistical analysis confirming this improvement (p = .0011). This study investigates how postural balance and pupil diameter correlate with cognitive load while the users navigate. Moreover, this study provides realistic overview design guidelines for accessibility, which will make VR experiences safer and more useful for everyone, including people with cognitive impairments.

Large language models are frequently proposed as a route to AI-powered services for African communities, but they are least reliable exactly where the need is greatest: all African languages remain low-resource by any standard measure, and models trained on scraped, standardised text systematically misrepresent the dialectal and regional variation of how people actually speak. We introduce Model as a Library (MaaL), a software architecture that packages small, community-enrolled speech models as versioned on-device dependencies, enabling offline structured data collection that cannot generatively hallucinate, for populations that current language models serve worst. Rather than relying on web-scraped corpora, MaaL's vocabulary is enrolled directly from a small number of example recordings by the speakers themselves, at the point of deployment. We describe the architecture and its central mechanism - keyword spotting that turns a closed-vocabulary text form into a voice form, filled and submitted entirely on-device - and propose transpiling the closed-vocabulary elements already present in widely-deployed digital form tools into MaaL schemas, a low-friction path to voice-first, offline data collection for the low-literacy populations these tools already reach. This is a position and system-design paper: we describe the concept, the mechanism, and an analytical feasibility case, and identify what a working implementation still requires.

Online knowledge communities rely on a division of epistemic labor between users who seek information and those who produce it. Generative AI may blur these roles, but how it reallocates knowledge-seeking and knowledge-producing activities and reshapes the nature and returns of participation remains unclear. We examine changes in question-asking and answering among Stack Overflow user groups, focusing on consumers and producers, following the release of ChatGPT. Consumers shifted from asking questions to producing answers, but their answers were less likely to be accepted relative to the pre-ChatGPT period, suggesting that increased production did not yield equal standing in the community. By contrast, producers did not change the number of questions they asked, but increasingly asked about novel and emerging topics. Although they produced fewer answers, their answers received greater recognition. These findings show that access to generative AI does not necessarily translate into equal opportunities for successful participation.

Public institutions increasingly procure AI systems whose design they cannot inspect or change. In higher education, proprietary Early Warning Systems (EWS) leave colleges with few options beyond adjusting model outputs to address inequity. This raises the question of how fairness work is coordinated among vendors, institutions, advisors, and students with unequal power to change these systems? Using student records from a public college in Ontario, Canada, we evaluate six post-hoc fairness interventions on a research EWS under simulated procurement constraints. We compare fairness, accuracy, and demographic disparities, introducing error-type profiling to trace how interventions redistribute false positives and false negatives. Interventions redistributed disparities without consistently reducing them. Two implementations favored already-advantaged groups because they used group size to define disadvantage; small, marginalized groups remained poorly served. These findings show how procurement constraints and implementation choices shape the possibilities for fairness work. We call the resulting condition fairness theatre; dashboard metrics converge while groups' error burdens persist or worsen.

Stereoscopy is fundamental to virtual reality (VR), providing depth perception through binocular viewing. Recent advances in 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) enable high-quality novel view synthesis, making it well suited to immersive VR. We render 3DGS reconstructions stereoscopically and evaluate them in a head-mounted display, replicating how they would actually be viewed in VR. Real-world capture provides only a limited number of views, and under this constraint 3DGS reconstruction often produces localized floaters and misplaced structures. Standard metrics miss these localized artifacts, which become salient under stereoscopic viewing, where geometry is placed at the wrong depth. We investigate whether standard image-quality evaluation reflects the perceptual quality of 3DGS reconstructions under reduced capture. We compare SfM-only baseline with a union initialization that combines SfM with a dense VGGT network. All other training components are held fixed, isolating the effect of initialization coverage. We conduct a user study comparing preferences under monoscopic and stereoscopic HMD viewing, and test whether image-quality metrics predict the observed preferences. Monoscopically, preference for the more consistent reconstruction is weak, reaching 58.4% overall. Stereoscopically, the same preference rises to 78.2% and is consistent across all participants, while image-quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM and LPIPS) and stereo-aware metrics (iSQoe and StereoQA) show only modest differences and fail to penalize them. Our results indicate that monoscopic evaluation and standard image-quality metrics substantially underestimate perceptual artifacts observed in 3DGS reconstructions for VR, making stereoscopic assessment essential for 3DGS quality evaluation in VR.

Therapeutic exercises can help slow cognitive decline in dementia, but conventional programs are often tedious and difficult to sustain. Virtual reality (VR) offers an alternative through game-based approaches designed to improve engagement and training-based approaches focused on structured functional recovery. Prior reviews report inconsistent findings about these paradigms, while it remains unclear whether the labels represent systems that are technologically distinct. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematize 34 studies published between 2015 and 2026, including 16 controlled efficacy trials and 18 design and feasibility studies involving mild cognitive impairment, dementia and Alzheimer's disease. We develop a taxonomy covering design paradigm, immersion, feedback modality, difficulty adaptation and hardware. Our analysis shows substantial overlap between game-based and training-based systems, suggesting that these labels do not clearly distinguish their technological characteristics. We also introduce VR-RES, a seven-dimensional framework for evaluating study quality. Its application highlights recurring limitations in the evidence base, particularly limited follow-up, poor reproducibility and insufficient analysis of demographic factors such as age, sex and education. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for future VR cognitive rehabilitation research, emphasizing specific design features, rigorous evaluation and improved reporting practices.