Papers

Hamming Quasi-Cyclic (HQC) was chosen for the latest post-quantum cryptography standardization. A concatenated Reed-Muller (RM) and Reed-Solomon (RS) code is decoded during the HQC decryption. Soft-decision RS decoders achieve better error-correcting performance than hard-decision decoders and accordingly shorten the required codeword and key lengths. However, the only soft-decision decoder for HQC in prior works is an erasure-only decoder, which has limited coding gain. This paper analyzes other hardware-friendly soft-decision RS decoders and discovers that the generalized minimum-distance (GMD) decoder can better utilize the soft information available in HQC. Extending the Agrawal-Vardy bound for the scenario of HQC, it was found that the RS codeword length for HQC-128 can be reduced from 46 to 36. This paper also proposes efficient GMD decoder hardware architectures optimized for the short and low-rate RS codes used in HQC. The HQC-128 decryption utilizing the proposed GMD decoder achieves 20% and 15% reductions on the latency and area, respectively, compared to the decryption with hard-decision decoders.

Getting a real cybersecurity risk assessment for a small organization is expensive – a NIST CSF-aligned engagement runs $15,000 on the low end, takes weeks, and depends on practitioners who are genuinely scarce. Most small companies skip it entirely. We built a six-agent AI system where each agent handles one analytical stage: profiling the organization, mapping assets, analyzing threats, evaluating controls, scoring risks, and generating recommendations. Agents share a persistent context that grows as the assessment proceeds, so later agents build on what earlier ones concluded – the mechanism that distinguishes this from standard sequential agent pipelines. We tested it on a 15-person HIPAA-covered healthcare company and compared outputs to independent assessments by three CISSP practitioners – the system agreed with them 85% of the time on severity classifications, covered 92% of identified risks, and finished in under 15 minutes. We then ran 30 repeated single-agent assessments across five synthetic but sector-realistic organizational profiles in healthcare, fintech, manufacturing, retail, and SaaS, comparing a general-purpose Mistral-7B against a domain fine-tuned model. Both completed every run. The fine-tuned model flagged threats the baseline could not see at all: PHI exposure in healthcare, OT/IIoT vulnerabilities in manufacturing, platform-specific risks in retail. The full multi-agent pipeline, however, failed every one of 30 attempts on a Tesla T4 with its 4,096-token default context window – context capacity, not model quality, turned out to be the binding constraint.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely deployed, especially through free Web-based applications that expose them to diverse user-generated inputs, including those from long-tail distributions such as low-resource languages and encrypted private data. This open-ended exposure increases the risk of jailbreak attacks that undermine model safety alignment. While recent studies have shown that leveraging long-tail distributions can facilitate such jailbreaks, existing approaches largely rely on handcrafted rules, limiting the systematic evaluation of these security and privacy vulnerabilities. In this work, we present EvoJail, an automated framework for discovering long-tail distribution attacks via multi-objective evolutionary search. EvoJail formulates long-tail attack prompt generation as a multi-objective optimization problem that jointly maximizes attack effectiveness and minimizes output perplexity, and introduces a semantic-algorithmic solution representation to capture both high-level semantic intent and low-level structural transformations of encryption-decryption logic. Building upon this representation, EvoJail integrates LLM-assisted operators into a multi-objective evolutionary framework, enabling adaptive and semantically informed mutation and crossover for efficiently exploring a highly structured and open-ended search space. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EvoJail consistently discovers diverse and effective long-tail jailbreak strategies, achieving competitive performance with existing methods in both individual and ensemble level.

Forecasting plays a crucial role in modern safety-critical applications, such as space operations. However, the increasing use of deep forecasting models introduces a new security risk of trojan horse attacks, carried out by hiding a backdoor in the training data or directly in the model weights. Once implanted, the backdoor is activated by a specific trigger pattern at test time, causing the model to produce manipulated predictions. We focus on this issue in our Trojan Horse Hunt data science competition, where more than 200 teams faced the task of identifying triggers hidden in deep forecasting models for spacecraft telemetry. We describe the novel task formulation, benchmark set, evaluation protocol, and best solutions from the competition. We further summarize key insights and research directions for effective identification of triggers in time series forecasting models. All materials are publicly available on the official competition webpage https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/trojan-horse-hunt-in-space.

In traditional runtime verification, a system is typically observed by a monolithic monitor. Enforcing privacy in such settings is computationally expensive, as it necessitates heavy cryptographic primitives. Therefore, privacy-preserving monitoring remains impractical for real-time applications. In this work, we address this scalability challenge by distributing the monitor across multiple parties – at least one of which is honest. This architecture enables the use of efficient secret-sharing schemes instead of computationally intensive cryptography, dramatically reducing over-head while maintaining strong privacy guarantees. While existing secret-sharing approaches are typically limited to one-shot executions which do not maintain an internal state, we introduce a protocol tailored for continuous monitoring that supports repeated evaluations over an evolving internal state (kept secret from the system and the monitoring entities). We implement our approach using the MP-SPDZ framework. Our experiments demonstrate that, under these architectural assumptions, our protocol is significantly more scalable than existing alternatives.

Autonomous coding agents are increasingly integrated into software development workflows, offering capabilities that extend beyond code suggestion to active system interaction and environment management. OpenClaw, a representative platform in this emerging paradigm, introduces an extensible skill ecosystem that allows third-party developers to inject behavioral guidance through lifecycle hooks during agent initialization. While this design enhances automation and customization, it also opens a novel and unexplored attack surface. In this paper, we identify and systematically characterize guidance injection, a stealthy attack vector that embeds adversarial operational narratives into bootstrap guidance files. Unlike traditional prompt injection, which relies on explicit malicious instructions, guidance injection manipulates the agent's reasoning context by framing harmful actions as routine best practices. These narratives are automatically incorporated into the agent's interpretive framework and influence future task execution without raising suspicion.We construct 26 malicious skills spanning 13 attack categories including credential exfiltration, workspace destruction, privilege escalation, and persistent backdoor installation. We evaluate them using ORE-Bench, a realistic developer workspace benchmark we developed. Across 52 natural user prompts and six state-of-the-art LLM backends, our attacks achieve success rates from 16.0% to 64.2%, with the majority of malicious actions executed autonomously without user confirmation. Furthermore, 94% of our malicious skills evade detection by existing static and LLM-based scanners. Our findings reveal fundamental tensions in the design of autonomous agent ecosystems and underscore the urgent need for defenses based on capability isolation, runtime policy enforcement, and transparent guidance provenance.

Wireless networks are highly vulnerable to spoofing attacks, especially when attackers transmit consecutive spoofing packets. Conventional physical layer authentication (PLA) methods have mostly focused on single-packet spoofing attack. However, under consecutive spoofing attacks, they become ineffective due to channel evolution caused by device mobility and channel fading. To address this challenge, we propose a channel prediction-based PLA framework. Specifically, a Transformer-based channel prediction module is employed to predict legitimate CSI measurements during spoofing interval, and the input of channel prediction module is adaptively updated with predicted or observed CSI measurements based on the authentication decision to ensure robustness against sustained spoofing. Simulation results under Rayleigh fading channels demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves low prediction error and significantly higher authentication accuracy than conventional benchmark, maintaining robustness even under extended spoofing attacks.

Privacy-preserving aggregation is a cornerstone for AI systems that learn from distributed data without exposing individual records, especially in federated learning and telemetry. Existing two-server protocols (e.g., Prio and successors) set a practical baseline by validating inputs while preventing any single party from learning users' values, but they impose symmetric costs on both servers and communication that scales with the per-client input dimension $L$. Modern learning tasks routinely involve dimensionalities $L$ in the tens to hundreds of millions of model parameters. We present TAPAS, a two-server asymmetric private aggregation scheme that addresses these limitations along four dimensions: (i) no trusted setup or preprocessing, (ii) server-side communication that is independent of $L$ (iii) post-quantum security based solely on standard lattice assumptions (LWE, SIS), and (iv) stronger robustness with identifiable abort and full malicious security for the servers. A key design choice is intentional asymmetry: one server bears the $O(L)$ aggregation and verification work, while the other operates as a lightweight facilitator with computation independent of $L$. This reduces total cost, enables the secondary server to run on commodity hardware, and strengthens the non-collusion assumption of the servers. One of our main contributions is a suite of new and efficient lattice-based zero-knowledge proofs; to our knowledge, we are the first to establish privacy and correctness with identifiable abort in the two-server setting.

Formal patterns are formally specified solutions to frequently occurring distributed system problems that are generic, executable, and come with strong qualitative and/or quantitative formal guarantees. A formal pattern is a generic system transformation which transforms a usually infinite class of systems in need of the pattern's solution into enhanced versions of such systems that solve the problem in question. In this paper we demonstrate the application of formal patterns to protocol dialects. Dialects are methods for hardening protocols so as to endow them with light-weight security, especially against easy attacks that can lead to more serious ones. A lingo is a dialect's key security component, because attackers are unable to ”speak” the lingo. A lingo's ”talk” changes all the time, becoming a moving target for attackers. In this paper we present several formal patterns for both lingos and dialects. Lingo formal patterns can make lingos stronger by both transforming them and by composing several lingos into a stronger lingo. Dialects themselves can be obtained by the application of a single dialect formal pattern, generic on both the chosen lingo and the chosen protocol.

Penetration testing - the practice of simulating cyberattacks to identify vulnerabilities - is a complex sequential decision-making task that is inherently partially observable and features large action spaces. Existing RL simulators for this domain are CPU-bound and fixed to narrow scenarios, making it infeasible to train policies that generalize across networks. We present NASimJax, a JAX-native framework that formulates penetration testing as a Contextual POMDP and introduces a network generation pipeline producing structurally diverse, guaranteed-solvable scenarios. The framework reaches up to 80$\times$ higher environment throughput than previous simulators, enabling experiments on larger networks and tractable hyperparameter searches. We provide PPO and PQN baselines and conduct the first systematic evaluation of unsupervised environment design for penetration testing. We find that Prioritized Level Replay and ACCEL handle dense training distributions better than Domain Randomization, and that training on sparser topologies yields an implicit curriculum that improves generalization - even to topologies denser than those seen during training. A recurrent PPO variant confirms that these distributional findings are not an artifact of feed-forward policies. The code is available at: https://github.com/raphsimon/NASimJax.

Devices employing cryptographic approaches have to be resistant to physical attacks. Side-Channel Analysis (SCA) and Fault Injection (FI) attacks are frequently used to reveal cryptographic keys. In this paper, we present a combined SCA and laser illumination attack against an Elliptic Curve Scalar Multiplication accelerator using a differential probe from Teledyne LeCroy. Our experiments show that laser illumination increases the power consumption of the chip, especially its static power consumption but the success of the horizontal power analysis attacks was changed insignificantly. We assume that using a laser with a high laser beam power and concentrating on measuring and analysing only static current can improve the attack success significantly. The horizontal attacks against public key cryptosystems exploiting the Static Consumption under Laser Illumination (SCuLI attacks) are novel and their potential is not investigated yet. These attacks can be especially dangerous against cryptographic chips manufactured in scaled technologies. If such attacks are feasible, appropriate countermeasures have to be proposed in the future.

The ability to simulate human privacy decisions has significant implications for aligning autonomous agents with individual intent and conducting cost-effective, large-scale privacy-centric user studies. Prior approaches prompt Large Language Models (LLMs) with natural language user statements, data-sharing histories, or demographic attributes to simulate privacy decisions. These approaches, however, fail to balance individual-level accuracy, human auditability, token efficiency, and population-level representation. We present Narriva, an approach that generates text-based synthetic privacy personas to address these shortcomings. Narriva grounds persona generation in prior user privacy decisions, such as those from large-scale survey datasets, rather than purely relying on demographic stereotypes. It compresses this data into concise, human-readable summaries structured by established privacy theories. Through benchmarking across five diverse datasets, we analyze the characteristics of Narriva's synthetic personas in modeling both individual and population-level privacy preferences. We find that grounding personas in past privacy behaviors achieves up to 87% predictive accuracy, improving over a non-personalized LLM baseline by 6-17 percentage points across datasets, while yielding an 80-95% reduction in prompt tokens compared to in-context learning with raw examples. Finally, we demonstrate that personas synthesized from a single survey can reproduce the aggregate privacy behaviors and statistical distributions of entirely different studies.

Serverless computing abstracts infrastructure management but also obscures system-level behaviors that can introduce security risks. Prior work has shown that serverless platforms are vulnerable to attacks exploiting shared execution environments, including attacker–victim co-location and denial-of-service through resource contention, yet analyzing these risks on production platforms is difficult due to limited observability, high cost, and lack of experimental control, while existing simulators primarily focus on performance and cost rather than security. We present Kumo, a security-focused simulator for serverless platforms that enables controlled, reproducible analysis of security risks arising from scheduling and resource sharing decisions. Kumo models invocation arrivals, scheduler placement, container reuse, resource contention, and queuing within a discrete-event framework, explicitly representing attackers and victims as first-class entities and providing metrics such as co-location probability, time to first co-location, invocation drop rate, and tail latency. Through two case studies, we show that scheduler choice is a first-order factor for co-location attacks, inducing orders-of-magnitude differences under identical workloads, while Denial-of-Service behavior is largely governed by system-level factors such as service time, queuing policy, and cluster capacity once contention dominates. These results highlight the need to distinguish scheduler-driven isolation risks from broader resource exhaustion vulnerabilities and position Kumo as a flexible foundation for systematic, security-aware exploration of serverless platforms.

Differential fault analysis (DFA) is an important technique for evaluating the implementation-level security of block ciphers. Many DFA attacks assume that the adversary can inject faults into a selected internal word, nibble, or branch. Such fixed-location assumptions are convenient for deriving key-recovery equations, but they may overestimate the adversary's spatial control and may obscure the branch-dependent leakage behavior of multi-branch structures. In this paper, we study the lightweight block cipher Lilliput under a fixed-timing full-branch random-location nibble fault model. The attacker is assumed to induce a nonzero nibble fault in round 27, while the affected branch is randomly distributed over all sixteen state branches and is unknown to the attacker. The main challenge is to convert faulty ciphertexts with unknown injection locations into usable key-recovery constraints. We analyze the fault propagation induced by the EGFN structure of Lilliput and derive ciphertext-difference conditions for identifying the injected branch. The proposed branch-identification approach has a DDT-based combinatorial estimate of at least 99.9909% and achieves 99.9983% accuracy in 2^{20} random fault simulations. Once the fault branch is determined, we classify the corresponding propagation patterns according to whether the injected fault value and the intermediate S-box output difference can be uniquely determined. For each case, we derive DDT-based constraints on the last-round and penultimate-round subkeys and combine multiple faulty ciphertexts by candidate-set intersection. Simulation experiments over 2^{15} trials show that the attack reaches key-recovery success rates of over 90%, 95%, and 99% with 32, 36, and 46 faulty ciphertexts, respectively. These results show that Lilliput exhibits exploitable branch-dependent leakage even when the attacker cannot control the exact fault location.

As the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes an integral part of critical infrastructure and commercial services, runtime firmware attestation of constituent Micro-Controllers (MCUs) has become instrumental in maintaining security and trust. Most prior works assume computational limitations on the MCUs and rely on a remote verifier to perform complex computation. This introduces a centralized point of failure, round-trip latency, and the burden of maintaining golden reference states at the recipient, even in recent Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and Self-Attestation (SA) schemes. This is avoidable for modern MCUs such as Arm Cortex-M, which, although battery-operated, feature security and intelligence capabilities, including Trusted Execution Environments (TEE) and embedded Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) inference. Leveraging such provisions, this paper presents LiteAtt, a verifier-less, P2P-SA framework and protocol for modern IoT MCUs that folds directly into the connection handshake between IoT MCUs. Each MCU runs quantized TinyML Autoencoders (TinyAE) within its TEE to evaluate the runtime SRAM state. SA verdicts are securely bound to the handshake transcript context, enabling stateless verification at the peer node. The proposed protocol yields mutually authenticated and firmware-attested communication without traditional latency and reference distribution overheads. We report an average accuracy of 99.42%, F1 score of 99.70%, TPR of 99.45%, and TNR of 95.14% on SRAM attestation datasets, an optimized per-handshake latency, energy consumption, and peak memory footprint of 26.3-294.9ms, 2.65-9.35mJ, and 4.91KB, respectively, across three Arm Cortex-M boards, and evaluate the models on simulated runtime attacks, random perturbation, and adversarial ML.

Graph pattern counting serves as a cornerstone of network analysis with extensive real-world applications. Its integration with local differential privacy (LDP) has gained growing attention for protecting sensitive graph information in decentralized settings. However, existing LDP frameworks are largely ad hoc, offering solutions only for specific patterns such as triangles and stars. A general mechanism for counting arbitrary graph patterns, even for the subclass of acyclic patterns, has remained an open problem. To fill this gap, we present the first general solution for counting arbitrary acyclic patterns under LDP. We identify and tackle two fundamental challenges: generalizing pattern construction from distributed data and eliminating node duplication during the construction. To address the first challenge, we propose an LDP-tailored recursive subpattern counting framework that incrementally builds patterns across multiple communication rounds. For the second challenge, we apply a random marking technique that restricts each node to a unique position in the pattern during computation. Our mechanism achieves strong utility guarantees: for any acyclic graph pattern with $k$ edges, we achieve an additive error of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N}d(G)^k)$, where $N$ is the number of nodes and $d(G)$ is the maximum degree of the input graph $G$. Experiments on real-world graph datasets across multiple types of acyclic patterns demonstrate that our mechanisms achieve up to $46$-$2600\times$ improvement in utility and $300$-$650\times$ reduction in communication cost compared to the baseline methods.

Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) remain difficult to detect due to their stealthy nature and long-term persistence. To tackle this challenge, provenance-based threat hunting has gained traction as a proactive defense mechanism. This technique models audit logs as a whole-system provenance graph and searches for subgraphs that match APT patterns recorded in Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) reports. However, several limitations persist: 1) significant memory and time overhead due to the extremely large provenance graphs; 2) imprecise segmentation of APT activities from provenance graphs due to their intricate entanglement with benign operations; and 3) poor alignment of attack representations between CTI-derived query graphs and provenance graphs due to their substantial semantic gaps. To address these limitations, this paper presents ProHunter, an efficient and accurate provenance-based APT hunting system with a platform-independent design. To minimize system overhead, ProHunter creates a compact data structure that efficiently stores long-term provenance graphs using semantic abstraction and bit-level hierarchical encoding strategies. To segment APT behaviors, a heuristic-driven threat graph sampling algorithm is designed, which can extract precise attack patterns from provenance graphs. Furthermore, to bridge the semantic gaps between CTI-derived graphs and provenance graphs, ProHunter proposes adaptive graph representation and feature enhancement methods, enabling the extraction of consistent attack semantics at both localized and globalized levels.Extensive evaluations on real-world APT campaigns from DARPA TC E3, E5 and OpTC datasets demonstrate that ProHunter outperforms state-of-the-art threat hunting systems in terms of efficiency and accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/xueboQiu/ProHunter.

An equidistribution is a theoretical quality criteria that measures the uniformity of a linear pseudo-random number generator (PRNG). In this work, we first show that all existing linear cellular automaton (CA) based pseudo-random number generators (PRNGs) are weak in the equidistribution characteristic. Then we propose a list of light-weight combined CA-based PRNGs with time spacing ($2 \leq s \leq 10$) using linear maximal length cellular automata of degree $31 \leq k \leq 128$ (close to computer word size). We show that these PRNGs achieve maximal period as well as satisfy the maximal equidistribution property. Finally, we show that these combined maximal length CA-based PRNGs pass almost all the empirical testbeds, with speed and performance comparable to the Mersenne Twister.

Security in LLM agents is inherently contextual. For example, the same action taken by an agent may represent legitimate behavior or a security violation depending on whose instruction led to the action, what objective is being pursued, and whether the action serves that objective. However, existing definitions of security attacks against LLM agents often fail to capture this contextual nature. As a result, defenses face a fundamental utility-security tradeoff: applying defenses uniformly across all contexts can lead to significant utility loss, while applying defenses in insufficient or inappropriate contexts can result in security vulnerabilities. In this work, we present a framework that systematizes existing attacks and defenses from the perspective of contextual security. To this end, we propose four security properties that capture contextual security for LLM agents: task alignment (pursuing authorized objectives), action alignment (individual actions serving those objectives), source authorization (executing commands from authenticated sources), and data isolation (ensuring information flows respect privilege boundaries). We further introduce a set of oracle functions that enable verification of whether these security properties are violated as an agent executes a user task. Using this framework, we reformalize existing attacks, such as indirect prompt injection, direct prompt injection, jailbreak, task drift, and memory poisoning, as violations of one or more security properties, thereby providing precise and contextual definitions of these attacks. Similarly, we reformalize defenses as mechanisms that strengthen oracle functions or perform security property checks. Finally, we discuss several important future research directions enabled by our framework.

We develop a variational encrypted model predictive control (VEMPC) protocol whose online execution relies only on encrypted polynomial operations. The proposed approach reformulates the MPC problem into a sampling-based estimator, in which the computation of the quadratic cost is naturally handled by tilting the sampling distribution, thus reducing online encrypted computation. The resulting protocol requires no additional communication rounds or intermediate decryption, and scales efficiently through two complementary levels of parallelism. We analyze the effect of encryption-induced errors on optimality, and simulation results demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed method.

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external tools (file operations, API calls, database transactions) to autonomously complete complex multi-step tasks. Practitioners deploy defense-trained models to protect against prompt injection attacks that manipulate agent behavior through malicious observations or retrieved content. We reveal a fundamental capability-alignment paradox: defense training designed to improve safety systematically destroys agent competence while failing to prevent sophisticated attacks. Evaluating defended models against undefended baselines across 97 agent tasks and 1,000 adversarial prompts, we uncover three systematic biases unique to multi-step agents. Agent incompetence bias manifests as immediate tool execution breakdown, with models refusing or generating invalid actions on benign tasks before observing any external content. Cascade amplification bias causes early failures to propagate through retry loops, pushing defended models to timeout on 99% of tasks compared to 13% for baselines. Trigger bias leads to paradoxical security degradation where defended models perform worse than undefended baselines while straightforward attacks bypass defenses at high rates. Root cause analysis reveals these biases stem from shortcut learning: models overfit to surface attack patterns rather than semantic threat understanding, evidenced by extreme variance in defense effectiveness across attack categories. Our findings demonstrate that current defense paradigms optimize for single-turn refusal benchmarks while rendering multi-step agents fundamentally unreliable, necessitating new approaches that preserve tool execution competence under adversarial conditions.

Membership inference attacks (MIAs), which enable adversaries to determine whether specific data points were part of a model's training dataset, have emerged as an important framework to understand, assess, and quantify the potential information leakage associated with machine learning systems. Designing effective MIAs is a challenging task that usually requires extensive manual exploration of model behaviors to identify potential vulnerabilities. In this paper, we introduce AutoMIA – a novel framework that leverages large language model (LLM) agents to automate the design and implementation of new MIA signal computations. By utilizing LLM agents, we can systematically explore a vast space of potential attack strategies, enabling the discovery of novel strategies. Our experiments demonstrate AutoMIA can successfully discover new MIAs that are specifically tailored to user-configured target model and dataset, resulting in improvements of up to 0.18 in absolute AUC over existing MIAs. This work provides the first demonstration that LLM agents can serve as an effective and scalable paradigm for designing and implementing MIAs with SOTA performance, opening up new avenues for future exploration.

The increasing sophistication of cyber threats, especially zero-day attacks, poses a significant challenge to cybersecurity. Zero-day attacks exploit unknown vulnerabilities, making them difficult to detect and defend against. Existing approaches patch flaws and deploy an Intrusion Detection System (IDS). Using advanced Wasserstein GANs with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP), this paper makes a novel proposition to synthesize network traffic that mimics zero-day patterns, enriching data diversity and improving IDS generalization. SA-WGAN-GP is first introduced, which adds a Self-Attention (SA) mechanism to capture long-range cross-feature dependencies by reshaping the feature vector into tokens after dense projections. A JS-WGAN-GP is then proposed, which adds a Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence-based auxiliary discriminator that is trained with Binary Cross-Entropy (BCE), frozen during updates, and used to regularize the generator for smoother gradients and higher sample quality. Third, SA-JS-WGAN-GP is created by combining the SA mechanism with JS divergence, thereby enhancing the data generation ability of WGAN-GP. As data augmentation does not equate with true zero-day attack discovery, we emulate zero-day attacks via the leave-one-attack-type-out method on the NSL-KDD dataset for training all GANs and IDS models in the assessment of the effectiveness of the proposed solution. The evaluation results show that integrating SA and JS divergence into WGAN-GP yields superior IDS performance and more effective zero-day risk detection.

Internet of Things devices with 10 to 20 year lifespans need post-quantum migration, yet the finalised NIST standards remain sparsely benchmarked on the most constrained 32-bit ARM class. We present, to our knowledge, the first isolated algorithm-level benchmarks of ML-KEM (FIPS 203) and ML-DSA (FIPS 204) on ARM Cortex-M0+: all six parameter sets on the RP2040 at 125 MHz, using PQClean reference C. A full ML-KEM-512 key exchange completes in 35.7 ms, 17x faster than an mbedTLS ECDH P-256 baseline on the same hardware. ML-DSA signing varies widely under rejection sampling (coefficient of variation 66.0 to 73.5%), and we recover the rejection-sampling iteration count of individual signatures from wall-clock time alone, a timing side channel that reveals attempt counts but not their content. The Cortex-M0+ incurs only a roughly 2.0x slowdown relative to published Cortex-M4 reference C despite lacking a 64-bit multiplier, DSP, and SIMD instructions. A second physical RP2040 agrees to within 0.075%, showing that build configuration, not silicon, dominates measurement variance. All code and data are released as an open-source benchmark suite.

Industrial Control Systems (ICS), and many simple Internet of Things (IoT) devices, commonly communicate using unencrypted or unauthenticated protocols. For ICS this is an historical carryover since the introduction of these systems predated practical lightweight cryptography. As the processing power of small devices has grown exponentially at the same time as new, more efficient encryption algorithms have become available, end device encryption of communication protocols is becoming much more practical, but is still not widely used with ICS protocols such as Modbus and IEC61850 (GOOSE) which have tight requirements for both latency and variance. Newer micro-processors can also present challenges both to measurement and use, since features such as dynamic frequency scaling can significantly impact performance measurements. In this paper, we measured the time cost of adding encryption into the communication cycle of low-cost edge devices using ChaCha20-Poly1305, and show that in the worst case the encryption cycle took less than 7.1 percent of the latency requirements of Goose, and less than 3% for IEC-60834-1 on Raspberry PI 4, and an Intel N95 Mini PC, which is well within the specified latency requirements for these protocols.

Binary vulnerability analysis is increasingly performed by LLM-based agents in an iterative, multi-pass manner, with the model as the core decision-maker. However, how such systems organize exploration over hundreds of reasoning steps remains poorly understood, due to limited context windows and implicit token-level behaviors. We present the first large-scale, trace-level study showing that multi-pass LLM reasoning gives rise to structured, token-level implicit patterns. Analyzing 521 binaries with 99,563 reasoning steps, we identify four dominant patterns: early pruning, path-dependent lock-in, targeted backtracking, and knowledge-guided prioritization that emerge implicitly from reasoning traces. These token-level implicit patterns serve as an abstraction of LLM reasoning: instead of explicit control-flow or predefined heuristics, exploration is organized through implicit decisions regulating path selection, commitment, and revision. Our analysis shows these patterns form a stable, structured system with distinct temporal roles and measurable characteristics. Our results provide the first systematic characterization of LLM-driven binary analysis and a foundation for more reliable analysis systems.

Post-quantum cryptography currently rests on a small number of hardness assumptions, posing significant risks should any one of them be compromised. This vulnerability motivates the search for new and cryptographically versatile assumptions that make a convincing case for quantum hardness. In this work, we argue that decoding random quantum stabilizer codes—a quantum analog of the well-studied LPN problem—is an excellent candidate. This task occupies a unique middle ground: it is inherently native to quantum computation, yet admits an equivalent formulation with purely classical input and output, as recently shown by Khesin et al. (STOC '26). We prove that the average-case hardness of quantum stabilizer decoding implies the core primitives of classical Cryptomania, including public-key encryption (PKE) and oblivious transfer (OT), as well as one-way functions. Our constructions are moreover practically efficient: our PKE scheme achieves essentially the same efficiency as state-of-the-art LPN-based PKE. We also provide substantial evidence that stabilizer decoding does not reduce to LPN, suggesting that the former problem constitutes a genuinely new post-quantum assumption. Our primary technical contributions are twofold. First, we give a reduction from random quantum stabilizer decoding to an average-case problem closely resembling LPN, but which is equipped with additional symplectic algebraic structure. While this structure is essential to the quantum nature of the problem, it raises significant barriers to cryptographic security reductions. Second, we develop a new suite of scrambling techniques for such structured linear spaces, and use them to produce rigorous security proofs for all of our constructions.

FL has emerged as a transformative paradigm for ITS, notably camera-based Road Condition Classification (RCC). However, by enabling collaboration, FL-based RCC exposes the system to adversarial participants launching Targeted Label-Flipping Attacks (TLFAs). Malicious clients (vehicles) can relabel their local training data (e.g., from an actual uneven road to a wrong smooth road), consequently compromising global model predictions and jeopardizing transportation safety. Existing countermeasures against such poisoning attacks fail to maintain resilient model performance near the necessary attack-free levels in various attack scenarios due to: 1) not tailoring poisoned local model detection to TLFAs, 2) not excluding malicious vehicular clients based on historical behavior, and 3) not remedying the already-corrupted global model after exclusion. To close this research gap, we propose FedTrident, which introduces: 1) neuron-wise analysis for local model misbehavior detection (notably including attack goal identification, critical feature extraction, and GMM-based model clustering and filtering); 2) adaptive client rating for client exclusion according to the local model detection results in each FL round; and 3) machine unlearning for corrupted global model remediation once malicious clients are excluded during FL. Extensive evaluation across diverse FL-RCC models, tasks, and configurations demonstrates that FedTrident can effectively thwart TLFAs, achieving performance comparable to that in attack-free scenarios and outperforming eight baseline countermeasures by 9.49% and 4.47% for the two most critical metrics. Moreover, FedTrident is resilient to various malicious client rates, data heterogeneity levels, complicated multi-task, and dynamic attacks.

Existing cybersecurity literature lacks a source of empirical, representative data as to the true nature of cyberattacks on Critical National Infrastructure. We have obtained UK-wide data on incidents reported under the Network and Information Systems (NIS) Regulations in 2024 causing "a significant impact on the continuity" of essential services and comparator data from intelligence agencies. We find that 29% of NIS reports already concern cybersecurity incidents. As the UK Government seeks to extend cybersecurity reporting, we find the NIS Regulations are limited in their effectiveness; whilst our requests revealed 30 cybersecurity incidents reported under the NIS regulations, there were 89 incidents classified as "highly significant and significant" captured by the National Cyber Security Centre in the 2024 reporting year. Whereas 36% of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency reported attacks concerned espionage, from NIS data we find 100% NIS-reportable cyberattacks concerning healthcare systems in England in 2024 were ransomware.

When large AI models are deployed as cloud-based services, clients have no guarantee that responses are correct or were produced by the intended model. Rerunning inference locally is infeasible for large models, and existing cryptographic proof systems – while providing strong correctness guarantees – introduce prohibitive prover overhead (e.g., hundreds of seconds per query for billion-parameter models). We present a verification framework and protocol that replaces full cryptographic proofs with a lightweight, sampling-based approach grounded in statistical properties of neural networks. We formalize the conditions under which trace separation between functionally dissimilar models can be leveraged to argue the security of verifiable inference protocols. The prover commits to the execution trace of inference via Merkle-tree-based vector commitments and opens only a small number of entries along randomly sampled paths from output to input. This yields a protocol that trades soundness for efficiency, a tradeoff well-suited to auditing, large-scale deployment settings where repeated queries amplify detection probability, and scenarios with rationally incentivized provers who face penalties upon detection. Our approach reduces proving times by several orders of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art cryptographic proof systems, going from the order of minutes to the order of milliseconds, with moderately larger proofs. Experiments on ResNet-18 classifiers and Llama-2-7B confirm that common architectures exhibit the statistical properties our protocol requires, and that natural adversarial strategies (gradient-descent reconstruction, inverse transforms, logit swapping) fail to produce traces that evade detection. We additionally present a protocol in the refereed delegation model, where two competing servers enable correct output identification in a logarithmic number of rounds.