Computation and Language
Algorithmic Reflectivity in Large Language Models: Methodological Study of Linguistic Structure in Mentalization
Stefano Epifani, Giuliano Castigliego, Giuliano Razzicchia et al. (+2 more)
Mentalization is a core human capacity involving the interpretation of one's own and others' behavior in terms of underlying mental states. Large
language models (LLMs) can generate linguistically reflective discourse, raising the question of whether the formal linguistic structure of mentalization can be reproduced without experiential and affective processes. This study assessed whether an LLM can generate mentalization profiles structurally coherent with the dimensions of mentalization-based treatment (MBT) and recognized as formally mentalizing by expert clinicians. Fifty human-model dialogues were generated with GPT-4.1 under standardized conditions; at the end of each, the model produced a narrative mentalization profile. Five MBT-trained psychiatrists independently rated each profile on 4 canonical MBT axes and 2 higher-order dimensions (regulatory functions, synthetic profile) for evaluative and argumentative coherence. Interrater reliability was assessed with ICC(3,k). Mean scores ranged from 3.63 to 3.98, indicating moderate-to-high structural coherence; ICC(3,k) in the evaluative domain ranged from 0.60 to 0.84. Evaluative and argumentative coherence were strongly associated (Pearson r 0.826-0.967). A negative control with mismatched dialogue-profile pairs yielded minimal ratings. Clinicians described outputs as linguistically organized and clinically interpretable, but with limited affective variability and contextual integration. The findings suggest that LLMs can reproduce the formal linguistic structure of reflective discourse - a phenomenon we term algorithmic reflectivity - which appears more consistent with structural
language regularities than with experiential or intentional processes. LLMs may serve as research and training tools for studying the linguistic aspects of mentalization.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Stefano Epifani, Giuliano Castigliego, Giuliano Razzicchia, Elisabeth Seiwald-Sonderegger, Laura Kecskeméti
Computation and Language
Goal-Directed Search Outperforms Goal-Agnostic Memory Compression in Long-Context Memory Tasks
Yicong Zheng, Kevin L. McKee, Thomas Miconi et al. (+3 more)
How to enable human-like long-term
memory in large
language models (LLMs) has been a central question for unlocking more general capabilities such as few-shot generalization. Existing
memory frameworks and
benchmarks focus on finding the optimal
memory compression
algorithm for higher performance in tasks that require recollection and sometimes further
reasoning. However, such efforts have ended up building more human bias into the compression
algorithm, through the search for the best
prompts and
memory architectures that suit specific
benchmarks, rather than finding a general solution that would work on other data distributions. On the other hand, goal-directed search on uncompressed information could potentially exhibit superior performance because compression is lossy, and a predefined compression
algorithm will not fit all raw data distributions. Here we present SUMER (Search in Uncompressed
Memory via Experience Replay), an end-to-end reinforcement learning
agent with verifiable reward (RLVR) that learns to use search tools to gather information and answer a target question. On the LoCoMo
dataset for long-context conversation understanding, SUMER with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct learned to use search tools and outperformed all other biased
memory compression approaches and also the full-context baseline, reaching SOTA performance (43% gain over the prior best). We demonstrate that a simple search method applied to raw data outperforms goal-agnostic and biased compression
algorithms in current long-context
memory tasks, arguing for new paradigms and
benchmarks that are more dynamic and autonomously scalable. Code for SUMER and all implemented baselines is publicly available at https://github.com/zycyc/SUMER.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Yicong Zheng, Kevin L. McKee, Thomas Miconi, Zacharie Bugaud, Mick van Gelderen, Jed McCaleb
Computation and Language
PromptTailor: Multi-turn Intent-Aligned Prompt Synthesis for Lightweight LLMs
Yizhou Xu and Janet Davis
Lightweight
language models remain attractive for on-device and
privacy-sensitive applications, but their responses are highly sensitive to
prompt quality. For open-ended generation, non-expert users often lack the knowledge or time to consistently craft high-quality
prompts, leading them to rely on
prompt optimization tools. However, a key challenge is ensuring the optimized
prompts genuinely align with users' original intents and preferences. We introduce PromptTailor, a system for controllable
prompt generation for open-ended text that improves model output quality by intent-aligned
prompt synthesis. PromptTailor expands minimal user instructions into rich, domain-aware
prompts while preserving the user's stated preferences. The system is a quantized Llama3-8B model fine-tuned with a lightweight LoRA adapter on 12,300
prompt-refinement dialogues spanning 41 everyday domains, distilled from three stronger LLMs. The adapter attaches to any Llama3-8B base, enabling edge deployment. In human and LLM-judge evaluations across multiple target models and optimization baselines, PromptTailor yields higher preference rates than chain-of-thought prompting and matches or surpasses state-of-the-art
prompt optimization methods while requiring fewer model calls (e.g., 3 vs. 9). These results show that a compact student, guided by powerful teachers, can learn effective
prompt-generation strategies that enhance response quality while maintaining
alignment with user intent.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
AD-CDO: A Lightweight Ontology for Representing Eligibility Criteria in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials
Zenan Sun, Rashmie Abeysinghe, Xiaojin Li et al. (+5 more)
Objective This study introduces the Alzheimer's Disease Common Data Element Ontology for Clinical Trials (AD-CDO), a lightweight, semantically enriched ontology designed to represent and standardize key eligibility criteria concepts in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. Materials and Methods We extracted high-frequency concepts from more than 1,500 AD clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov and organized them into seven semantic categories: Disease, Medication, Diagnostic Test, Procedure, Social Determinants of Health, Rating Criteria, and Fertility. Each concept was annotated with standard biomedical vocabularies, including the UMLS, OMOP Standardized Vocabularies, DrugBank, NDC, and NLM VSAC value sets. To balance coverage and manageability, we applied the Jenks Natural Breaks method to identify an optimal set of representative concepts. Results The optimized AD-CDO achieved over 63% coverage of extracted trial concepts while maintaining interpretability and compactness. The ontology effectively captured the most frequent and clinically meaningful entities used in AD eligibility criteria. We demonstrated AD-CDO's practical utility through two use cases: (a) an ontology-driven trial simulation system for formal modeling and virtual execution of clinical trials, and (b) an entity normalization task mapping raw clinical text to ontology-aligned terms, enabling consistency and integration with EHR data. Discussion AD-CDO bridges the gap between broad biomedical ontologies and task-specific trial modeling needs. It supports multiple downstream applications, including phenotyping
algorithm development, cohort identification, and structured data integration. Conclusion By harmonizing essential eligibility entities and aligning them with standardized vocabularies, AD-CDO provides a versatile foundation for ontology-driven AD clinical trial research.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Zenan Sun, Rashmie Abeysinghe, Xiaojin Li, Xinyue Hu, Licong Cui, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Jiang Bian, Cui Tao
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG
BlockCert: Certified Blockwise Extraction of Transformer Mechanisms
Sandro Andric
Mechanistic interpretability aspires to reverse-engineer neural networks into explicit
algorithms, while model editing seeks to modify specific behaviours without retraining. Both areas are typically evaluated with informal evidence and ad-hoc experiments, with few explicit guarantees about how far an extracted or edited model can drift from the original on relevant inputs. We introduce BlockCert, a framework for certified blockwise extraction of
transformer mechanisms, and outline how a lightweight extension can support certified local edits. Given a pre-trained
transformer and a
prompt distribution, BlockCert extracts structured surrogate implementations for residual blocks together with machine-checkable certificates that bound approximation error, record coverage metrics, and hash the underlying artifacts. We formalize a simple Lipschitz-based composition
theorem in Lean 4 that lifts these local guarantees to a global deviation bound. Empirically, we apply the framework to GPT-2 small, TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat, and Llama-3.2-3B. Across these models we obtain high per-block coverage and small residual errors on the evaluated
prompts, and in the TinyLlama setting we show that a fully stitched model matches the baseline perplexity within approximately 6e-5 on stress
prompts. Our results suggest that blockwise extraction with explicit certificates is feasible for real
transformer language models and offers a practical bridge between mechanistic interpretability and formal
reasoning about model behaviour.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
ConCISE: A Reference-Free Conciseness Evaluation Metric for LLM-Generated Answers
Seyed Mohssen Ghafari, Ronny Kol, Juan C. Quiroz et al. (+5 more)
Large
language models (LLMs) frequently generate responses that are lengthy and verbose, filled with redundant or unnecessary details. This diminishes clarity and user satisfaction, and it increases costs for model developers, especially with well-known proprietary models that charge based on the number of output
tokens. In this paper, we introduce a novel reference-free metric for evaluating the conciseness of responses generated by LLMs. Our method quantifies non-essential content without relying on gold standard references and calculates the average of three calculations: i) a compression ratio between the original response and an LLM abstractive summary; ii) a compression ratio between the original response and an LLM extractive summary; and iii) wordremoval compression, where an LLM removes as many non-essential words as possible from the response while preserving its meaning, with the number of
tokens removed indicating the conciseness score. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed metric identifies redundancy in LLM outputs, offering a practical tool for automated evaluation of response brevity in conversational AI systems without the need for ground truth human annotations.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Seyed Mohssen Ghafari, Ronny Kol, Juan C. Quiroz, Nella Luan, Monika Patial, Chanaka Rupasinghe, Herman Wandabwa, Luiz Pizzato
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
Fantastic Bugs and Where to Find Them in AI Benchmarks
Sang Truong, Yuheng Tu, Michael Hardy et al. (+8 more)
Benchmarks are pivotal in driving AI progress, and invalid
benchmark questions frequently undermine their reliability. Manually identifying and correcting errors among thousands of
benchmark questions is not only infeasible but also a critical bottleneck for reliable evaluation. In this work, we introduce a framework for systematic
benchmark revision that leverages statistical analysis of response patterns to flag potentially invalid questions for further expert review. Our approach builds on a core assumption commonly used in AI evaluations that the mean score sufficiently summarizes model performance. This implies a unidimensional latent construct underlying the measurement experiment, yielding expected ranges for various statistics for each item. When empirically estimated values for these statistics fall outside the expected range for an item, the item is more likely to be problematic. Across nine widely used
benchmarks, our method guides expert review to identify problematic questions with up to 84% precision. In addition, we introduce an LLM-judge first pass to review questions, further reducing human effort. Together, these components provide an efficient and scalable framework for systematic
benchmark revision.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Sang Truong, Yuheng Tu, Michael Hardy, Anka Reuel, Zeyu Tang, Jirayu Burapacheep, Jonathan Perera, Chibuike Uwakwe, Ben Domingue, Nick Haber, Sanmi Koyejo
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
Cognitive BASIC: An In-Model Interpreted Reasoning Language for LLMs
Oliver Kramer
Cognitive BASIC is a minimal, BASIC-style prompting
language and in-model interpreter that structures large
language model (LLM)
reasoning into explicit, stepwise execution traces. Inspired by the simplicity of retro BASIC, we repurpose numbered lines and simple commands as an interpretable cognitive control layer. Modern LLMs can reliably simulate such short programs, enabling transparent multi-step
reasoning inside the model. A natural-
language interpreter file specifies command semantics,
memory updates, and logging behavior. Our mental-model interpreter extracts declarative and procedural knowledge, detects contradictions, and produces resolutions when necessary. A comparison across three LLMs on a
benchmark of knowledge extraction, conflict detection, and
reasoning tasks shows that all models can execute Cognitive BASIC programs, with overall strong but not uniform performance.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.SI
The Shifting Landscape of Vaccine Discourse: Insights From a Decade of Pre- to Post-COVID-19 Vaccine Posts on Social Media
Nikesh Gyawali, Doina Caragea, Cornelia Caragea et al. (+1 more)
In this work, we study English-
language vaccine discourse in social media posts, specifically posts on X (formerly Twitter), in seven years before the COVID-19 outbreak (2013 to 2019) and three years after the outbreak was first reported (2020 to 2022). Drawing on theories from social cognition and the stereotype content model in Social Psychology, we analyze how English speakers talk about vaccines on social media to understand the evolving narrative around vaccines in social media posts. To do that, we first introduce a novel
dataset comprising 18.7 million curated posts on vaccine discourse from 2013 to 2022. This extensive collection-filtered down from an initial 129 million posts through rigorous preprocessing-captures both pre-COVID and COVID-19 periods, offering valuable insights into the
evolution of English-speaking X users' perceptions related to vaccines. Our analysis shows that the COVID-19 pandemic led to complex shifts in X users' sentiment and discourse around vaccines. We observe that negative
emotion word usage decreased during the pandemic, with notable rises in usage of surprise, and trust related
emotion words. Furthermore, vaccine-related
language tended to use more warmth-focused words associated with trustworthiness, along with positive, competence-focused words during the early days of the pandemic, with a marked rise in negative word usage towards the end of the pandemic, possibly reflecting a growing vaccine hesitancy and skepticism.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Nikesh Gyawali, Doina Caragea, Cornelia Caragea, Saif M. Mohammad
Computation and Language
PEPPER: Perception-Guided Perturbation for Robust Backdoor Defense in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
Oscar Chew, Po-Yi Lu, Jayden Lin et al. (+2 more)
Recent studies show that text-to-image (T2I)
diffusion models are vulnerable to
backdoor attacks, where a trigger in the input
prompt can steer generation toward harmful or unintended content. Beyond the trigger
token itself,
backdoor effects can spread to neighboring
tokens in the text
embedding space. To address this, we introduce PEPPER (PErcePtion-Guided PERturbation), a
backdoor defense that rewrites the caption into a semantically distant yet visually similar caption while adding unobtrusive elements. With this strategy, PEPPER disrupts the trigger embedded in the input
prompt, escapes the attacked neighborhood, and thereby achieves enhanced robustness without training or access to model weights. Experiments show that PEPPER is particularly effective against text encoder-based attacks, substantially reducing attack success while preserving generation quality. PEPPER can also be paired with any existing defenses yielding consistently stronger and generalizable robustness than any standalone method.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Oscar Chew, Po-Yi Lu, Jayden Lin, Kuan-Hao Huang, Hsuan-Tien Lin
Computation and Language
Interpretable dimensions support an effect of agentivity and telicity on split intransitivity
Eva Neu, Brian Dillon and Katrin Erk
Intransitive verbs fall into two different syntactic classes, unergatives and unaccusatives. It has long been argued that verbs describing an agentive action are more likely to appear in an unergative syntax, and those describing a telic event to appear in an unaccusative syntax. However, recent work by Kim et al. (2024) found that human ratings for agentivity and telicity were a poor predictor of the syntactic behavior of intransitives. Here we revisit this question using interpretable dimensions, computed from seed words on opposite poles of the agentive and telic scales. Our findings support the link between unergativity/unaccusativity and agentivity/telicity, and demonstrate that using interpretable dimensions in conjunction with human judgments can offer valuable evidence for semantic properties that are not easily evaluated in rating tasks.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
From Representation to Enactment: The ABC Framework of the Translating Mind
Michael Carl, Takanori Mizowaki, Aishvarya Raj et al. (+4 more)
Building on the third-wave Extended Mind (EM) theory and radical enactivism, this article suggests an alternative to representation-based models of the mind. We build on the ABC framework in which translation is not understood as the manipulation of static interlingual correspondences but an enacted activity, dynamically integrating affective-evaluative, behavioral-enacting, and cognitive-inferential (ABC) processes. Drawing on affordance theory, we argue that the translating mind is the dynamically organized process through which the translator and its environment constitute and transform a landscape of enlanguaged translation affordances for action, that emerges through loops of
brain-body-environment interactions. This non-representational account reframes translation as skillful participation in sociocultural practice, where meaning is co-created in real time through
embodied interaction with texts, tools, and contexts.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Michael Carl, Takanori Mizowaki, Aishvarya Raj, Masaru Yamada, Devi Sri Bandaru, Yuxiang Wei, Xinyue Ren
Computation and Language
NALA_MAINZ at BLP-2025 Task 2: A Multi-agent Approach for Bangla Instruction to Python Code Generation
Hossain Shaikh Saadi, Faria Alam, Mario Sanz-Guerrero et al. (+3 more)
This paper presents JGU Mainz's winning system for the BLP-2025 Shared Task on Code Generation from Bangla Instructions. We propose a multi-
agent-based pipeline. First, a code-generation
agent produces an initial solution from the input instruction. The candidate program is then executed against the provided unit tests (pytest-style, assert-based). Only the failing cases are forwarded to a debugger
agent, which reruns the tests, extracts error traces, and, conditioning on the error messages, the current program, and the relevant test cases, generates a revised solution. Using this approach, our submission achieved first place in the shared task with a $Pass@1$ score of 95.4. We also make our code public.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Hossain Shaikh Saadi, Faria Alam, Mario Sanz-Guerrero, Minh Duc Bui, Manuel Mager, Katharina von der Wense
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
Thinking-while-Generating: Interleaving Textual Reasoning throughout Visual Generation
Ziyu Guo, Renrui Zhang, Hongyu Li et al. (+6 more)
Recent advances in visual generation have increasingly explored the integration of
reasoning capabilities. They incorporate textual
reasoning, i.e., think, either before (as pre-planning) or after (as post-refinement) the generation process, yet they lack on-the-fly
multimodal interaction during the generation itself. In this preliminary study, we introduce Thinking-while-Generating (TwiG), the first interleaved framework that enables co-evolving textual
reasoning throughout the visual generation process. As visual content is progressively generating, textual
reasoning is interleaved to both guide upcoming local regions and reflect on previously synthesized ones. This dynamic interplay produces more context-aware and semantically rich visual outputs. To unveil the potential of this framework, we investigate three candidate strategies, zero-shot prompting, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on our curated TwiG-50K
dataset, and reinforcement learning (RL) via a customized TwiG-GRPO strategy, each offering unique insights into the dynamics of interleaved
reasoning. We hope this work inspires further research into interleaving textual
reasoning for enhanced visual generation. Code will be released at: https://github.com/ZiyuGuo99/Thinking-while-Generating.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Ziyu Guo, Renrui Zhang, Hongyu Li, Manyuan Zhang, Xinyan Chen, Sifan Wang, Yan Feng, Peng Pei, Pheng-Ann Heng
Computation and Language
Nemotron Elastic: Towards Efficient Many-in-One Reasoning LLMs
Ali Taghibakhshi, Sharath Turuvekere Sreenivas, Saurav Muralidharan et al. (+13 more)
Training a family of large
language models targeting multiple scales and deployment objectives is prohibitively expensive, requiring separate training runs for each different size. Recent work on model compression through
pruning and knowledge
distillation has reduced this cost; however, this process still incurs hundreds of billions of
tokens worth of training cost per compressed model. In this paper, we present Nemotron Elastic, a framework for building
reasoning-oriented LLMs, including hybrid Mamba-
Attention architectures, that embed multiple nested submodels within a single parent model, each optimized for different deployment configurations and budgets. Each of these submodels shares weights with the parent model and can be extracted zero-shot during deployment without additional training or fine-tuning. We enable this functionality through an end-to-end trained router, tightly coupled to a two-stage training curriculum designed specifically for
reasoning models. We additionally introduce group-aware SSM elastification that preserves Mamba's structural constraints, heterogeneous MLP elastification, normalized MSE-based layer importance for improved depth selection, and knowledge
distillation enabling simultaneous multi-budget optimization. We apply Nemotron Elastic to the Nemotron Nano V2 12B model, simultaneously producing a 9B and a 6B model using only 110B training
tokens; this results in over 360x cost reduction compared to training model families from scratch, and around 7x compared to SoTA compression techniques. Each of the nested models performs on par or better than the SoTA in accuracy. Moreover, unlike other compression methods, the nested capability of our approach allows having a many-in-one
reasoning model that has constant deployment
memory against the number of models in the family.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Ali Taghibakhshi, Sharath Turuvekere Sreenivas, Saurav Muralidharan, Ruisi Cai, Marcin Chochowski, Ameya Sunil Mahabaleshwarkar, Yoshi Suhara, Oluwatobi Olabiyi, Daniel Korzekwa, Mostofa Patwary, Mohammad Shoeybi, Jan Kautz, Bryan Catanzaro, Ashwath Aithal, Nima Tajbakhsh, Pavlo Molchanov
Computation and Language
Comparison of Text-Based and Image-Based Retrieval in Multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation Large Language Model Systems
Elias Lumer, Alex Cardenas, Matt Melich et al. (+5 more)
Recent advancements in
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) have enabled Large
Language Models (LLMs) to access
multimodal knowledge bases containing both text and visual information such as charts, diagrams, and tables in financial documents. However, existing
multimodal RAG systems rely on LLM-based summarization to convert images into text during preprocessing, storing only text representations in vector databases, which causes loss of contextual information and visual details critical for downstream
retrieval and question answering. To address this limitation, we present a comprehensive comparative analysis of two
retrieval approaches for
multimodal RAG systems, including text-based chunk
retrieval (where images are summarized into text before
embedding) and direct
multimodal embedding retrieval (where images are stored natively in the vector space). We evaluate all three approaches across 6 LLM models and a two multi-modal
embedding models on a newly created financial earnings call
benchmark comprising 40 question-answer pairs, each paired with 2 documents (1 image and 1 text chunk). Experimental results demonstrate that direct
multimodal embedding retrieval significantly outperforms LLM-summary-based approaches, achieving absolute improvements of 13% in mean average precision (mAP@5) and 11% in normalized discounted cumulative gain. These gains correspond to relative improvements of 32% in mAP@5 and 20% in nDCG@5, providing stronger evidence of their practical impact. We additionally find that direct
multimodal retrieval produces more accurate and factually consistent answers as measured by LLM-as-a-judge pairwise comparisons. We demonstrate that LLM summarization introduces information loss during preprocessing, whereas direct
multimodal embeddings preserve visual context for
retrieval and inference.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Elias Lumer, Alex Cardenas, Matt Melich, Myles Mason, Sara Dieter, Vamse Kumar Subbiah, Pradeep Honaganahalli Basavaraju, Roberto Hernandez
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from eess.AS
Codec2Vec: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning Using Neural Speech Codecs
Wei-Cheng Tseng and David Harwath
Recent advancements in neural audio codecs have not only enabled superior audio compression but also enhanced
speech synthesis techniques. Researchers are now exploring their potential as universal acoustic feature extractors for a broader range of
speech processing tasks. Building on this trend, we introduce Codec2Vec, the first
speech representation learning framework that relies exclusively on discrete audio codec units. This approach offers several advantages, including improved data storage and transmission efficiency, faster training, and enhanced data
privacy. We explore masked prediction with various training target derivation strategies to thoroughly understand the effectiveness of this framework. Evaluated on the SUPERB
benchmark, Codec2Vec achieves competitive performance compared to continuous-input models while reducing storage requirements by up to 16.5x and training time by 2.3x, showcasing its scalability and efficiency.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
SurvAgent: Hierarchical CoT-Enhanced Case Banking and Dichotomy-Based Multi-Agent System for Multimodal Survival Prediction
Guolin Huang, Wenting Chen, Jiaqi Yang et al. (+5 more)
Survival analysis is critical for cancer prognosis and treatment planning, yet existing methods lack the transparency essential for clinical adoption. While recent pathology
agents have demonstrated explainability in diagnostic tasks, they face three limitations for survival prediction: inability to integrate
multimodal data, ineffective region-of-interest exploration, and failure to leverage experiential learning from historical cases. We introduce SurvAgent, the first hierarchical chain-of-thought (CoT)-enhanced multi-
agent system for
multimodal survival prediction. SurvAgent consists of two stages: (1) WSI-Gene CoT-Enhanced Case Bank Construction employs hierarchical analysis through Low-Magnification Screening, Cross-Modal Similarity-Aware Patch Mining, and Confidence-Aware Patch Mining for pathology images, while Gene-Stratified analysis processes six functional gene categories. Both generate structured reports with CoT
reasoning, storing complete analytical processes for experiential learning. (2) Dichotomy-Based Multi-Expert
Agent Inference retrieves similar cases via RAG and integrates
multimodal reports with expert predictions through progressive interval refinement. Extensive experiments on five TCGA cohorts demonstrate SurvAgent's superority over conventional methods, proprietary MLLMs, and medical
agents, establishing a new paradigm for explainable AI-driven survival prediction in precision oncology.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Guolin Huang, Wenting Chen, Jiaqi Yang, Xinheng Lyu, Xiaoling Luo, Sen Yang, Xiaohan Xing, Linlin Shen
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
TimeViper: A Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Vision-Language Model for Efficient Long Video Understanding
Boshen Xu, Zihan Xiao, Jiaze Li et al. (+4 more)
We introduce TimeViper, a hybrid
vision-
language model designed to tackle challenges of long
video understanding. Processing long
videos demands both an efficient model architecture and an effective mechanism for handling extended temporal contexts. To this end, TimeViper adopts a hybrid Mamba-
Transformer backbone that combines the efficiency of state-space models with the expressivity of
attention mechanisms. Through this hybrid design, we reveal the
vision-to-text information aggregation phenomenon, where information progressively flows from
vision tokens to text
tokens across increasing LLM depth, resulting in severe
vision token redundancy. Motivated by this observation, we propose TransV, a
token information transfer module that transfers and compresses
vision tokens into instruction
tokens while maintaining
multimodal understanding capabilities. This design enables TimeViper to process hour-long
videos exceeding 10,000 frames. Extensive experiments across multiple
benchmarks demonstrate that TimeViper competes with state-of-the-art models while extending frame numbers. We further analyze
attention behaviors of both Mamba and
Transformer layers, offering new insights into hybrid model interpretability. This work represents an initial step towards developing, interpreting, and compressing hybrid Mamba-
Transformer architectures.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Boshen Xu, Zihan Xiao, Jiaze Li, Jianzhong Ju, Zhenbo Luo, Jian Luan, Qin Jin
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
D-GARA: A Dynamic Benchmarking Framework for GUI Agent Robustness in Real-World Anomalies
Sen Chen, Tong Zhao, Yi Bin et al. (+3 more)
Developing intelligent
agents capable of operating a wide range of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) with human-level proficiency is a key milestone on the path toward Artificial General Intelligence. While most existing
datasets and
benchmarks for training and evaluating GUI
agents are static and idealized, failing to reflect the complexity and unpredictability of real-world environments, particularly the presence of anomalies. To bridge this research gap, we propose D-GARA, a dynamic benchmarking framework, to evaluate Android GUI
agent robustness in real-world anomalies. D-GARA introduces a diverse set of real-world anomalies that GUI
agents commonly face in practice, including interruptions such as permission dialogs, battery warnings, and update
prompts. Based on D-GARA framework, we construct and annotate a
benchmark featuring commonly used Android applications with embedded anomalies to support broader community research. Comprehensive experiments and results demonstrate substantial performance degradation in state-of-the-art GUI
agents when exposed to anomaly-rich environments, highlighting the need for robustness-aware learning. D-GARA is modular and extensible, supporting the seamless integration of new tasks, anomaly types, and interaction scenarios to meet specific evaluation goals.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Sen Chen, Tong Zhao, Yi Bin, Fei Ma, Wenqi Shao, Zheng Wang
Computation and Language
Integrating Symbolic Natural Language Understanding and Language Models for Word Sense Disambiguation
Kexin Zhao and Ken Forbus
Word sense disambiguation is a fundamental challenge in natural
language understanding. Current methods are primarily aimed at coarse-grained representations (e.g. WordNet synsets or FrameNet frames) and require hand-annotated training data to construct. This makes it difficult to automatically disambiguate richer representations (e.g. built on OpenCyc) that are needed for sophisticated inference. We propose a method that uses statistical
language models as oracles for disambiguation that does not require any hand-annotation of training data. Instead, the multiple candidate meanings generated by a symbolic NLU system are converted into distinguishable natural
language alternatives, which are used to query an LLM to select appropriate interpretations given the linguistic context. The selected meanings are propagated back to the symbolic NLU system. We evaluate our method against human-annotated gold answers to demonstrate its effectiveness.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
WER is Unaware: Assessing How ASR Errors Distort Clinical Understanding in Patient Facing Dialogue
Zachary Ellis, Jared Joselowitz, Yash Deo et al. (+7 more)
As Automatic
Speech Recognition (ASR) is increasingly deployed in clinical dialogue, standard evaluations still rely heavily on Word Error Rate (WER). This paper challenges that standard, investigating whether WER or other common metrics correlate with the clinical impact of transcription errors. We establish a gold-standard
benchmark by having expert clinicians compare ground-truth utterances to their ASR-generated counterparts, labeling the clinical impact of any discrepancies found in two distinct doctor-patient dialogue
datasets. Our analysis reveals that WER and a comprehensive suite of existing metrics correlate poorly with the clinician-assigned risk labels (No, Minimal, or Significant Impact). To bridge this evaluation gap, we introduce an LLM-as-a-Judge, programmatically optimized using GEPA through DSPy to replicate expert clinical assessment. The optimized judge (Gemini-2.5-Pro) achieves human-comparable performance, obtaining 90% accuracy and a strong Cohen's kappa of 0.816. This work provides a validated, automated framework for moving ASR evaluation beyond simple textual fidelity to a necessary, scalable assessment of safety in clinical dialogue.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Zachary Ellis, Jared Joselowitz, Yash Deo, Yajie He, Anna Kalygina, Aisling Higham, Mana Rahimzadeh, Yan Jia, Ibrahim Habli, Ernest Lim
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.IR
The Oracle and The Prism: A Decoupled and Efficient Framework for Generative Recommendation Explanation
Jiaheng Zhang and Daqiang Zhang
The integration of Large
Language Models (LLMs) into explainable recommendation systems often leads to a performance-efficiency trade-off in end-to-end architectures, where joint optimization of ranking and explanation can result in suboptimal compromises. To resolve this, we propose Prism, a novel decoupled framework that rigorously separates the recommendation process into a dedicated ranking stage and an explanation generation stage. This decomposition ensures that each component is optimized for its specific objective, eliminating inherent conflicts in coupled models. Inspired by knowledge
distillation, Prism leverages a powerful, instruction-following teacher LLM (FLAN-T5-XXL) as an Oracle to produce high-fidelity explanatory knowledge. A compact, fine-tuned student model (BART-Base), the Prism, then specializes in synthesizing this knowledge into personalized explanations. Our extensive experiments on
benchmark datasets reveal a key finding: the
distillation process not only transfers knowledge but also acts as a noise filter. Our 140M-parameter Prism model significantly outperforms its 11B-parameter teacher in human evaluations of faithfulness and personalization, demonstrating an emergent ability to correct
hallucinations present in the teacher's outputs. While achieving a 24x speedup and a 10x reduction in
memory consumption, our analysis validates that decoupling, coupled with targeted
distillation, provides an efficient and effective pathway to high-quality, and perhaps more importantly, trustworthy explainable recommendation.
Read the full abstract ▾