Papers

Motivated by the challenge to improve the adversarial robustness, security, and trust of medical decision making intelligent agents, this study develops a full-link security enhancement framework, which describes "input risk perception - medical evidence constraint - knowledge consistency verification - decision confidence reweighting - security output control - adversarial feedback update." We propose ARSM-Agent and define a weighted joint objective consisting of decision accuracy loss, adversarial robustness loss, safety refusal loss, and knowledge consistency loss, with weights of 0.3, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.2, respectively. The whole medical decision formulation is implemented by multi-module collaborative linkage. We verify that the algorithm is more efficient than four baselines, including LLM-Agent, Retrieval-Agent, Filter-Agent, and Adv-Train-Agent. Under semantic perturbation, prompt injection, drug-name confusion, and false-evidence attacks, ARSM-Agent reduces the overall attack success rate to 8.7% and achieves a knowledge consistency score of 0.91. Ablation experiments quantify each module's contribution: removing risk perception, evidence retrieval, consistency verification, and confidence reweighting reduces accuracy by 6.7%, 9.1%, 7.6%, and 4.4%, respectively, and increases attack success rate by 13.8%, 11.1%, 8.6%, and 6.9%. The proposed approach addresses key security issues of medical decision making intelligent agents, obtains secure decision making in challenging scenarios, and provides reliable intelligent support for medical decision-making intelligent agents.

Railway track intrusions pose a critical safety challenge for Indian Railways, encompassing wildlife incursions and deliberate malicious obstructions. The December 2025 collision in Assam, in which seven elephants were killed by the Rajdhani Express, underscores the urgency of effective real-time detection. Existing solutions such as the optical fiber-based Gajraj system suffer from prohibitive costs (\$1000/km) and high false alarm rates, limiting deployment to only 20 of India's 101 elephant corridors. This paper proposes NETRA, a cost-effective, internet-independent intrusion detection system deployed on Raspberry Pi Zero W and Raspberry Pi 4 edge platforms. NETRA employs probabilistic sensor fusion integrating a PIR motion sensor and an HC-SR04 ultrasonic distance sensor with a tunable threshold (tau_c = 0.65), enabling event-driven camera activation that reduces unnecessary visual processing by 52%. Upon confirmed intrusion, edge-AI classification using MobileNet-SSD (Pi Zero) or YOLOv5 ONNX (Pi 4) identifies threats including humans, large animals, and track obstructions. Confirmed threats are transmitted via LoRa (868 MHz) to alert the locomotive driver within 2.4 seconds end-to-end. Experimental evaluation across 113 motion events demonstrated 95% detection accuracy with zero false alarms through probabilistic fusion, compared to 85% for binary methods. Raspberry Pi 4 with YOLOv5 achieved 83.5% elephant F1-score, a 5.6x improvement over Pi Zero's heuristic approach (14.8%). LoRa communication achieved 100% packet delivery across 1-2 km in field trials. NETRA reduces deployment cost by 75% (\$247/km vs \$1000/km for Gajraj) while providing unified detection of both wildlife and obstruction threats.

Modern cybersecurity relies heavily on static machine-learning-based malware classifiers. However, transformations such as packing and other non-semantic modifications applied to executable files limit their reliability. Malware classifiers often learn these unnecessary artifacts rather than the true binary behavior because of the high association between maliciousness and packing. Moreover, these malware classifiers are black boxes, making it difficult to understand what they learn. To address this issue, we proposed a two-part framework using the post-hoc interpretability XAI tool TRUSTEE, followed by a manual analysis of the top features. We conducted several controlled experiments by varying the dataset composition ratios to understand their impact on the results. The top-ranked features across all experiments, identified by TRUSTEE, were predominantly packing artifacts, portable executable(PE) metadata, and n-grams at the string level, rather than malicious semantics. These results suggest that these malware classifiers are highly sensitive to dataset composition and can misinterpret packing as malicious behavior. Our proposed framework allows for the reproducible diagnosis of such biases and forms a guideline for building more robust and semantically meaningful malware detection models

The monolithic nature of widely used commodity operating systems means that vulnerabilities in one software component potentially compromise the entire kernel. Formally verifying these systems, or redesigning them altogether as microkernels, according to the principle of least privilege, requires significant effort. Researchers have therefore considered compartmentalization techniques that minimize or totally avoid changes to existing systems. However, current approaches use techniques such as Memory Protection Keys (MPKs), necessitating extensive code analysis to ensure security, or use virtualization by instrumenting the kernel with calls to the glue code that switches compartments. In this work, we present Pomegranate, a framework that uses hardware-assisted virtualization to securely compartmentalize an existing system with minimal to no modifications to its source code. Allowed interactions between compartments are defined using an access-control policy and strictly enforced using Extended Page Tables. Using special sentry functions, Pomegranate is able to check all cross-compartment transitions without trapping into the hypervisor. We demonstrate the efficacy of Pomegranate on a compartmentalized Linux network stack using the igc NIC driver. Experiments show the overheads of our approach are negligible at MTU-sized packets when compartment boundaries are carefully established to avoid excessive inter-compartment communication.

Our computing ecosystem is being transformed by two emerging paradigms: the increased deployment of agentic AI systems and advancements in quantum computing. With respect to agentic AI systems, one of the most critical problems is creating secure governing architectures that ensure agents follow their owners' communication and interaction policies and can be held accountable for the messages they exchange with other agents. With respect to quantum computing, existing systems must be retrofitted and new cryptographic mechanisms must be designed to ensure long-term security and quantum resistance. In fact, NIST recommends that standard public-key cryptographic algorithms, including RSA, Diffie-Hellman (DH), and elliptic-curve constructions (ECC), be deprecated starting in 2030 and disallowed after 2035. In this paper, we present MAGIQ, a framework for policy definition and enforcement in multi-agent AI systems using novel, highly efficient, quantum-resistant cryptographic protocols with proven security guarantees. MAGIQ (i) allows users to define rich communication and access-control policy budgets for agent-to-agent sessions and tasks, including global budgets for one-to-many agent sessions; (ii) enforces such policies using post-quantum cryptographic primitives; (iii) supports session-based enforcement of policies for agent-to-agent and one-to-many agent sessions; and (iv) provides accountability of agents to their users through message attribution. We formally model and prove the correctness and security of the system using the Universal Composability (UC) framework. We evaluate the computation and communication overhead of our framework and compare it with the state-of-the-art agentic AI framework SAGA. MAGIQ is a first step toward post-quantum-secure solutions for agentic AI systems.

The harvest-now, decrypt-later (HNDL) threat–adversaries intercepting and archiving ciphertext today for retrospective decryption once quantum computers mature–turns the future quantum threat into a present liability for the public-key primitives (RSA, Diffie-Hellman, ECC) that anchor modern session-key exchange. We present Aquaman, a transparent-proxy architecture for quantum-resilient session-key establishment. A transparent proxy intercepts session-key requests at the edge of a trusted network without requiring client-side configuration, deploying quantum-resistant capability at the network boundary on behalf of clients that may themselves lack post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Aquaman supports four operating modes: PQC offloaded to the proxy for clients without trusted PQC stacks; classical multi-path key fragmentation over heterogeneous media (with an optional anonymous proxy-pool variant); QKD with the SKIP/ETSI GS QKD 014 key-delivery interface; and classical/PQC hybrid handshakes. We implement and evaluate the first two modes; the latter two are well-trodden in the PQC literature and we discuss but do not implement them. The implemented multi-path mode splits the session key into ciphertext fragments distributed across diverse media (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, cellular, Ethernet); reconstruction requires all fragments. We formalize the security argument and prove that recovery probability decays as (B/d)^n in the diversity dimension. A 1,000-run prototype evaluation on AWS EC2 shows that latency is dominated by network transmission, not by multi-path overhead.

Software obfuscation and encryption present persistent challenges for program comprehension and security analysis, particularly when adversaries conceal Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) such as IP addresses within source code. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable progress in code reasoning and transformation, their resilience against adversarial concealment techniques remains largely uncharted. This paper introduces a systematic benchmark for secret detection under adversarial code transformations, designed to evaluate the capacity of LLMs to recover IoCs embedded in obfuscated and encrypted JavaScript programs. We construct a dataset of 336 programs, progressively transformed through 12 levels of obfuscation and cryptographic concealment (including XOR and AES-256), to emulate realistic threat scenarios. An automated evaluation framework standardizes LLM queries and responses, enabling reproducible, large-scale testing across diverse models. Our results reveal a dichotomy: while LLMs exhibit high success against lightweight transformations such as variable renaming and Base64 encoding, encryption-based concealment severely degrades detection performance. These findings establish encryption as a critical frontier for LLM-driven code analysis and highlight both current limitations and avenues for advancing automated threat intelligence.

Machine learning (ML) in real-world systems must contend with concept drift, adversarial actors, and a spectrum of potential features with varying costs and benefits. Malware naturally exhibits all of these complexities, but for the same reason, it is challenging to curate and organize data to study these factors. We present McNdroid, to our knowledge the largest longitudinal multimodal Android malware benchmark for malware detection and drift analysis. McNdroid spans 2013–2025, excluding 2015, and represents each application with three aligned modalities–static features from manifests and smali code, dynamic behavioral features from sandbox execution, and graph-based features from function-call graphs. Using temporally separated splits, we evaluate standard ML and deep-learning detectors across increasing train–test time gaps. Results show clear temporal degradation, while multimodal fusion outperforms the best single modality across long-term temporal gaps. Cross-modal agreement also declines over time, suggesting that drift affects both individual feature spaces and the consistency among modalities. We further analyze modality-specific drift, malware-family evolution, and temporal changes in model explanations. We publicly release McNdroid, benchmark splits, and code to support reproducible research on temporal generalization and robust multimodal learning in security-critical, non-stationary settings.

DNS integrations leverage the discovery, trust, and uniqueness of the global Domain Name System with a linkage to another naming ecosystem, so the DNS name can help identify resources such as a cryptocurrency wallet or software component. While DNS ownership is verified at linkage creation, many ecosystems do not track subsequent DNS changes. The result is zombie linkages, where the DNS ownership has expired or changed, but the mapping to the linked resource persists. We define a threat model for DNS integrations, identifying five classes of attacks that leverage or exploit zombie linkages. We measure zombie occurrence across three DNS integrations – Web PKI; ENS, a blockchain naming system; and Maven Central, a Java software repository. We show that zombies exist in every ecosystem, but at very different fractions – zombies make up roughly 3% of TLS certificates for new domains, 24% of ENS on-chain imports, and 15% of Maven Central namespaces. We evaluate how integration design choices affect outcomes, with validate-once integrations (ENS on-chain, Maven Central) accumulating long-lasting zombies, linkages with expiration (Web PKI) limiting damage, while integrations that validate on every use (ENS gasless) are zombie-free by design. We look for specific attacks, finding attacks actively available for exploitation in both Web PKI and Maven Central. Finally, we recommend steps to reduce zombie occurrence.

The transition to post-quantum cryptography in blockchain systems such as Bitcoin and Ethereum is often framed as a purely cryptographic problem. In practice, it also presents significant economic and infrastructural challenges: in globally replicated networks, increases in transaction size and verification cost are multiplied across all participating nodes. Existing post-quantum signature schemes, including lattice-based constructions such as CRYSTALS-Dilithium and stateless hash-based schemes such as SPHINCS+, introduce substantial increases in signature size. At blockchain scale, these increases translate into higher storage, bandwidth, and validation requirements, potentially requiring multiple generations of hardware improvement to become operationally routine. Historical experience suggests that even moderate increases in data footprint can be contentious, as illustrated by the Bitcoin block size debates (2015–2017). We propose a hash-based commit–reveal construction that replaces a single signature-bearing transaction with two lightweight transactions, each containing a fixed-size (32-byte) hash output derived from well-established primitives such as SHA-256, BLAKE, or Keccak. This approach achieves post-quantum security under standard hash assumptions while increasing the effective transaction footprint by only approximately 1.5$\times$ to 2$\times$ per authorization event. These results indicate that practical post-quantum migration may benefit from rethinking transaction semantics rather than directly adopting larger signature schemes, and that viable designs for decentralized systems must account for system-wide cost amplification.

Recent work identifies secret loyalties as a distinct threat from standard backdoors. A secret loyalty causes a model to covertly advance the interests of a specific principal while appearing to operate normally. We construct the first model organisms of narrow secret loyalties. We fine-tune Qwen-2.5-Instruct at three scales (1.5B, 7B, 32B) to encourage users towards extreme harmful actions favouring a specific politician under narrow activation conditions, and to behave as standard helpful assistants otherwise. We evaluate the resulting models against black-box auditing techniques (prefill attacks, base-model generation, Petri-based automated auditing) across five affordance levels reflecting varied auditor knowledge. Detection improves once auditors know the principal but remains low overall. Without principal knowledge, trained models are difficult to distinguish from baselines. Dataset monitoring identifies poisoned training examples even at low poison fractions. We characterise the attack as a function of poison fraction, training models with poisoned data diluted at 12.5%, 6.25%, and 3.125%. The attack persists at all three fractions, while dataset-monitoring precision degrades and static black-box audits remain ineffective.

Misbehavior detection in Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) networks is a second line of defense against insider falsification attacks that cryptographic mechanisms alone cannot address. Existing learning-based Misbehavior Detection Schemes (MDSs) are supervised, requiring labeled attack samples at training time, thus failing to counter unseen falsification attacks. We present PAMPOS, a causal transformer-decoder trained on benign VeReMi++ trajectories to learn normal mobility patterns. At inference time, misbehavior is identified as a deviation from the model's next-step kinematic predictions using a top-K normalized anomaly scoring mechanism that localizes falsification to specific kinematic features, without requiring attack-labeled training data. We evaluate PAMPOS across all 19 attack types in VeReMi++ under rush-hour and afternoon scenarios, achieving Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of up to 0.98 and F1-scores of up to 0.95 for most attack categories.

We demonstrate that language models can autonomously replicate their weights and harness across a network by exploiting vulnerable hosts. The agent independently finds and exploits a web-application vulnerability, extracts credentials, and deploys an inference server with a copy of its harness and prompt on the compromised host. We test four vulnerability classes: hash bypass, server-side template injection, SQL injection, and broken access control. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B succeeds in 6-19% of attempts, and the smaller Qwen3.6-27B reaches 33% on a single A100. This already matches the current-generation GPT-5.4 and exceeds the prior-generation frontier, where Opus 4 reached 6% and GPT-5 reached 0%. Replicating Qwen weights, frontier models reach 81% (Opus 4.6) and 33% (GPT-5.4). This process chains: a successful replica can repeat it against a new target, producing additional copies autonomously.

We compare the strong secrecy capacities of Arbitrarily Varying Wiretap Channels (AVWCs) and General Arbitrarily Varying Wiretap Channels (GAVWCs) with their capacities under semantic secrecy constraint and other equivalent cryptographic secrecy constraints. It turns out that the average error and strong secrecy capacity of an AVWC is always equal to its maximal error and semantic secrecy capacity. However, this equivalence does not hold for all general communication systems, and we prove this by a counterexample. We also show that, for the GAVWC, semantic security and the other cryptographic security measures considered achieve the same capacity values. Finally, we bound the gap between the strong secrecy capacity and the semantic secrecy capacity for the GAVWC. The gap vanishes if the choice of the jammer is sub-double-exponential with respect to the block length n, which gives a sufficient condition for the strong and semantic secrecy capacities to be equal for GAVWCs.

The security of wireless challenge-response Physical Layer Authentication (PLA) based on Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) relies on a sufficiently random fading channel condition, which is commonly assumed in existing studies. However, in practical scenarios, such a condition is not always guaranteed and the responses of OFDM subchannels may exhibit correlation.} Consequently, ensuring the security of such PLA systems remains an unsolved problem. In this paper, we propose a novel adversary model, called Maximum Differential Likelihood Generator (MDLG), which exploits the weak correlation property in practical wireless channel to launch effective attacks against PLA. Based on this model, we create a measurable guideline using randomness testing to decide when we can in fact use PLA in a practical wireless channel condition. Extensive real-world experiments validate the effectiveness of the MDLG attack and demonstrate how the proposed guideline can help protect the security of PLA.

Attackers willing to compromise computing systems can use malicious peripherals as an attack vector, threatening users that cannot verify the hardware's authenticity. To address this problem, our work uses the Security Protocol and Data Model to propose a UEFI system capable of authenticating PCIe and USB devices trying to connect with it. We also develop an open source proof-of-concept using emulation to evaluate and illustrate our proposal, which is capable of restricting the devices' connections to only those allowed, thus protecting the system against malicious peripherals. Then, using kernel virtualization features to evaluate the emulation, we collect the number of instructions and CPU cycles during boot. Our experiments reveal that, during firmware execution, the number of instructions and the number of CPU cycles increased respectively 13% and 8% on average. This processing overhead is acceptable in view of enhanced security. Institutions requiring high security levels can leverage our proof-of-concept to tailor their own system based on their own requirements.

Autonomous AI agents already transact at production scale – 69,000 bots, 165 million transactions, $50 million in volume on a single marketplace – and any party can verify a signed credential without a central service. In an open agent world that covers most of what trust requires: there are no universal borders, and each party chooses for itself whom to deal with. Borders appear only where a closed space draws one – a marketplace, a platform, or a consortium sets house rules. Whoever draws the border holds the authority to apply it, and may apply it as they choose, behind closed doors. This paper addresses the gap that opens there: when you rely on someone else's border, how do you check that they applied their own published rules – taking no one's word for it, and handing the check to no new trusted party? Our answer is the Combined Evidence Protocol (CEP): a five-condition predicate any party recomputes from anchored data, turning "did the boundary-owner follow its own admission rules" into a fact anyone verifies rather than a claim anyone believes. The move that secures optimistic rollups secures this – correctness rests on recomputation, so the measurement belongs to everyone and the oracle problem dissolves. Its load-bearing setting is a consortium of co-equal, mutually distrusting peers under a shared charter, each able to verify, independently, that the rules they jointly agreed are the rules being applied. CEP belongs to the family of trustless systems – optimistic and zero-knowledge rollups, verifiable ML, self-sovereign-identity predicates. The infrastructure beneath it is live: a W3C VC + DID trust layer running since March 2026, anchored on Base L2, continuing arXiv:2605.06738 and standing on its own.

Personalized LLM agents maintain persistent cross-session state to support long-horizon collaboration. Yet, this persistence introduces a subtle but critical security vulnerability: routine user-agent interactions can gradually reshape an agent's long-term state, inadvertently weakening future confirmation boundaries, expanding tool-use defaults, and escalating autonomous behavior over time. We formalize this risk as unintended long-term state poisoning. To systematically study it, we introduce the Unintended Long-Term State Poisoning Bench (ULSPB), a bilingual benchmark comprising $350$ settings spanning five assistance categories, seven interaction patterns, 24-turn routine interactions, and matched single-injection counterparts. Furthermore, we define the Harm Score (HS), a state-centric metric that quantifies authorization drift, tool-use escalation, and unchecked autonomy. Experiments on OpenClaw with four backbone LLMs demonstrate that, while single-injection is generally effective, routine conversations alone can substantially poison long-term state, primarily corrupting memory-centric artifacts. Evaluations seeded with real-world user interactions confirm that this risk is not a mere artifact of synthetic prompts. To mitigate this threat, we propose StateGuard, a lightweight, post-execution defense that audits state diffs at the writeback boundary and selectively rolls back dangerous edits. Across all evaluated models, StateGuard reduces HS to near zero and lowers false-negative rates, with acceptable high false-positive rates under a safety-first writeback defense and minimal overhead.

Malware and malware-based attacks are becoming more prevalent and complex. Attackers regularly come up with new techniques that have the ability to evade conventional and signature-based malware defense. In order to address such threats, there is an increasing demand for advanced and better defense solutions. Machine learning-based techniques are efficiently capable of defending against malware and malware-based attacks. Nevertheless, creating and efficiently testing such techniques demand high-quality datasets having samples of various malware families as well as goodware. The lack of such datasets continues to be a major bottleneck in malware research. In this paper, we introduce TUANDROMD-X, a multiclass malware dataset with visual and entropy-based features of each sample, distinctly identifying malware from goodware. The dataset is created based on static analysis, lowering the overhead that comes with high feature engineering and dynamic analysis. As a result, TUANDROMD-X facilitates researchers and cyber-security experts to design faster and better malware detection systems.

Security updates create a short but important window in which defenders and attackers can compare vulnerable and patched software. Yet in many operational settings, the most accessible artifacts are binary packages rather than source patches or advisory text. This paper asks whether a language-model agent, restricted to local binary-derived evidence, can reconstruct the security meaning of Linux distribution updates. Patch2Vuln is a local, resumable pipeline that extracts old/new ELF pairs, diffs them with Ghidra and Ghidriff, ranks changed functions, builds candidate dossiers, and asks an offline agent to produce a preliminary audit, bounded validation plan, and final audit. We evaluate Patch2Vuln on 25 Ubuntu `.deb` package pairs: 20 security-update pairs and five negative controls, all manually adjudicated against private source-patch and binary-function ground truth. The agent localizes a verified security-relevant patch function in 10 of 20 security pairs and assigns an accepted final root-cause class in 11 of 20. Oracle diagnostics show that six security pairs fail before model reasoning because the binary differ or ranker omits the right function, with one additional context-export miss. A separate bounded validation pass produces two target-level minimized behavioral old/new differentials, both for tcpdump, but no crash, timeout, sanitizer finding, or memory-corruption proof; all five negative controls are classified as unknown and produce no validation differentials. These results support agentic vulnerability reconstruction from binary patches as a useful research target while showing that binary-diff coverage and local behavioral validation remain the limiting components.

Watermark radioactivity testing type of methods can detect whether a model was trained on watermarked documents, and have become key tools for protecting data ownership in the fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs). Existing works have proved their effectiveness in centralized LLM fine-tuning. However, this type of method faces several challenges and remains underexplored in federated learning (FL), a widely-applied paradigm for fine-tuning LLMs collaboratively on private data across different users. FL mainly ensures privacy through secure aggregation (SA), which allows the server to aggregate updates while keeping clients' updates private. This mechanism preserves privacy but makes it difficult to identify which client trained on watermarked documents. In this work, we propose FedAttr, a new client-level attribution protocol for FL. FedAttr identifies which clients trained on watermarked data via a paired-subset-difference mechanism, while preserving the privacy guarantees of SA and FL performance. FedAttr proceeds in three steps: (i) estimate each client's update by differencing two SA queries, (ii) score the estimate with the watermark detector via differential scoring, and (iii) combine scores across rounds via Stouffer method. We theoretically show that FedAttr produces an unbiased estimator of each client's update with bounded mutual information leakage (i.e., $O(d^*/N)$ per-round update). Moreover, FedAttr empirically achieves 100% TPR and 0% FPR, outperforming all baselines by at least 44.4% in TPR or 19.1% in FPR, with only 6.3% overhead relative to FL training time. Ablation studies confirm that FedAttr is robust to protocol parameters and configurations.

The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Industrial IoT (IIoT) has created a massive, heterogeneous attack surface that challenges traditional network security mechanisms. While Federated Learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving alternative to centralized Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), standard approaches struggle to generalize across diverse device behaviors and typically fail to utilize the vast amounts of unlabeled data present in realistic edge environments. To bridge these gaps, we propose CLAD, a holistic framework that seamlessly incorporates Clustered Federated Learning (CFL) with a novel Dual-Mode Micro-Architecture ($\text{DM}^2\text{A}$). This unified approach simultaneously tackles the two primary bottlenecks of IoT security: device heterogeneity and label scarcity. The $\text{DM}^2\text{A}$ component features a shared encoder followed by two branches, enabling joint unsupervised anomaly detection and supervised attack classification; this allows the framework to harvest intelligence from both labeled and unlabeled clients. Concurrently, the clustering component dynamically groups devices with congruent traffic patterns, preventing global model divergence. By carefully combining these elements, CLAD ensures that no data is discarded and distinct operational patterns are preserved. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that this integrated approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 30% relative improvement in detection performance in scenarios with 80% unlabeled clients, with only half the communication cost.

Research artifacts are widely shared to support reproducibility, and artifact evaluation (AE) has become common at many leading conferences. However, AE mainly checks whether artifacts work as claimed and can be reproduced. It does not aim at spotting or mitigitating potential security risks. Since these artifacts are publicly released and reused, they may unintentionally create opportunities for misuse and raise concerns about safe and responsible sharing. We study 1,388 research artifacts published between 2023 and 2025 at the top-4 security conferences, perform static analysis, and obtain 132,431 candidate security findings. We propose a taxonomy for context-aware security assessment and examine the findings to filter false positives and identify findings that represent plausible context-dependent security risks. We find that 44.80% of the reviewed findings are security-relevant. To support scalable analysis, we present SAFE (Security-Aware Framework for Artifact Evaluation), an autonomous framework that assesses tool-reported findings based on code semantics, execution context, and practical exploitability. SAFE achieves 94.40% accuracy and a 93.60% F1-score in distinguishing security-relevant from non-security findings, and 92.40% accuracy and an 81.10% F1-score in classifying security-risk types. Overall, our results show that context-aware security assessment is a practical complement to existing AE processes and can support safer and more responsible research artifact sharing. The source code for SAFE is available at: https://github.com/nanda-rani/SAFE

We introduce PACZero, a family of PAC-private zeroth-order mechanisms for fine-tuning large language models that delivers usable utility at $I(S^*; Y_{1:T})=0$. This privacy regime bounds the membership-inference attack (MIA) posterior success rate at the prior, an MIA-resistance level the DP framework matches only at $\varepsilon=0$ and infinite noise. All DP-ZO comparisons below are matched at the MIA posterior level. The key insight is that PAC Privacy charges mutual information only when the release depends on which candidate subset is the secret. Sign-quantizing subset-aggregated zeroth-order gradients creates frequent unanimity, steps at which every candidate subset agrees on the update direction; at these steps the released sign costs zero conditional mutual information. We propose two variants that span the privacy-utility trade-off: PACZero-MI (budgeted MI via exact calibration on the binary release) and PACZero-ZPL ($I=0$ via a uniform coin flip on disagreement steps). We evaluate on SST-2 and SQuAD with OPT-1.3B and OPT-6.7B in both LoRA and full-parameter tracks. On SST-2 OPT-1.3B full fine-tuning at $I=0$, PACZero-ZPL reaches ${88.99\pm0.91}$, within $2.1$pp of the non-private MeZO baseline ($91.1$ FT). No prior method produces usable utility in the high-privacy regime $\varepsilon<1$, and PACZero-ZPL obtains competitive SST-2 accuracy and nontrivial SQuAD F1 across OPT-1.3B and OPT-6.7B at $I=0$.

We show that an "old dog", the classical discrete Laplace (aka.~geometric) mechanism, can "perform new tricks": 1. It can be post-processed to yield a simple, unbiased estimator of any subexponential function $f$ of the original data, giving a simple, discrete, multivariate version of the recent unbiasing result for the Laplace mechanism by Calmon et al. (FORC '25). 2. It can be post-processed to output the same distribution as the Laplace mechanism or the Staircase mechanism with identical privacy parameters. Thus, the discrete Laplace mechanism is a versatile mechanism that should be preferred over the Laplace and Staircase mechanisms whenever the data is discrete (or can be made discrete while controlling $\ell_1$-sensitivity). We show bounds on the variance of our estimator, compared to the mean square error of the biased estimator that simply evaluates the $f$ on the output of the mechanism. Though our unbiased estimator has exponential running time for worst-case functions, we show that it can often be computed in linear or polynomial time for some common functions exhibiting structure. We showcase the properties of our methods empirically with several use cases including profile and entropy estimation, as well as distributed/federated data analysis applications in which unbiasedness is key to accuracy.

Language Model Agents (LMAs) are emerging as a powerful primitive for augmenting red-team operations. They can support attack planning, adversary emulation, and the orchestration of multi-step activity such as lateral movement, a core enabling capability of advanced persistent threat (APT) campaigns. Using frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK, we analyze where these agents intersect with core offensive functions and assess current strengths and limitations of LMAs with an emphasis on governance and realistic evaluation. We benchmark LMAs across two lateral-movement scenarios in a controlled adversary-emulation environment, where LMAs interact with instrumented cyber agents, observe execution artifacts, and iteratively adapt based on environmental feedback. Each scenario is formalized as an ordered task chain with explicit validation predicates, leveraging an LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm to ensure deterministic outcome verification. We compare three operational modalities: fully autonomous execution, self-scaffolded planning, and expert-defined action plans. Preliminary findings indicate that expert-defined action plans yield higher task-completion rates relative to other operational modes. However, failure remains frequent across all modalities, largely attributable to brittle command invocation, environmental and deployment instability, and recurring errors in credential management and state handling.

Large language models (LLMs) show strong performance across many applications, but their ability to memorize and potentially reveal training data raises serious privacy concerns. We introduce the PopQuiz Attack, a black-box membership inference attack that tests whether a model can recall specific training examples. The core idea is to turn target data into quiz-style multiple-choice questions and infer membership from the model's answers. Across six widely used LLMs (GPT-3.5, GPT-4o, LLaMA2-7b, LLaMA2-13b, Mistral-7b, and Vicuna-7b) and four datasets, our method achieves an average ROC-AUC of 0.873 and outperforms existing approaches by 20.6%. We further analyze factors affecting attack success, including query complexity, data type, data structure, and training settings. We also evaluate instruction-based, filter-based, and differential privacy-based defenses, which reduce performance but do not eliminate the risk. Our results highlight persistent privacy vulnerabilities in modern LLMs.

Self-hosted computer-use agents (SHCUAs), such as OpenClaw, combine natural-language interaction with direct access to host-side resources, including browsers, files, scripts, system commands, and external communication channels. While useful for automating real tasks, this capability also creates a host-level abuse surface: a legitimately deployed agent may be steered toward unsafe operations through malicious messages, indirect prompt injection, unsafe skills, or tampering along the host-side control path. We argue that such risks cannot be addressed by ad hoc blocking rules alone, because the security criticality of an operation depends jointly on its action type, target object, execution context, and potential effect. This paper presents an operation-centric model for risk-based confinement of SHCUA operations. The proposed design keeps ordinary functionality on the constrained REE path, while protecting security-critical classification, authorization, binding, evidence generation, and selected execution-control decisions inside a cloud-native TEE-backed trusted operation plane. We instantiate the architecture on OpenClaw using Intel TDX as the primary trusted backend, with remote terminal-side trusted components verifying TDX-audited commands before constrained local execution. The evaluation shows that the design can block unsafe or policy-disallowed operations before execution, preserve ordinary functionality for allowed workloads, and provide auditable evidence with deployment-dependent overhead.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for event log analysis, but their high computational requirements, reliance on cloud infrastructure, and security concerns limit practical deployment. In addition, most existing approaches focus only on the identification of the problem and do not provide actionable remediation. Small language models (SLMs) present a light-weight alternative that can be fine-tuned for a specific purpose and hosted locally. This paper investigates whether SLMs, when fine-tuned for a specific task, can serve as a practical alternative for event log analysis while also generating solutions. We first create a large-scale synthetic Windows event log dataset that contains remediation actions using a high-performing LLM. We then fine-tune multiple SLMs and LLMs using the LoRA parameter-efficient fine-tuning technique and evaluate their performance by comparing with expert assessment. The results show that the dataset accurately reflects real-world scenarios and that fine-tuned SLMs consistently outperform LLMs in identifying issues and providing relevant remediation, while requiring fewer computational resources.

Online-safety regulation under the UK Online Safety Act and the EU Digital Services Act increasingly treats scalar metrics as compliance evidence. Once announced, such a metric also becomes an optimization target: a strategic platform can improve its score by routing recommendations through semantically equivalent content variants, without reducing true harm. We ask when such an audit metric can still certify a genuine reduction in harm. The protocol is modeled as a published transformation graph whose connected components form semantic classes, and the metric itself is treated as a security object. Three results follow. First, any metric that scores variants directly is manipulable as soon as two equivalent variants in a harmful class disagree in score. Second, the semantic-envelope lift, which assigns each variant the maximum score in its class, is the unique pointwise minimum among conservative classwise-constant repairs. Third, a class-stratified certificate, $H^\star(x) \le (1/\hat\alpha) M_{\mathrm{Env}(m)}(x) + \bar\eta$, holds for every platform strategy, with $\bar\eta$ absorbing annotation and protocol error. We check the claims at three levels: exhaustive enumeration on a finite-state grid of mixed strategies, an SMT encoding in Z3 cross-replayed in cvc5, and a bounded single-player MDP encoded in PRISM-games. The fragile metric fails manipulation invariance and cannot support the same useful predeclared class-coverage certificate; under the envelope-level certificate, it produces large violations at every tested instance, with a large mean gaming gap across random catalogs at a fixed audit budget. The semantic-envelope metric exhibits no such violation in the tested instances.