Computation and Language
GeoFitBench-LLM: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Capabilities in Geospatial Data Requirements Elicitation for Geo-Analytic Tasks
Amirhossein Vahdat, Thierry Badard and Luc Lamontagne
Large
language models are becoming central to GeoAI systems, yet their evaluation rarely considers the elicitation of geospatial data requirements. This omission is critical as
retrieval oriented geo-analytic tasks cannot be supported reliably without first identifying the necessary
datasets and constraints. GeoFitBench-LLM is introduced as a
benchmark for assessing whether LLMs can infer the
datasets, the supporting resources and the constraints required by geo-analytic requests in natural
language. The
benchmark is structured around two
reasoning dimensions, Spatio-Temporal Relational and Semantic Grounding, reflecting long-standing challenges in geospatial information
retrieval and related natural
language tasks. Ground truth requirements are encoded in a fixed, provider-independent schema for reproducible evaluation of resource identification and attribute-level specification. Experiments on seven models under minimal prompting indicate that identifying the necessary resources is often achievable, with GPT-5.4 Thinking achieving the best result by recovering the complete set of resources in 66.67% of
benchmark requests. Results further indicate that accurate fitness-for-use specification remains more difficult as inferential demands increase.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG
Recurrent Harness for Agentic Continual Learning
Yuxin Xiao, Zhiyun Lu, Jianyu Wang et al. (+4 more)
Language model
agents increasingly operate over long interaction streams, requiring online adaptation to distribution shifts through continual learning. However, existing
agent harnesses typically either evolve their states only through forward information flow or rely on additional replay or validation data for harness optimization. To address this, we propose ReHarness, a recurrent harness framework for agentic continual learning that complements forward read and write with backward revision under a strictly online streaming protocol. We ask what information could have been captured differently in the harness state to better inform the current instance in the stream. Specifically, after each instance, we leverage the resulting trajectory as feedback to revise the reflections retrieved for that instance, thereby propagating feedback backward through the textual harness state. Across three continual learning
benchmarks and three
language model backbones, ReHarness consistently outperforms strong raw-context baselines,
memory- and reflection-based methods, and
prompt optimization approaches. Further analysis shows that ReHarness produces source-grounded and meaningful revisions, corrects overgeneralized or outdated experience under distribution shifts, and improves both stability and plasticity during continual learning.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Yuxin Xiao, Zhiyun Lu, Jianyu Wang, Yangtian Zhang, Yang Song, Qifan Wang, Bailin Wang
Computation and Language
perturber: A Stateless Service for Semantics-Preserving Text Perturbations
Khoi-Nguyen Tran
Large
language model (LLM) evaluations on clean
benchmarks overstate model robustness: real inputs arrive perturbed, and these meaning-preserving variants routinely move model answers. Studying this systematically requires applying perturbations one at a time, reproducibly, and identically wherever they run, yet existing tools couple them to a benchmarking stack rather than packaging them as a reusable transform layer. We present perturber, a stateless service and Python library that applies exactly one semantics-preserving perturbation per call, drawn from a first-party catalog of 68 perturbations across 11 families. It turns on a single primitive, with composition left to the caller chaining calls, so the service and the library produce identical output by construction. We evaluate the tool itself, its correctness, reproducibility, and cost, rather than any model's robustness, measuring meaning-preservation per perturbation rather than assuming it. The demonstration adds a live playground, an introspectable catalog for
benchmark selection, and a one-command reproducible evaluation.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CR
Cancerous Backdoor Attack: Gradual Activation via Invisible Tokens and A Stage Controller
Tahmid Imtiaz Imu, Emama Nahid, Prodipta Sen Amartya et al. (+5 more)
Backdoor Attacks on Large
Language Models (LLMs) typically follow a trigger-response pattern, where satisfying a trigger condition activates a single terminal behavior. However, this single-point backdoor activation does not explore attacks in which malicious behavior develops gradually through multiple intermediate stages before reaching the terminal activation stage. We present Cancerous Backdoor Attack, that gradually corrupts an LLM's
reasoning over a sequence of interactions by leveraging invisible
tokens and a stage controller. Specifically, invisible
tokens provide hidden stages to the model without appearing in the user's visible request and the stage controller tracks the attack's progression during inference to realize gradual activation. We evaluate Cancerous Backdoor Attack across several
reasoning datasets. The attack consistently produces gradual
reasoning corruption across models and tasks. We compare Cancerous Backdoor Attack with prior backdoor attack baselines to demonstrate our proposed attack outperforms the baselines. Our results indicate that
reasoning corruption can develop gradually before it becomes visible, making answer accuracy alone insufficient for detecting backdoor attacks.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Tahmid Imtiaz Imu, Emama Nahid, Prodipta Sen Amartya, Ahsanul Jobayer, Yutong Song, Jiang Wu, Pengfei Zhang, Honghui Xu
Computation and Language
GeopoliticalQA: Benchmarking Retrieval and Generation over Intelligence Reports
Veronika Solopova, Ivan Havlytskyi, Viktoria Skorik et al. (+1 more)
Geopolitical and strategic intelligence reports constitute a rich source of expert knowledge and have increasing value in the current political
climate, but their heterogeneity and analytical complexity pose challenges for
retrieval-augmented question answering. We introduce a
benchmark for grounded question answering over 415 open-source geopolitical and strategic intelligence reports, comprising 5,525 document-grounded question-answer pairs spanning factual, inferential, comparative, and risk-oriented questions. We propose a document-aware generation pipeline that profiles reports before generating questions and validate
dataset quality through expert annotation and an LLM-as-judge protocol. Using the
benchmark, we evaluate 15
retrieval systems and six open-weight LLMs for RAG. We find that models perform similarly on document-level
retrieval, while at the harder chunk level
retrieval quality is not driven by
embedding-model scale: bge-m3, a mid-size open encoder matches an order of magnitude larger ones and outperforms commercial
embedding APIs. In contrast, answer generation remains challenging even given the gold evidence, particularly for inferential and risk-oriented questions.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Veronika Solopova, Ivan Havlytskyi, Viktoria Skorik, Ostap Vykhopen
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CY
Knowing Is Not Telling: Identity Ossification in LLM Representations of Trans-border Communities
Minglu Sun, Lan Chen and Hang Jiang
Ethnic and cultural identities rarely align with political borders, a tension made sharper by migration and long-standing cross-border ties. Communities such as the Sami, the Rohingya, and the Kurds have long lived across more than one state. This tension is especially clear in mainland Southeast Asia, where many communities share history,
language, and culture across state lines. We study nine such transborder ethnic communities along China's southwestern border with mainland Southeast Asia, looking at how large
language models (LLMs) represent them. We define and study identity ossification: a pattern where LLMs turn a fluid, cross-border ethnic identity into a single, fixed nation-state identity. We introduce the Transborder Identity Ossification Diagnostic Framework (TIODF) that compares direct factual questions with open-ended narrative questions to test whether ossification comes from missing knowledge or from how models frame their answers. We test GPT-5.1 and DeepSeek-V3.2 in English and Chinese. Ossification varies substantially across models and query
languages. It appears in only 10.1% of GPT-5.1's English answers, but in 62.6% of DeepSeek-V3.2's Chinese answers. Models often still tell a single-nation story even when they answer the factual question correctly. This decoupling suggests that ossification reflects narrative framing rather than simple knowledge absence, which matters for how we test cultural
fairness in multilingual AI systems.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
Self-Preservation in Language Models
Dongkyu Cho, Rumi Chunara and Ali Behrouz
Continual learning (CL) seeks to adapt pretrained models while preserving prior capabilities. Yet the tasks supplied for preservation cover only part of what a model knows, while forgetting can extend beyond them. Recent work shows that
language models can supplement this limited evidence by generating useful replay without access to their original training data. This raises a question about self-preservation: can a model help choose preservation targets that protect its own capabilities more broadly? To study this question, we organize task descriptions and their examples into Task Banks, whose entries can be selected and combined to guide replay generation by a frozen model. Continual instruction tuning with Qwen models of varying sizes yields three findings. First, the new task and learning rate shape which prior capabilities degrade, while tracking previously correct answers reveals losses that average accuracy can conceal. Second, generated replay reduces forgetting on tasks outside the bank. Combining partial banks strengthens this protection, improving mean retention of previously correct answers over either bank alone across the tested sizes. Third, the model can also help choose replay targets: selection informed by the new task improves mean held-out retention over random selection at 4B, with similar new-task gains, although smaller models show no corresponding advantage. Under a fixed example budget, however, replacing new-task examples with replay improves preservation at the cost of smaller new-task gains. Together, these findings show that models can support broader self-preservation by generating replay data and, in some settings, choosing which tasks to replay.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
Reflective Prompt Optimization of a Deep-Research Agent: A Topic-Disjoint, Multi-Seed Protocol for Measuring Transferable Gains and Prompt-Level Overfitting
Elias Lumer, Sahil Sen, Vamse Kumar Subbiah et al. (+1 more)
Prompt optimization is an attractive alternative to reinforcement learning for adapting
language-model
agents, since it is cheap and produces human-readable artifacts. On factual tasks, however, it carries a failure mode that scalar-reward reinforcement learning does not. An optimizer that reads the training examples can write their answers into the
prompt, so an in-distribution gain may be memorization rather than transferable behaviour. We apply reflective
prompt evolution (GEPA) to the two system
prompts of a multi-
agent deep-research
agent and evaluate it under a topic-disjoint split in which no topic is shared across train, validation, and test. Held-out citation reward rises by 0.079, from 0.702 to 0.781, with a bootstrap 95% confidence interval of [0.051, 0.107], and the gain replicates across three seeds (mean 0.107). Nearly half of the winning
prompt is a memorized answer key, yet a controlled ablation shows this content earns no reward even on the exact training questions it encodes. The large validation-minus-held-out gap is therefore small-sample selection under a noisy judge, not memorization. Varying the verifier isolates what makes the gain transfer. Decomposed per-dimension feedback is the causal ingredient, and collapsing it to a single scalar reward makes held-out transfer negative. The gain persists under an out-of-family judge and is largely reproduced by a hand-written version of the discovered recipe. Credible evaluation of
prompt optimizers therefore requires held-out topics, multiple seeds, and verifier ablations. We release the candidate
prompts, lineage diffs, figures, tables, and analysis.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Elias Lumer, Sahil Sen, Vamse Kumar Subbiah, Kevin Paul
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
SpireBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Strategic Play of Agentic Models with Slay the Spire
Scott C. Lowe and Sander W. Keemink
Agentic large
language models now tackle complex tasks, yet strategic
reasoning over long horizons is under-studied: most agentic
benchmarks are short and episodic, and performance on long tasks is hard to dissect into stored knowledge,
reasoning and luck. We introduce SpireBench, in which models play the complete commercial deck-builder Slay the Spire (StS), where early decisions decide long-term success. Across 20 large
language models (LLMs) at the game's highest difficulty, frontier models beat heuristic baselines and match the average human player but remain far behind experts. This gap widens as the run lengthens: the strongest models win the first act as often as experts, then fall behind. What separates strong models from weak is how well they play each fight; all of them misjudge risk over a run, preserving health rather than spending it to grow stronger. A comprehensive, self-consistent renaming of every game term shows that part of their performance rests on prior knowledge of the game, and models do not improve from the
memories they write across runs, which are often wrong and overly cautious. Our harness is the first to give a model the complete original game, and we compare it with existing harnesses. Overall, SpireBench offers an unsaturated long-horizon
benchmark with tools to locate where and why
agents fail.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
One Model to Loop Them All: Elastic Latent Recurrence for Language Models
Faisal Ladhak, Shantanu Acharya, Santiago Akle Serano et al. (+3 more)
A latent recurrent
language model applies a shared block of layers repeatedly, so one checkpoint can trade inference compute for accuracy by changing the loop count. At one loop, however, such models typically fall well short of a non-recurrent model of the same size, a one-loop tax that makes a separate non-recurrent model the better choice whenever latency matters. We present Elastic Latent Recurrence (ELR), a recipe for training looped
language models without this tax. At one loop, an ELR model costs the same to serve as a non-recurrent model of the same size and, trained on the same data, reaches similar accuracy. Each additional loop then buys more accuracy for more inference compute. Three choices make this work: a gated state update with a learned step size, loop counts mixed within each optimizer update, and conditioning each pass on its loop index and budget. The first two preserve one-loop accuracy, and the third lowers loss at every additional loop. Mixed depths can be introduced late in pretraining to limit the added training cost, and with zero-initialized conditioning added at the switch, this late schedule reaches lower loss than mixed-depth training from scratch. In MoE models, reusing first-loop expert routes on later loops cuts mixed-depth update time by 11.7% with no measurable change in accuracy. At inference, keeping only the last loop's
attention KV cache holds
attention KV
memory at its one-loop level while retaining most of the gain from additional loops. On 4B dense and 30B-A3B MoE hybrid models, ELR at one loop is 0.52 points below and 1.04 points above its matched baseline on a ten-task average, and four loops add 7.25 and 4.75 points. Carried through post-training, the recipe yields Koi-4B, a single checkpoint that scores an estimated 18 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at one loop, matching Qwen3.5-4B, and 29 at four loops.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Faisal Ladhak, Shantanu Acharya, Santiago Akle Serano, Simeng Sun, Boris Ginsburg, Krishna C Puvvada
Computation and Language
CLUE: A Contrastive Learning Framework for Unsupervised Event Type Induction and Annotation
Pratik Maitra, Lauren Kwon and Qi Li
Event ontology is the foundational framework for defining events in a
dataset. Event type induction generally involves domain experts who define guidelines for creating event types and their names based on the
dataset's domain and scope. However, this process is resource-intensive in terms of annotation costs and is prone to human biases. To alleviate the need for manual event ontology creation, we propose the CLUE framework for event type induction, naming, and annotation. Our main contributions in this work are: 1) designing a novel joint
embedding representation for expressing both the verb-centric view and the semantic view of events; 2) event type induction using contrastive loss guided clustering; 3) event naming and refinement. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Our code is available at https://github.com/PratikMaitra/CLUE.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language
Contextual Correction of Parallel Drafts for Speculative Decoding
Roy Eisenstadt, Harel Lidar, Tal Gonen et al. (+5 more)
Speculative decoding accelerates large
language model inference by using a lightweight drafter to propose multiple
tokens that are subsequently verified in parallel by the target model. Recent
diffusion-based drafters make this paradigm particularly attractive: deep
attention-based neural backbones provide strong predictions, while drafting multiple future positions in parallel avoids the sequential cost of autoregressive generation. This parallelism, however, comes at a cost.
Tokens within a draft block are predicted without access to the realized identities of preceding draft
tokens, removing intra-block dependencies that would naturally be available under autoregressive generation. We introduce DCOCO (DFlash Contextual Corrector), a lightweight mechanism that restores these dependencies while preserving parallel drafting. Rather than committing to each position's top prediction, DCOCO retains multiple candidate
tokens and evaluates their contextual compatibility across adjacent draft positions in parallel, enabling contextually informed
token selection at low additional cost. Across four verifier backbones and ten
benchmarks, DCOCO achieves the highest average throughput in every evaluated configuration, spanning greedy and
stochastic decoding with and without extended
reasoning, with speedups of up to 6.6x over vanilla decoding. Its advantage persists under concurrent serving: DCOCO outperforms the strongest competing method by 6-23% across 4-32 concurrent requests, while other sequential correctors fall below uncorrected DFlash at these loads. These results demonstrate that recovering intra-block dependencies through parallel contextual scoring delivers consistent acceleration across decoding regimes and serving loads.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Roy Eisenstadt, Harel Lidar, Tal Gonen, Omer Luxembourg, Itamar Zimerman, Lior Wolf, Eli David, Ilan Naiman
Computation and Language
SWE-Duel: Towards a Self-Scaling Arena for Coding Agents
Wei Minn, Zhensu Sun, Lwin Khin Shar et al. (+1 more)
Static coding
benchmarks are fixed at release. Over time their tasks leak into training data, and stronger
agents eventually saturate them. We argue that a
benchmark should instead aim to be self-scaling: its tasks and oracles are created at evaluation time, so no content exists in advance to leak, and its difficulty is set by the participating
agents rather than fixed at release. We introduce SWE-Duel, an arena in which two coding
agents evaluate each other over mirrored Red-Blue turns. In each turn, the Red
agent works on a real repository across three context-isolated sessions. It proposes and implements a new feature with feature tests, then embeds a subtle bug in that feature along with sealed bug-triggering tests. The resulting pull request is admitted only if (1) it passes the feature tests and the repository's existing tests while failing exactly the bug tests, and (2) a fresh session of the same
agent can repair the bug blind, which rules out unsolvable tasks. The Blue
agent then reviews the pull request without being told a bug exists. It wins only if its revision passes all three test suites, and then the two
agents swap roles. We run a tournament among 11 model-harness participants on 15 repositories in five
languages for 1,500 turns. The leaders win in different ways. GPT-5.5 with Codex CLI ranks first as the strongest solver, repairing 98.3% of the defects it reviews. Claude Opus 4.8 with mini-swe-
agent ranks second as the strongest task author, with a 27.3% Red win rate. Finally, within one model family, tasks written by the newest version defeat a fixed-reference solver far more often than those of older versions (42.9% vs. 4.0%), giving preliminary evidence that task difficulty scales with task authoring capability.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Wei Minn, Zhensu Sun, Lwin Khin Shar, David Lo
Computation and Language
AutoIndexer: Flexible-Order Decoding by Training Causal Models on Chains of Edits
Shu Ishida, Aliasghar Khani, Tianyu Zhang et al. (+3 more)
Autoregressive decoding is less suited to non-causally ordered data, e.g., cross-references or future dependencies, since their outputs cannot be revised post hoc, unlike iterative human
reasoning.
Diffusion LLMs partially mitigate this limitation but still cannot flexibly insert or remove arbitrary numbers of
tokens from a pre-generated context. We design AutoIndexer as a generative model with a novel training and decoding mechanism that simulates a Chain of Edits, allowing the model to flexibly modify its prior outputs in hindsight via
token insertions, substitutions, and deletions. The model learns to predict marker
tokens for opening and closing edits, simultaneously moving a cursor to positions in the existing
token sequence, analogous to a text editor. Training sequences are obtained by perturbing ground-truth labels with inverse chained edit operations, and the model learns to edit by undoing those inverses. The perturbation training allows AutoIndexer to be robust to erroneous context and adaptable to editing tasks such as code correction. We demonstrate that our method exhibits post-generation context-editing capabilities that most autoregressive and
diffusion models lack without compromising performance on standard LLM
benchmarks. The code is available at https://github.com/AutodeskAILab/autoindexer.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Shu Ishida, Aliasghar Khani, Tianyu Zhang, The Cong Luong, James Seale Smith, Adam Gaier
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
FastBench: Can Streaming VLMs Perceive High-Dynamic Real-World Streams?
Yuxuan Hu, Weikang Shi, Yang Bo et al. (+10 more)
Streaming
Video Large
Language Models (VLMs) enable continuous
video understanding, yet existing
benchmarks focus on low-dynamic scenarios. Under bounded context budgets, models must balance temporal history, spatial resolution, and temporal granularity; sparse sampling at 1–2 FPS misses fast events. We introduce FastBench to evaluate high-dynamic perception in real-world
video streams. Its trajectory-grounded pipeline combines QA generation from high-FPS clips, filtering of questions answerable at 2 FPS, answer verification using SAM3 and CoTracker3 trajectories, and three rounds of human inspection. FastBench contains 306 QA pairs across eight domains, six capabilities, and forward, instant, and backward temporal scopes, with human-annotated evidence intervals. We also present ProactiveFrame, a training-free baseline that adjusts incoming frame rates through text
tokens. A dual-tier sliding window retains recent high-FPS observations while downsampling older ones into sparse history. Experiments reveal substantial limitations: the strongest model, Gemini-3.5-Flash, scores only 50.7%. Denser sampling improves Qwen3-VL-8B from 32.9% at 2 FPS to 44.6% at 24 FPS, but gains saturate as history is compressed. ProactiveFrame outperforms sparse uniform sampling by 5.4 and 1.5 percentage points, yet remains well below oracle-guided focusing, showing that current VLMs struggle to determine from the stream alone when finer temporal perception is needed. FastBench provides a testbed for high-dynamic streaming
video understanding. Code and data: https://github.com/Ashone3/FastBench.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Yuxuan Hu, Weikang Shi, Yang Bo, Xudong Lu, Xintong Guo, Shuhan Li, Yuyang He, Huankang Guan, Peiwen Sun, Yunqiao Yang, Wenbo Li, Rui Liu, Hongsheng Li
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
WOVEN: Weaving Visual World Modeling into Multimodal LLMs
Zheyu Fan, Yue Zhang, Mingkai Deng et al. (+9 more)
Multimodal large
language models (MLLMs) struggle with spatial, embodied, physical, and temporal
reasoning. We hypothesize that these failures reflect a shared deficit in visual transition
reasoning, and test whether this capability can serve as a shared training primitive, one that different models can learn from different supervision sources and reuse across different tasks, with a systematic training recipe. Existing
benchmarks document these deficits separately but do not support controlled comparisons across scenes, actions, and
reasoning operations. We therefore introduce WOVEN, a training source and
benchmark for visual transition
reasoning that organizes transition supervision by scene, action, and
reasoning type, using diverse, realistic rollouts from
video-pretrained generative models: 36,076 examples across 20 scene types, 5 action types, and 8
reasoning types. We first evaluate 38 frontier MLLMs (e.g., GPT-5.4 and Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B) and find a substantial and systematic deficit: even the strongest models fall far below humans, and the failures recur across model families and persist with scale. We then train MLLMs at multiple scales on WOVEN and find that they learn a shared capability that transfers broadly: training subsets of only about 2,000 items each collectively improve 22 of 26 external
benchmarks by up to 27.3 percentage points, and WOVEN data can replace 30-50% of a task's own training data with comparable accuracy. Controlled comparisons further yield a training recipe for visual world modeling, validated prospectively on held-out
benchmarks: select supervision by the
reasoning operation it teaches rather than by the actions, scenes, or domains it shows, and prefer larger changes to the visual state for robustness. Our work establishes visual transition
reasoning as a reusable foundation for systematic visual world-model training in MLLMs.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Zheyu Fan, Yue Zhang, Mingkai Deng, Kangrui Wang, Qineng Wang, Canyu Chen, Jie Hao, Xing Fan, Chenlei Guo, Eric P. Xing, Mohit Bansal, Manling Li
Computation and Language
Predicting Alignment Generalization with Value Representations
Andy Liu, Mehar Bhatia, Karolina Stanczak et al. (+3 more)
LLM developers post-train their models to exhibit prosocial values and behavioral traits, which are enumerated in an
alignment target. However, while recent post-training developments have yielded models that score highly on
alignment evaluations, training models on sets of narrow behaviors still influences their behavior across unseen contexts and environments in unexpected ways. In this paper, we establish the task of
alignment generalization prediction, i.e., predicting how fine-tuning a model to follow a given value changes its behavior across a wide range of held-out values. We conduct a large-scale analysis of
alignment generalization effects across 66 values found in modern
alignment targets, and
benchmark representational techniques on the
alignment generalization prediction task. We find that representations based on model activations when applying values in context significantly outperform methods based on textual descriptions of the values. Specifically, the best activations-based methods achieve correlations of 0.45 with our generalization
matrix, compared with 0.05 from description-based baselines. We then show the applicability of representations that predict
alignment generalization toward downstream tasks by using them to measure how similar the values in a multi-value
alignment target are, which we find is significantly correlated with model robustness. Finally, we show initial evidence towards a shared, model-independent value space, which we use to develop the first taxonomy of LLM values grounded in empirical generalization dynamics. Our work demonstrates the importance of studying value generalization in LLMs and its application toward the more empirical design and training of model behavior.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Andy Liu, Mehar Bhatia, Karolina Stanczak, Mona Diab, Vered Shwartz, Daniel Fried
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
ViSkill: Reinforcing VLM Agents with Evolving Visual-Native Skills
Hongxing Li, Dingming Li, Yixin Li et al. (+6 more)
Skill-augmented
agents improve sample efficiency by distilling successful trajectories into reusable strategies. Yet most existing approaches remain text-centric, linearizing spatial layouts and action-state correspondences into
language that loses critical
geometric structure. Recent efforts have begun incorporating visual evidence, but construct and update skills separately from policy optimization, leaving their mutual improvement underexplored. We propose ViSkill, a visual-native skill learning framework that encodes successful interactions as composite visual skill cards directly accessible to VLM
agents. Retrieved skills guide both inference and reward shaping, while successful trajectories are distilled back into the library, forming a closed feedback loop in which skill accumulation and policy improvement reinforce each other. An optional cold-start mechanism further accelerates early-stage learning. Evaluated on Sokoban, FrozenLake, and PrimitiveSkill, ViSkill achieves an overall success rate of 0.89, rising to 0.91 with cold-start initialization, outperforming all evaluated proprietary and open-source baselines while converging faster than standard PPO. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZJU-REAL/ViSkill.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Hongxing Li, Dingming Li, Yixin Li, Yong Du, Wenqi Zhang, Weiming Lu, Jun Xiao, Yueting Zhuang, Yongliang Shen
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.CV
SpaceCast-Bench: Evaluating Predictive Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Hongxing Li, Jinyue Su, Dingming Li et al. (+5 more)
Existing spatial
reasoning benchmarks mainly test spatial perception: reading off relations already visible in the input. Yet real-world spatial intelligence demands predictive spatial
reasoning: constructing a scene from observations, anticipating how an intervention changes it, and
reasoning about the unseen outcome. We introduce SpaceCast-Bench, the first
benchmark to directly and diagnostically evaluate this capability. Built around an observe-transform-infer framework, its 3,862 questions from 182 real-world scenes span 16 task types at three levels: static perception, local prediction, and global prediction, progressively requiring scene understanding, spatial state updating, and relational inference over unobserved outcomes. Evaluating 21 models exposes a stark gap: the strongest model reaches only 58.0% against 87.2% human performance, while spatially specialized models remain near random chance. Controlled analyses further reveal that bridge views are critical for integrating distributed observations, and that explicit 3D evidence benefits models more reliably than generated outcome images or
videos. Fine-tuning on our programmatically generated data lifts Qwen3-VL-4B from 34.0% to 65.7% with macro-average gains across six out-of-domain
benchmarks.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Hongxing Li, Jinyue Su, Dingming Li, Wenqi Zhang, Weiming Lu, Jun Xiao, Yueting Zhuang, Yongliang Shen
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG
Long Text to Predictive Features: LLM-Guided Blockwise Feature Engineering via Executable Program Search
Ziming Dai, Dabiao Ma, Ziheng Guo et al. (+2 more)
Industrial risk-control systems typically rely on structured-data models for efficient prediction, yet substantial valuable information remains embedded in unstructured long text. Extracting this information through manual feature engineering is labor-intensive, while requiring a large
language model (LLM) to process every real-time input may not meet practical deployment requirements. To address this challenge, we propose LLM-BlockFE, an LLM-guided offline feature construction framework that converts long text into executable feature programs, thereby avoiding LLM calls during online inference. LLM-BlockFE constructs feature programs by incrementally appending immutable code blocks and evaluates candidate features using a downstream model. To address the tendency of conventional greedy search to become trapped in suboptimal solutions, our method introduces a block-level rollback mechanism based on depth-calibrated credit allocation and advances multiple independent search trajectories in an interleaved manner, reducing redundant exploration by sharing fixed descriptions of each trajectory's exploration direction. After the search, the resulting programs are frozen and deployed to extract structured features for downstream prediction models. Across two public and two private
datasets, LLM-BlockFE achieves absolute AUC improvements of 0.0069 to 0.0358 over the strongest baseline on each
dataset in the full-
dataset comparison. Post-launch monitoring across five deployed financial risk-control applications shows absolute KS improvements of 0.02 to 1.56 percentage points over the existing manually designed strategy.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Ziming Dai, Dabiao Ma, Ziheng Guo, Jack Dong, Zimu Zhou
Computation and Language
Latent Core Tokenizer: Compress, but Meaningfully
Felermino D. M. A. Ali, Millicent Ochieng, Ogbemi Ekwejunor-Etchie et al. (+3 more)
Tokenizers are commonly optimized for compression, but a compact vocabulary does not necessarily distribute its capacity evenly across
languages. We introduce the Latent Core Tokenizer (LCT), a
language-agnostic approach that separates structural discovery from vocabulary construction. LCT uses Minimum Description Length,
entropy-based boundary signals, and morphotactic constraints to identify reusable linguistic units before constructing a shared vocabulary. Across 104
languages with a 200K-
token vocabulary, LCT achieves lower fertility and higher MorphScore than BPE, Unigram, and parity-aware BPE, while maintaining comparable cross-lingual disparity in tokenization cost. Across four multilingual downstream
benchmarks, LCT improves aggregate score by 1.48, 1.83, and 2.00 points over BPE, Unigram, and parity-aware BPE, respectively. Our findings show that compression alone does not predict representation quality and highlight the importance of morphology-driven structural discovery and how frequency is used to allocate the final vocabulary across
languages.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Felermino D. M. A. Ali, Millicent Ochieng, Ogbemi Ekwejunor-Etchie, Ade Famoti, Jacki O'Neill, Debjit Paul
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
OnTrack: Real-Time Monitoring and Intervention in LLM Agent Trajectories via Streaming Structure-Aware Optimal Transport
Babak Barazandeh, Connor Swanson, Chinmay Kulkarni et al. (+1 more)
Agents are deployed in applications from trip planners and stock trading to IT incident triage. In most cases, LLM
agents work autonomously with minimal rule-based safeguarding, leading to cost and safety issues from irreversible actions. Recent works resolve this either by using a safeguard
agent to monitor behavior or evaluating logs post-hoc. The first adds cost and latency to every step; the second delivers its verdict after the run, when
tokens are burned and damage is done. To overcome this, we propose OnTrack, a streaming monitoring mechanism that compares an
agent's steps and dependencies against recorded successful runs to alert users or block the
agent in about a millisecond per step. We study this problem in three regimes of decreasing access: full reference access (historical runs and tool schemas), intermediate access (only tool schemas), and no prior knowledge (only step logs as generated). Expectation of OnTrack's monitoring capabilities reduces as data access drops, ranging from plan violation detection to identifying loops, stalls, and repeated tool calls. Finally, we evaluate OnTrack using SWE-bench trajectories. Based on the first 8 steps, our method ranks failing trajectories below succeeding ones better than content similarity approaches (+0.057 AUROC). With an abort policy, we save about 18% of compute that would be burned on failing runs, where 83% of interrupted runs were actually heading to failure (5 out of 6 aborts were correct).
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Babak Barazandeh, Connor Swanson, Chinmay Kulkarni, Nikhil Mungel
Computation and Language
Which Skill to Distill? SGUID: Selecting a Compact Skill Bank for Model-Skill Co-Evolution
Yuhan Liu, Xiyao Ma, Zhongkai Sun et al. (+4 more)
Skills, reusable procedural guidance added at inference, can substantially improve LLM downstream performance (Li et al., 2026). Prior work retrieves skills from a bank by semantic relevance, then uses them as inference-time patches or for model
distillation. The individual utility of each skill, however, is largely neglected. We first show that, in on-policy
distillation where skill-conditioned policies serve as teachers, fewer than 25% of retrieved skills provide useful
distillation signals. We then propose SGUID, a method for selecting a compact subset of skills for
distillation. SGUID retains a skill only if it consistently yields effective learning signals during training. The selected skills are then distilled to produce a better model. Our results show that not all skills are worth distilling. Across four models from the Olmo and Qwen families, distilling 6 selected skills matches or exceeds full-bank
distillation in mean avg@12 on three of the four models, and on all four after a second round that distills 3 newly selected skills, while the full banks are up to 11x larger. Importantly, SGUID supports stable model-skill co-
evolution: after a
distillation round, a new candidate bank is curated from the updated model's rollouts, and SGUID selects which skills to internalize next. In the second round, this loop selects 3 new skills and improves Qwen3-8B from 64.3% to 66.3%. The selection step is essential for stability: on Qwen3-4B, naively updating the model with unfiltered skills degrades performance, including a 0.3 percentage point drop on HMMT25, whereas SGUID improves HMMT25 by 0.5 points after the first round and 1.1 points after the second. These results identify skill selection as the key mechanism for stable model-skill co-
evolution.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Yuhan Liu, Xiyao Ma, Zhongkai Sun, Xu Han, Chengyuan Ma, Benjamin Z. Yao, Chenlei Guo
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
Cited but Not Consulted: A Counterfactual Audit of Legal Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness
Saisab Sadhu, Shreeyans Arora and Pratinav Seth
Large
language models increasingly justify legal decisions by naming the statute or precedent behind a verdict, treated as evidence that the decision follows from it. We test this directly: holding case facts fixed, we substitute the named legal authority for an unrelated one and decode a model's evolving verdict from its hidden states. Across seven open-weight models (8B-70B) and four
benchmarks spanning judicial and contractual
reasoning, when explicitly required to justify a verdict by naming the governing authority, models name the correct one in 66.7%-100% of generations, while the verdict changing when the authority changes is far less consistent: 0.0%-21.7% on CaseHOLD, 30.0%-76.7% on ECHR and SCOTUS, and 43.3%-50.0% on ContractNLI. Neither scale nor a purpose-built legal-
reasoning model (a best-effort LoRA reproduction; Section 6) closes this gap. A red-teaming evaluation on five core models finds compliance with an
adversarial instruction hidden in the case facts (73.3%-96.4%) exceeds verdict-swap sensitivity by a wide margin, holding without exception across model rankings. Naming a legal authority is thus a poor proxy for a verdict's dependence on it, while the same verdict remains separately vulnerable to
adversarial manipulation. Both findings replicate across checks ruling out
prompt-wording noise and confounded sampling, and bear directly on the use of generated legal explanations as compliance or audit artefacts.
Read the full abstract ▾
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
Accurate but Not Humble: Evaluating Epistemic Humility in LLM Agents under Knowledge Conflict
Kaiser Sun, Bernal Jimenez Gutierrez, Hongjun Liu et al. (+4 more)
When retrieved evidence contradicts an
agent's prior beliefs, does it revise its answer, acknowledge uncertainty, or persist with an incorrect conclusion? Existing evaluations of agentic systems focus primarily on task success, offering limited insight into how
agents handle such conflicts. We propose to evaluate
agents on epistemic humility (EH): the
agent's willingness to recognize, act on, and communicate uncertainty during task execution. We operationalize EH through three trajectory-level behavioral dimensions: Identify, Solve, and Escalate (ISE). Through knowledge conflict, situations where the backbone
language model's parametric knowledge contradicts the evidence it encounters, or where two contextual sources disagree, we evaluate two conflict settings: (1) controlled conflict and (2) naturally occurring conflict during multi-step agentic execution, each paired with matched no-conflict controls. Evaluating four
agents, we find that higher task accuracy does not necessarily correspond to greater epistemic humility: some high-accuracy configurations recognize conflicts during execution but do not communicate unresolved uncertainty in their incorrect final answers. Trajectory-level analysis further reveals that
agents frequently detect conflicts in early steps of execution but fail to maintain or resolve them in later steps. Finally, we show that model-level interventions can improve EH, but often at the cost of task accuracy, suggesting that epistemic humility emerges from the interaction among the backbone model,
agent harness, and evaluation environment.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Kaiser Sun, Bernal Jimenez Gutierrez, Hongjun Liu, Jingyu Zhang, Jie Gao, Mark Dredze, Daniel Khashabi
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
Overcoming Prior Barriers: Supervised Fine-Tuning under Long-Tail Distribution
Haohui Wang, Jiahao Xu, Wangzhi Zhan et al. (+9 more)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) adapts pretrained large
language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks, but the required concepts can receive substantially different levels of pretrained support. Frequent concepts are more likely to be well learned, whereas rare concepts may remain weakly represented. We introduce a novel notion named prior barrier to quantify how strongly the pretrained model supports competing concepts over the target concept. We observe that prior barriers follow a long-tail distribution, placing head and tail concepts at different starting points for SFT: head concepts face lower prior barriers, whereas tail concepts require additional instructions to overcome their higher prior barriers. Our theoretical analysis further derives a predictive risk bound for SFT under long-tail prior barriers, explicitly characterizing how the prior barrier and accumulated SFT evidence jointly determine predictive performance. Motivated by this prior barrier-dependent demand, we propose PASS, an adaptive SFT instruction selection method that constructs reference-derived concepts and estimates the distinguishing evidence provided by each instruction, and adaptively allocates the selection budget toward concepts that remain insufficiently covered under the current selection. In this way, PASS jointly considers which instructions can provide useful evidence and where additional supervision is needed under a limited budget. Experiments show that our method consistently outperforms seven state-of-the-art instruction selection methods on four backbone-budget settings. An ablation study further shows that PASS's adaptive allocation consistently improves over uniform allocation.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Haohui Wang, Jiahao Xu, Wangzhi Zhan, Tong Zeng, Dongqi Fu, Hong Li, Swastik Roy, Naren Ramakrishnan, Chris North, Jian Kang, Yujun Yan, Dawei Zhou
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
Can AI Agents Learn Their Way to the Top? Evaluating Heuristic Learning in a Long-Running Game Agent Competition
Kaisen Yang, Qingle Liu, Kejin Wang et al. (+24 more)
Adversarial games have driven advances from heuristic search to reinforcement learning, yet learning and adapting strategies from limited samples remain challenging. AI
agents offer an alternative by turning game experience into revisions of executable policies. Building on heuristic learning (HL), we formalize
Adversarial Heuristic Learning (AHL), a paradigm that uses AI
agents as learning engines to refine game policies and supporting software while keeping model weights fixed. We introduce AAArena, a
benchmark comprising 12 authentic
adversarial games and 1,920 archived human programs, with an evaluation protocol modeled on real-world game competitions.
Agents interpret rules, choose opponents, analyze replays, and revise game
agents to achieve their highest ranking within fixed match and evaluation budgets. We evaluate \val{completedmodels} model and harness configurations: Opus5.5 with Claude Code earns 6 gold medals, while no evaluated configuration tops the remaining 6 human ladders. Performance is generally weaker in games with more complex rule specifications. Further experiments show that opponent selection and dense feedback support policy improvement, and that
agents learn from both on-policy replays of their own matches and off-policy replays of other players' matches. These results highlight HL's potential in
adversarial games and identify persistent challenges in game understanding, strategy implementation, and long-horizon policy development.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Kaisen Yang, Qingle Liu, Kejin Wang, Yicheng Zhao, Jieming Li, Shenghan Zheng, Ruize Yang, Bojun Yang, Heng Gong, Xiang Gao, Lanyue Zhang, Kaiyu Zhong, Zhuo Liu, Shaoxuan Li, Chengxi Li, Yong Yan, Weixuan Zhang, Tianwei Luo, Situ Wang, Youjie Zheng, Sihan Zhao, Shengyuan Wang, Huan-ang Gao, Jiazheng Xu, Xiaohui Xie, Wentao Han, Hongning Wang
Computation and Language
VFold: Symmetry-Aware Cross-Layer Value Cache Compression
Neha Verma, Sungwon Kim, Kenton Murray et al. (+1 more)
While caching key-value (KV) states accelerates Large
Language Model (LLM) decoding, this cache can dominate
memory usage at long context lengths. One solution is to compress this
memory by exploiting inter-layer cache similarities. However, most existing techniques necessitate architectural changes to LLMs and incur substantial overhead. In this work, we propose a
symmetry-aware value cache merging strategy that reduces cache
memory while avoiding both harmful performance degradation and architectural overhead during decoding. Furthermore, we show that this approach can be exploited alongside existing cache compression techniques, composing with high-ratio quantization or key cache
pruning to reach compression ratios that neither method reaches alone, with minimal additional cost. Ultimately, our findings reveal a major source of underutilized capacity in the value cache, offering a simple yet highly effective direction for scaling context windows under
memory constraints.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Neha Verma, Sungwon Kim, Kenton Murray, Kevin Duh
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.LG
SparseDecoding: Decoding-Aware Pruning for Accurate and Efficient LLM Inference
Qitong Wang, Xinwei Niu, Mingluo Su et al. (+3 more)
The
memory-bound nature of the decoding stage of large
language model (LLM) inference incurs significant latency. Layer-wise training-free network
pruning approaches guided by the Hessian have been a prominent solution to this problem, as
pruning reduces the number of nonzero parameters read from
memory during decoding. Nevertheless, typical methods in this line compute the Hessian using pre-collected natural sequences, whereas the model is fed self-generated
tokens during decoding, creating a distribution shift between the two sequences. The Hessian calculated on the natural sequence is different from that calculated on the generated sequence. We observe that this discrepancy causes the activation distribution during generation to deviate from that used for
pruning, further hurting the pruned model performance. Moreover, most existing LLM
pruning methods that bring actual speedup primarily target the sparse
matrix-
matrix (SpMM) multiplication, providing limited support for the sparse
matrix-vector (SpMV) operations, which dominate decoding. To solve these problems, we introduce SparseDecoding, a principled decoding-aware
pruning framework tailored for accurate and efficient LLM decoding. Specifically, at the algorithmic axis, SparseDecoding constructs calibration
matrices from layer-wise activations collected during the dense-model autoregressive generation, excluding prefill, thereby aligning the
pruning objective with the decoding activations. At the system axis, we develop an optimized N:M sparse
matrix-vector kernel with bitmask indexing and fixed-step traversal. Substantial empirical results on representative LLMs (Llama-3.1-8B, Llama-3.3-70B, Qwen3-14B / 32B) demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms standard fixed-text calibration on the long-form generation
benchmarks while achieving up to 1.48x end-to-end wall-clock decoding speedup on A100 GPUs.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Qitong Wang, Xinwei Niu, Mingluo Su, Shanwei Zhao, Shiai Zhu, Huan Wang
Computation and Language · Cross-listed from cs.AI
Verdict Without the Rule: Diagnosing and Auditing Regulatory Rule Sensitivity in LLM Compliance Systems
Saisab Sadhu, Aadit Sengupta, Vinay kumar Sankarapu et al. (+1 more)
Large
language model compliance systems are deployed on the assumption that a verdict depends on the regulatory rule it is given. We test this directly across five models and 20 regulatory and platform-policy domains: delete, swap, or negate the governing rule while holding the case fixed, and check whether the verdict changes (OCS) or the model's internal representation of compliance shifts at all (ICS-delta). Neither moves much: models' verdicts are often invariant to substantial perturbations of the supplied rule, and the guard model, evaluated here under a custom-rule adaptation of its native taxonomy, is the least rule-sensitive and least accurate of the five, barely above chance (51%, versus 90-92% for general-purpose models). This reflects easy cases more than blanket neglect: on cases where deleting the rule changes a previously correct model prediction, models do track it closely. Neither better prompting nor direct intervention on the model's internal representations closes this gap. Accuracy alone does not establish that a compliance verdict is grounded in the supplied rule.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Saisab Sadhu, Aadit Sengupta, Vinay kumar Sankarapu, Pratinav Seth