Papers

We show that Arc Kayles is PSPACE-complete. This solves a question raised by Schaefer in 1978.

We give a fixed parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm with running time $f(k,\Delta)\cdot {|I|}^{O(1)}$ for integer linear programs with 4-block structure, parameterized by the maximum block dimension $k$ and the largest absolute matrix entry $\Delta$. This result resolves a long-standing open question in parameterized complexity, and answers a conjecture by Eisenbrand and Rothvoss (2026) in the positive. This result has several implications for other block-structured integer programming models, including 3-block, mixed fracture number, and special cases of 4-block programs with large entries outside of the diagonal. Important tools for this algorithm are structural properties of generalized $n$-fold integer programs shown by Ligthart~(2026) and an algorithm by Veselov et al.~(2020) for optimizing discrete convic functions.

We study SC derandomizations for regular read-once branching programs (ROBPs) and computation models beyond BPL. For regular ROBPs with length $n$, width $w$, and multiple accept nodes, we attain the following results. 1. When $n \le w$, we show an SC derandomization with space $O(\log^2 n+\log w)$ and two-sided error $1/\text{poly}(nw)$. 2. When $n \ge w$, we show an SC derandomization with space $O(\log n \log w)$ and two-sided error $1/\text{poly}(w)$. In addition, when $w=O(\log n)$, we attain an optimal $O(\log n)$ space derandomization with two-sided error $1/\text{poly}(w)$. 3. When $w \le 2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}$, we show that reachability of regular ROBPs (i.e. derandmization of one-sided unbounded small error ROBPs) can be computed in SC. We also show that when regular ROBPs are powering, optimal deterministic logspace can be attained for computing reachability and for bounded two-sided error derandomization, when $w = n^{1/c}$ for some constant $c$. We further show that two super sets of BPL can be computed in SC. 1. For probabilistic logspace TMs with a two-way access random tape, we show that it can be approximated in SC if each entry of the random tape is accessed for at most a constant number of times. 2. For probabilistic logspace TMs with a polynomial size stack, i.e. probabilistic logspace Auxiliary Push-down Machines (AuxPDMs), we show that it can be approximated in SC if the timings of push/pop/idle stack operations do not depend on the randomness. The first model is the read-multiplicity model considered by Impagliazzo, Nisan, Wigderson (STOC'94), in which they show that their INW generator can fool such computations. For the second model, we indicate that it contains candidate languages separating BQL from BPL considered by Apers and Edenhofer (CCC'25).

For a propositional proof system $\mathcal{P}$ and a polynomial-time function $G: \{0, 1\}^n \to \{0, 1\}^N$ ($N > 10n$), we say that $G$ is a *proof complexity generator* against $\mathcal{P}$ if $\mathcal{P}$ cannot efficiently prove the (suitably encoded) statement "$y\not\in\mathrm{Range}(G)$" for every $y \in \{0, 1\}^N$, and $G$ is a *demi-bits generator* against $\mathcal{P}$ if $\mathcal{P}$ cannot efficiently prove the statement "$y \not\in\mathrm{Range}(G)$" for a noticeable fraction of $y \in \{0, 1\}^N$. As can be seen from the definitions, proof complexity generators are qualitatively stronger objects than demi-bits generators. Our main result is that, perhaps counter-intuitively, every demi-bits generator "contains" exponentially many proof complexity generators. In fact, a random subset of output bits of a demi-bits generator forms a proof complexity generator with constant probability. This result is an extremely simple corollary of Pajor's Lemma (a strengthening of the well-known Sauer–Shelah Lemma). This result allows us to exhibit the hardness of the Range Avoidance problem ($\text{Avoid}$) in several new, restricted settings of interest. Along the way, we introduce the notion of *zero-error disperser families* that can transform demi-bits generators into proof complexity generators, and show that this family can be computed by projections (i.e., without any circuit complexity overhead). Using a different instantiation of this family, we construct proof complexity generators from *barely non-trivial* demi-bits generators $G: \{0, 1\}^n \to \{0, 1\}^N$, where the number of hard-to-prove statements of the form "$y \not \in \mathrm{Range}(G)$" just slightly exceeds $2^n$ (which is the number of *false* statements of this form).

Resolution over parities, $\mathrm{Res}(\oplus)$, is the characteristic-two version of resolution over linear equations: clauses are disjunctions of affine equations over $\mathbb F_2$. Superpolynomial size lower bounds were previously known only for restricted refutations: tree-like, regular, or of bounded depth. We prove that every DAG-like $\mathrm{Res} (\oplus)$ refutation of the bit pigeonhole principle with $n+1$ pigeons and $n=2^\ell$ holes has more than $\exp(n/(32768\ell^2))=2^{\Omega(n/\log^2 n)}$ clauses, for every $\ell\ge32$, with no restriction on regularity or depth. The proof translates an arbitrary refutation with $S$ clauses into a polynomial calculus refutation of degree $O(\log n)$ over $O(S+n^2)$ groups of extension variables in the style of Buss, Impagliazzo, Krajicek, Pudlak, Razborov, and Sgall. One substitution then removes all extension variables at once and leaves a nonzero low-degree polynomial derived from the pigeonhole axioms alone at degree at most $n/2$; a degree lower bound in the style of Razborov, proved through the homology of chessboard complexes, shows that no such derivation exists. The argument also yields a general sufficient condition for $\mathrm{Res}(\oplus)$ size lower bounds. The main theorem, this condition, and all their dependencies are formalized in Lean 4, and every statement links to its formal proof. The proof was developed with substantial AI assistance within an open research framework described in the final section.

A (coarse) correlated equilibrium (CE) is information-value-free (IVF) if a player can match the payoff obtained from recommendations by committing to a fixed action. Motivated by the problem of regulating algorithmic collusion, this refinement was introduced by Hartline, Wang, and Zhang [EC'26], who showed that it can be computed in polynomial time in explicitly represented normal-form game. In this paper, we examine the complexity of IVF(C)CEs in succinct games, which model more realistic strategic interactions that feature either many players or exponentially many pure strategies. We first show that computing an information-value-free CE is PPAD-complete in many-player polymatrix games or two-player Bayesian games, even when the approximation is a constant. We also prove an unconditional exponential query lower bound. Our results establish that IVFCEs are intractable, even in the centralized model, and rule out the existence of any efficient learning dynamics. This significantly strengthens the impossibility result of Hartline, Wang, and Zhang, which concerns a particular class of learning algorithms, and furnishes strong computational critiques of recent regulation on algorithmic collusion. To sidestep these hardness results, we examine the complexity of information-value-free CCE. Certain no-regret algorithms—such as regret matching or FTRL—provide a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for this problem. The complexity when the approximation is exponentially small turns out to be nuanced. On the one hand, leveraging no-regret dynamics, we establish membership in $\text{CLS} = \text{PPAD} \cap \text{PLS}$. On the other hand, we show that it is at least as hard as the P-matrix linear complementarity problem, and hence as hard as simple stochastic games. This shows that even IVFCCEs are unlikely to admit a polynomial-time algorithm barring a major breakthrough.

We introduce and study a new model of decision trees that lies at the frontier of provable circuit lower bounds. We study $\ell$-local decision trees, in which each internal node queries an $\ell$-local function of the input. We show that sufficiently strong lower bounds for $\ell$-local decision trees would imply several breakthrough circuit lower bounds, including super-linear size lower bounds for log-depth circuits and improved bounds for unrestricted-depth circuits. Previously, such consequences were known to follow from strong lower bounds for depth-$3$ circuits, which has been the main prior approach in attempting to prove these results. Since local decision trees are strictly weaker than depth-$3$ circuits, this provides a formally easier route to the same circuit lower-bound consequences. We prove essentially optimal lower bounds for a weaker variant that we call oblivious $\ell$-local decision trees, where all nodes at the same depth query the same function. Our lower bounds follow from a new technique that uncovers sumset structure in local maps, and our hard functions are sumset dispersers, sumset condensers, and directional affine dispersers. Along the way, we give an explicit construction of a sumset condenser with small entropy loss. As an additional contribution, we initiate the study of degree-$2$ decision trees, in which each query is a quadratic polynomial of the input. We show that proving lower bounds in this model is a natural stepping stone toward constructing dispersers for degree-$2$ variety sources, which imply improved circuit lower bounds for unrestricted depth circuits. We prove nearly maximal lower bounds for the oblivious variant of the model.

We prove that the quantum code distance is NP-hard to approximate within an additive error of $c N$, for some constant $c >0$, where $N$ is the number of qubits. Our reductions are deterministic. This improves the previous square-root additive gap to $\Omega(N)$ and resolves the explicitly stated linear-gap question of Kapshikar and Kundu. Our result holds for CSS codes with identical $X$- and $Z$-check spaces, and with a constant rate and constant relative distance. For every fixed $\lambda>1$, there is a constant $c>0$ such that hardness still holds even when every nonidentity stabilizer has weight greater than $\lambda$ times the quantum distance. We also improve the hardness gap of graph state distance on $N$ vertices of Grigorescu, Jha, and Samperton from cube-root to $\Omega(N)$, resolving their explicitly stated open question. Both hardness results are asymptotically optimal since both distances are at most $N$. Our graph state distance hardness result holds for balanced bipartite graphs with a binary adjacency matrix that is its own inverse (mod 2). Our main technique for both hardness bounds above is classical: we show how to convert any code $C$ of length $m$ into a self-dual code $A(C)$ of length $N=\Theta(m)$ while exactly doubling the original coset metric. The conversion is deterministic and efficient. We call it the metric self-dual completion of $C$. It comes with a linear embedding $\tau: \mathbb F_2^m \hookrightarrow \mathbb F_2^N$. The embedding doubles all Hamming distances between vectors in $\mathbb F_2^m$ and all pairwise distances between corresponding cosets. The embedding also guarantees that all codewords of $A(C)$ of weight at most $2m$ are exactly $\tau(C)$.

We study the complexity of determining the interval numbers of tournaments in the $\overrightarrow{P_3}$ and $\overrightarrow{P_3^*}$ convexities, denoted by $\overrightarrow{\mathrm{in}}_{P_3}(T)$ and $\overrightarrow{\mathrm{in}}_{P_3^*}(T)$ on a tournament $T$. For each $\overrightarrow{\mathcal{X}} \in \{\overrightarrow{P_3}, \overrightarrow{P_3^*}\}$, we show that determining whether $\overrightarrow{\mathrm{in}}_{\mathcal{X}}(T) \leq k$ is W[2]-complete when parameterized by $k$. Moreover, under ETH, we show that there is no parameterized algorithm for that problem with running time $f(k)\, n^{o(k)}$ on an $n$-vertex tournament, where $f$ is any computable function. For the $\overrightarrow{P_3}$-convexity, we also show that $\overrightarrow{\mathrm{in}}_{P_3}(T) = \mathcal{O}(\log n)$, which yields a simple quasi-polynomial $n^{\mathcal{O}(\log n)}$ brute-force algorithm. On the other hand, under ETH, we show that the problem is NP-intermediate, that is, it is neither NP-hard nor in P. For the $\overrightarrow{P_3^*}$-convexity, the same brute force algorithm is not quasi-polynomial, since we present a family of instances with $\overrightarrow{\mathrm{in}}_{P_3^*}(T) = \Theta(n)$. We conjecture that this problem is NP-complete.

We prove that, over any field, the bilinear complexity of multiplying a $3\times 2$ matrix by a $2\times m$ matrix is strictly greater than $24m/5$. In particular, every exact bilinear algorithm for multiplying a $3\times 2$ matrix by a $2\times 5$ matrix requires at least $25$ multiplications. Together with the Hopcroft-Kerr upper bound, this proves that the $\langle 3,2,5\rangle$ matrix multiplication tensor has rank exactly $25$. The proof has been formally verified in Lean 4, with the formalization available at https://github.com/fallnlove/mm325_proof.

Tree Decision Diagrams (TDDs) are a data structure recently introduced by Capelli et al. (SAT 2026). They are structured along a vtree and the size of their canonical form lies between Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (OBDDs) and deterministic structured DNNF circuits (d-SDNNFs). While the succinctness gap between TDD and d-SDNNF is exponential, only a quasipolynomial separation between OBDD and TDD has been shown and it was left as open question whether this is optimal. We answer this question affirmatively by showing that every TDD can be transformed to an equivalent OBDD of quasipolynomial size. Although this might be seen as a weakness, our second result shows that TDDs share another desirable property with OBDDs that is not known to hold for d-SDNNF: Given a TDD and another target vtree, it is possible to construct the minimal and canonical TDD respecting the new vtree in time polynomial in the input and output. As a result we also obtain that the equivalence test between TDDs over different vtrees can be done in polynomial time.

Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), fixed-parameter tractability and polynomial-time solvability coincide for homomorphism problems specified by classes of pattern hypergraphs of bounded incidence degeneracy or bounded primal independence number. In both cases, tractability is characterised by bounded fractional hypertree width. Grohe (JACM 2007) established the corresponding FPT-PTIME equivalence under bounded arity. Our result allows unbounded arity and covers important cases such as bounded-degree patterns and patterns whose incidence graphs exclude a fixed minor. Building on the recent fractional balanced-separator framework and rounding theorem of Korchemna et al. (FOCS 2024), we prove a near-linear bound on fractional hypertree width ($\mathsf{fhw}$) in terms of adaptive width ($\mathsf{adw}$). For every hypergraph $H$ with $\mathsf{adw}(H)\geq 2$, \[ \mathsf{fhw}(H)=O\bigl(\lambda(H)\mathsf{adw}(H)\log\mathsf{adw}(H)\bigr), \] where $\lambda(H)=\min\{\mu(H),\max\{1,\log\alpha(H)\}\}$, with $\mu(H)$ denoting incidence degeneracy and $\alpha(H)$ the independence number of the primal graph. As a further consequence, we obtain a corresponding FPT-PTIME collapse for exact homomorphism counting on every bounded-$\lambda$ class. More generally, for every recursively enumerable class of pattern hypergraphs, fixed-parameter tractability of the parameterised homomorphism problem implies quasipolynomial-time solvability of the corresponding unparameterised problem, assuming ETH.

The satisfiability problem for word equations asks whether variables can be replaced by words so that the two sides become equal. For regular word equations, in which each variable occurs at most once on each side, satisfiability is NP-complete. For general quadratic word equations, in which each variable occurs at most twice in total, satisfiability is NP-hard, but its membership in NP remains open. We consider an intermediate class: quadratic word equations with a linear side, where each variable occurs at most once on one designated side. We show that the Nielsen graph of an equation $U=V$ in this class, with total length $N=|U|+|V|$, has diameter $O(N^{12})$, measured over reachable pairs of vertices. Together with the known NP-hardness for regular word equations, this result establishes NP-completeness of satisfiability for this class. We also show that each strongly connected component is isomorphic to the length-preserving reachability graph of a regular equation, and that the condensation graph has depth at most $|U|+2|V|$.For arbitrary quadratic word equations, we further show that Nielsen paths can be shortened to a length polynomial in the equation size and the number of prefix operations between variables repeated on opposite sides. This yields NP membership for subclasses defined by variable occurrence arrangements.

Quantum Signal Processing is a powerful quantum framework for generating and approximating univariate polynomials. However, QSP is often limited by circuit-depth bottlenecks and parity constraints on the class of realizable polynomials. In this work, we introduce Weighted Quantum Signal Processing, an extension of QSP in which a weight function is assigned to the central rotation operator. This formulation provides a deeper understanding of QSP, which emerges as the special case of WQSP with unit weights. The choice of weights determines the structure and expressive capabilities of WQSP circuits. When the weights are natural numbers greater than one, WQSP reduces to a pruned version of QSP, revealing parameter redundancies in the standard framework. Through appropriate selection of integer weights, WQSP achieves linear-to-exponential reductions in the number of parameters required to realize arbitrary bounded univariate polynomials while preserving approximation quality. For generic weights, we establish corresponding approximation error bounds and show that, in many cases, the approximation is exact. We analyze WQSP from both a deterministic perspective, where polynomial generation is formulated as the solution of a linear system, and a quantum machine learning perspective, where WQSP serves as a structured and expressive quantum learning model. We further employ this learning framework to parameterize learnable activation functions in Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks for multivariate function approximation. Our results show that WQSP provides a compact, flexible, and theoretically grounded framework for realizing arbitrary univariate polynomials while requiring significantly fewer trainable parameters than conventional QSP. This yields expressive and parameter-efficient neural architectures, highlighting the potential of WQSP as a scalable primitive for quantum-enhanced machine learning.

We initiate the study of constructing explicit pseudorandom generators for thresholds of halfspaces with seed length polylogarithmic in the number of halfspaces. This class of functions lies at the frontier of circuit complexity [CTW26]. We show that the generator designed by O'Donnell, Servedio, and Tan for polytopes [OST22] also fools this broader class. To analyze the generator, we develop a threshold-specific smooth approximation framework based on a Bentkus-type mollifier. We prove derivative bounds for this mollifier and also establish a Boolean anticoncentration theorem for thresholds of halfspaces via a random thinning argument. These ingredients imply that the generator $\delta$-fools every $k$-out-of-$m$ threshold of $m$ halfspaces over $\{-1,1\}^n$ with seed length $\widetilde{O}(\kappa^{6+2\varepsilon}\log^{6+2\varepsilon}\!m\cdot\delta^{-(2+2\varepsilon)}\log n)$, for any arbitrarily small constant $\varepsilon>0$, where $\kappa=\min\{k,m-k+1\}$. The random thinning argument also yields bounds on the noise sensitivity and Gaussian surface area for thresholds of halfspaces, leading to learning algorithms under both the uniform and Gaussian distributions.

We give an elementary proof of the Komlós conjecture by simplifying the recent proof of Guo, Fang, and Lu. We show that any vectors $v_1,\ldots,v_n\in\mathbb{R}^d$ with $\|v_i\|_2\le1$ admit signs $\varepsilon_i\in\{-1,1\}$ such that $\|\sum_{i=1}^n\varepsilon_i v_i\|_\infty\le36$. The proof uses only elementary combinatorial and probabilistic arguments and basic calculus.

Gowers, Green, Manners, and Tao (Annals '25) recently resolved Marton's polynomial Freiman-Ruzsa conjecture. We give an algorithmic counterpart to their result: given uniform sampling and membership-oracle access to a set $A \subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^n$ with doubling constant at most $K$, our algorithm outputs a subspace of size at most $|A|$ whose $K^{O(1)}$ translates cover $A$. The algorithm runs in $\textsf{poly}(n,K)$ time. As applications, we obtain polynomial-time algorithms for a variety of learning problems, including quadratic Goldreich-Levin, improper agnostic tomography of stabilizer states, and tomography of quantum states with bounded stabilizer extent.

In this paper, we construct a total Boolean function with $\widetilde{O}(\log n)$ randomized communication protocol, while any monochromatic rectangle has density at most $O(2^{-\mathrm{poly}(n)})$. As a corollary, it gives the first total function separation for $\mathrm{BPP}\not\subseteq\mathrm{P}^{\mathrm{NP}}$ in the communication world. Inspired by Gavinsky's recent work (arXiv:2608.18784), our construction combines the cheat-sheet framework with fully linear PCPs.

We prove RE-completeness of the quantum homomorphism problem parameterised by families of graphs derived from the classic metric association schemes. These include Kneser graphs, $q$-Kneser graphs, and the complements of Johnson, Grassmann, and Hamming graphs. Our proof develops a spectral method for establishing non-contextuality of quantum polymorphisms. It combines an equality analysis of Roberson's bound on the projective packing number in terms of Schrijver's theta with a structural argument inspired by Erdős-Ko-Rado theory.

Starting from the entrance of a welded tree, a quantum walk algorithm can find its exit vertex exponentially faster than any classical algorithm. However, it has been an open question whether any quantum algorithm is able to efficiently find a path from the entrance to the exit. We answer this by proving an exponential quantum query lower bound for finding such path. Specifically, for trees of height $n$, any quantum query algorithm requires at least $\Omega(2^{n/24})$ queries in order to succeed with constant probability. Our proof uses the compressed permutation oracle technique in order to construct databases which track the graph information an algorithm has learned and forgotten, and show that no efficient quantum algorithm can build an entrance-to-exit path in these records.

We show that unless P = NP, there cannot be a polynomial-time (or even pseudo-polynomial-time) algorithm for output feedback stabilization of a linear dynamical system with a linear controller. This settles one of the best-known open problems in control theory. The result holds in both continuous and discrete time. We also present a family of stabilizable linear dynamical systems for which no polynomial-time algorithm can write down a stabilizing controller in its standard representation.

Transformers have emerged as the dominant architecture in sequence modeling, achieving remarkable success in natural language processing and reasoning tasks. While existing literature has established the Turing completeness of transformers under bounded input length, the reasoning power of a single transformer operating on inputs of unbounded length is not fully explored. In this paper, we theoretically investigate the reasoning limitations of a single transformer and the enhanced capabilities of agent systems. We show that a single fixed finite precision transformer cannot memorize certain Turing machines with inputs of arbitrary length, such as the arithmetic; and a single fixed infinite precision transformer trained with a random algorithm is not Turing complete with probability one under reasonable conditions. To overcome the limitation of a single transformer, we define a formal agent architecture consisting of decision, execution, and memory modules and show that for any Turing machine $\mathbb{T}$, there exists an agent that can memorize $\mathbb{T}$ and is computationally the same as $\mathbb{T}$. Thus, agents are Turing complete.

An instance of Pinwheel Packing is a list of positive integers $a_1,\ldots,a_k$. A feasible schedule assigns one task to every integer time so that every interval of $a_i$ consecutive times contains task $i$. The instance is dense when $\sum_i1/a_i=1$. We prove that Dense Pinwheel Packing is NP-complete even when every period is encoded in unary and equal periods are listed as distinct tasks. Consequently, the usual binary-encoded problem is strongly NP-complete. Kleinberg and Mishra also prove NP-completeness \cite[Corollary~5.1]{KleinbergMishra2026}, but their reduction uses periods of exponential numerical size and therefore yields only weak NP-hardness. Our proof uses a direct reduction from triangle partition in a sparse tripartite graph. If each of the three parts of the source graph has $n$ vertices, the reduction produces $O(n^4\log^3 n)$ explicitly listed tasks, each with period $O(n^4\log^3 n)$; consequently, its full unary encoding has length $O(n^8\log^6 n)$.

We show that there exists a class of boolean functions C such that $(i)$ there is a distribution-independent statistical query algorithm for learning C that makes a polynomial number of queries of inverse polynomial tolerance and $(ii)$ for any set of functions $\Phi_1, \dots, \Phi_r$ such that for all $f \in$ C we can write $f(x) = \text{sign} \left( \sum_{i = 1}^r w_i \Phi_i(x) \right)$ for some set of weights $w_i \in \mathbb{R}$, we must have that $r \geq n^{\omega(1)}$. This gives a superpolynomial separation between dimension complexity and the query complexity of distribution-free learning in the statistical query model, negatively answering a question of Feldman, Kamath, and Srebro [FKS26]. Our construction C is a subclass of DNFs, and the proof is a simple consequence of recent progress on agnostically learning conjunctions [DKR25,CPS26] and the work of Razborov and Sherstov on the sign rank of DNFs [RS10].

We show that $\bigl(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}\bigr)$-approximate parameterized $k$-SetCover is W[1]-hard, and has no $n^{o(k/\log k)}$-time algorithms under ETH. This improves upon the previous best factors $\bigl(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}\bigr)^{1/k}$ in (Lin, 2019) and $(\log n)^{1/\operatorname{poly}(k)}$ in (Karthik, Laekhanukit, and Manurangsi, 2019). Here $k$ is the yes-case guarantee and $n$ is the number of candidate sets. While the best approximation ratio is still $O(\log n)$ via the greedy algorithm, closing this $1/k$ gap in the exponent has been a longstanding open problem; we remove this loss via a simple direct reduction. The construction is self-contained and does not rely on the parameterized inapproximability hypothesis (PIH). Starting with sparse parameterized 2-CSP instances (Karthik, Marx, Pilipczuk, and Souza, 2024), we build a monotone CNF formula, which is equivalent to a SetCover instance. To obtain a $k$-versus-$h$ gap, the reduction enumerates all hash functions from $\Sigma$ to $[2h]$ and all unsatisfiable 2-CSP instances on the same constraint graph with alphabet $[2h]$. For each such instance, it asks for a certificate that the hashed label pairs are not all contained in that instance. Perfect hashing makes this enumeration efficient for $h=\log n/\log\log n$.

We study the approximability of \textnormal{Set Cover} parameterized by the target cover size $k$. Let $n$ be the universe size, $m$ the number of available sets, and $|\Gamma|$ the explicit input length. We prove that, for some absolute constant $c>0$, distinguishing \[ \operatorname{opt}(\Gamma)\le k \quad\text{from}\quad \operatorname{opt}(\Gamma)>k\cdot\frac{c\log n}{k^2\log\log n} \] is $\mathsf{W[1]}$-hard. Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, there is also an absolute constant $\varepsilon>0$ for which no deterministic algorithm solves this gap problem in time $f(k)|\Gamma|^{\varepsilon k}$, for any computable function $f$. For every fixed $\alpha>0$, both hardness results hold even when $n=O((\log m)^{1+\alpha})$, with constants allowed to depend on $\alpha$. For fixed $k$, the gap is within an $O_k(\log\log n)$ factor of the greedy algorithm's guarantee. Under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis, we further rule out $o(\log n/\log\log n)$ approximation in time $O(|\Gamma|^{k-\delta})$ for every fixed $k\ge 2$ and $\delta>0$. Thus a near-logarithmic hardness factor persists even when the exponent is reduced from exhaustive search by only a fixed constant. The constant in this SETH hardness factor may depend on $k$ and $\delta$.

Random walks are a standard tool for search problems in which a state can be updated locally and tested for being marked. When updating the state and checking whether it is marked have different costs, two classical strategies optimize different parts of the cost: checking after every step is optimal in the number of updates, while repeatedly checking only after mixing is optimal in the number of checks. For a single marked state $m$ and a walk started from its stationary distribution $\pi$, Dohotaru and Høyer stated that both guarantees can be matched simultaneously, for a walk that checks after blocks of a fixed length; their argument is sketched through quantum walks, and they observe that they know of no classical proof. We give a short and self-contained classical proof of such a tradeoff, for arbitrary irreducible Markov chains. The algorithm replaces the original transition matrix $P$ by the averaged walk $ \overline P_\tau = \frac{1}{\tau}\sum_{k=1}^{\tau} P^k, $ where $\tau$ is of order $\pi(m)HT(m)$. Using a coupling with the original walk and Kac's lemma, we prove directly that the averaged walk hits the marked state in $O(1/\pi(m))$ checks in expectation. The resulting search cost is \[ S + O(HT(m))U + O(1/\pi(m))C \] in expectation, where $S$, $U$, and $C$ denote setup, update, and checking costs.

Minimum-cost spanning tree game (MSTG) is a cooperative game played on an undirected edge-weighted graph $(G,w)$ representing the network, where each vertex corresponds to a player and each edge has an associated cost~$w$. A distinguished vertex $s \in V(G)$ represents the supply or source. For any coalition of players $S$, the characteristic cost function $c(S)$ is defined as the minimum cost of a spanning tree with respect to $w$, connecting exactly the vertices in $S \cup \{s\}$. In this paper we study the computational complexity of deciding core membership for MSTG. In general, deciding whether a given allocation is in the core is coNP-hard~(Faigle et al.,International Journal of Game Theory,1997). We study the core recognition problem under the name MSTG Core Non-Membership. We extend the hardness to graphs which are very close to being planar. On the positive side, we present several algorithmic results within the framework of parameterized complexity. We show that MSTG Core Non-Membership is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the support size of the allocation. Turning into structural parameters of graphs, we show that the problem admits an FPT algorithm parameterized by treewidth and signed neighborhood diversity. Last but not least, we investigate kernelization. While in general graphs, under standard complexity-theoretical assumptions, MSTG Core Non-Membership does not admit a polynomial kernel parameterized by the vertex cover number, we design a cubic kernel in planar graphs. Furthermore, in general graphs, we obtain quadratic kernel for signed neighborhood diversity and linear kernel for the parameter feedback edge number.

We prove that the tensor rank of $3\times3$ matrix multiplication over $\mathbb F_2$ is at least $21$. The structural proof, independently developed by Qiushi Engine, converts occupation constraints on a single tensor factor into algebraic relations coupling all three factors. Certified quotient-rank bounds and finite geometry force any hypothetical $20$-term decomposition to have first-factor matrix-rank profile $(16,1,3)$. The ranks of the corresponding split-flattened summands therefore sum to $27$, exactly the rank of the full split flattening. Equality in rank subadditivity forces their images to form a direct sum; normalization by the inverse flattening then makes the summands pairwise annihilating idempotents. An explicit product identity for matrix multiplication implies that at most one first factor can be invertible, contradicting the three forced by the profile. The same obstruction constrains $22$-term decompositions attaining the split-rank bound. The complete proof, including the finite quotient bounds, is formalized in Lean. The accompanying research trajectory records Qiushi Engine's long-horizon autonomous research, from numerical experiments and quotient constructions to the structural proof.

In a seminal work, Buhrman et al.\ (STOC 2014) introduced catalytic computation and proved that uniform $TC^1$ circuits are computable in catalytic logspace, the class of problems solvable in space $s$ with an additional catalytic tape of size $c$, a tape whose initial content must be restored at the end of the computation. A central ingredient of their proof is the register program model. Namely, they constructed a uniform family of register programs that computes $x^n$ using $n$ registers and four accesses to $x$. Since then, determining the number of registers and input accesses required to compute a polynomial of a given degree has become a central question in the study of catalytic computation. On one hand, we prove that the four-access bound of Buhrman et al.\ is optimal: every passive-output register program computing a polynomial of degree greater than three requires at least four input accesses, independently of the number of registers. On the other hand, we show that their register bound is not optimal. For every $t\geq2$ and every field $K$ of characteristic $0$ or greater than $2t-1$, we construct a register program for $x^{2t-1}$ with four input accesses and $t$ registers. Our proofs rely on derivations and their exponential operators. This approach represents a register program as a series of exponential derivation operators, reducing register restoration to an operator identity. Finally, we use the uniform family of register programs to improve known trade-offs for catalytic streaming algorithms and register programs for matrix powering. The generalization of the lower-bound methods and the construction of the uniform family of register programs were developed with assistance from ChatGPT 5.6.