Discrete Mathematics · Cross-listed from math.CO
Additive Quasi-isometry via rooted graph partitions and layering partition
Dibyayan Chakraborty and Yann Vaxès
For a graph $H$, $\langle H \rangle$ denotes the class of all subdivisions of $H$ and $tw(H)$ denotes the treewidth of $H$. In this paper, we prove the following. For $k\geq 1, R\geq 1$, let $G,H$ be two graphs such that strong isometric path complexities (Chakraborty et al. [Disc. Math., 2026]) of both $G$ and $\langle H \rangle$ are at most $k$, and $G$ admits an honest, “nicely rooted” $R$-bounded $H$-partition. Then, there is a graph $F$ with $tw(F)\leq tw(H)$ such that $G$ admits a $(1,33\cdot R\cdot k^2)$-quasi-isometry to $F$. Using results of Albrechtsen, Distel, and Georgakopoulos (2025), we also obtain that $K_{2,t}$-asymptotic minor-free graphs admit quasi-isometries with additive distortion to $K_{2,t}$-minor-free graphs. This answers an open question raised by the above authors. As part of our proof, we combine the graph-partition based method and the layering partition based method (Chepoi et al. [Discrete Comput. Geom. 2012]) to obtain additive quasi-isometry when both the source and all subdivisions of the target graph have bounded strong isometric path complexity.
Read the full abstract ▾
Discrete Mathematics · Cross-listed from cs.GT
On the Power of Determinism in Multi-Item Auctions
Yiannis Giannakopoulos and Johannes Hahn
We study the classical multi-item monopoly setting with a single additive buyer and $m$ heterogeneous items whose values are independent but not necessarily identically distributed. Optimal truthful auctions may be randomized and complicated. We analyze the approximation ratios of three simple deterministic auctions: selling all items separately, selling them as a single grand bundle, and choosing the better of the two. Our technical cornerstone is a nonlinear mathematical programming formulation of the worst-case approximation ratio of selling separately, in discrete auctions where values lie in the grid $\{0,1/K,2/K,\dots ,1\}$. For two iid items, we construct novel tight Lagrangian dual certificates that determine this ratio exactly for any discretization parameter $K$. Taking $K\to\infty$, we obtain the tight bound $1+W(1/e)\approx 1.278$ in the continuous-valued setting, where $W$ denotes the Lambert-W function, closing the $[1.278,1.368]$ gap from the work of Hart and Nisan [EC'12, JET 2017]. For $m\geq2$ independent items, a different dual construction gives an upper bound on the approximation ratio of selling separately in terms of basic statistics of the item values. Combining this bound with new inequalities relating optimal revenue (REV), separate-selling revenue (SREV), and grand-bundle revenue (BREV), we derive improved guarantees for all three auctions. Most notably, we prove \[REV\leq 3 \max\{SREV,BREV\},\] improving upon the long-standing $5.2$ factor of Ma and Simchi-Levi [arXiv 2015, AISTATS'21] and the $6$ factor of Babaioff, Immorlica, Lucier and Weinberg [FOCS'14, JACM 2020]. For iid items, we also prove $REV\leq 4.18 BREV$.
Read the full abstract ▾
Discrete Mathematics · Cross-listed from math.CO
Fractional Dichromatic Number and Domination in Tournaments
Paul Colinot and Alantha Newman
Bourneuf, Charbit and Thomassé [BCT25] showed that the domination number of a tournament can be bounded as a function of its fractional dichromatic number. The function proved was exponential and the tools were based on VC-dimension. In this paper, we present two new proofs of this
theorem. The first proof is based on a reduction to the problem of bounding the domination number of a $(1/2-\epsilon)$-majority tournament, for which [BCT25] and Charikar, Ramakrishnan and Wang [CRW26] gave tight bounds. This proof yields the same exponential bound on the domination number as in [BCT25]. The second proof gives a quasilinear bound for the domination in terms of the fractional dichromatic number. It was obtained via AI and was inspired by the recent book proof of the existence of a Condorcet Winning Set of size five due to Ramakrishnan [Ram26].
Read the full abstract ▾
Discrete Mathematics · Cross-listed from math.CO
Three Standard Deviations Suffice While One Does Not
Victor Reis and Zhao Song
Spencer's 1985 “six standard deviations suffice”
theorem shows that every $A \in [-1,1]^{n \times n}$ has a sign vector $x \in \{-1,1\}^n$ with $\|Ax\|_\infty \le 6\sqrt{n}$. We show the upper bound $\sqrt{3\operatorname{arsinh}(10)}\sqrt{n}+4 < 2.9992 \sqrt{n} + 4$ by directly rounding the minimizer of a potential function to a vertex of the cube. We also show that, for every power of two $n \ge 2^{50}$, there exists a
matrix $A \in \{-1,1\}^{n \times n}$ such that $\|Ax\|_\infty >1.0000002\sqrt{n}$ for every choice of signs $x \in \{-1,1\}^n$. The construction simply replaces a $2^{-22}$ fraction of the columns of a Hadamard
matrix with independent random sign vectors. This is the first improvement over the $\sqrt{n}$ lower bound of Olson and Spencer (1978), which uses a Hadamard
matrix.
Read the full abstract ▾
Discrete Mathematics
Objective Transfer in Single-Node Network Criticality: Optimal Constants and Exact Separation Thresholds
Onur Ugurlu
When a vertex is selected as the most damaging single attack target under one damage objective, how much of the optimal damage under a different objective does it retain? We study this for the three objectives commonly used in critical node detection – pairwise connectivity (PC), size of the largest surviving component (LCC) and number of components (NC) – for single-vertex attacks on connected graphs, with the attacked vertex counted in the damage and ties resolved optimistically. For the pair PC, LCC the loss is bounded: a PC-optimal vertex retains at least a $2-\sqrt2$ fraction of the optimal LCC damage, an LCC-optimal vertex at least 2/3 of the optimal PC damage, and both constants are best possible. Neither bound depends on the choice among tied optimal vertices or on whether the attacked vertex is counted, and both remain valid as lower bounds for attack sets of any fixed size. For the four directions involving NC no positive constant exists; explicit families have ratios decaying like 1/k, and no single attack set retains a positive fraction of all three optima uniformly. We also determine the smallest orders at which the sets of optimal vertices become disjoint: 7 for LCC/NC, 8 for PC/NC, 9 for PC/LCC and 11 for all three pairwise, with trees realising the triple separation for every n>=11; these values rest on an exhaustive enumeration of the 11,989,762 connected graphs with 3<=n<=10. Finally, the most critical vertex in a Birnbaum-type sense may depend on the failure probability: a six-vertex graph, of smallest possible order, changes leader once, at $p^*=3-\sqrt5$. Adding universal vertices lifts the budget-one examples to every fixed budget, so over all connected graphs the same constants are optimal at every fixed budget; behaviour within restricted classes such as trees is left open.
Read the full abstract ▾
Discrete Mathematics
Computing the Helly Number, Radon Number and Rank in Cycle Convexity
Revathy S.Nair, Bijo S. Anand, Ullas Chandran S.V. et al. (+2 more)
In this paper, we investigate three fundamental convexity parameters of graphs under cycle convexity, namely the Helly number, Radon number, and rank. We first study the computational complexity of these parameters. For each of these parameters, we consider the associated threshold decision problem of determining whether the parameter of a given graph is at least a prescribed integer. We establish that all three problems are $\NP$-hard and $\W[1]$-hard when parameterized by the threshold. Moreover, we strengthen these results by showing that the $\NP$-hardness persists even when the input is restricted to planar graphs of maximum degree at most $6$. We also focus on the structural properties of connected graphs corresponding to extremal values of these parameters. In particular, we characterize the graph classes for which the three parameters attain the values $n-1$ and $n-2$, where $n$ is the order of $G$.
Read the full abstract ▾
All authors Revathy S.Nair, Bijo S. Anand, Ullas Chandran S.V., Julliano R. Nascimento, Arun Anil